Paris Hilton and 2257 - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

SmokeyTheBear · 05-20-2005, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

I doubt you'd need to worry about the 2257 stuff in her case...

Her age isn't in any way questionable.. Unless someone is just after your ass and wants to use the 2257 deal as ammo.. which will probably happen now and then..

Judge's dont work on "hunches" or what "may" be obvious.

If they ask you for 2257 documentation for your paris hilton ad banner and you say " this guy on gfy said its ok " isn't going to cut it..

Im not doubting xpays legal rights to the video, but when other sponsors are contacting affiliates telling them they will be cancelled if they promote xpays , then "someone" must not believe they do..

Xpays doesnt have to prove anything to us, but an article in the nytimes about paris participating in the video isn't going to cut it for 2257.

Scootermuze · 05-20-2005, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shooting_Manic

Gotgauge is correct and just to add to that... Its not her age that is in question, its if they have the proper documents. The new 2257 is as much about having all the documents and stored in the correct way as much as it is about the models age.

Understood and no arguement.. however... all of the new twist yells that the law is for the protection of minors and to insure that minors aren't being used in sexually explicit content...

Under the law.. the courts must rely on the 'original intent' of a law.. and as such.. the law could only apply if an individual included in sexually explicit content was, in the eyes of the court, questionable insofar as age.

If there was any question whatsoever in the age of P. Hilton, then ol' what's his face, that released the video would be in the courts as we speak instead of livin' life in luxury.. ..

But then I guess there are many laws where the courts forget to consider the original intent... Can you say IRS? ..

basschick · 05-20-2005, 08:42 PM

the new 2257 regs we all read require ALL content, regardless of model's age or fame, to be fully backed by i.d.

that means if i'm shooting 75 year old grannies, i still have to have the i.d., and if i put them on a banner, i have to give them to my affiliates for the affiliates to be within the law. also, according to the lawyers i talked with, if i put a banner on my site with a model, it doesn't matter where it's hosted - only that it's on my website.

assuming those are the regs as they got finalized, paris hilton banners will be no different.

RogerV · 05-20-2005, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by basschick

the new 2257 regs we all read require ALL content, regardless of model's age or fame, to be fully backed by i.d.

that means if i'm shooting 75 year old grannies, i still have to have the i.d., and if i put them on a banner, i have to give them to my affiliates for the affiliates to be within the law. also, according to the lawyers i talked with, if i put a banner on my site with a model, it doesn't matter where it's hosted - only that it's on my website.

assuming those are the regs as they got finalized, paris hilton banners will be no different.

then make sure your banners are not sexually explicit. girls face or in a bra, bikinni etc.

Scootermuze · 05-20-2005, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by basschick

the new 2257 regs we all read require ALL content, regardless of model's age or fame, to be fully backed by i.d.

that means if i'm shooting 75 year old grannies, i still have to have the i.d., and if i put them on a banner, i have to give them to my affiliates for the affiliates to be within the law. also, according to the lawyers i talked with, if i put a banner on my site with a model, it doesn't matter where it's hosted - only that it's on my website.

assuming those are the regs as they got finalized, paris hilton banners will be no different.

IF they are sexually explicit... But.. I really doubt they'll kick your door down to make sure the 75 year old granny isn't a minor...

Scootermuze · 05-20-2005, 09:15 PM

Hmmm..

I guess it all means that if I promote an adult video/vod site, I need names, addresses, and copy of drivers licenses of everyone in every video that the sponsor site has for sale...

I have a feeling that Gonzales is goin down on this one...

Shooting_Manic · 05-20-2005, 09:40 PM

Quote:

I guess it all means that if I promote an adult video/vod site, I need names, addresses, and copy of drivers licenses of everyone in every video that the sponsor site has for sale

Thats exactly what it means.

mufas · 05-20-2005, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

you have a copy of paris hilton's license ??? find it hard to believe she gave that to you although the bitch is pretty stupid..

05-20-2005, 08:42 PM	#53
basschick Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: el lay, ca usa Posts: 2,540	the new 2257 regs we all read require ALL content, regardless of model's age or fame, to be fully backed by i.d. that means if i'm shooting 75 year old grannies, i still have to have the i.d., and if i put them on a banner, i have to give them to my affiliates for the affiliates to be within the law. also, according to the lawyers i talked with, if i put a banner on my site with a model, it doesn't matter where it's hosted - only that it's on my website. assuming those are the regs as they got finalized, paris hilton banners will be no different. __________________ Got Gay and For Women Traffic?

05-20-2005, 09:15 PM	#56
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	Hmmm.. I guess it all means that if I promote an adult video/vod site, I need names, addresses, and copy of drivers licenses of everyone in every video that the sponsor site has for sale... I have a feeling that Gonzales is goin down on this one...