GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   So, anyone manage to get any 2257 id's for actors in DVD movies yet? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=474878)

jollyperv 05-31-2005 04:59 PM

So, anyone manage to get any 2257 id's for actors in DVD movies yet?
 
...Or is this even a requirement? I'd imagine it is, but I'd think it would be a real pain in the ass contacting the producers and convincing them to give you these documents.

xxxice 05-31-2005 05:00 PM

It is going to be very interesting to c what happens :upsidedow

Jace 05-31-2005 05:14 PM

What will be interesting is when the wrong person gets ahold of that info because they claimed to be a "webmaster"....and the porn star gets stalked and killed/raped, and the family sues the USA government for being so irresponsible

jollyperv 05-31-2005 05:16 PM

God damn this is such a clusterfuck. Did they even fucking READ what they signed into law?

Babagirls 05-31-2005 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaceXXX
What will be interesting is when the wrong person gets ahold of that info because they claimed to be a "webmaster"....and the porn star gets stalked and killed/raped, and the family sues the USA government for being so irresponsible

yup. my thoughts exactly. and ironically, i think its going to take something that bad to happen to make the goverment take a second look at what they did wrong & hopefully revise/change it.

jollyperv 05-31-2005 06:03 PM

Hopefully it won't come down to that, but there sure are a lot of sick fucks out there.

teksonline 05-31-2005 06:09 PM

what about titties in R rated flicks? its nudity... hence full 2257 disclosure is needed?
so we get to see Angelina Jolie real address? and whoever else is next to strip for their new role in a movie?

What's gonna be even more funny is the exposure of the substitute model fill ins for these movies...


FOOD FOR THOUGHT.
In a movie they have butt actors and whatnot, so like someone say like George Clooney does a naked scene and they use a butt actor fill in on his ass shot... people
can now find out it was not really his ass and would be a huge embarrasment
to the producers lol...

jollyperv 05-31-2005 07:21 PM

"yo, I'm gonna need the 2257's for those stunt cocks..."
:1orglaugh

SykkBoy 05-31-2005 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaceXXX
What will be interesting is when the wrong person gets ahold of that info because they claimed to be a "webmaster"....and the porn star gets stalked and killed/raped, and the family sues the USA government for being so irresponsible

this is my biggest problem with the new statutes...and you know what sucks? that sick cocksucker Bush and his band of Merry motherfuckers will say "maybe they shouldn't have been in porn".

wjxxx 05-31-2005 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teksonline
what about titties in R rated flicks? its nudity...

but it`s not sexually explicit

Matt_WildCash 05-31-2005 08:13 PM

We are collecting 2257 info and are starting to recieve some of it from the studio's. Most studio's don't have it ready to go so are right now all working on getting it scaned, copied and organized to be sent out

fireorange 05-31-2005 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teksonline
what about titties in R rated flicks? its nudity... hence full 2257 disclosure is needed?
so we get to see Angelina Jolie real address? and whoever else is next to strip for their new role in a movie?

sexually explicit

Please tell me you're not a US webmaster :1orglaugh

jollyperv 05-31-2005 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt_WC
We are collecting 2257 info and are starting to recieve some of it from the studio's. Most studio's don't have it ready to go so are right now all working on getting it scaned, copied and organized to be sent out

So they're just sending them out, no questions asked? This will never fly.

Shoehorn! 05-31-2005 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jollyperv
God damn this is such a clusterfuck. Did they even fucking READ what they signed into law?

Probably not, but thats the government for you.

d00t 06-01-2005 12:37 AM

whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

European Lee 06-01-2005 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d00t
whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

0.00% chance it wont go through.

Because it already has and becomes law on the 23rd :winkwink:

Regards,

Lee

kernelpanic 06-01-2005 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d00t
whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

Depends on how well the FSC does in court.

jollyperv 06-01-2005 08:58 AM

I think I may join the FSC

bdld 06-01-2005 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d00t
whats the % chance this won't actually go through?

it already has gone through

kernelpanic 06-01-2005 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jollyperv
I think I may join the FSC

You should, since it takes an enormous amount of money to continue the fight in court. What the FSC is doing is worthwhile, and will ultimately help to protect your freedom.

xxxjay 06-01-2005 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by European Lee
0.00% chance it wont go through.

Because it already has and becomes law on the 23rd :winkwink:

Regards,

Lee

I disagree...there is a 99.9% it will be delayed.

That is why nobody is in any hurry to pass out the documents and doing so prematurely may actually also be a crime.

Lee is pushing some hotlinking thing that will not help anyone and stands to profit from the fear, so I would ignore what he has to say.

xxxdesign-net 06-01-2005 01:08 PM

btw.. will 2257 affect sexshops..? I mean. when they are displaying their DVDs. they are displaying XXX content..

xxxjay 06-01-2005 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jollyperv
I think I may join the FSC

You should. If it wasn't for the FSC the deadline would just expire without a fight.

Jace 06-01-2005 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay
so I would ignore what he has to say.

most of the people in this business that matter already do

mahoney 06-01-2005 01:13 PM

We are giving out ALL 2257 info
No Problems Here :thumbsup

teksonline 06-01-2005 01:38 PM

define sexually explicit, a love scene simulated or not, is sexually explicit


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123