GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   2247 Solutions : Online service for both producers and webmasters... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=472173)

latinasojourn 05-25-2005 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusionx
Use the EXIF or IPTC info that is stored within the JPEG image. Software can easily read the data during a scan.

Every JPEG can contain it's own data linking back to a database.

Unfortunately, GIF doesn't support this.. but who cares about gifs anyway :)

yes, thanks for reminding me of that.

breezebrowser can do a sort like that i think.

jonesy 05-25-2005 10:09 PM
Aaron

showed your screen shot of your 2257 software and the thread to a few friends in the progaming field tonight just to get a heads up - got a very detailed one - gotta tell ya man im impressed.

ronaldo 05-25-2005 10:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusionx
I just read this:

J.D. Obenberger, principal in the Chicago law firm J.D. Obenberger & Associates, noticed a number of things ?sidestepped? by the Justice Department when it drafted the final regulations. Obenberger went so far as to call the issues ?ignored.? Among them is the economic burden imposed on Web cam operators by the requirement that they archive and include with their records a copy of every live broadcast. The legality of collecting and filing multiple, redundant IDs ? often encouraged when dealing with new models ? is another gray area Obenberger feels should have been addressed for the benefit of both the adult industry and the government. ?Producers are prohibited by law from having more than one form of ID with any one record,? Obenberger says. ?You can go to jail for [violating] that. It just makes sense for a producer to copy more than one ID, because [an underage] girl might have a fake driver?s license saying she?s 21, but it?s unlikely she?d have two IDs that match.?


No idea if it's valid, but as an FYI...

Here's the source:

http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=227704

9th paragraph down
WTF??? Do I read this correctly?

?Producers are prohibited by law from having more than one form of ID with any one record,? Obenberger says. ?You can go to jail for [violating] that. It just makes sense for a producer to copy more than one ID, because [an underage] girl might have a fake driver?s license saying she?s 21, but it?s unlikely she?d have two IDs that match.?

So, a producer protects himself by ensuring that the model is of LEGAL age (what these new 2257 regulations are meant to do, mind you) by getting more than one piece of ID, and THAT is against the law?

If I read that correctly, than that really shows where the DOJ's mindset really is. Just in case you had any question about it.

BTW, your idea looks good Aaron. You'll make your money back in NO time if you so choose.

AaronM 05-25-2005 11:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesy
Aaron

showed your screen shot of your 2257 software and the thread to a few friends in the progaming field tonight just to get a heads up - got a very detailed one - gotta tell ya man im impressed.

Thank you....But I have to give credit where credit is due.

I have had a lot of input from others about this. I combined their input with my ideas and handed it over to Stuart.

He's the brains of this operation. :winkwink:

jonesy 05-26-2005 12:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
Thank you....But I have to give credit where credit is due.

I have had a lot of input from others about this. I combined their input with my ideas and handed it over to Stuart.

He's the brains of this operation. :winkwink:
i shouldve mentioned your crew also :thumbsup .

posting those screenshots tells me a lot about you aaron and it changed my perception of you and im not talking about your ball breaking board persona :1orglaugh

coming up with the idea back when talk of changes to 2257 were first made public, (which was how long ago?) is what really impressed me.

StuartD 05-26-2005 04:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
Thank you....But I have to give credit where credit is due.

I have had a lot of input from others about this. I combined their input with my ideas and handed it over to Stuart.

He's the brains of this operation. :winkwink:
hehe... thanks, but I'm just a piece of the pie. There's no way in hell I could have scripted anything even close to compliant on my own.
As I said before, I just follow directions well :winkwink:

Matt_WildCash 05-26-2005 04:34 AM
AaronM hit me up matt at wildcash.com when you have your solution setup sounds good so far, as long as price isn't overly expensive sounds like a nice service

Taboo 05-26-2005 05:15 AM
<------------------------------
Aaron, put me on your waiting list - very nice setup. kudos to you and Stuart.

and Thanks to galleryseek for creating this thread. :thumbsup

hopefully the MODS can rename the title to 2257 so we can all search for this thread when search comes back.

pornguy 05-26-2005 10:29 AM
Anyone that would like to help put Aaron, send him a dontation to help cover legal fees.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:06 PM.
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123