war of the worlds - GoFuckYourself.com

bllott · 07-03-2005, 07:55 PM

I just saw that movie, i have never seen anything dumber. I want 90 minutes of my life back. correction, with the commercials in the beginning it's over 2 hours

Serge Litehead · 07-03-2005, 08:18 PM

spectacular effects,
week on the plot,
scene in the last house/basement got boring,
very fast "victory" with no real power advantage against aliens - nature did everything.

imageman · 07-03-2005, 08:55 PM

Quite good effects the Batman film was much better IMHO

Bansheelinks · 07-03-2005, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imageman

Quite good effects the Batman film was much better IMHO

yeah but Batman Begins is much better than any film this year, 'cept Cinderella Man.........those two are the best so far

imageman · 07-03-2005, 08:56 PM

The trailer for King Kong looked amazing. Fantastic effects from the little i saw.

Bansheelinks · 07-03-2005, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imageman

The trailer for King Kong looked amazing. Fantastic effects from the little i saw.

I had a post to it a week ago.

Bansheelinks · 07-03-2005, 08:57 PM

http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=...ight=king+kong

KING KONG TRAILER

imageman · 07-03-2005, 08:58 PM

But it looks way cool on the big screen. Some great T Rex CGI

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bansheelinks

I had a post to it a week ago.

Babagirls · 07-03-2005, 09:00 PM

i havent heard a good review yet about WOTW
but ya, Batman was kickass, just saw that one a couple weeks ago

sickkittens · 07-03-2005, 09:01 PM

Glad I saw Batman instead.

sniperwolf · 07-03-2005, 09:03 PM

spoiler...okay maybe I'm sot suppose to watch that film

webcrawler · 07-03-2005, 09:13 PM

I'd still give it a try.

KRL · 07-03-2005, 09:16 PM

I'll repeat my review on this thread to save some folks their money and time.

OK, just got back from War of the Worlds.

Overall, I think that was the worst movie Spielberg has ever made. What a waste of 2 hours.

The screenplay was a total botch job. The storyline was utterly ridiculous and choppy.

Acting sucked. That little girl should win the Oscar for Most Annoying STFU Kid in a Film. God damn shut up already with the canned lines.

This was Tom Cruise at the level of time to hustle anonther $20 Mil instead of being an actor. A true actor would never have taken this role after reading the screenplay for it.

The special effects were epic, but overkill in so many scenes.

The military in this movie was completely hookie.

There were lots of weird characters in this film. A lot of dark meaning also to many scenes which I think most people won't get unless you were looking behind the lines and scenes.

The ending was as stupid as they come and a total sputtering let down.

One of the main problems the film lacked a hero. Cruise was a putz, a divorced loser who was trying to win respect from his nerd son, who was also terribly cast, and trying to get his kids through the ordeal.

There was no bad guy in the film, just a bunch of aliens you'll swear you've seen before in some other sci-fi film and I bet anything they were re-used ones.

I rate this move a big fat ZERO on a 1 to 10.

Rob · 07-03-2005, 09:47 PM

It really sucked.

xxxice · 07-03-2005, 09:53 PM

It was fun to watch

bllott · 07-03-2005, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bansheelinks

yeah but Batman Begins is much better than any film this year, 'cept Cinderella Man.........those two are the best so far

both those movies were complete garbage too, there haven't been good movies for a very very long time

loverboy · 07-04-2005, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

I'll repeat my review on this thread to save some folks their money and time.

OK, just got back from War of the Worlds.

Overall, I think that was the worst movie Spielberg has ever made. What a waste of 2 hours.

The screenplay was a total botch job. The storyline was utterly ridiculous and choppy.

Acting sucked. That little girl should win the Oscar for Most Annoying STFU Kid in a Film. God damn shut up already with the canned lines.

This was Tom Cruise at the level of time to hustle anonther $20 Mil instead of being an actor. A true actor would never have taken this role after reading the screenplay for it.

The special effects were epic, but overkill in so many scenes.

The military in this movie was completely hookie.

There were lots of weird characters in this film. A lot of dark meaning also to many scenes which I think most people won't get unless you were looking behind the lines and scenes.

The ending was as stupid as they come and a total sputtering let down.

One of the main problems the film lacked a hero. Cruise was a putz, a divorced loser who was trying to win respect from his nerd son, who was also terribly cast, and trying to get his kids through the ordeal.

There was no bad guy in the film, just a bunch of aliens you'll swear you've seen before in some other sci-fi film and I bet anything they were re-used ones.

I rate this move a big fat ZERO on a 1 to 10.

very interesting remarks

pxxx · 07-04-2005, 09:27 AM

I saw it last night, complete garbage. That is two bad movies in a role. The last one was Land of The Dead, GARBAGE movie.

bllott · 07-04-2005, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pxxx

I saw it last night, complete garbage. That is two bad movies in a role. The last one was Land of The Dead, GARBAGE movie.

at least land of the dead is 18a, has some bloodshed

crockett · 07-04-2005, 04:00 PM

Ok I'll break the bad streak here and say I liked it. I almost didn't go check it out after I read this post.

However I went and check it out anyway. Overall I thought it was pretty good, keeps yea on the edge of your seat if nothing else. I will say the ending was a little weak.

I don't think there was supposed to be a hero in the movie, I think the basic plot of the movie was the guy trying to save his kids.

SomeCreep · 07-04-2005, 04:03 PM

War of the worlds was an average film. I thought the story got slow at times. The ending was stupid.

solonline · 07-04-2005, 04:33 PM

shame to read bad reviews - was looking forward to watching it.

Russian · 07-04-2005, 04:34 PM

What did you expect, stupid fucks? I'm shure you did not read the original book, huh?

s9ann0 · 07-04-2005, 04:43 PM

i thougth it was ok tyou can't expect much out of the ordinary hollywood bs with Tom Cruise in it

tungsten · 07-04-2005, 04:49 PM

i will still go see it tonight

zentz · 07-04-2005, 05:37 PM

stop the crap, its a good movie

alec · 07-04-2005, 06:54 PM

Was it really $100 million on its opening week? I've seen not really that exciting.

Bob_cougar · 07-04-2005, 09:05 PM

the movie was disastrous thanks to TOM CRUISE's publicity stunts.

KRL · 07-04-2005, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zentz

stop the crap, its a good movie

It was stupid and sucked wind bigtime. There was even a decent looking chick in the film for christ's sake. At least give us a babe.

Your Mothers Secret · 07-04-2005, 09:51 PM

Sounds like you guys are all brainwashed into wanting a "typical " Hollywood
product. You're not happy unless there is a "HERO" with "angelic children" and
a warm fuzzy ending to the film.

I liked War of the Worlds.
It surely wasn't as cute as ET

"War of the Worlds" was a dark and realistic depiction of an instant horrorific holocaust. Cruse played a regular and simple kind of guy, with spoiled fucked up kids.

Great acting ? No.

Spielberg's fantasy films overshadow any actor. And of course Cruse took the part for the money, wouldn't you?
"Shindlers List" has been the only Spielberg film that allowed actors to actually act.

"War of the Worlds" keeps you on the edge of your seat like a rollercoaster, then the holocaust suddenly ends as it began, you're left sitting there in your seat sharing the same thoughts as Tom Cruse's character "Ray",,
F.U.C.K. !! Now what?

The film was intended to shock you, not fill you full of "warmth and hope" as the end of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind".

Sounds like the film shocked alot of you for the simple fact it didn't look like, or end like, anything Spielberg has ever done.
He should get credit for that alone.

bllott · 07-04-2005, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Ok I'll break the bad streak here and say I liked it. I almost didn't go check it out after I read this post.

However I went and check it out anyway. Overall I thought it was pretty good, keeps yea on the edge of your seat if nothing else. I will say the ending was a little weak.

I don't think there was supposed to be a hero in the movie, I think the basic plot of the movie was the guy trying to save his kids.

ending was a little weak? what were you watching? the perfect storm?

crockett · 07-04-2005, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bllott

ending was a little weak? what were you watching? the perfect storm?

hey you gave your opinon and I gave mine.. If you hated it so bad why did you even wait for the ending?

d_train · 07-05-2005, 05:00 AM

major disappointment considering its spielberg...batman begins is better except for katie holmes acting...which is amateur...

hova · 07-05-2005, 05:03 AM

I agree with KRL

keyboard warrior · 07-05-2005, 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Ok I'll break the bad streak here and say I liked it. I almost didn't go check it out after I read this post.

However I went and check it out anyway. Overall I thought it was pretty good, keeps yea on the edge of your seat if nothing else. I will say the ending was a little weak.

I don't think there was supposed to be a hero in the movie, I think the basic plot of the movie was the guy trying to save his kids.

yeh same here the movie is good till the end - the basment part was the best of the movie with that snake thingy.

BigPinPin · 07-05-2005, 07:00 AM

the movie was just a remake....it was ok...cool effects and stuff, but that´s all.

Code_Havoc · 07-05-2005, 07:10 AM

Listen to the old radio broadcast that was done of War of the Worlds, during the Red Scare if I remember correctly. It's actually pretty good.

HpicAnn · 07-05-2005, 08:04 AM

I liked War of the worlds it has amazing special effects..

split_joel · 07-05-2005, 08:42 AM

War of the worlds was good, aside from the end, it was worth my money

Adultnet · 07-05-2005, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigPinPin

the movie was just a remake....it was ok...cool effects and stuff, but that´s all.

I guess I wont spend my time to go for this one..

Cirrus · 07-05-2005, 09:02 AM

I liked it (very much :-])

sickkittens · 07-05-2005, 09:06 AM

I talked to a couple more people who saw it and said it was ok except for the ending...which doesn't sound like a good thing.

loverboy · 07-05-2005, 09:35 AM

the only reason i'll be watching it coz my girl is a big fan of Tom Cruise.
don't wanna break her heart

wildgirl · 07-05-2005, 10:11 AM

I haven't seen it yet til now, I have no time watching it

flirty · 07-05-2005, 10:30 AM

will still see it despite of many spoilers around

nick1980 · 07-06-2005, 09:01 PM

I agree. Nothing great about it.

Screaming · 07-06-2005, 09:03 PM

i had a feeling it was going to be like that

mayon · 07-06-2005, 09:06 PM

the effects are great, the plot was BAD

Shooting_Manic · 07-06-2005, 09:08 PM

Worst movie I have seen in some time. All the hype and one major let down.

Gator · 07-06-2005, 09:14 PM

woj......

07-03-2005, 07:55 PM	#1
bllott Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Everywhere Posts: 2,368	war of the worlds I just saw that movie, i have never seen anything dumber. I want 90 minutes of my life back. correction, with the commercials in the beginning it's over 2 hours

07-03-2005, 08:18 PM	#2
Serge Litehead Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Behind the scenes Posts: 5,190	spectacular effects, week on the plot, scene in the last house/basement got boring, very fast "victory" with no real power advantage against aliens - nature did everything. __________________ SilverCrocodile.com Adult web design since '05

07-03-2005, 08:55 PM	#3
imageman Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,938	I was'nt too bad Quite good effects the Batman film was much better IMHO

07-03-2005, 08:56 PM	#5
imageman Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,938	King Kong The trailer for King Kong looked amazing. Fantastic effects from the little i saw.

07-03-2005, 09:00 PM	#9
Babagirls Text Writer Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 18,812	i havent heard a good review yet about WOTW but ya, Batman was kickass, just saw that one a couple weeks ago __________________ Need a Text Writer? Blogs\|Reviews\|Descriptions\|Paysites\|TGP's\|Stories ICQ: 397892500

07-03-2005, 08:57 PM	#7
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=...ight=king+kong KING KONG TRAILER

07-03-2005, 09:01 PM	#10
sickkittens I am a meat popsicle. Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,100	Glad I saw Batman instead. __________________ HIGHEST PAYOUTS FOR NO-CONSOLE TOURS IN THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY! THIS SIG CAN BE YOURS FOR $200 - ICQ: 78881543

07-03-2005, 09:03 PM	#11
sniperwolf Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 17,743	spoiler...okay maybe I'm sot suppose to watch that film __________________ ~Accepting design works~

07-03-2005, 09:13 PM	#12
webcrawler Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: ICQ .:. 286608143 Posts: 2,692	I'd still give it a try.

07-03-2005, 09:16 PM	#13
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	I'll repeat my review on this thread to save some folks their money and time. OK, just got back from War of the Worlds. Overall, I think that was the worst movie Spielberg has ever made. What a waste of 2 hours. The screenplay was a total botch job. The storyline was utterly ridiculous and choppy. Acting sucked. That little girl should win the Oscar for Most Annoying STFU Kid in a Film. God damn shut up already with the canned lines. This was Tom Cruise at the level of time to hustle anonther $20 Mil instead of being an actor. A true actor would never have taken this role after reading the screenplay for it. The special effects were epic, but overkill in so many scenes. The military in this movie was completely hookie. There were lots of weird characters in this film. A lot of dark meaning also to many scenes which I think most people won't get unless you were looking behind the lines and scenes. The ending was as stupid as they come and a total sputtering let down. One of the main problems the film lacked a hero. Cruise was a putz, a divorced loser who was trying to win respect from his nerd son, who was also terribly cast, and trying to get his kids through the ordeal. There was no bad guy in the film, just a bunch of aliens you'll swear you've seen before in some other sci-fi film and I bet anything they were re-used ones. I rate this move a big fat ZERO on a 1 to 10. __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

07-03-2005, 09:47 PM	#14
Rob I'm a great bowler. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Right Outside of Normal. Posts: 13,309	It really sucked. __________________

07-03-2005, 09:53 PM	#15
xxxice Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 5,042	It was fun to watch

07-04-2005, 09:27 AM	#18
pxxx First African GFY Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Jersey Posts: 12,114	I saw it last night, complete garbage. That is two bad movies in a role. The last one was Land of The Dead, GARBAGE movie.

07-04-2005, 04:00 PM	#20
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	Ok I'll break the bad streak here and say I liked it. I almost didn't go check it out after I read this post. However I went and check it out anyway. Overall I thought it was pretty good, keeps yea on the edge of your seat if nothing else. I will say the ending was a little weak. I don't think there was supposed to be a hero in the movie, I think the basic plot of the movie was the guy trying to save his kids. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

07-04-2005, 04:03 PM	#21
SomeCreep :glugglug Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Where the Wild Things Are Posts: 26,118	War of the worlds was an average film. I thought the story got slow at times. The ending was stupid. __________________ Webair Hosting I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

07-04-2005, 04:33 PM	#22
solonline Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: EU- Posts: 718	shame to read bad reviews - was looking forward to watching it.

07-04-2005, 04:34 PM	#23
Russian Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 430	What did you expect, stupid fucks? I'm shure you did not read the original book, huh? __________________ C lick my sig

07-04-2005, 04:43 PM	#24
s9ann0 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Boston Posts: 4,873	i thougth it was ok tyou can't expect much out of the ordinary hollywood bs with Tom Cruise in it

07-04-2005, 04:49 PM	#25
tungsten Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 10,579	i will still go see it tonight __________________ VOYEUR /HOMEMADE, HENTAI / CARTOON, Reality, Amateur, Shemale, Hardcore, Cuckold, Celebrity, Retro/Vintage, ect...ALL OUR SITES >> Unbelievable Ratio \| High % of Rebills \| Bi-Monthly Payments (also to E-Passporte) Ton's of EXCLUSIVE Free content & FHG's \|=> GREAT REVENUE $$$ GUARANTEED!

07-04-2005, 05:37 PM	#26
zentz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 8,053	stop the crap, its a good movie __________________ Programs that owe me money ---- Epassporte.com ~ $2700 \| Protraffic.com ~ $2600 \| XonDemand.com ~ $3000 Email: [email protected]

07-04-2005, 06:54 PM	#27
alec Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,877	Was it really $100 million on its opening week? I've seen not really that exciting. __________________

07-04-2005, 09:05 PM	#28
Bob_cougar Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,935	the movie was disastrous thanks to TOM CRUISE's publicity stunts. __________________

07-04-2005, 09:51 PM	#30
Your Mothers Secret Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 240	Sounds like you guys are all brainwashed into wanting a "typical " Hollywood product. You're not happy unless there is a "HERO" with "angelic children" and a warm fuzzy ending to the film. I liked War of the Worlds. It surely wasn't as cute as ET "War of the Worlds" was a dark and realistic depiction of an instant horrorific holocaust. Cruse played a regular and simple kind of guy, with spoiled fucked up kids. Great acting ? No. Spielberg's fantasy films overshadow any actor. And of course Cruse took the part for the money, wouldn't you? "Shindlers List" has been the only Spielberg film that allowed actors to actually act. "War of the Worlds" keeps you on the edge of your seat like a rollercoaster, then the holocaust suddenly ends as it began, you're left sitting there in your seat sharing the same thoughts as Tom Cruse's character "Ray",, F.U.C.K. !! Now what? The film was intended to shock you, not fill you full of "warmth and hope" as the end of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind". Sounds like the film shocked alot of you for the simple fact it didn't look like, or end like, anything Spielberg has ever done. He should get credit for that alone. Last edited by Your Mothers Secret; 07-04-2005 at 09:53 PM..

07-05-2005, 05:00 AM	#33
d_train Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,527	major disappointment considering its spielberg...batman begins is better except for katie holmes acting...which is amateur... __________________ EXTREME Hosting Services -- Extreme Dependability -- Low Pricing FREE TOOL to check your site's content originality and increase your Search Engine ranking

07-05-2005, 05:03 AM	#34
hova Traffillionaire Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: ICQ:209371571 Posts: 22,430	I agree with KRL __________________ http://traffillions.com/ Sign up and get lifetime revshare on your traffic

07-05-2005, 07:00 AM	#36
BigPinPin Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Spain Posts: 894	the movie was just a remake....it was ok...cool effects and stuff, but that´s all.

07-05-2005, 07:10 AM	#37
Code_Havoc Registered User Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 221	Listen to the old radio broadcast that was done of War of the Worlds, during the Red Scare if I remember correctly. It's actually pretty good.

07-05-2005, 08:04 AM	#38
HpicAnn Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 4,319	I liked War of the worlds it has amazing special effects.. __________________ GiVe YoU a BiG......... tImE Best Converting Webmaster Programs! All Niches Covered! [email protected] IcQ: 226461222

07-05-2005, 08:42 AM	#39
split_joel Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 2,270	War of the worlds was good, aside from the end, it was worth my money __________________ E-mail marketing - Automation Scripting - IP Space AIM: splitjoelp ICQ: 254759453 skype - splitjoelp 702-941-6465

07-05-2005, 09:02 AM	#41
Cirrus Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: www.Reyko.com Posts: 1,145	I liked it (very much :-]) __________________ Reyko.com - exclusive glamour production icq:35570298

07-05-2005, 09:06 AM	#42
sickkittens I am a meat popsicle. Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,100	I talked to a couple more people who saw it and said it was ok except for the ending...which doesn't sound like a good thing. __________________ HIGHEST PAYOUTS FOR NO-CONSOLE TOURS IN THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY! THIS SIG CAN BE YOURS FOR $200 - ICQ: 78881543

07-05-2005, 09:35 AM	#43
loverboy When it rains, it pours Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 20,609	the only reason i'll be watching it coz my girl is a big fan of Tom Cruise. don't wanna break her heart

07-05-2005, 10:11 AM	#44
wildgirl My Sig was too Big! :( Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,554	I haven't seen it yet til now, I have no time watching it __________________ My Best Money Maker:

07-05-2005, 10:30 AM	#45
flirty Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,840	will still see it despite of many spoilers around

07-06-2005, 09:01 PM	#46
nick1980 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,435	I agree. Nothing great about it. __________________ Increase your sales. Up to $4 per click.