Remind them how successful we have ALREADY been at keeping minors out of porn. When we simply object to 2257, it makes it seem to those looking in from the outside that we've been negligent or insufficient, and that a governmental/legislative intervention was NECESSARY -- it was not, as we can readily show.
I think if we always start by describing how 2257 is UNNECESSARY, and let folks know that we're proud of our industry's age enforcement record, it will make people wonder -- "Then, why was this law passed?" -- which is exactly what we want --
j-