New York Man Sentenced, Fined for Violating 2257 Law - GoFuckYourself.com

just a punk · 06-06-2005, 05:36 AM

It begun: "After failing to provide the proper age-verification documentation on several underage models, a well-known author who once mingled with Ernest Hemingway was sentenced to three years in federal prison and fined $25,000."

Full Story

BastarD · 06-06-2005, 05:38 AM

content producers, beware!

Major (Tom) · 06-06-2005, 05:40 AM

Martell's photographs, featuring five girls between the ages of 13-17, were first reported by a film processing company, which filed a report with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in January 2004.

What do you expect.. he fucking diserved it! It's not like they were 18 and he had a clerical error of some sorts. He "IS" a pedo. Bottom LINE.

Duke

Major (Tom) · 06-06-2005, 05:44 AM

and this is poor journalism too. I believe this broke by xbiz..
The guy isnt guilty of violating 2257.. hes guilty of being a fucking peice of shit pedo. Big difference.

Scare tactic by x biz. if we were on .xxx none of this would be happening, right?
Laugh!

Duke

Dalai lama · 06-06-2005, 05:44 AM

It's not even the 23th yet.

Harmon · 06-06-2005, 05:50 AM

Isn't that article FAKE??? I thought this has already been established

Wizzo · 06-06-2005, 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dalai lama

It's not even the 23th yet.

2257 has been a law for many years, just been revised to cover the web better.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon

Isn't that article FAKE??? I thought this has already been established

Straight from the DOJ's site:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nyn/NewsRe...0411291057.htm

Machete_ · 06-06-2005, 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx

It begun: "After failing to provide the proper age-verification documentation on several underage models, a well-known author who once mingled with Ernest Hemingway was sentenced to three years in federal prison and fined $25,000."

Full Story

has nothing to do about violating the 2257 code... 2257 is about documentation.. this is just a pedo getting cought

just a punk · 06-06-2005, 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

The guy isnt guilty of violating 2257.. hes guilty of being a fucking peice of shit pedo. Big difference.

100% Agreed. However everything now will be announced under "2257 flag".

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

Scare tactic by x biz. if we were on .xxx none of this would be happening, right?
Laugh! Duke

As about the .XXX issue:
http://www.fhgstore.com/showarticle.html?id=9000&cat=2
http://www.fhgstore.com/showarticle.html?id=8987&cat=2

XxXotic · 06-06-2005, 07:10 AM

am I the only one who noticed that article is a year old? Check the date - Nov 04

taibo · 06-06-2005, 07:40 AM

there had to be an example

Zoe_Zoebaboe · 06-06-2005, 07:47 AM

Yeah, agreed. Was charged for being a pedo. Bastard.

NTSS · 06-06-2005, 07:54 AM

There is already a thread about this somewhere...i read it a few days ago

FilthyRob · 06-06-2005, 08:11 AM

He deserves it

sherie · 06-06-2005, 08:31 AM

The keywork here being "underage" Jebus, get my umbrella, the sky is truely falling!

Biggy2 · 06-06-2005, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

and this is poor journalism too. I believe this broke by xbiz..
The guy isnt guilty of violating 2257.. hes guilty of being a fucking peice of shit pedo. Big difference.

Scare tactic by x biz. if we were on .xxx none of this would be happening, right?
Laugh!

Duke

listen to this guy, he knows what hes talking about.

Read thru it and see how in the end the girls were between 13-17, and he photographed them while he was naked himself, sometimes trying to use drugs to coerce them. The reporting in the beginning makes it sound like it was just a mere 2257 violation.

just a punk · 06-06-2005, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XxXotic

am I the only one who noticed that article is a year old? Check the date - Nov 04

Actually I didn't look for the date. I read the title first and I wonder how they are compare CP-related crimes with 2257 which isn't yet in force.

Honez · 06-06-2005, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sherie

The keywork here being "underage" Jebus, get my umbrella, the sky is truely falling!

Princess Ellisa · 06-06-2005, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy2

listen to this guy, he knows what hes talking about.

Read thru it and see how in the end the girls were between 13-17, and he photographed them while he was naked himself, sometimes trying to use drugs to coerce them. The reporting in the beginning makes it sound like it was just a mere 2257 violation.

Who wrote the article? It is a very misleading title. He wasn't fined for failure to produce documnents related to 2257.

Even if he had wanted to maintain nicely organized records he could not have because he is a PEDO and they are KIDS.

Couple that with the fact that this story is over a year old and I say that Xbiz was trying desperately to look interesting.

fris · 06-06-2005, 09:19 AM

obviously the government thinks all porn leads to childporn. which is very misleading.

which is why they are doing it.

just a punk · 06-06-2005, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ellisa

Who wrote the article?

Gretchen Gallen

just a punk · 06-06-2005, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris

obviously the government thinks all porn leads to childporn. which is very misleading.

which is why they are doing it.

Yep, now every "news" will dance around 2257 and CP making 2257 violation look like a CP-related crime. This only begins...

ronaldo · 06-06-2005, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris

obviously the government thinks all porn leads to childporn. which is very misleading.

which is why they are doing it.

Actually, they want everyone to THINK that's the case. It makes them justified in prosecuting online porn.

Either that or they're living in caves.

Rui · 06-06-2005, 09:34 AM

piss-poor attempt at hyping the new 2257 rules...he is a pedo...this as nothing to do with 2257

Major (Tom) · 06-06-2005, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy2

listen to this guy, he knows what hes talking about.

Read thru it and see how in the end the girls were between 13-17, and he photographed them while he was naked himself, sometimes trying to use drugs to coerce them. The reporting in the beginning makes it sound like it was just a mere 2257 violation.

i just call it as i see it

thx

duke

Terry · 06-06-2005, 09:44 AM

Bastard pedo's!!!

MandyBlake · 06-06-2005, 10:07 AM

they were underage...good!

dopeman · 06-06-2005, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebus_dk

has nothing to do about violating the 2257 code... 2257 is about documentation.. this is just a pedo getting cought

"entered a plea of guilty today to a felony charge of failing to maintain required records relating to persons portrayed in sexually explicit visual depictions produced by MARTELL."

just a punk · 06-06-2005, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MandyBlake

they were underage...good!

And what's good there? Now every 2257 violation will be equated with underage. At least for the ppl. who don't have an idea what a NORMAL adult biz is

Quote:

Originally Posted by dopeman

"entered a plea of guilty today to a felony charge of failing to maintain required records relating to persons portrayed in sexually explicit visual depictions produced by MARTELL."

Yep, that's what I mean.

06-06-2005, 05:36 AM	#1
just a punk So fuckin' bored Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 32,386	New York Man Sentenced, Fined for Violating 2257 Law It begun: "After failing to provide the proper age-verification documentation on several underage models, a well-known author who once mingled with Ernest Hemingway was sentenced to three years in federal prison and fined $25,000." Full Story __________________ Obey the Cowgod

06-06-2005, 05:40 AM	#3
Major (Tom) Boomer Woffen Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 30,543	Martell's photographs, featuring five girls between the ages of 13-17, were first reported by a film processing company, which filed a report with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in January 2004. What do you expect.. he fucking diserved it! It's not like they were 18 and he had a clerical error of some sorts. He "IS" a pedo. Bottom LINE. Duke __________________ My mother said, to get things done You'd better not mess with Major Tom

06-06-2005, 05:44 AM	#4
Major (Tom) Boomer Woffen Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 30,543	and this is poor journalism too. I believe this broke by xbiz.. The guy isnt guilty of violating 2257.. hes guilty of being a fucking peice of shit pedo. Big difference. Scare tactic by x biz. if we were on .xxx none of this would be happening, right? Laugh! Duke __________________ My mother said, to get things done You'd better not mess with Major Tom

06-06-2005, 05:44 AM	#5
Dalai lama Strength and Honor Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Europe Posts: 16,540	It's not even the 23th yet. __________________ A program you can trust. Gallerybooster Run multiply TGPs of 1 script

06-06-2005, 05:50 AM	#6
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,010	Isn't that article FAKE??? I thought this has already been established __________________ [email protected]

06-06-2005, 05:38 AM	#2
BastarD Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Very close to that Jack Daniels bottle.. Posts: 6,341	content producers, beware!

06-06-2005, 07:10 AM	#10
XxXotic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Da Swamps Posts: 8,500	am I the only one who noticed that article is a year old? Check the date - Nov 04 __________________ Sponsors.. Tired of people not using your shitty RSS Feeds? Let Us Help You! Oxeo - Serious Hosting For Serious Webmasters. iCQ:135.887013

06-06-2005, 07:40 AM	#11
taibo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 3,720	there had to be an example

06-06-2005, 07:47 AM	#12
Zoe_Zoebaboe Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Sin City Posts: 4,463	Yeah, agreed. Was charged for being a pedo. Bastard. __________________ http://www.myspace.com/jennabea ICQ: 166862923 Email: [email protected]

06-06-2005, 07:54 AM	#13
NTSS Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Da Hood Posts: 5,688	There is already a thread about this somewhere...i read it a few days ago __________________ ICQ: 150-803-430 Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

06-06-2005, 08:11 AM	#14
FilthyRob Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Anaheim - CA Posts: 6,741	He deserves it __________________ AKA - Clubsexy

06-06-2005, 08:31 AM	#15
sherie Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 7,020	The keywork here being "underage" Jebus, get my umbrella, the sky is truely falling! __________________ AIM sherierocks ICQ 127-296-286 Skype traffichor

06-06-2005, 09:19 AM	#20
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,372	obviously the government thinks all porn leads to childporn. which is very misleading. which is why they are doing it. __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Stuff

06-06-2005, 09:34 AM	#24
Rui web Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: On icq: 85-483-060 Posts: 9,533	piss-poor attempt at hyping the new 2257 rules...he is a pedo...this as nothing to do with 2257

06-06-2005, 09:44 AM	#26
Terry Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,604	Bastard pedo's!!! __________________ TengaCash ICQ: 6776764

06-06-2005, 10:07 AM	#27
MandyBlake The one and only! Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 17,761	they were underage...good! __________________ Mandy's Playhouse Her First Fat Girl If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921