A blog post I wanted to share - 2257 related - GoFuckYourself.com

Probono · 06-22-2005, 01:23 PM

I am writing this on the eve of the last day before mandatory compliance with the new regulations under 18 USC 2257. For those of you outside the adult industry 18 USC 2257 is just one more law you never heard about; there are so many.

To those in the adult industry it is a mine field. The law was enacted in 1990 and was designed to prevent underage people from doing pornography; a noble goal that few except pedophiles would disagree with.

The law was unfortunately flawed. First and foremost it allows the producer of pornography to rely upon the ID presented by the performer. This means that Traci Lords, the 15 year old porn star that triggered the legislation would have still been able to do porn since she had what appeared to be valid ID.

The law remained dormant with few exceptions until this year. In 2004 the US DOJ published proposed regulations under the law and took comments on those proposals. One month ago they published their approved regulations and made most of them retroactive 10 years and added now requirements in record keeping from June 23 2005 forward.

The law and regulations seem fair on the first reading, however if read and think about them again there are a few MAJOR issues.

1. The regulations make record keeping very difficult, every image published, it's location online and the models in it must be stored, indexed and locatable. A monumental database task and only 30 days to do it.

2. It creates a need for publishers to list their addresses and names online for the world to see. This innocuous bit means amateur girls who post on the Internet must either put their address out for every stalker to find or rent office space and be there for regular business hours; for their hobby.

3. During regular business hours law enforcement may make unannounced warrantless searches of those records and the premises in general. No notice, no warrant! Producers of adult materials now have fewer rights than terror suspects.

4. If a record keeping error is discovered there is jail time, up to 5 years for the first offense. This is NOT if an underage model is discovered, this is if an error in records for any image the owner can go to Federal Prison

What is the real effect of 18 USC 2257? A chilling effect on pornography on the Internet originating in the United States. The Bush DOJ now has a tool to drive pornography, a huge industry offshore. The pornography will not go away, pedophiles and child pornography will not be stopped but a multibillion dollar US industry will slowing, moving or closing.

If you like having adult material on the Internet speak out! Of course you won't speak out because you don't want your wife, priest, pastor or children to know. Sad how your rights will be taken one at a time without an effort to say NO!

http://www.sex3.com/blogs/?p=65

Fletch XXX · 06-22-2005, 01:29 PM

great post

erehwon · 06-22-2005, 01:45 PM

EXCELLENT POST!

Probono · 06-22-2005, 08:02 PM

I think this is important. The world does not understand the implications, lots of people will care in their locked rooms but not publicly.

AdultInsider Cloner · 06-22-2005, 08:04 PM

So what's the word on the FSC injunction?

fusionx · 06-22-2005, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Probono

I think this is important. The world does not understand the implications, lots of people will care in their locked rooms but not publicly.

Cross posted and linked from http://www.fight2257.com - great post!

GatorB · 06-22-2005, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Probono

What is the real effect of 18 USC 2257? A chilling effect on pornography on the Internet originating in the United States. The Bush DOJ now has a tool to drive pornography, a huge industry offshore.

http://www.sex3.com/blogs/?p=65

Anyone saying Bush is not stupid needs to read this part again.
Ok so Bush doesn't like porn has to cater to the reglious right to "ban" porn and in the end porn just gets moved offshore where it will next to impossible to enforce by the US. If the Jesus freaks hate porn now wait until they get their wish and US porn is moved offshore. Plenty of beasty and shit eating porn for everyone!

Probono · 06-22-2005, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fusionx

Cross posted and linked from http://www.fight2257.com - great post!

Please feel free to copy and post this anyplace you think it might be read.

MyNameIsEmily · 06-23-2005, 09:37 AM

Don't miss a chance to fight back.

"Free Speech, No Sex!"

Please support the Free Speech Coalition, by adding one of these banners to your signature:

PHP Code:


			
[URL=http://www.freespeechcoalition.com][IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/Britney_Spears/468x60-animate.gif[/IMG][/URL]

PHP Code:


			
[URL=http://www.freespeechcoalition.com][IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/Britney_Spears/88x31-animate.gif[/IMG][/URL]

06-22-2005, 01:23 PM	#1
Probono Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Under the Rainbow Posts: 2,731	A blog post I wanted to share - 2257 related I am writing this on the eve of the last day before mandatory compliance with the new regulations under 18 USC 2257. For those of you outside the adult industry 18 USC 2257 is just one more law you never heard about; there are so many. To those in the adult industry it is a mine field. The law was enacted in 1990 and was designed to prevent underage people from doing pornography; a noble goal that few except pedophiles would disagree with. The law was unfortunately flawed. First and foremost it allows the producer of pornography to rely upon the ID presented by the performer. This means that Traci Lords, the 15 year old porn star that triggered the legislation would have still been able to do porn since she had what appeared to be valid ID. The law remained dormant with few exceptions until this year. In 2004 the US DOJ published proposed regulations under the law and took comments on those proposals. One month ago they published their approved regulations and made most of them retroactive 10 years and added now requirements in record keeping from June 23 2005 forward. The law and regulations seem fair on the first reading, however if read and think about them again there are a few MAJOR issues. 1. The regulations make record keeping very difficult, every image published, it's location online and the models in it must be stored, indexed and locatable. A monumental database task and only 30 days to do it. 2. It creates a need for publishers to list their addresses and names online for the world to see. This innocuous bit means amateur girls who post on the Internet must either put their address out for every stalker to find or rent office space and be there for regular business hours; for their hobby. 3. During regular business hours law enforcement may make unannounced warrantless searches of those records and the premises in general. No notice, no warrant! Producers of adult materials now have fewer rights than terror suspects. 4. If a record keeping error is discovered there is jail time, up to 5 years for the first offense. This is NOT if an underage model is discovered, this is if an error in records for any image the owner can go to Federal Prison What is the real effect of 18 USC 2257? A chilling effect on pornography on the Internet originating in the United States. The Bush DOJ now has a tool to drive pornography, a huge industry offshore. The pornography will not go away, pedophiles and child pornography will not be stopped but a multibillion dollar US industry will slowing, moving or closing. If you like having adult material on the Internet speak out! Of course you won't speak out because you don't want your wife, priest, pastor or children to know. Sad how your rights will be taken one at a time without an effort to say NO! http://www.sex3.com/blogs/?p=65

06-22-2005, 01:29 PM	#2
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	great post __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

06-22-2005, 01:45 PM	#3
erehwon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: A secure undisclosed location... Posts: 3,759	EXCELLENT POST! __________________ Money NEVER $leep$...

06-22-2005, 08:04 PM	#5
AdultInsider Cloner Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Costa Rica Posts: 1,472	So what's the word on the FSC injunction? __________________ Fighting the hypertrophy of social cognition. Never make small plans for they lack the magic to stir mens souls. FreeNetPass v2 - IS HERE! 9 Years and still going STRONG!

06-23-2005, 09:37 AM	#9
MyNameIsEmily Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 887	Don't Be An Idiot Don't miss a chance to fight back. *"Free Speech, No Sex!"* Please support the Free Speech Coalition, by adding one of these banners to your signature: PHP Code: `[URL=http://www.freespeechcoalition.com][IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/Britney_Spears/468x60-animate.gif[/IMG][/URL]` PHP Code: `[URL=http://www.freespeechcoalition.com][IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/Britney_Spears/88x31-animate.gif[/IMG][/URL]` __________________ Last edited by MyNameIsEmily; 06-23-2005 at 09:39 AM..

06-22-2005, 08:02 PM	#4
Probono Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Under the Rainbow Posts: 2,731	I think this is important. The world does not understand the implications, lots of people will care in their locked rooms but not publicly.