Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 04-20-2005, 05:15 PM   #1
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
Easy $5 for solving math problem.

First person to solve this correctly will get $5. I cant get the answer myself for this one..


An oil company purchased an option of land in Alaska. Preliminary geologic studies assigned the following prior probabilities.
P(high qualith oil) = 0.60
P(medium quality oil) = 0.20
P(no oil) = 0.20

a. What is the probability of finding oil?(I know the answer, 0.80)

B. After 200 feet of drilling on the first well, a soil test is taken. The probabilities of finding the particular type of soil identified by the test follow:

P ( soil | high quality oil) = .20
P(soil | medium-quality ) = 0.80
P(soil | no oil) = 0.20

How should the firm interpret the soil test? What are the revised probabilities, and what is the new probability of finding oil?
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:16 PM   #2
StuartD
Sofa King Band
 
StuartD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outside the box
Posts: 29,903
the answer is "There's a 100% probability of finding ICE"
StuartD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:19 PM   #3
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
lol

8char
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:34 PM   #4
thaifan99
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,029
Oil will be $5 a gallon soon!
thaifan99 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:37 PM   #5
VeriSexy
Join The Royal Family
 
VeriSexy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 25,463
Pick C
__________________
Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos
.
With TOP RATIO Sites like


ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com |
TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com


VeriSexy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:39 PM   #6
Rob
I'm a great bowler.
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Right Outside of Normal.
Posts: 13,309
We'll just bomb them and take the oil.

Want my email addy to send the $5?
__________________
Rob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:39 PM   #7
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
!!!!!!!!! come on guys, $10 now
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:40 PM   #8
Rob
I'm a great bowler.
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Right Outside of Normal.
Posts: 13,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaifan99
Oil will be $5 a gallon soon!
Damn, I'm paying almost $5 for 1 quart of Quaker State so that's a pretty damn good deal!
__________________
Rob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:41 PM   #9
MrIzzz
If u touch it, I will cum
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: long island
Posts: 22,923
do your own homework!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________


WHO WANTS TO PLAY GRAB-ASS?
MrIzzz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:48 PM   #10
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,490
I'm waiting until its $20
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:48 PM   #11
Nicky
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Nicky's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 30,070
I can tell u 1 thing atleast, there is still 0,8 chance on finding oil....
__________________

gfynicky @ gmail.com
Nicky is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:53 PM   #12
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,490
Ok, I'm in a good mood.
First off your first answer is wrong.

Quote:
a. What is the probability of finding oil?(I know the answer, 0.80)
It's not 0.80, you don't just add the first 2 probabilities and ignore the second set of data given. You need to multiply the 2 probabilities and then sum them up:

So, (0.60 * 0.20) + (0.20 * 0.80) + (0.20 * 0.20) = .12 + .16 + 0.4 = 0.68

So you actually have a 68% chance of discovering oil now.
PS: It's been 2 years since I did stats, so don't hold me to this answer. If you fail, its your own fault for not paying attention in class.

WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:56 PM   #13
paxton
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,156
a. P(finding oil) = 1 - p(no oil) = 1 - 0.20 = 0.80

b. Test interpretation: We can see the conditional probability for the medium quality oil goes up while the other two go down. That means doing such positive test can improve your chance to find the medium quality oil.

New probability of finding oil is 0.8125 (see below)

0.5 * 0.2 + 0.2 * 0.8 / 0.5 * 0.2 + 0.2 * 0.8 + 0.3 * 0.2 = 0.8125


Send the money to the charity of Mr.Izzz's choice, since after all he is right in saying that you should "do your own homework!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Is my answer right? Of course. I googled it. I have the source for this answer if needed.

__________________
Contact ICQ: 159141828
paxton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 05:59 PM   #14
fedfest
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,334
Eigther it's a missprint and it should have been .20 .60 .20 in wich case the probability is still .80
or..
probability 1.0 = they found oil
fedfest is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:05 PM   #15
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,490
The revised probabilities are now:
Note: P(finding oil) = my answer from part (a) = 0.68

P(high qualith oil) * P ( soil | high quality oil) / P(finding oil) = 0.1765
P(medium quality oil) * P(soil | medium-quality) / P(finding oil) = 0.2353
P(no oil) * P(soil | no oil) / P(finding oil) = 0.0588

WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:08 PM   #16
Icon
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The watercooler of life tripping balls with NPH
Posts: 1,757
seven - the answer in seven
__________________

Icon
Professional Shark Wrestler
ICQ: 214 674 095


"I see Brown people"
Icon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:10 PM   #17
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,490
OLD RESULTS (GIVEN):
P(soil | high quality oil) = .20
P(soil | medium-quality ) = 0.80
P(soil | no oil) = 0.20

NEW RESULTS (CALCULATED):
P(high qualith oil) * P ( soil | high quality oil) / P(finding oil) = 0.1765
P(medium quality oil) * P(soil | medium-quality) / P(finding oil) = 0.2353
P(no oil) * P(soil | no oil) / P(finding oil) = 0.0588


The firm should intepret the results as:
The conditional probability of finding high quality, medium quality and no oil have all dropped (although by different ratios).

WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:28 PM   #18
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiredGuy
Ok, I'm in a good mood.
First off your first answer is wrong.


It's not 0.80, you don't just add the first 2 probabilities and ignore the second set of data given. You need to multiply the 2 probabilities and then sum them up:

So, (0.60 * 0.20) + (0.20 * 0.80) + (0.20 * 0.20) = .12 + .16 + 0.4 = 0.68

So you actually have a 68% chance of discovering oil now.
PS: It's been 2 years since I did stats, so don't hold me to this answer. If you fail, its your own fault for not paying attention in class.

WG
Remember the second values werent given until question B..

QUestion A assumes u use the first set of values..
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:36 PM   #19
Babagirls
Text Writer
 
Babagirls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 18,812
HUHHHHH??
__________________




Need a Text Writer?
Blogs|Reviews|Descriptions|Paysites|TGP's|Stories

ICQ: 397892500
Babagirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:39 PM   #20
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by paxton
a. P(finding oil) = 1 - p(no oil) = 1 - 0.20 = 0.80

b. Test interpretation: We can see the conditional probability for the medium quality oil goes up while the other two go down. That means doing such positive test can improve your chance to find the medium quality oil.

New probability of finding oil is 0.8125 (see below)

0.5 * 0.2 + 0.2 * 0.8 / 0.5 * 0.2 + 0.2 * 0.8 + 0.3 * 0.2 = 0.8125


Send the money to the charity of Mr.Izzz's choice, since after all he is right in saying that you should "do your own homework!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Is my answer right? Of course. I googled it. I have the source for this answer if needed.


Can i get the source?
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:39 PM   #21
Spunky
I need a beer
 
Spunky's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠
Posts: 133,949
If I can't count on my fingers and toes ..forget it
__________________
Spunky is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:44 PM   #22
buddyjuf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
P ( soil | high quality oil) = .20
P(soil | medium-quality ) = 0.80
P(soil | no oil) = 0.20

how can that be? it adds up to 1.20, not 1...
  Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 06:48 PM   #23
paxton
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxweekxx
Can i get the source?
page 24...

http://www.1493.com.tw/upfiles/skill01100857753.pdf

My answer simply changes the variables in part (1) ... part (2) is the same as yours.

__________________
Contact ICQ: 159141828
paxton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 07:05 PM   #24
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
Umm dude there is also another source with a totally different answer:
grr wtf..

4 of my friends got different answers for this. seems like the question is not 100% clear.
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 07:07 PM   #25
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxweekxx
Umm dude there is also another source with a totally different answer:
grr wtf..

4 of my friends got different answers for this. seems like the question is not 100% clear.

Welcome to Stats
No two people will get the same two answers, lol.
WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 07:09 PM   #26
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiredGuy
Welcome to Stats
No two people will get the same two answers, lol.
WG

LOL ya there's 2 sources (Professors) with same question online, both of them have different answers,

WTF really
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 07:27 PM   #27
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxweekxx
LOL ya there's 2 sources (Professors) with same question online, both of them have different answers,

WTF really

Here's one where the question is almost worded identically (different numbers):

http://stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~pzhang/stat101/HW02.doc (Question on bottom)

http://stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~pzhan...01/HW02sol.doc (Answer on bottom).

Answers seem to be similiar to mine.
WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 07:54 PM   #28
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
Ya but see

[What is the probability of a positive soil test?
P(+)=P(+ | high quality oil)* P(high quality oil)+P(+ | medium quality oil)* P(medium quality oil)+P(+ | no oil)* P(no oil)=0.32]

Im not looking for the PROBABILITY of a positive SOIL TEST...
Thats what you/they calculated.


Question says probability of finding oil.. So how can you include the probability of finding no oil into the calculation
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 07:58 PM   #29
woj
<&(©¿©)&>
 
woj's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 47,882
xxweekxx, you are a clown
__________________
Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager
woj is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 07:59 PM   #30
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by woj
xxweekxx, you are a clown

Ya i am.lol i was gonna have u do it but i figured no way to verify your answer.. see what i mean??

so far 5 people got 5 diff answers
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 08:05 PM   #31
pxxx
First African GFY Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,114
Wow, i was a science person in high school, and still is. I hate math! Calculus wasn't as bad as many made it sound.
pxxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 08:09 PM   #32
pornguy
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pornguy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Homeless
Posts: 62,911
The oil rig was shut down because Onook got into a fight with his wife, went postal, and killed 12 of the 16 employees!
__________________
PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!
pornguy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 08:25 PM   #33
cool1g
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hollyweird adjacent
Posts: 977
The answer is the two trains will take 2 hours before they crash into each other....wait...wrong college problem
cool1g is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 08:33 PM   #34
Screaming
I can change this!!!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,972
at least a .80% chance of finding some kind of oil, heh well i gave it a shot
__________________
Screaming is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 08:39 PM   #35
tre sandman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: trash can
Posts: 113
wow! a lot of math wizards!!!
__________________
tre sandman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 08:47 PM   #36
xxweekxx
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,780
I thought GFY was smart
__________________
_________________
I am the best
xxweekxx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 10:48 PM   #37
BlueDesignStudios
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,492
is there still that $5 up for grabs??
__________________

Blue Design Studios - Adult Design Specialists!
Email me for a free quote: [email protected]
BlueDesignStudios is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 11:01 PM   #38
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxweekxx
I thought GFY was smart
What gave you that impression? LOL
WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 11:23 PM   #39
Dalai lama
Strength and Honor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 16,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxweekxx
I thought GFY was smart
Think again.
__________________

A program you can trust.
Gallerybooster Run multiply TGPs of 1 script
Dalai lama is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2005, 11:23 PM   #40
SomeCreep
:glugglug
 
SomeCreep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Where the Wild Things Are
Posts: 26,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxweekxx
First person to solve this correctly will get $5. I cant get the answer myself for this one..


An oil company purchased an option of land in Alaska. Preliminary geologic studies assigned the following prior probabilities.
P(high qualith oil) = 0.60
P(medium quality oil) = 0.20
P(no oil) = 0.20

a. What is the probability of finding oil?(I know the answer, 0.80)

B. After 200 feet of drilling on the first well, a soil test is taken. The probabilities of finding the particular type of soil identified by the test follow:

P ( soil | high quality oil) = .20
P(soil | medium-quality ) = 0.80
P(soil | no oil) = 0.20

How should the firm interpret the soil test? What are the revised probabilities, and what is the new probability of finding oil?
After numerous calculations, I have concluded the answer is: Penis
__________________

Webair Hosting

I use and recommend Webair for hosting.
SomeCreep is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.