NPR Washington is interviewing me about .xxx, this should be interesting... - GoFuckYourself.com

PhillipB · 06-08-2005, 03:48 PM

Going to be on the air in the government's own backyard Monday. What message should I send to those listening?

wallst · 06-08-2005, 03:49 PM

Aly · 06-08-2005, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wallst

wallst · 06-08-2005, 03:52 PM

ok, you asked for my message

PhillipB · 06-08-2005, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wallst

ok, you asked for my message

haha, nice!

pussyluver · 06-08-2005, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by APN Philip

Going to be on the air in the government's own backyard Monday. What message should I send to those listening?

Read the 1st and 14th amendment to the US Constiution. .xxx really shouldn't fly.

Practical issues is rights over key money URLs such as adult.com (adult.xxx) etc. who gets it?? Who gets pussy.xxx?

Waste of time, because the Supreme Court will prolly knock it down...

The behind the scenes BS that as already occoured with respect to ASACP etc.

PhillipB · 06-08-2005, 04:00 PM

Good points, I will definitely ellaborate on those.

FilthyRob · 06-08-2005, 04:04 PM

I hope this never passes

polish_aristocrat · 06-08-2005, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by APN Philip

Good points, I will definitely ellaborate on those.

read Lensmans and Mike Hawks threads on the .xxx extensions

polish_aristocrat · 06-08-2005, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FilthyRob

I hope this never passes

it almost already passed

clickhappy · 06-08-2005, 04:09 PM

can you slip in a quickie mention on 2257 and models losing their privacy?

PhillipB · 06-08-2005, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy

can you slip in a quickie mention on 2257 and models losing their privacy?

I sure will. I've already expressed my desire to speak a little about 2257 and the producer was receptive.

AmigoPorn · 06-08-2005, 05:21 PM

Are those interviews live or pre-recorded? I listen to NPR every day.

tony286 · 06-08-2005, 05:22 PM

you should read Connors article

PhillipB · 06-08-2005, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmigoPorn

Are those interviews live or pre-recorded? I listen to NPR every day.

live, check it out Monday, 10am PST.

PhillipB · 06-08-2005, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

you should read Connors article

I have and his views coincide with mine.

NTSS · 06-08-2005, 10:26 PM

Tell em' we're pissed!

2HousePlague · 06-08-2005, 10:43 PM

Remind them how successful we have ALREADY been at keeping minors out of porn. When we simply object to 2257, it makes it seem to those looking in from the outside that we've been negligent or insufficient, and that a governmental/legislative intervention was NECESSARY -- it was not, as we can readily show.

I think if we always start by describing how 2257 is UNNECESSARY, and let folks know that we're proud of our industry's age enforcement record, it will make people wonder -- "Then, why was this law passed?" -- which is exactly what we want --

j-

06-08-2005, 03:48 PM	#1
PhillipB Just a Simple Carpenter Join Date: May 2003 Location: Your mom's house... Posts: 1,338	NPR Washington is interviewing me about .xxx, this should be interesting... Going to be on the air in the government's own backyard Monday. What message should I send to those listening?

06-08-2005, 03:49 PM	#2
wallst Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: South East Posts: 1,621	__________________ Earl Miller Cash 20th Congress

06-08-2005, 03:52 PM	#4
wallst Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: South East Posts: 1,621	ok, you asked for my message __________________ Earl Miller Cash 20th Congress

06-08-2005, 04:04 PM	#8
FilthyRob Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Anaheim - CA Posts: 6,741	I hope this never passes __________________ AKA - Clubsexy

06-08-2005, 05:21 PM	#13
AmigoPorn Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Mexico - So far away from god, so close to the United States Posts: 21,583	Are those interviews live or pre-recorded? I listen to NPR every day. __________________ ICQ: 267899523

06-08-2005, 04:00 PM	#7
PhillipB Just a Simple Carpenter Join Date: May 2003 Location: Your mom's house... Posts: 1,338	Good points, I will definitely ellaborate on those.

06-08-2005, 04:09 PM	#11
clickhappy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 4,027	can you slip in a quickie mention on 2257 and models losing their privacy?

06-08-2005, 05:22 PM	#14
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	you should read Connors article

06-08-2005, 10:26 PM	#17
NTSS Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Da Hood Posts: 5,688	Tell em' we're pissed! __________________ ICQ: 150-803-430 Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

06-08-2005, 10:43 PM	#18
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Remind them how successful we have ALREADY been at keeping minors out of porn. When we simply object to 2257, it makes it seem to those looking in from the outside that we've been negligent or insufficient, and that a governmental/legislative intervention was NECESSARY -- it was not, as we can readily show. I think if we always start by describing how 2257 is UNNECESSARY, and let folks know that we're proud of our industry's age enforcement record, it will make people wonder -- "Then, why was this law passed?" -- which is exactly what we want -- j- __________________ tada!