How will Ifriends get their 2257 compliance on? - GoFuckYourself.com

scardog · 06-08-2005, 07:56 PM

Just curious about a site that large with so many models cumming and going. ;)

Any ideas how the big cam sites will deal with the 2257 issue?

clickhappy · 06-08-2005, 07:58 PM

I think you have to send them your id before youre allowed to have a cam on there

scardog · 06-08-2005, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy

I think you have to send them your id before youre allowed to have a cam on there

2257 requires a lot more than just IDs.

Steen2 · 06-08-2005, 08:02 PM

By being fashionably late for everything, yet still turning out on top.

Honestly, does their affiliate support group work one month a year or something?

scardog · 06-08-2005, 08:05 PM

I have the answer. Should have gone there first. Sorry. They claim they have no control over the conduct, and each performer is responsible for 2257. All they do is make sure they are over 18. They say they fall in the service provider category. Wonder if that will work?

tony286 · 06-08-2005, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scardog

I have the answer. Should have gone there first. Sorry. They claim they have no control over the conduct, and each performer is responsible for 2257. All they do is make sure they are over 18. They say they fall in the service provider category. Wonder if that will work?

how would that work when they have affiliates , they require the models to send ID and a pic holding it.

scardog · 06-08-2005, 08:08 PM

great question Tony. Seems like they would have to release the models info to all affiliates.

chase · 06-08-2005, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scardog

great question Tony. Seems like they would have to release the models info to all affiliates.

Not likely...
Copied from the VCH forum:
"iFriends never has, and never will, disclose a chathost's sensitive personal information to ANYONE, for ANY REASON, unless we are compelled to do so by a court of law (for example, we routinely assist federal and local law-enforcement agencies who are investigating credit-card fraud ... yes, some of the credit-card cheats on iFriends have gone to jail ...)

As to 18-2257, the regulations actually work to further protect and safeguard your own privacy with respect to relationship with iFriends. They are a PLUS, not a negative. The regulations do not go into effect until late June, and we will have information in greater detail for all hosts before then.

But suffice to say, the status quo will PREVAIL, your personal information will continue to be PROTECTED more vigorously than the Gold in Fort Knox, and changes in regulations will have ZERO IMPACT upon your iFriends life. (That's why iFriends is here -- to take care of administrative and record-keeping headaches so you don't have to, and so you don't have to worry about stalkers because your home address is kept under lock and key.)

If you think about it, better recordkeeping regulations are a GOOD thing ... they are designed to target those services that are the *opposite* of iFriends; services with zero record-keeping ... services that let kids on and let kids get naked ... whereas iFriends, with its extensive 18+ ID Card gauntlet, assoicated documentation and proof-of-ages on file for more than 40 millions pictures & movies, is the *example* the government would like to see other services follow.

Stay tuned, we'll have more detailed information available as regulations go into effect in late June. "

tony286 · 06-08-2005, 08:30 PM

Thats a push, service provider, they publish all the content . Its not like its on others servers. Also how could the model be responsible for 2257 when its ifriends broadcasting the images? But then again I cant imagine the amount of man hours it would take for them to get into compliance.

acctman · 06-08-2005, 09:56 PM

think about it would you hold Yahoo.com resposible for the live video feed that happens every second over there ymsg program? its up to the model or persons to be responsible. trust me they won't get in trouble if that was the case then every web feed on the next would be fucked

will76 · 06-08-2005, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scardog

great question Tony. Seems like they would have to release the models info to all affiliates.

It's easy, don't use their nude images. If you want to use their content use non nude images. Ifriends is fine as far as they comply to 2257, but the affiliates who use nude images will be asking for trouble with the new 2257 regs. If you want to use nudity and promote ifriends or any other site for that matter, then buy your own nude content that complies with 2257.

eLdIaBlo · 06-09-2005, 12:04 AM

I would hope this puts and end to google images jacking of our images

Jace · 06-09-2005, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eLdIaBlo

I would hope this puts and end to google images jacking of our images

fuck that, i make bank from google images

if you don't know how to manipulate google images you are not expanding your marketing potential

KRL · 06-09-2005, 12:13 AM

Everyone should just move together to softcore teaser images.

LiveDose · 06-09-2005, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eLdIaBlo

I would hope this puts and end to google images jacking of our images

Are you serious?

thonglife · 06-09-2005, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eLdIaBlo

I would hope this puts and end to google images jacking of our images

Nah - same reason Usenet will still be very alive and well. See Sig!

TheJimmy · 06-09-2005, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Everyone should just move together to softcore teaser images.

did that about 3 years ago...works like a charm...

I can't help it that I'm a bit clairvoyant

RogerV · 06-09-2005, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheJimmy

did that about 3 years ago...works like a charm...

I can't help it that I'm a bit clairvoyant

Same here and things convert alot better may them pay for pink

06-08-2005, 07:56 PM	#1
scardog Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 886	How will Ifriends get their 2257 compliance on? Just curious about a site that large with so many models cumming and going. ;) Any ideas how the big cam sites will deal with the 2257 issue?

06-08-2005, 08:02 PM	#4
Steen2 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 7,662	By being fashionably late for everything, yet still turning out on top. Honestly, does their affiliate support group work one month a year or something? __________________ ICQ: 2262.73945

06-09-2005, 12:04 AM	#12
eLdIaBlo Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 105	google images I would hope this puts and end to google images jacking of our images

06-09-2005, 12:13 AM	#14
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	Everyone should just move together to softcore teaser images. __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

06-08-2005, 07:58 PM	#2
clickhappy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 4,027	I think you have to send them your id before youre allowed to have a cam on there

06-08-2005, 08:05 PM	#5
scardog Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 886	I have the answer. Should have gone there first. Sorry. They claim they have no control over the conduct, and each performer is responsible for 2257. All they do is make sure they are over 18. They say they fall in the service provider category. Wonder if that will work?

06-08-2005, 08:08 PM	#7
scardog Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 886	great question Tony. Seems like they would have to release the models info to all affiliates.

06-08-2005, 08:30 PM	#9
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	Thats a push, service provider, they publish all the content . Its not like its on others servers. Also how could the model be responsible for 2257 when its ifriends broadcasting the images? But then again I cant imagine the amount of man hours it would take for them to get into compliance.

06-08-2005, 09:56 PM	#10
acctman Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Atlanta Posts: 2,840	think about it would you hold Yahoo.com resposible for the live video feed that happens every second over there ymsg program? its up to the model or persons to be responsible. trust me they won't get in trouble if that was the case then every web feed on the next would be fucked