Is xxxjay against the protection of Children in the porn industry? - GoFuckYourself.com

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 04:29 AM

I don't understand why you would post the link to this article and then make statements that seem to disagree with Bush and his idea to simply make the produces of porn prove the age of the models.

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Producers of sexually explicit material must be able to prove the subjects depicted in their photographs and films are adults, according to new government regulations approved Tuesday by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Porn producers must keep detailed records that verify the identity and age of each individual depicted. The new regulations, to be published in the Federal Register, also update the definition of "pornography producers" to include producers of visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct published on the Internet.

You responded like this:
We are all fucked now...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/17/ch...regs/index.html

He's got plenty of time, judicial appointments, and further regulations left to hammer us out of existance base over the next couple years to appease his right wing Christian.

Congratulations assholes.

...Watch out people, Geroge Bush is trying to make child porn harder to produce in America...

You guys are fucking pathetic. Lets talk about the subject rather than to declare everything that Bush has to say as absolutely wrong.

It's been taken to the point as to where George Bush doesn't approve of child porn, so democrats consider that mentality wrong and try to protest the protection of children in America from being in the porn industry as illegal models.

...or, you're just a stupid fuck that posted the article without reading it.

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 04:36 AM

You = idiot

Sleazy, feel free to use this as you see fit as it covers the 8 character rule.

mikeylikesit · 05-21-2005, 04:37 AM

you are the dumbest person i have ever had the pleasure of reading a post from

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 04:42 AM

Woah, I can't see shit behind all of the liberal small talk. Make a point that goes beyond the value of a petty insult you big bad webmaster bad asses.

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

Woah, I can't see shit behind all of the liberal small talk. Make a point that goes beyond the value of a petty insult you big bad webmaster bad asses.

How about you have your head so far up your ass you can't make sense of a simple to understand post?

xxxjay · 05-21-2005, 04:46 AM

Fuck off you fucking dickface. If I knew anything about the production of CP I would turn the fuckers in the the police MYSELF!

You ought to get your ass kicked for this thread.

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay

Fuck off you fucking dickface. If I knew anything about the production of CP I would turn the fuckers in the the police MYSELF!

You ought to get your ass kicked for this thread.

Don't get heated jay, this is what happens when retards try to talk politics.

mikeylikesit · 05-21-2005, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

Woah, I can't see shit behind all of the liberal small talk. Make a point that goes beyond the value of a petty insult you big bad webmaster bad asses.

first off nice copy and paste to a 404 dumbass.... second you are a dumbass.... third yep you are a dumbass and have no idea what you are talking about and just want to whore you hosting referral

the regs DO NOT protect children whatsoever and you should have your ass kicked and if you are not banned for accusing somebdoy of that then this board is lame

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeylikesit

first off nice copy and paste to a 404 dumbass.... second you are a dumbass.... third yep you are a dumbass and have no idea what you are talking about and just want to whore you hosting referral

the regs DO NOT protect children whatsoever

Not to mention that even if they did he knows completely fuck all about them?

baddog · 05-21-2005, 04:50 AM

I think they are saying you are an idiot for implying that xxxjay is against protecting kids. I don't think they are addressing the question because you had such an inane topic title.

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

I think they are saying you are an idiot for implying that xxxjay is against protecting kids. I don't think they are addressing the question because you had such an inane topic title.

Such a gentleman baddog. Fuck this guy and his ignorant ass. If he had looked past the flashy news headlines before opening his stupid mouth he wouldn't be getting this response. He's just as bad as the Christian extremists that want to send us to hell on an express train.

StuartD · 05-21-2005, 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

I think they are saying you are an idiot for implying that xxxjay is against protecting kids. I don't think they are addressing the question because you had such an inane topic title.

Yeah, the fact that it's obvious to everyone in the industry why people are opposed to the new reg's but not obvious to this one person.... also is cause for an "idiot" remark.

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NichePay - StuartD

Yeah, the fact that it's obvious to everyone in the industry why people are opposed to the new reg's but not obvious to this one person.... also is cause for an "idiot" remark.

Good point.

mikeylikesit · 05-21-2005, 04:54 AM

and again after inspection of the sig that would be Chris J Malais in case anybody is interested

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 04:55 AM

The point I was trying to make was that xxxjay looks like a pro child porn producing webmaster when he goes around posting links to anti child porn regulations without any further explaination other than "Fuck mother fuck conservative fuck Christian mother fuck!".

I'm not trying to get picky or technical here. I'm just giving you the point blank reality of being forced into a two party system.

The Other Steve · 05-21-2005, 04:56 AM

Yet another retarded person who has no clue and has not taken the time to read the regulations and consider what they do and do not say.

Please turn yourself in for reprocessing at the earliest convenience because you are consuming valuable oxygen and other vital resources without putting anything of value back into this world.

On a more serious note - don't be a complete idiot - look beyond the Justice Department hype and realise that these regulations are about porn in general and not anything to do with protecting minors.

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

The point I was trying to make was that xxxjay looks like a pro child porn producing webmaster when he goes around posting links to anti child porn regulations without any further explaination other than "Fuck mother fuck conservative fuck Christian mother fuck!".

I'm not trying to get picky or technical here. I'm just giving you the point blank reality of being forced into a two party system.

I give it a 3 out of 10 on the backtrack meter.

mikeylikesit · 05-21-2005, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

The point I was trying to make was that xxxjay looks like a pro child porn producing webmaster when he goes around posting links to anti child porn regulations without any further explaination other than "Fuck mother fuck conservative fuck Christian mother fuck!".

I'm not trying to get picky or technical here. I'm just giving you the point blank reality of being forced into a two party system.

BULLSHIT has gotta be called on that post... it's obvious that you have no idea about the proposed regs and are talking out of your ass

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadglni

Such a gentleman baddog. Fuck this guy and his ignorant ass. If he had looked past the flashy news headlines before opening his stupid mouth he wouldn't be getting this response. He's just as bad as the Christian extremists that want to send us to hell on an express train.

I'm the biggest anti christian on Earth. This isn't about Christianity. This is about webmasters wanting to start a war, rather than to settle with a compromise. This shit isn't as bad as you guys are making it out to be, and what makes it worse is the propaganda like ways you use to get people to side with you.

Atleast I read articles before I post them. If you are against child porn, then don't blindly disagree with another article that is against child porn. It makes you look like a god damned idiot.

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeylikesit

BULLSHIT has gotta be called on that post... it's obvious that you have no idea about the proposed regs and are talking out of your ass

Your post holds about as much water as a near water tight ass hole. Not quite, but nearly.

The Other Steve · 05-21-2005, 05:04 AM

Pea Brain - trust me - there is no compromise - the government wants us out of business - so please get in touch with reality and stop wasting space on GFY's servers with your useless blathering.

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Other Steve

Yet another retarded person who has no clue and has not taken the time to read the regulations and consider what they do and do not say.

Please turn yourself in for reprocessing at the earliest convenience because you are consuming valuable oxygen and other vital resources without putting anything of value back into this world.

On a more serious note - don't be a complete idiot - look beyond the Justice Department hype and realise that these regulations are about porn in general and not anything to do with protecting minors.

Nothing can be said without saying something. When you post an article and say "Stupid dumb conservative christian fuck shit ass bitch", and the article claims to be against child porn, you are the one that is going to be looked down on by more enlightened individuals.

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

I'm the biggest anti christian on Earth. This isn't about Christianity. This is about webmasters wanting to start a war, rather than to settle with a compromise. This shit isn't as bad as you guys are making it out to be, and what makes it worse is the propaganda like ways you use to get people to side with you.

Atleast I read articles before I post them. If you are against child porn, then don't blindly disagree with another article that is against child porn. It makes you look like a god damned idiot.

The only idiot here is you. You read an article that throws a veil over the real issues and anyone that knows what's really up supports child porn? Get fucking real and find a new nickname jackass. Anyone that matters knows exactly what Jays post meant and we don't care how it looks to people with the comprehension of an ape. I have read the article, and obviously much more on the subject than you.

mikeylikesit · 05-21-2005, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

Your post holds about as much water as a near water tight ass hole. Not quite, but nearly.

you are an idiot... PERIOD! have you read the regs? and do you know that if you fuck up your filing for an 80 year old women one time you go to jail for up to 5 years? obviously you haven't or you would know that it isn't about CP it is about getting rid of everything that the gov't decides is "obscene"

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

Nothing can be said without saying something. When you post an article and say "Stupid dumb conservative christian fuck shit ass bitch", and the article claims to be against child porn, you are the one that is going to be looked down on by those with learning disabilities.

I completely agree!

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Other Steve

Pea Brain - trust me - there is no compromise - the government wants us out of business - so please get in touch with reality and stop wasting space on GFY's servers with your useless blathering.

You guys are throwing the Bush intentions way out of line.
Porn is good for the economy. He doesn't want a billion dollar industry to go down the drain.

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadglni

I completely agree, and my dick is grayish yellow!

Nice one sport.

Manowar · 05-21-2005, 05:10 AM

you obviously dont fully understand the situation.

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeylikesit

you are an idiot... PERIOD! have you read the regs? and do you know that if you fuck up your filing for an 80 year old women one time you go to jail for up to 5 years? obviously you haven't or you would know that it isn't about CP it is about getting rid of everything that the gov't decides is "obscene"

You're paranoid.

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

Nice one sport.

How about you quit making a bigger and bigger fool of yourself, read up on the topic at hand, and come back to apologize to Jay when you are really "enlightened".

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadglni

How about you quit making a bigger and bigger fool of yourself, read up on the topic at hand, and come back to apologize to Jay when you are really "enlightened".

Jay doesn't go about the cause in a respectable way.

xxxjay · 05-21-2005, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

I'm the biggest anti christian on Earth. This isn't about Christianity. This is about webmasters wanting to start a war, rather than to settle with a compromise. This shit isn't as bad as you guys are making it out to be, and what makes it worse is the propaganda like ways you use to get people to side with you.

Atleast I read articles before I post them. If you are against child porn, then don't blindly disagree with another article that is against child porn. It makes you look like a god damned idiot.

That explains everything...religion is a cruth for the feeble-minded IMO.

Yeah, I could settle wth comprimise. Even I would agree that it is a little too easy for kids to access porn, but these new 2257 regs are not even close to something you can comprimise with or (I have had bigger more well organised people admit this) even be able to comply with to the letter of the law

And of yeah, fuck you.

I've already emailed this thread to my lawyer - you really should check yourself before you post shit like this.

mikeylikesit · 05-21-2005, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

You're paranoid.

no i'm smart and have actually read something besides one post and article before i commited slander on a public forum with my name in my sig accusing the wrong person of pandering to CP... your best hope now is that this thred gets deleted

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay

I've already emailed this thread to my lawyer - you really should check yourself before you post shit like this.

ruh roh raggy

sweetcuties · 05-21-2005, 05:26 AM

He's from Kentucky enough said... carry on

chadglni · 05-21-2005, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweetcuties

He's from Kentucky enough said... carry on

He also vanished after Jays last post. Maybe he really isn't that stupid after all?

junction · 05-21-2005, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

I don't understand why you would post the link to this article and then make statements that seem to disagree with Bush and his idea to simply make the produces of porn prove the age of the models.

Here is

. Use it to buy a clue you ignorant fucking noob.

guschi2k · 05-21-2005, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

I don't understand why you would post the link to this article and then make statements that seem to disagree with Bush and his idea to simply make the produces of porn prove the age of the models.

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Producers of sexually explicit material must be able to prove the subjects depicted in their photographs and films are adults, according to new government regulations approved Tuesday by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Porn producers must keep detailed records that verify the identity and age of each individual depicted. The new regulations, to be published in the Federal Register, also update the definition of "pornography producers" to include producers of visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct published on the Internet.

You responded like this:
We are all fucked now...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/17/ch...regs/index.html

He's got plenty of time, judicial appointments, and further regulations left to hammer us out of existance base over the next couple years to appease his right wing Christian.

Congratulations assholes.

...Watch out people, Geroge Bush is trying to make child porn harder to produce in America...

You guys are fucking pathetic. Lets talk about the subject rather than to declare everything that Bush has to say as absolutely wrong.

It's been taken to the point as to where George Bush doesn't approve of child porn, so democrats consider that mentality wrong and try to protest the protection of children in America from being in the porn industry as illegal models.

...or, you're just a stupid fuck that posted the article without reading it.

You didn't understand shit. This whole thing isn't just about the protection of children anymore and will pretty much just hurt every honest porn producer and webmaster. The only reason they are selling this shit as a ANTI CH*LDPORN PACKAGE is to gain more public support from dumbf*cks like you, who don't know shit!!!

Kre8t0r · 05-21-2005, 06:10 AM

Wow this thread reached a totally new level of Stupidity!!

Like EVERYONE in this thread has said, read up and get a clue. If you have trouble with that try getting someone with an IQ above the double digit range to read it and explain it to you.

Where's Headless?? I think we have our Donkey of the month here!

P.S. On another note you may also want to do a little praying to "the movement" you defend so much that Jay is in a good mood and doesn't want to take your ignorant ass to court!

Gawdy · 05-21-2005, 07:26 AM

Firstly, Chris you should be banned for this thread.

But you do bring up a good point, when you say: "Porn is good for the economy. He doesn't want a billion dollar industry to go down the drain."

This is what confuses me. Why are they obviously using this back door to try and push US small enterprizes out of business? They obviously are, but why?

StuartD · 05-21-2005, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gawdy

This is what confuses me. Why are they obviously using this back door to try and push US small enterprizes out of business? They obviously are, but why?

Because Bush thinks that God speaks to him, telling that porn is bad.

QuaWee · 05-21-2005, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NichePay - StuartD

Because Bush thinks that God speaks to him, telling that porn is bad.

Gawdy · 05-21-2005, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NichePay - StuartD

Because Bush thinks that God speaks to him, telling that porn is bad.

Yes but he must know that all this will do is push this to other countries and to bigger corporations, so there wont be any less porn just less US webmasters.

radical · 05-21-2005, 08:04 AM

Mate, quite simply you have accused a person on public board, which if you had any real sense, you would have emailed Jay himself if you needed any clarification on this point!

But now you have decided to bring this into the public domain, and guess what your reputation will be destroyed and now your maybe looking at legal action for slander!

From what I know of Jay, even though I don't know him personally I would say he's a webmaster who tries his hardest to protect pple and would report anything remotly linked to cp, the same as all of us!

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 05-21-2005, 08:24 AM

mardigras · 05-21-2005, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ

Bwa!

slackologist · 05-21-2005, 08:37 AM

Not only ignorant, you're a fucking asshole as well. As proved by this thread. Get the fuck out of here.

Chris Malais · 05-21-2005, 02:19 PM

Sue me. I dare you.

I'm poor. You're rich. What do you have to lose? Hell, I just got back from my 9 - 5.

mikeylikesit · 05-21-2005, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais

Sue me. I dare you.

I'm poor. You're rich. What do you have to lose? Hell, I just got back from my 9 - 5.

that must suck to have a 9 to 5 on a saturday....

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 05-21-2005, 02:28 PM

Chris you mention bad use of propaganda...

XXXJAY should not be your target by any means.
Ya need to calm down some. Take it from a guy that knows.

Your going to end up banned.

05-21-2005, 04:29 AM	#1
Chris Malais Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Kentucky Posts: 1,904	Is xxxjay against the protection of Children in the porn industry? I don't understand why you would post the link to this article and then make statements that seem to disagree with Bush and his idea to simply make the produces of porn prove the age of the models. WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Producers of sexually explicit material must be able to prove the subjects depicted in their photographs and films are adults, according to new government regulations approved Tuesday by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Porn producers must keep detailed records that verify the identity and age of each individual depicted. The new regulations, to be published in the Federal Register, also update the definition of "pornography producers" to include producers of visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct published on the Internet. You responded like this: We are all fucked now... http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/17/ch...regs/index.html He's got plenty of time, judicial appointments, and further regulations left to hammer us out of existance base over the next couple years to appease his right wing Christian. Congratulations assholes. ...Watch out people, Geroge Bush is trying to make child porn harder to produce in America... You guys are fucking pathetic. Lets talk about the subject rather than to declare everything that Bush has to say as absolutely wrong. It's been taken to the point as to where George Bush doesn't approve of child porn, so democrats consider that mentality wrong and try to protest the protection of children in America from being in the porn industry as illegal models. ...or, you're just a stupid fuck that posted the article without reading it. __________________ http://www.psychicrevenue.com/pws02901 Free horoscope on your websites. Make some money!

05-21-2005, 04:36 AM	#2
chadglni Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: PEI, Canada Posts: 6,924	You = idiot Sleazy, feel free to use this as you see fit as it covers the 8 character rule. __________________ Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

05-21-2005, 04:37 AM	#3
mikeylikesit The Kink of Hearts Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Fremont Street Posts: 182	you are the dumbest person i have ever had the pleasure of reading a post from __________________ FINALLY A DATING APP SPONSOR FOR AFFILIATES! MAKE MONEY WITH THE NEW HOOKUP APP

05-21-2005, 04:42 AM	#4
Chris Malais Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Kentucky Posts: 1,904	Woah, I can't see shit behind all of the liberal small talk. Make a point that goes beyond the value of a petty insult you big bad webmaster bad asses. __________________ http://www.psychicrevenue.com/pws02901 Free horoscope on your websites. Make some money!

05-21-2005, 04:46 AM	#6
xxxjay Tube groupie. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: LoScandalous, CA Posts: 13,482	Fuck off you fucking dickface. If I knew anything about the production of CP I would turn the fuckers in the the police MYSELF! You ought to get your ass kicked for this thread. __________________ http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

05-21-2005, 04:50 AM	#10
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	I think they are saying you are an idiot for implying that xxxjay is against protecting kids. I don't think they are addressing the question because you had such an inane topic title.

05-21-2005, 04:54 AM	#14
mikeylikesit The Kink of Hearts Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Fremont Street Posts: 182	and again after inspection of the sig that would be Chris J Malais in case anybody is interested __________________ FINALLY A DATING APP SPONSOR FOR AFFILIATES! MAKE MONEY WITH THE NEW HOOKUP APP

05-21-2005, 04:55 AM	#15
Chris Malais Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Kentucky Posts: 1,904	The point I was trying to make was that xxxjay looks like a pro child porn producing webmaster when he goes around posting links to anti child porn regulations without any further explaination other than "Fuck mother fuck conservative fuck Christian mother fuck!". I'm not trying to get picky or technical here. I'm just giving you the point blank reality of being forced into a two party system. __________________ http://www.psychicrevenue.com/pws02901 Free horoscope on your websites. Make some money!

05-21-2005, 04:56 AM	#16
The Other Steve Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Sunny Queensland - perfect one day and better the next. Posts: 2,106	Yet another retarded person who has no clue and has not taken the time to read the regulations and consider what they do and do not say. Please turn yourself in for reprocessing at the earliest convenience because you are consuming valuable oxygen and other vital resources without putting anything of value back into this world. On a more serious note - don't be a complete idiot - look beyond the Justice Department hype and realise that these regulations are about porn in general and not anything to do with protecting minors. __________________ Left intentionally blank ... just like my brain

05-21-2005, 05:04 AM	#21
The Other Steve Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Sunny Queensland - perfect one day and better the next. Posts: 2,106	Pea Brain - trust me - there is no compromise - the government wants us out of business - so please get in touch with reality and stop wasting space on GFY's servers with your useless blathering. __________________ Left intentionally blank ... just like my brain

05-21-2005, 05:10 AM	#28
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	you obviously dont fully understand the situation.

05-21-2005, 05:26 AM	#35
sweetcuties Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Posts: 5,859	He's from Kentucky enough said... carry on __________________

05-21-2005, 06:10 AM	#39
Kre8t0r Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: From Hurricane Hell to Frozen Hell Posts: 1,304	Wow this thread reached a totally new level of Stupidity!! Like EVERYONE in this thread has said, read up and get a clue. If you have trouble with that try getting someone with an IQ above the double digit range to read it and explain it to you. Where's Headless?? I think we have our Donkey of the month here! P.S. On another note you may also want to do a little praying to "the movement" you defend so much that Jay is in a good mood and doesn't want to take your ignorant ass to court!

05-21-2005, 07:26 AM	#40
Gawdy Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 397	Firstly, Chris you should be banned for this thread. But you do bring up a good point, when you say: "Porn is good for the economy. He doesn't want a billion dollar industry to go down the drain." This is what confuses me. Why are they obviously using this back door to try and push US small enterprizes out of business? They obviously are, but why?

05-21-2005, 08:04 AM	#44
radical Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Bonnie Scotland Posts: 2,876	Mate, quite simply you have accused a person on public board, which if you had any real sense, you would have emailed Jay himself if you needed any clarification on this point! But now you have decided to bring this into the public domain, and guess what your reputation will be destroyed and now your maybe looking at legal action for slander! From what I know of Jay, even though I don't know him personally I would say he's a webmaster who tries his hardest to protect pple and would report anything remotly linked to cp, the same as all of us! __________________ ICQ: 166108967

05-21-2005, 08:24 AM	#45
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	__________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

05-21-2005, 08:37 AM	#47
slackologist Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Earth Posts: 2,379	Not only ignorant, you're a fucking asshole as well. As proved by this thread. Get the fuck out of here.

05-21-2005, 02:19 PM	#48
Chris Malais Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Kentucky Posts: 1,904	Sue me. I dare you. I'm poor. You're rich. What do you have to lose? Hell, I just got back from my 9 - 5. __________________ http://www.psychicrevenue.com/pws02901 Free horoscope on your websites. Make some money!

05-21-2005, 02:28 PM	#50
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	Chris you mention bad use of propaganda... XXXJAY should not be your target by any means. Ya need to calm down some. Take it from a guy that knows. Your going to end up banned. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|