2257 Specific Answer Needed - GoFuckYourself.com

MrChips · 06-23-2005, 02:32 AM

Ok

I have a html page on a server.

In that page are JPGs of a fully dressed girl.

The JPGS clearly show the girl is dressed and ALONE, and therefore COULD NOT be clipped from a full picture which is hardcore.

However - the photoshoot the pic came from IS HARDCORE and although I only put the softcore dressed pic up - do I have to have the docs for the girl?

I think not - but am open to suggestions.

TheDoc · 06-23-2005, 02:45 AM

Legally yes you would need the docs, but I guess if you can't tell then it won't be an issue. But why take the chance?

MrChips · 06-23-2005, 02:51 AM

Sorry thedoc - Im not quite with you - thanks for your answer.

When you say "you cant tell" - Im not sure what that means.

Basically - If Legally I need the docs - then that is absolute BOLLOX.

Because this means that NO PICTURE OF A FEMALE IS ALLOWED ON THE NET WITHOUT DOCS - IF YOU KNOW SHES A PORNSTAR.........

Surely?

I dont know what this is coming too - if you need docs to show a girls face - then Im glad I dont live in the US.

THATS PATHETIC.

TheDoc · 06-23-2005, 02:57 AM

I may have miss read your question

If a girl in the photo is dress but another part of the photo contains hardcore action then you would need the docs, even if you crop out the non-nude girl. If the photo is just of a dressed girl, then you wouldn't need the docs.

MrChips · 06-23-2005, 03:10 AM

Cheers thedoc - thats what I was thinking - its Photo Level - not shoot level.

You americans should fight back against this - you are so SURPRESSED over there - its like your government thinks you all should be living under a rock.

Infact - I think that the way you guys are being supressed is like being under a dictator.

Im all for fighting CP, I'd even like to take a job doing that with my internet skills Im sure I could code some really good network filters to uncover the scum. But this 2257 - and its penalties - TERRIBLE.

For primary producers - no problem - but mere "uploaders" of pages of already documented pics - well soz - this is absolute Dictatorship rule.

It is a DISGUSTING DAY FOR YOU AMERICANS....

SOZ FOR YOU.

budz · 06-23-2005, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrChips

You americans should fight back against this - you are so SURPRESSED over there - its like your government thinks you all should be living under a rock.

Infact - I think that the way you guys are being supressed is like being under a dictator.

Im all for fighting CP, I'd even like to take a job doing that with my internet skills Im sure I could code some really good network filters to uncover the scum. But this 2257 - and its penalties - TERRIBLE.

For primary producers - no problem - but mere "uploaders" of pages of already documented pics - well soz - this is absolute Dictatorship rule.

It is a DISGUSTING DAY FOR YOU AMERICANS....

SOZ FOR YOU.

I couldn't agree more. Two good quotes :

"This [the U.S. Constitution] is likely to be administered for a course of years and then end in despotism*... when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other."
Benjamin Franklin

"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter, and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

*Definitions of despotism on the Web:

absolutism: dominance through threat of punishment and violence
dictatorship: a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a constitution or laws or opposition etc.)

TheDoc · 06-23-2005, 03:18 AM

Most adult companies / webmasters don't have the money to fight this. So we joined up with the FSC with the hopes they do a good job for us all. Not much more most of us can do.

But then again.. You would think all these "so called huge companies" would have banned together and taken it to the next level.

I don't have the cash to stand up and take them on but I would be willing to join others on a more one on one fight. I asked around and nobody seemed interested.

MyNameIsEmily · 06-23-2005, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrChips

You americans should fight back against this - you are so SURPRESSED over there - its like your government thinks you all should be living under a rock.

Infact - I think that the way you guys are being supressed is like being under a dictator.

Im all for fighting CP, I'd even like to take a job doing that with my internet skills Im sure I could code some really good network filters to uncover the scum. But this 2257 - and its penalties - TERRIBLE...

It is a DISGUSTING DAY FOR YOU AMERICANS...

[size=8]AMERICANS ARE SO FUCKING STUPID.

I HAVN'T SEEN ONE US WEBMASTER HERE WITH A FREE SPEECH COALITION BANNER ON RTHEIR SITE, LET ALONE THEIR SIG.

TheDoc · 06-23-2005, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MyNameIsEmily

[size=8]AMERICANS ARE SO FUCKING STUPID.

I HAVN'T SEEN ONE US WEBMASTER HERE WITH A FREE SPEECH COALITION BANNER ON RTHEIR SITE, LET ALONE THEIR SIG.

Then you should check out the Evil Genius Cash sites. Our warning pages have had "We Are Proud Members Of The Free Speech Coalition" for a long while now.

We have had it on some sites for years.

06-23-2005, 02:32 AM	#1
MrChips Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,504	2257 Specific Answer Needed Ok I have a html page on a server. In that page are JPGs of a fully dressed girl. The JPGS clearly show the girl is dressed and ALONE, and therefore COULD NOT be clipped from a full picture which is hardcore. However - the photoshoot the pic came from IS HARDCORE and although I only put the softcore dressed pic up - do I have to have the docs for the girl? I think not - but am open to suggestions.

06-23-2005, 02:45 AM	#2
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	Legally yes you would need the docs, but I guess if you can't tell then it won't be an issue. But why take the chance? __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation

06-23-2005, 02:57 AM	#4
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	I may have miss read your question If a girl in the photo is dress but another part of the photo contains hardcore action then you would need the docs, even if you crop out the non-nude girl. If the photo is just of a dressed girl, then you wouldn't need the docs. __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation

06-23-2005, 03:18 AM	#7
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	Most adult companies / webmasters don't have the money to fight this. So we joined up with the FSC with the hopes they do a good job for us all. Not much more most of us can do. But then again.. You would think all these "so called huge companies" would have banned together and taken it to the next level. I don't have the cash to stand up and take them on but I would be willing to join others on a more one on one fight. I asked around and nobody seemed interested. __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation

06-23-2005, 02:51 AM	#3
MrChips Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,504	Sorry thedoc - Im not quite with you - thanks for your answer. When you say "you cant tell" - Im not sure what that means. Basically - If Legally I need the docs - then that is absolute BOLLOX. Because this means that NO PICTURE OF A FEMALE IS ALLOWED ON THE NET WITHOUT DOCS - IF YOU KNOW SHES A PORNSTAR......... Surely? I dont know what this is coming too - if you need docs to show a girls face - then Im glad I dont live in the US. THATS PATHETIC.

06-23-2005, 03:10 AM	#5
MrChips Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,504	Cheers thedoc - thats what I was thinking - its Photo Level - not shoot level. You americans should fight back against this - you are so SURPRESSED over there - its like your government thinks you all should be living under a rock. Infact - I think that the way you guys are being supressed is like being under a dictator. Im all for fighting CP, I'd even like to take a job doing that with my internet skills Im sure I could code some really good network filters to uncover the scum. But this 2257 - and its penalties - TERRIBLE. For primary producers - no problem - but mere "uploaders" of pages of already documented pics - well soz - this is absolute Dictatorship rule. It is a DISGUSTING DAY FOR YOU AMERICANS.... SOZ FOR YOU.