Spring break type content is fucked (2257) - GoFuckYourself.com

martyVP · 06-26-2005, 10:14 AM

those guys have no records and if some smartass is going to come in this thread and tell me that springbreak content is exzempt due to the fact that its considered "public nudity", think again.

its only considered "public nudity" if there is no type of touching, fondling, or contact.

tony286 · 06-26-2005, 10:15 AM

yep things will change

chadglni · 06-26-2005, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyVP

those guys have no records and if some smartass is going to come in this thread and tell me that springbreak content is exzempt due to the fact that its considered "public nudity", think again.

its only considered "public nudity" if there is no type of touching, fondling, or contact.

You goat fucker. It's considered documentary type of work when it's in public. People just say public nudity thinking anyone that gives a shit might have already looked into the laws instead of spouting bullshit.

martyVP · 06-26-2005, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadglni

You goat fucker. It's considered documentary type of work when it's in public. People just say public nudity thinking anyone that gives a shit might have already looked into the laws instead of spouting bullshit.

call it what you want you shmuck...publish that shit after 2257 is enforced and you don't have records, you be gettin it up the ass by "bubba"

As far as the goatfucker comment...why don't you come and let me fuck you in the ass?

btw..i have discussed this issue with Gregg Piccinelli, Clyde Dewitt, and tim umbreit fyi.

do you even know what these guys do?

StuartD · 06-26-2005, 10:24 AM

I really wish more people could understand what "sexually explicit" meant.

ProjectNaked · 06-26-2005, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NichePay - StuartD

I really wish more people could understand what "sexually explicit" meant.

What he said....yes there will be changes BUT, there is a big difference between "sexually explicit" and "documentary" content. "Spring Break" sites won't be fuked, rather forced to snip out scenes showing sexual acts, touching, etc... That is why we have always made release forms a mandatory for girls getting into any type of contest / shoot. I honestly don't believe these will be the first target either...there are too many better targets that they have their sites on. GGW did a nice job of paving the litigation highway for "Spring Break" content

martyVP · 06-26-2005, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProjectNaked

What he said....yes there will be changes BUT, there is a big difference between "sexually explicit" and "documentary" content. "Spring Break" sites won't be fuked, rather forced to snip out scenes showing sexual acts, touching, etc... That is why we have always made release forms a mandatory for girls getting into any type of contest / shoot. I honestly don't believe these will be the first target either...there are too many better targets that they have their sites on. GGW did a nice job of paving the litigation highway for "Spring Break" content

in most videos i have seen, 90 percent would be cut in that case

juve20 · 06-26-2005, 11:22 AM

2257 sucks!!

tony

martyVP · 06-26-2005, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by juve20

2257 sucks!!

tony

sucks big balls, that is!!!

Nightwind · 06-26-2005, 11:27 AM

People are so classy here. 3 Posts in and already the thread started is called a goat fucker, as a result he wants to fuck the guy in the ass.

chadglni · 06-26-2005, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyVP

do you even know what these guys do?

Give you bad fucking advice?

tungsten · 06-26-2005, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwind

People are so classy here. 3 Posts in and already the thread started is called a goat fucker, as a result he wants to fuck the guy in the ass.

i found that quite humorous as well :D

emthree · 06-26-2005, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwind

People are so classy here. 3 Posts in and already the thread started is called a goat fucker, as a result he wants to fuck the guy in the ass.

STFU Scrotum Juggler

chadglni · 06-26-2005, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwind

People are so classy here. 3 Posts in and already the thread started is called a goat fucker, as a result he wants to fuck the guy in the ass.

I can't help the topic starter is a shit disturbing moron. Really I can't.

AmateurFlix · 06-26-2005, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwind

People are so classy here. 3 Posts in and already the thread started is called a goat fucker, as a result he wants to fuck the guy in the ass.

Nightwind your sig rocks

jeffrey · 06-26-2005, 12:24 PM

lol
Only for Americans

taibo · 06-26-2005, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyVP

those guys have no records and if some smartass is going to come in this thread and tell me that springbreak content is exzempt due to the fact that its considered "public nudity", think again.

its only considered "public nudity" if there is no type of touching, fondling, or contact.

good point.

Paul Waters · 06-26-2005, 12:44 PM

What constitutes "sexually explicit"

Is it defined in 2257? I don't see it.

Anywhere else in US law?

In Canada, we have some history of formal government film censorship, and there was a period when anything sexually explicit had to be cut. During that period fondling of titties, and ass grabbing went through uncut.

NaughtyRob · 06-26-2005, 12:46 PM

I hope that arrogant fuck that owns Girls Gone Wild goes down.

pornguy · 06-26-2005, 12:47 PM

One of the major porblems that we will face is what does the DOJ think sexually explicit means??

ProjectNaked · 06-26-2005, 12:47 PM

something personal with Joe?

Rex · 06-26-2005, 01:21 PM

thanks marty

JFK · 06-26-2005, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyVP

call it what you want you shmuck...publish that shit after 2257 is enforced and you don't have records, you be gettin it up the ass by "bubba"

As far as the goatfucker comment...why don't you come and let me fuck you in the ass?

btw..i have discussed this issue with Gregg Piccinelli, Clyde Dewitt, and tim umbreit fyi.

do you even know what these guys do?

Somehow I dont think its the midnight shift @Mickey D's..........say Hi to Tim for me

Nismo · 06-26-2005, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ContentProducer

I hope that arrogant fuck that owns Girls Gone Wild goes down.

I sure as hell hope he doesn't. Cause if he does, who's next? Content suppliers who produce similar content. Then who's next?

beemk · 06-26-2005, 02:30 PM

thanks for all the info, you must be a lawyer huh?

jeffrey · 06-26-2005, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ContentProducer

I hope that arrogant fuck that owns Girls Gone Wild goes down.

but he has them all sign something...

Peace · 06-26-2005, 04:46 PM

so who hurt the most?

The Bootyologist · 06-26-2005, 04:54 PM

what about lascivious dipslay of genitals?

i think that could be applied to almost any genital display

Major (Tom) · 06-26-2005, 05:01 PM

you can touch, fondle, and suck on a breast and its not sexually explicit.

Duke

modF · 06-26-2005, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

One of the major porblems that we will face is what does the DOJ think sexually explicit means??

Janet Jackson's busted ass nipple evidently ;)

reynold · 06-26-2005, 08:15 PM

Sad to say, we still need a lawyer here..

VeriSexy · 06-26-2005, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NichePay - StuartD

I really wish more people could understand what "sexually explicit" meant.

06-26-2005, 10:14 AM	#1
martyVP Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,917	Spring break type content is fucked (2257) those guys have no records and if some smartass is going to come in this thread and tell me that springbreak content is exzempt due to the fact that its considered "public nudity", think again. its only considered "public nudity" if there is no type of touching, fondling, or contact.

06-26-2005, 10:24 AM	#5
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	I really wish more people could understand what "sexually explicit" meant. __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

06-26-2005, 11:22 AM	#8
juve20 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: uk Posts: 2,542	2257 sucks!! tony __________________ Monetize your site with AdBrite! Monetize your site with AdBrite!

06-26-2005, 11:27 AM	#10
Nightwind Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Location: ICQ: 303-282-636 Posts: 4,786	People are so classy here. 3 Posts in and already the thread started is called a goat fucker, as a result he wants to fuck the guy in the ass. __________________

06-26-2005, 12:24 PM	#16
jeffrey Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Alberta Posts: 1,864	lol Only for Americans __________________ Coming Soon!

06-26-2005, 10:15 AM	#2
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	yep things will change

06-26-2005, 12:44 PM	#18
Paul Waters Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Toronto, Ontario Posts: 4,402	What constitutes "sexually explicit" Is it defined in 2257? I don't see it. Anywhere else in US law? In Canada, we have some history of formal government film censorship, and there was a period when anything sexually explicit had to be cut. During that period fondling of titties, and ass grabbing went through uncut. __________________ Paul

06-26-2005, 12:46 PM	#19
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	I hope that arrogant fuck that owns Girls Gone Wild goes down. __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

06-26-2005, 12:47 PM	#20
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	One of the major porblems that we will face is what does the DOJ think sexually explicit means?? __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

06-26-2005, 12:47 PM	#21
ProjectNaked Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Detroit Areola Posts: 4,309	something personal with Joe?

06-26-2005, 01:21 PM	#22
Rex Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: ohio Posts: 2,241	thanks marty __________________ I don't own RexMag anymore.

06-26-2005, 02:30 PM	#25
beemk CLICK HERE Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 20,829	thanks for all the info, you must be a lawyer huh? __________________ I host with Vacares

06-26-2005, 04:46 PM	#27
Peace Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: NY and Moscow Posts: 5,552	so who hurt the most? __________________ Need Custom or Licensed Content? Visit PhotoVideoContent.com Email: [email protected] / Telegram: @romatibet / Skype: Peace888

06-26-2005, 04:54 PM	#28
The Bootyologist So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: m00dville Posts: 2,912	what about lascivious dipslay of genitals? i think that could be applied to almost any genital display

06-26-2005, 05:01 PM	#29
Major (Tom) White Pride Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 32,501	you can touch, fondle, and suck on a breast and its not sexually explicit. Duke __________________ WHITE LIVES MATTER

06-26-2005, 08:15 PM	#31
reynold Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Global Traveler Posts: 51,271	Sad to say, we still need a lawyer here..