So, anyone manage to get any 2257 id's for actors in DVD movies yet? - GoFuckYourself.com

jollyperv · 05-31-2005, 04:59 PM

...Or is this even a requirement? I'd imagine it is, but I'd think it would be a real pain in the ass contacting the producers and convincing them to give you these documents.

xxxice · 05-31-2005, 05:00 PM

It is going to be very interesting to c what happens

Jace · 05-31-2005, 05:14 PM

What will be interesting is when the wrong person gets ahold of that info because they claimed to be a "webmaster"....and the porn star gets stalked and killed/raped, and the family sues the USA government for being so irresponsible

jollyperv · 05-31-2005, 05:16 PM

God damn this is such a clusterfuck. Did they even fucking READ what they signed into law?

Babagirls · 05-31-2005, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaceXXX

What will be interesting is when the wrong person gets ahold of that info because they claimed to be a "webmaster"....and the porn star gets stalked and killed/raped, and the family sues the USA government for being so irresponsible

yup. my thoughts exactly. and ironically, i think its going to take something that bad to happen to make the goverment take a second look at what they did wrong & hopefully revise/change it.

jollyperv · 05-31-2005, 06:03 PM

Hopefully it won't come down to that, but there sure are a lot of sick fucks out there.

teksonline · 05-31-2005, 06:09 PM

what about titties in R rated flicks? its nudity... hence full 2257 disclosure is needed?
so we get to see Angelina Jolie real address? and whoever else is next to strip for their new role in a movie?

What's gonna be even more funny is the exposure of the substitute model fill ins for these movies...

FOOD FOR THOUGHT.
In a movie they have butt actors and whatnot, so like someone say like George Clooney does a naked scene and they use a butt actor fill in on his ass shot... people
can now find out it was not really his ass and would be a huge embarrasment
to the producers lol...

jollyperv · 05-31-2005, 07:21 PM

"yo, I'm gonna need the 2257's for those stunt cocks..."

SykkBoy · 05-31-2005, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaceXXX

What will be interesting is when the wrong person gets ahold of that info because they claimed to be a "webmaster"....and the porn star gets stalked and killed/raped, and the family sues the USA government for being so irresponsible

this is my biggest problem with the new statutes...and you know what sucks? that sick cocksucker Bush and his band of Merry motherfuckers will say "maybe they shouldn't have been in porn".

wjxxx · 05-31-2005, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teksonline

what about titties in R rated flicks? its nudity...

but it`s not sexually explicit

Matt_WildCash · 05-31-2005, 08:13 PM

We are collecting 2257 info and are starting to recieve some of it from the studio's. Most studio's don't have it ready to go so are right now all working on getting it scaned, copied and organized to be sent out

fireorange · 05-31-2005, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teksonline

what about titties in R rated flicks? its nudity... hence full 2257 disclosure is needed?
so we get to see Angelina Jolie real address? and whoever else is next to strip for their new role in a movie?

sexually explicit

Please tell me you're not a US webmaster

jollyperv · 05-31-2005, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt_WC

We are collecting 2257 info and are starting to recieve some of it from the studio's. Most studio's don't have it ready to go so are right now all working on getting it scaned, copied and organized to be sent out

So they're just sending them out, no questions asked? This will never fly.

Shoehorn! · 05-31-2005, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jollyperv

God damn this is such a clusterfuck. Did they even fucking READ what they signed into law?

Probably not, but thats the government for you.

d00t · 06-01-2005, 12:37 AM

whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

European Lee · 06-01-2005, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d00t

whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

0.00% chance it wont go through.

Because it already has and becomes law on the 23rd

Regards,

Lee

kernelpanic · 06-01-2005, 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d00t

whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

Depends on how well the FSC does in court.

jollyperv · 06-01-2005, 08:58 AM

I think I may join the FSC

bdld · 06-01-2005, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d00t

whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

it already has gone through

kernelpanic · 06-01-2005, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jollyperv

I think I may join the FSC

You should, since it takes an enormous amount of money to continue the fight in court. What the FSC is doing is worthwhile, and will ultimately help to protect your freedom.

xxxjay · 06-01-2005, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by European Lee

0.00% chance it wont go through.

Because it already has and becomes law on the 23rd

Regards,

Lee

I disagree...there is a 99.9% it will be delayed.

That is why nobody is in any hurry to pass out the documents and doing so prematurely may actually also be a crime.

Lee is pushing some hotlinking thing that will not help anyone and stands to profit from the fear, so I would ignore what he has to say.

xxxdesign-net · 06-01-2005, 01:08 PM

btw.. will 2257 affect sexshops..? I mean. when they are displaying their DVDs. they are displaying XXX content..

xxxjay · 06-01-2005, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jollyperv

I think I may join the FSC

You should. If it wasn't for the FSC the deadline would just expire without a fight.

Jace · 06-01-2005, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay

so I would ignore what he has to say.

most of the people in this business that matter already do

mahoney · 06-01-2005, 01:13 PM

We are giving out ALL 2257 info
No Problems Here

teksonline · 06-01-2005, 01:38 PM

define sexually explicit, a love scene simulated or not, is sexually explicit

05-31-2005, 04:59 PM	#1
jollyperv Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NYC Posts: 3,927	So, anyone manage to get any 2257 id's for actors in DVD movies yet? ...Or is this even a requirement? I'd imagine it is, but I'd think it would be a real pain in the ass contacting the producers and convincing them to give you these documents.

06-01-2005, 01:13 PM	#25
mahoney Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Las Vegas Nv Posts: 5,318	We are giving out ALL 2257 info No Problems Here __________________ Vegassexparty.com

05-31-2005, 05:00 PM	#2
xxxice Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 5,042	It is going to be very interesting to c what happens

05-31-2005, 05:14 PM	#3
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	What will be interesting is when the wrong person gets ahold of that info because they claimed to be a "webmaster"....and the porn star gets stalked and killed/raped, and the family sues the USA government for being so irresponsible

05-31-2005, 05:16 PM	#4
jollyperv Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NYC Posts: 3,927	God damn this is such a clusterfuck. Did they even fucking READ what they signed into law?

05-31-2005, 06:03 PM	#6
jollyperv Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NYC Posts: 3,927	Hopefully it won't come down to that, but there sure are a lot of sick fucks out there.

05-31-2005, 06:09 PM	#7
teksonline So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: At My Desk Posts: 2,904	what about titties in R rated flicks? its nudity... hence full 2257 disclosure is needed? so we get to see Angelina Jolie real address? and whoever else is next to strip for their new role in a movie? What's gonna be even more funny is the exposure of the substitute model fill ins for these movies... FOOD FOR THOUGHT. In a movie they have butt actors and whatnot, so like someone say like George Clooney does a naked scene and they use a butt actor fill in on his ass shot... people can now find out it was not really his ass and would be a huge embarrasment to the producers lol...

05-31-2005, 07:21 PM	#8
jollyperv Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NYC Posts: 3,927	"yo, I'm gonna need the 2257's for those stunt cocks..."

05-31-2005, 08:13 PM	#11
Matt_WildCash Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,699	We are collecting 2257 info and are starting to recieve some of it from the studio's. Most studio's don't have it ready to go so are right now all working on getting it scaned, copied and organized to be sent out

06-01-2005, 12:37 AM	#15
d00t Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: In your mind Posts: 3,766	whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

06-01-2005, 08:58 AM	#18
jollyperv Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NYC Posts: 3,927	I think I may join the FSC

06-01-2005, 01:08 PM	#22
xxxdesign-net My hips don't lie Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 10,129	btw.. will 2257 affect sexshops..? I mean. when they are displaying their DVDs. they are displaying XXX content..

06-01-2005, 01:38 PM	#26
teksonline So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: At My Desk Posts: 2,904	define sexually explicit, a love scene simulated or not, is sexually explicit