RealityCash Gallery affiliates and 2257 - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

woj · 05-26-2005, 03:31 PM

50..........

Eagleman · 05-26-2005, 04:24 PM

good stuff lens, keep up

PlugRush Sascha · 05-26-2005, 04:27 PM

Good work on setting an example, Reality Cash.

josian · 05-26-2005, 04:28 PM

I dont get it, how can a webmaster be compliant if he or she didnt have the actual record for all the models hes using on the galleries???
Maybe your galleries are 100 compliant(realitycash), but the webmasters who use them will go to jail if they dont have the actual record for each of the models in their homes or office.

chri$tian · 05-26-2005, 04:31 PM

There is now way those FHG's are 100% compliant for your webmaster or even for your self.... You mean to tell me you have ALL the paperwork for all that content in your office? Not trying to piss in your breakfast but, 99.9% of all webmaster are NOT in comliance with the NEW laws.

josian · 05-26-2005, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlasChris

There is now way those FHG's are 100% compliant for your webmaster or even for your self.... You mean to tell me you have ALL the paperwork for all that content in your office? Not trying to piss in your breakfast but, 99.9% of all webmaster are NOT in comliance with the NEW laws.

yep, and all the banners showed here in the forum, including the signatures, will need to have the records for each model.

DWB · 05-26-2005, 04:50 PM

Nice Lensman. Way to be on top of shit.

With that said, lets all gather together in prayer for an injunction.

sicone · 05-26-2005, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlasChris

There is now way those FHG's are 100% compliant for your webmaster or even for your self.... You mean to tell me you have ALL the paperwork for all that content in your office? Not trying to piss in your breakfast but, 99.9% of all webmaster are NOT in comliance with the NEW laws.

That is exactly what I'm telling you. We have ALL the paperwork for ever every model, every shoot and all other content appearing on our site(s).

If you choose to do business half assed thats your choice, but here its 100% or not used at all. Ask some of our shooters that I get after on a daily basis when they dont send in all the materials needed.

As far as for webmasters who submit make and submit their own galleries... please re read the first post of the thread. We have the solutions for you and you will be taken care of.

Relax, the sky is only falling for those who are jokes in the business, those who keep sloppy records or no records at all.

chri$tian · 05-26-2005, 05:10 PM

More power to you if you were able to collect ALL ID's and ALL model releses from the 30+ content companies you bought content from.

But for most webmaster i'm sure that is not the case, and i'm sure every affiliate of yours doe'nt have these copies at there office/home.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone

That is exactly what I'm telling you. We have ALL the paperwork for ever every model, every shoot and all other content appearing on our site(s).

If you choose to do business half assed thats your choice, but here its 100% or not used at all. Ask some of our shooters that I get after on a daily basis when they dont send in all the materials needed.

As far as for webmasters who submit make and submit their own galleries... please re read the first post of the thread. We have the solutions for you and you will be taken care of.

Relax, the sky is only falling for those who are jokes in the business, those who keep sloppy records or no records at all.

Za Ha · 05-26-2005, 05:18 PM

If I crop your galleries for my site how can I protect myself from 2257?

hammer2001 · 05-26-2005, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlasChris

More power to you if you were able to collect ALL ID's and ALL model releses from the 30+ content companies you bought content from.

But for most webmaster i'm sure that is not the case, and i'm sure every affiliate of yours doe'nt have these copies at there office/home.

True dat. But isn't it nice to see 9 outta 10 newbies in this thread replying ''wow way to go this is great'' ''always on top of da game"?

Lensman · 05-26-2005, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by josian

I dont get it, how can a webmaster be compliant if he or she didnt have the actual record for all the models hes using on the galleries???
Maybe your galleries are 100 compliant(realitycash), but the webmasters who use them will go to jail if they dont have the actual record for each of the models in their homes or office.

Maybe you should reread my announcement:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman

2. Building galleries?

Adult.com will make sure you can be 2257 compliant before the new regulations are enforced. We will have three solutions to choose from. More on this soon.

Spunky · 05-26-2005, 05:40 PM

When I close off all submissions..It's good to know

Lensman · 05-26-2005, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlasChris

More power to you if you were able to collect ALL ID's and ALL model releses from the 30+ content companies you bought content from.

But for most webmaster i'm sure that is not the case, and i'm sure every affiliate of yours doe'nt have these copies at there office/home.

The 2000+ galleries in RealityCash are ALL SHOT BY US! We have ALL THE RECORDS. They are all ready to go. RIGHT NOW!

Lensman · 05-26-2005, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Za Ha

If I crop your galleries for my site how can I protect myself from 2257?

Make sure to use softcore pics for your thumbs, then link to our FHGs.

If you want to build galleries, we will have 3 solutions to choose from, ALL will have your ass covered for 2257. More on this soon.

bdld · 05-26-2005, 05:57 PM

Reality Cash is the ONLY big sponsor to step up and keep affiliates informed and prepared.

sicone · 05-26-2005, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman

The 2000+ galleries in RealityCash are ALL SHOT BY US! We have ALL THE RECORDS. They are all ready to go. RIGHT NOW!

I guess it just sounds better coming from you

AtlasChris, Your right, i'd say there is a large % of webmasters who are not compliant even with the old laws. Kinda sad actually. For people promoting us, we have the answers for you, we will do everything on our end to help you be compliant (with our content), the rest is on you to do what needs to be done.

The Other Sweetie · 05-26-2005, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalai lama
http://galleries.adult.com/reality/...=MzMyMzoxNToxMA
Links to http://www.adult.com/2257/2257.html

Lensman/Adult.com, you are missing the model releases on this page.

These are ok for the old law.With the exception of changing the wording for the text link and adding in our physical address, that gallery is compliant with the new laws as well.

The gallery was made by us, the content is ours, is published and hosted on our server. We have a online database that is fully compliant and accessible by the DOJ as well as hard copies for that (and all sets) here in the office available for inspection during business hours.

Can you please show me where its not compliant?

Uhh, well actually Dalai Lama's point caught my eye for a different reason. According to the new regs, each subdomain must have a 2257 statement. That gallery, which is on the galleries.adult.com subdomain, has the 2257 statement linked to the main adult.com domain. A 2257 statement link really should be on galleries.adult.com/2257 (or whatever you choose to name it), not www.adult.com.

iwantchixx · 05-26-2005, 06:23 PM

See guys? It's NOT the end of the world!

Lensman · 05-27-2005, 12:24 AM

Each root subdomain must have the link to the 2257 statement, www.adult.com does, galleries.adult.com doesn't (but will tomorrow even though we don't have to for almost a month).

But sweetie, it doesn't say that the 2257 disclosure statment hase to be on the same subdomain, or even the domain, that it's linked from, as far as we can tell. Where do you see this?

The Other Sweetie · 05-27-2005, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman

Each root subdomain must have the link to the 2257 statement, www.adult.com does, galleries.adult.com doesn't (but will tomorrow even though we don't have to for almost a month).

But sweetie, it doesn't say that the 2257 disclosure statment hase to be on the same subdomain, or even the domain, that it's linked from, as far as we can tell. Where do you see this?

Far be it from me to tell you how to run your site. I'm sure you pay more for your attorney than I do mine; however, it does say that each 2257 statement must cover all applicable material on that particular level. Technically speaking, the contents of that specific gallery previously posted should have its 2257 linked to that level subdomain (in this case, galleries.adult.com) since that is where the sexually explicit material appears.

"...Each subdomain thus has its own homepage and each homepage must feature the statement.

For example, http://www.usdoj.gov is the full domain name of the Web site of the Department of Justice. http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal is the Web page of the Criminal Division, which is hosted by the Department's Web site. Under this rule, http://www.usdoj.gov would be required to have a statement and that statement would cover anything contained on http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal.

**However, http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov is a subdomain of the full domain http://www.usdoj.gov and would be required to have its own statement on that page, which would then cover any material on a Web page linked to it, such as http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/,..."

Lensman · 05-30-2005, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevo

Content Maker keeps records. RealtyCash is now forced to keeps records. Do people linking to RealityCash also have to keep records? Thats too much, if so...

Only if you use a thumb or pic that should explicit sexual contact. Softcore pic is OK and no records need to be kept, a censored pic (with a black mark over the penetration) is not OK.

New Hope · 05-30-2005, 09:35 PM

Well i guess it's 2257 compliant other than the fact that you didnt use the exact wording the DOJ requires to be on the page that is linked to your statement and that your statement claims that you are exempt because you are not the primary producer :-/

How is this different from the way things used to be? Not shit talking, just trying to understand.

andrej_NDC · 05-31-2005, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman

Make sure to use softcore pics for your thumbs, then link to our FHGs.

I think the origin of the thumb is important, if its from a hardcore gallery, doesnt matter if its softcore or not.

jayeff · 05-31-2005, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC

I think the origin of the thumb is important, if its from a hardcore gallery, doesnt matter if its softcore or not.

That's a gray area my lawyer pointed up. Part of the DOJ's language appears to relate to the specific image you are showing (although even that leaves ambiguity as to whether a cropped-to-softcore image can be regarded as softcore) and part to the complete photo-session from which the image is taken (which actually makes more sense since their aim is to ensure that minors are not involved in making porn).

A potential problem arising from that interpretation, is that even if you attempt to play safe and insist on softcore images pointing at softcore-only photosets, content providers, let alone sponsors putting a few pics into a gallery, may split the output of shoots into several sets. You may believe you are linking to a softcore photoshoot, when in fact you are not.

05-26-2005, 03:31 PM	#51
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	50.......... __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

05-26-2005, 04:27 PM	#53
PlugRush Sascha Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Germany Posts: 2,772	Good work on setting an example, Reality Cash. __________________ Plugrush - Push ads, native ads, banners & pops. Buy & sell adult and mainstream traffic. Skype plugrushsascha

05-26-2005, 04:28 PM	#54
josian Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Surrounded By RealMamis! Posts: 276	I dont get it, how can a webmaster be compliant if he or she didnt have the actual record for all the models hes using on the galleries??? Maybe your galleries are 100 compliant(realitycash), but the webmasters who use them will go to jail if they dont have the actual record for each of the models in their homes or office. __________________ Full videos and hundreds of pics of this big tits beauty available for sale. Exclusive and semi-exclusive available.

05-26-2005, 04:31 PM	#55
chri$tian Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Charleston, SC Posts: 2,468	There is now way those FHG's are 100% compliant for your webmaster or even for your self.... You mean to tell me you have ALL the paperwork for all that content in your office? Not trying to piss in your breakfast but, 99.9% of all webmaster are NOT in comliance with the NEW laws. __________________ http://www.3dsex.com

05-26-2005, 05:40 PM	#63
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,947	When I close off all submissions..It's good to know __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

05-26-2005, 04:24 PM	#52
Eagleman Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 104	good stuff lens, keep up

05-26-2005, 04:50 PM	#57
DWB Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Encrypted. Access denied. Posts: 31,779	Nice Lensman. Way to be on top of shit. With that said, lets all gather together in prayer for an injunction.

05-26-2005, 05:18 PM	#60
Za Ha Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Still lost Posts: 5,112	If I crop your galleries for my site how can I protect myself from 2257?

05-26-2005, 05:57 PM	#66
bdld $100,000 Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 11,452	Reality Cash is the ONLY big sponsor to step up and keep affiliates informed and prepared.

05-26-2005, 06:23 PM	#69
iwantchixx Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: The Boonies Posts: 12,860	See guys? It's NOT the end of the world!

05-27-2005, 12:24 AM	#70
Lensman GFY Chaperone Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Adult.com Posts: 9,846	Each root subdomain must have the link to the 2257 statement, www.adult.com does, galleries.adult.com doesn't (but will tomorrow even though we don't have to for almost a month). But sweetie, it doesn't say that the 2257 disclosure statment hase to be on the same subdomain, or even the domain, that it's linked from, as far as we can tell. Where do you see this?

05-30-2005, 09:35 PM	#73
New Hope Registered User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 15	Well i guess it's 2257 compliant other than the fact that you didnt use the exact wording the DOJ requires to be on the page that is linked to your statement and that your statement claims that you are exempt because you are not the primary producer :-/ How is this different from the way things used to be? Not shit talking, just trying to understand.