Sponsor closes their sites because of new 2257 (BadGirlBucks) - GoFuckYourself.com

fireorange · 05-24-2005, 11:08 AM

Just got this e-mail from a sponsor:

After careful consideration, MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com will no longer be accepting new sales as of June 1st, 2005. We have decided to remove these 2 sites from our program due to the recent signing of the new 2257 regulations. We will continue to produce "non-explicit" tease sites for you to promote.

There is "no need" to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st. The members area of each site will continue to be accessible until all members have cancelled. You will continue to receive credit for any and all rebills. You will continue to receive credit for every person you send.

We value you as an affiliate and will continue to help make you the most money on your traffic.

All of our other sites will continue to operate as is.
Thank you for promoting BadGirlBucks!
http://www.BadGirlBucks.com

Basic_man · 05-24-2005, 11:10 AM

Damn, that sucks big time. I'm wondering why they are closing their doors..

Phoenix · 05-24-2005, 11:11 AM

they closed just two sites..and wisely

looks like they will continue to operate their other sites?

a proper title would have been.."some" of their sites

;)

FunForOne · 05-24-2005, 11:12 AM

I wonder if the 2257 regulation might end up being a scape goat for under-performing sites as well.

who · 05-24-2005, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne

I wonder if the 2257 regulation might end up being a scape goat for under-performing sites as well.

Spot on.

xNetworx · 05-24-2005, 11:14 AM

They are only closing 2 sites fucktard

StuartD · 05-24-2005, 11:15 AM

got that email as well...
yeah, they definitely have more than 2 sites... so they're not closed by any means. Just shutting down 2 of their sites.

thonglife · 05-24-2005, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fireorange

Just got this e-mail from a sponsor:

After careful consideration, MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com will no longer be accepting new sales as of June 1st, 2005. We have decided to remove these 2 sites from our program due to the recent signing of the new 2257 regulations. We will continue to produce "non-explicit" tease sites for you to promote.

There is "no need" to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st. The members area of each site will continue to be accessible until all members have cancelled. You will continue to receive credit for any and all rebills. You will continue to receive credit for every person you send.

We value you as an affiliate and will continue to help make you the most money on your traffic.

All of our other sites will continue to operate as is.
Thank you for promoting BadGirlBucks!
http://www.BadGirlBucks.com

I once had to "remind" them to put a 2257 statement on an already published site. Makes me really wonder about them.

thonglife · 05-24-2005, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne

I wonder if the 2257 regulation might end up being a scape goat for under-performing sites as well.

Yup yup..

fireorange · 05-24-2005, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpporn

They are only closing 2 sites fucktard

I'm so offended, not.

Bump.

cherrylula · 05-24-2005, 11:39 AM

geez, well bye bye links to all their sites then. And I just started getting SE traffic too, awww shucks.

what's with all these reckless solo girl sites? More people who don't want to pay the girl to keep up the site I suppose. Gee, go figure they have to take them down.

AaronM · 05-24-2005, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula

what's with all these reckless solo girl sites? More people who don't want to pay the girl to keep up the site I suppose. Gee, go figure they have to take them down.

The problem, as I see it, is that many of the people who are launching these solo girl sites are doing so because they have seen programs such as Lightspeed who are successful with solo sites.

Many of these new sites are run by people who have no traffic, no money to buy traffic, and do not have an established affiliate base.

Because of this, the sites under perform. The site owners do not make much money with them and it's difficult to justify the continued expense of producing updates when the dollars are not coming in as they expected.

This is a common newbie mistake.

who · 05-24-2005, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thonglife

I once had to "remind" them to put a 2257 statement on an already published site. Makes me really wonder about them.

Oh no... more dramatic implications. Let me guess, underage performers?

No, no no no no no no

Just.. no.

thonglife · 05-24-2005, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .?.

Oh no... more dramatic implications. Let me guess, underage performers?

No, no no no no no no

Just.. no.

Nah... I know that's what you were getting a hard-on for though. It makes me wonder if anyone is paying attention.. to things such as coding.

FunForOne · 05-24-2005, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

The problem, as I see it, is that many of the people who are launching these solo girl sites are doing so because they have seen programs such as Lightspeed who are successful with solo sites.

Many of these new sites are run by people who have no traffic, no money to buy traffic, and do not have an established affiliate base.

Because of this, the sites under perform. The site owners do not make much money with them and it's difficult to justify the continued expense of producing updates when the dollars are not coming in as they expected.

This is a common newbie mistake.

In my opinion, very few girls are qualified to run a solo site. They have to have that "I"ve got to see more of her" appeal. It takes more than beauty to pull that off. Part of that is in the implied personallity of the girl.

Also, I imagine to stay profitable, they have to go out of their way to make the site interactive and keep members. Generally, in business, is cheaper to keep the customers you have than to get new ones.

There is a solo gal on gfy with big boobs and blonde hair that does it correctly.

rockbear · 05-24-2005, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .?.

Oh no... more dramatic implications. Let me guess, underage performers?

No, no no no no no no

Just.. no.

I'm thinking the same thing. Why that sponsor close only 2 sites? That smell not good at all.

detoxed · 05-24-2005, 11:57 AM

I love solo girls

fris · 05-24-2005, 11:59 AM

they bought their content off simon synester. why do you think?

Turf · 05-24-2005, 12:02 PM

without having seen the members area i would say that they must have another reason for closing down those 2 sites.. they are pretty non risque if you ask me..

eroswebmaster · 05-24-2005, 12:03 PM

LOL why shut down missymonroe.com it's not like you couldn't get the 2557 info...she's here in Vegas.

bigdog · 05-24-2005, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

The problem, as I see it, is that many of the people who are launching these solo girl sites are doing so because they have seen programs such as Lightspeed who are successful with solo sites.

Many of these new sites are run by people who have no traffic, no money to buy traffic, and do not have an established affiliate base.

Because of this, the sites under perform. The site owners do not make much money with them and it's difficult to justify the continued expense of producing updates when the dollars are not coming in as they expected.

This is a common newbie mistake.

good post

solo girl sites with revshare programs are a dime a dozen these days, unless you got a lot of your own traffic i think you will be in deep shit trying to get affilates.

James White · 05-24-2005, 12:11 PM

BadGirlBucks is a really good program, ive talked to the owners for a long time now, they have a VERY tight program as far as i have seen. They have told me they do everything inhouse, is this not true?

AaronM · 05-24-2005, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James White

BadGirlBucks is a really good program, ive talked to the owners for a long time now, they have a VERY tight program as far as i have seen. They have told me they do everything inhouse, is this not true?

I checked out the 2 sites that they are closing down. Neither girl was worth a solo site in the first place.

Although NONE of the sites of theirs that I looked at contain a legal 2257 declaration, the Missy Monroe site specifically mentions "SYNISTER FILMS" which tells me that they are not producing this stuff in house.

Nickatilynx · 05-24-2005, 12:54 PM

I gotta agree with Aaron on this.

But if anyone wants to sell me sites , I may be buying , so nice being in Canada ,eh

icq 8042030

Shooting_Manic · 05-24-2005, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

The problem, as I see it, is that many of the people who are launching these solo girl sites are doing so because they have seen programs such as Lightspeed who are successful with solo sites.

Many of these new sites are run by people who have no traffic, no money to buy traffic, and do not have an established affiliate base.

Because of this, the sites under perform. The site owners do not make much money with them and it's difficult to justify the continued expense of producing updates when the dollars are not coming in as they expected.

This is a common newbie mistake.

So very correct. You can make any site convert, ugly, fat, whatever if you have traffic and a budget to make it happen. Starting a new program, with no traffic and no money behind it is bound to fail. Theres way to many established site options out there for the little guy to just throw up a site and expect traffic and sales to be there. Some serious players are getting into this market, programs with the resources it takes to really make it happen. They have the traffic, backend and budget. This market is going to get very interesting over the next 6 months.

Point being, if you cant send at least 10k a day of traffic to the site, day one on your own, then you should rethink this market or any market for that matter.

crockett · 05-24-2005, 01:08 PM

The reason it was only those two sites from the looks of it, is because those two were their only "nude" sites. The rest are all non-nude tease sites.. They also probably don't preform as well being most of their affiliates are probably NN webmasters as they are their own little niche..

thonglife · 05-24-2005, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fireorange

Just got this e-mail from a sponsor:

After careful consideration, MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com will no longer be accepting new sales as of June 1st, 2005. We have decided to remove these 2 sites from our program due to the recent signing of the new 2257 regulations. We will continue to produce "non-explicit" tease sites for you to promote.

There is "no need" to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st. The members area of each site will continue to be accessible until all members have cancelled. You will continue to receive credit for any and all rebills. You will continue to receive credit for every person you send.

We value you as an affiliate and will continue to help make you the most money on your traffic.

All of our other sites will continue to operate as is.
Thank you for promoting BadGirlBucks!
http://www.BadGirlBucks.com

I laughed at this part too. "There is 'no need' to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st."

Yes.. surfers like misleading and dead links.

psyko514 · 05-24-2005, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

I checked out the 2 sites that they are closing down. Neither girl was worth a solo site in the first place.

Although NONE of the sites of theirs that I looked at contain a legal 2257 declaration, the Missy Monroe site specifically mentions "SYNISTER FILMS" which tells me that they are not producing this stuff in house.

Very few of their sites require a legal 2257 declaration in the first place

05-24-2005, 11:08 AM	#1
fireorange Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,648	Sponsor closes their sites because of new 2257 (BadGirlBucks) Just got this e-mail from a sponsor: After careful consideration, MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com will no longer be accepting new sales as of June 1st, 2005. We have decided to remove these 2 sites from our program due to the recent signing of the new 2257 regulations. We will continue to produce "non-explicit" tease sites for you to promote. There is "no need" to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st. The members area of each site will continue to be accessible until all members have cancelled. You will continue to receive credit for any and all rebills. You will continue to receive credit for every person you send. We value you as an affiliate and will continue to help make you the most money on your traffic. All of our other sites will continue to operate as is. Thank you for promoting BadGirlBucks! http://www.BadGirlBucks.com

05-24-2005, 11:10 AM	#2
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	Damn, that sucks big time. I'm wondering why they are closing their doors.. __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

05-24-2005, 11:11 AM	#3
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,469	they closed just two sites..and wisely looks like they will continue to operate their other sites? a proper title would have been.."some" of their sites ;) __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

05-24-2005, 11:15 AM	#7
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	got that email as well... yeah, they definitely have more than 2 sites... so they're not closed by any means. Just shutting down 2 of their sites. __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

05-24-2005, 11:59 AM	#18
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,446	they bought their content off simon synester. why do you think? __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.

05-24-2005, 11:12 AM	#4
FunForOne Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: USA Posts: 8,704	I wonder if the 2257 regulation might end up being a scape goat for under-performing sites as well.

05-24-2005, 11:14 AM	#6
xNetworx So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Whore Island Posts: 14,445	They are only closing 2 sites fucktard

05-24-2005, 11:39 AM	#11
cherrylula lol Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 15,969	geez, well bye bye links to all their sites then. And I just started getting SE traffic too, awww shucks. what's with all these reckless solo girl sites? More people who don't want to pay the girl to keep up the site I suppose. Gee, go figure they have to take them down.

05-24-2005, 11:57 AM	#17
detoxed vip member Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 17,798	I love solo girls

05-24-2005, 12:02 PM	#19
Turf Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: ICQ: 64644691 Posts: 1,865	without having seen the members area i would say that they must have another reason for closing down those 2 sites.. they are pretty non risque if you ask me.. __________________ Daddy Strokes - mature men stroking their meat Mature Gay Movies - mature men fucking everyone! Pleasing Daddy - young girls fucking mature men Looking for submitter accounts for older men niche content (both gay and straight) so hit me up if you run a tube and offer submitter accounts for paysites.

05-24-2005, 12:03 PM	#20
eroswebmaster March 1st, 2003 Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Seat 4 @ Venetian Poker Room Posts: 20,295	LOL why shut down missymonroe.com it's not like you couldn't get the 2557 info...she's here in Vegas. __________________ For rent - ICQ 127-027-910 Click here for more details

05-24-2005, 12:11 PM	#22
James White Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Dirty South, Atlanta ICQ# : 191-402-709 Posts: 1,405	BadGirlBucks is a really good program, ive talked to the owners for a long time now, they have a VERY tight program as far as i have seen. They have told me they do everything inhouse, is this not true?

05-24-2005, 12:54 PM	#24
Nickatilynx Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: International Gypsy Posts: 819	I gotta agree with Aaron on this. But if anyone wants to sell me sites , I may be buying , so nice being in Canada ,eh icq 8042030

05-24-2005, 01:08 PM	#26
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,818	The reason it was only those two sites from the looks of it, is because those two were their only "nude" sites. The rest are all non-nude tease sites.. They also probably don't preform as well being most of their affiliates are probably NN webmasters as they are their own little niche.. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.