lol I don't need scare people. They are already scared. I'm bringing up an obvious fact - that those with SE pages don't need to conform to tgp/mgp rules and therefore dont need to use content.

Some people didn't even realize that this was the case. Now they know and now they know there is a way to learn :thumbsup

So why did you bring up 2257's then? You could have just said no content needed - SEO your site... etc. etc.

WG

Your arguement is wrong on so many levels and you just had 2 of the best SE guys in the biz tell you that. If you want to continue with your profiteering...fine.

:2 cents:

Because people are looking for other ways to make money from the internet now that 2257 is getting so sticky... and most people don't know that SE sites can easily become immune to 2257 laws by removing their content.

People are scared about 2257 --- this specific aspect of SE style sites applies to 2257.

I really don't give a shit what other SEO's think... I don't expect any support from my competition :1orglaugh

I've never got any love from other SEO's on this board but I have got lots of new clients... I don't expect anything to change... you and the other haters reply while people who don't reply are the ones hiring me on icq :thumbsup

Maybe if you repeat that enough times, even you'll start to believe it.

Yawn...I've been turning away SEO clients for months -- hell I'll send you the leads if you want them.

Me and WG are technicly competitors, but we still are friends (I like to think we are anyway - haha) so it ain't like that.

I just think what you are doing is wrong.

What is it that I'm doing? People are already worried about 2257.

I'm letting them know that you don't need content to make money from adult and that those worried about 2257 should get into SEO.

2257 is a big wake up call for a lot of people and they are looking for other ways to make money. I'm letting people know what the deal is with SEO and 2257 and how SE webmasters got it made in the shade as far as 2257 goes because we don't need content :D

You can forward those SEO leads to [email protected] :thumbsup

Yep, just as I figured.

I agree. Although people like Jay and Marc from Hoes are technically competitors, we bounce ideas off each other all the time to see what works and what doesn't. I don't see other SEO's as competition I'd like to get rid of but rather an ally to figuring out what the SE's have changed and whats working lately.

WG

lol I'm being sarcastic I don't expect you send me anything :1orglaugh

...damn jojojo, that was one misleading mofu of a title. why don't you stop spamming your SEO stuff already ??? :glugglug

well I've never got any kind of support from you in any of my threads over the years... or from any other seo guy for that matter. All I ever get is criticism... maybe its because I publically post my successful top ten rankings and that pisses of most other SEO guys...

Sheesh.. this thread keeps hitting to the top and just read the header...

"SEO style sites are immune from 2257 laws..." DUH??

Cummon jojojo! :-) OK.. I know ya want to sell shit, but that claim is a bit bold! :winkwink:

So it's OK for me to post your priority ID tag? :)

:1orglaugh

No its not bold... it true... SEO style sites don't need content and/or can remove all content and thus are immune...

Any site that doesnt use images is immune.

When I had been "been doing SEO for last 2.5 years" (notice the .5 - haha) - I would have done some newbie shit like that. You have never even been on my radar until now and it isn't becasue of your SEO -- it's your shitty ethics that got you noticed.

Maybe you get so much "criticism" because you are easy not to like. You claim your are not profiteering off 2257, but look at the title of this thread.

I wonder how your "clients" must feel..that is...if you have any by the time this thread is over.

You don't need a priority ID tag when you use this backdoor url to submit - just type in any 23 characters and it will work :winkwink:
http://www.google.com/priority_id_su...rs/submit.html

lol how is posting examples of top ten rankings "newbie shit"??

It's because of those examples that I have got so many new clients.

I have never seen another self proclaimed seo guy post an example of a top ten result. Most seo guys are nothing but fancy lipservice.

I never said I wasn't profitting from 2257 laws :1orglaugh

I said don't make it out like I am ripping people off or acting unethically by providing people with the truth about seo and how if you work the se's only you don't even have to worry about the 2257 laws.

Sure ain't what the header says!! :-)

It does say that SEO sites are immune from USC 2257 - not that they are immune as long as you remove all images/content.

There could be one hell of a lot of use of browser back keys if the imagery ain't there! BUT.. often words speak louder! :-) Like in this instance....

only a dumb shit gives away the best cards in the deck...

yes you must read the first few lines of the thread to understand what I am talking about.. sorry to put you through all that effort - maybe they should make the titles accept 1000 characters... :1orglaugh

Dude, so you are building "a site with no content" -- meaning when some is looking for "hardcore porn videos" and they get to your site: There will be none there. So basicly, you are just building a bunch of doorway pages.

Wow, real cutting edge.

well yeah its much better to send them to a paysite and let them pay for the hardcore content.

who said anything about cutting edge lol?? :1orglaugh

I'm building sites that get ranked high for big terms and send traffic to paysites where the surfer buys a membership :thumbsup :1orglaugh

IE: doorway pages.

Wow, very 1998.

Just because a site you get to has nothing but ads and links to sponsors you call that a doorway page lol? call it what you want... I don't need to use any free samples to get the surfer to click into the paysite.

I'd rather have a domain with a FPA on it get ranked vs a gallery etc...

what exactly is your point? :1orglaugh

Here's a little newsflash for you: any page/site that ISN'T a paysite would be considered a "doorway" to a paysite. :1orglaugh

It's time to break out the big guns:
http://g.myspace.com/00047/37/64/47634673_l.jpg

lol..this thread is like a micro-study of gfy stuborness. On the one hand ypu have a guy endlessly trying to cash in on a current events issue and on the other you have the bullheaded webmasters that are expressing their hate of spam [unless it is their own] by refusing to understand what he meant to say.

lol very well put... I am very gracious for their bumps :thumbsup

just pleaaaaaaaaaase stop with the cats :mad: :Oh crap they are haunting me :helpme

Please don't call me a webmaster...it is like calling black people hahahahahahas...very derogitory.

Yeah, you are looking good too. I guess even bad publicity is good.

:upsidedow

It's not bad publicty when the only one hating on you is a righteous competitor :1orglaugh

adult webmasters don't give a shit about what you are saying. They are interested in:

a) how to make more money
b) how to protect their own ass

Learning seo helps them achieve both things - icq me people.

Mmmmm.. getting hot in here...

Thats two nice pussies you got there xxxjay! :)

lol wtf are you talking about thats not me :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

that would be some creative marketing though lol you give me too much credit.

THANKS MAN! :)

LISTEN TO SLUMPBUSTER:
http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fus...20050530035424