LOL: Terris Father turned off life-support for his own mother - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

MetaMan · 03-27-2005, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benc

My two cents, if your whole goal of seeing this girl die is to make a statment in the right to die issue, I suggest finding a much better case to use as a battleground, such as someone that has all their faculties and a disease, and wants to die.

I am the least religious person, and I support right to die, and think this girl should be kept alive.

i already told you, stfu, you are a complete fool! JUST A COMPLETE FUCKING IDIOT! i want to stomp you for being such a fool.

"
I am the least religious person, and I support right to die, and think this girl should be kept alive.
"

this just shows how incapable of rational thoughts you are, get the fuck out of this thread.

TheSaint · 03-27-2005, 02:22 PM

Since her brain is liquid it doesn't matter much what happens to Terri; sorry to say. But I don't know anyone that would want their demented self displayed on TV 24 hours a day and turned into the poster child for the far right.

I used to think that Romans feeding Christians to the lions was barbaric, but I can see now they might have had a point...

I had a child near death once, and I can tell you there is no way I'd let my baby end up like that; would fight like hell to let her die a dignified death as the husband is doing; he is the real hero in this. The lies by the far right are just amazing, for instance all the money was spent years ago and the husband gets not one penny when she does.

A selflish bastard would have sold her living corpse to that guy that offered him 1 million 2 weeks ago; anybody notice he turned it down????

CoreAdult-Dee · 03-27-2005, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clicky_Bucks

Like it or not, we all go. I personally am in favor of a more humane approach than the slow drag out, but I can understand the complexity and tension over assisted suicide and where that line should be drawn.

What really should be easy is permitting an individual to have the dignity to make these decisions for themselves.

And for everyone looking for the "evil husband" motive and quoting a bunch of blatant lies, it really does not help anyone nor does it help your credibility.The husband has turned down multiple offers of seven figures to just go away. The trust fund has been publicly accounted for and is totally exhausted. There is no insurance. There is no pay day.

The position on abuse causing this is a total joke. They only even raised it as an argument after they lost the first trial. This has been rejected by all of her treating physicians, the trial court, appellate courts, the GAL, the independent doctors looking at the case. But we have to vilify anyone as long as we can score political points and advance an agenda.

Every independent medical expert that has actually reviewed the records (unlike the 17 so-called experts in the affidavits who never bothered to even review her medical records, relied on 4 minutes of video snips from a five hour long tape, and amazingly NEVER EVEN DISCUSSED HER CAT SCAN) has found she is in PVS, or cerebral cortex is absolutely eliminated, and she has no hope of recovery.

Have you seen her CAT scan? Instead of a cerebral cortex there is only ventricle. Necrotic tissue extends even into other areas of the brain. Her brain stem is active ... the lights are on, but there is decidedly no one home.

Oh, the nurses. Yes, the people who never bothered to note that a patient in persistent vegetative state spoke. One who was fired because the husband complained about her lack of attention to Ms. Schiavo. The one who says she can eat ice cream and jello (um, why the feeding tube? duh). Interesting some of these people crawl out of the woodwork so late under the media spotlight and only after the first trial's result.

Even the parents and their legal counsel conceded she was in PVS throughout the first trial and on appeal. It was only after they lost that they completely shifted gears, made up a new story, and propped up good Dr. Hammesfahr.

This so-called expert for the parents claims he is Nobel nominated. Only he was nominated by his congressman. Maybe I should have my wife nominate me for the Nobel Peace Prize so I can add it to my resume. Do you not see the credibility gap??

He has been censured by the Florida DOH for lying to patients and has to have another doctor following him around and reviewing his files. When he said his treatment would work, and has worked, he could not point to a single specific case file or case study in support of his position. You would think that might be important if you are testifying in court. If you really want to believe experts of this caliber rather than actual evidence, that is a fine statement of why we need courts deciding these types of issues and actually weighing evidence rather than using mob rule in the legislature to eliminate the individual's rights to control their medical treatment.

Hmm, should the court believe the guy with the fake Nobel certification, license complaints, and with no proof supporting his opinion? Yet that is exactly what some people latch on to. Logic and reason seem to be evaporating from our country's fabric on a daily basis.

The parents in the first trial indicated they would consent to amputation of all her arms and legs, and then still do open heart surgery and keep her alive. They testified under oath that if she woke up and told them she wanted the tube removed, they would ignore her wishes and keep her alive indefinitely. Tell me that is not sick. I understand their pain and their loss. But try and tell me that this is about their daughter's wishes and desires. After they testify in that fashion, how is anyone really supposed to believe they have their daughter's wishes in mind and are accurately testifying to them???

Let this poor poor woman retain just a tiny shred of her lost dignity and pass. Splashing this poor woman's absent shell on videos to raise money for causes and push a so-called "pro-life" agenda is really pretty sick. Calling people who look at this differently as part of a "culture of death" is ridiculous. No one wants this woman to die. What people on the other side of this issue react to is the need to respect the wishes of an individual regarding their, repeat THEIR, medical care. That is really respect for life, dignity, and the ultimate responsibility of a person for their own choices.

On a final note, better draft an iron clad living will. Better ensure you have your DNR fully executed. Make sure you lock down who is your agent for treatment decisions. I have, have you?

What a fantastic post! It is well thought out and cuts it down to the core. I feel the same way. As for my "living will" my mother had one...her wishes were honored by her doctor. I have the same doctor and he made not of it in my medical records and I signed it. My entire family knows my wishes and I say it publicly to anyone that will listen.

If there is no hope for me....let me DIE. I love the people in my life far too much to want to put them through that. Pull the plug, take out the feeding tube and go have yourselves a party. Remember the times we laughed and cried together....remember the good, the bad...and remember how much I loved everyone. As for the money...save it..spend it...blow it...donate it...hey I'm not going to need it...others might as well enjoy it.

My life is today, in the here and now...everyone's should be. Enjoy it while you can...and when your time comes...go with dignity and grace.

Giorgio_Xo · 03-27-2005, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loryn-Adult.com

The mother was at then end of her life and was on life support, Terri is young and is not on life support. BIG DIFFERENCE!!!

Terri was on life-support - the feeding tube. She has been brain dead for over a decade.

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

No, you stupid asshat, he is comparing how we treat animals & muderers with more dignity than humans.

Killing a criminal = capital punishment.
It's a special prerogative of a state.

Terri has commited no crimes and hasnt been convicted.

Now STFU you stupid piece of shit.

baddog · 03-27-2005, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

When our pets (dogs/cats) are in terminall pain we are allowed to put them out in with out letting them suffer through pain.

Our criminals have a choice of a painless leathel injection.

But a normal human being has to be started to death.

Because euthanasia is illegal, write your Congressman.

However, because of the condition of her brain she is not suffering, she is not saying "someone get me a sandwich please."

Damian_Maxcash · 03-27-2005, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

No need to introduce yourself in every post. I already got the idea of who you are.

Because if someone ends it, he would be considered a murderer.

1000's of people every day have their lives ended artificially, even in the US... Most people that die in a non-emergancy situation are made comfortable towards the end with morphine. Most will die from an overdose of that morphine.

It will not be any different in this girls case.

Johny Traffic · 03-27-2005, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Fucking idiot.. God you have no clue whats going on

Dont I, so all the doctors and judges are wrong, but you are right? Do you think adding lots of syupid laughing faces after your post makes you look clever or funny? Explain what you know that all the doctors and judges dont clever laughing man

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

True.
So but why cant you agree that since we are in a sense killing her by not feeding her, why not just end it with one heavy dose of morphine

No one is killing her right now.

But if they give her a heavy dose of morphine, then that person would be a murderer.

Thats how the laws works.

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001

1000's of people every day have their lives ended artificially, even in the US... Most people that die in a non-emergancy situation are made comfortable towards the end with morphine. Most will die from an overdose of that morphine.

It will not be any different in this girls case.

If an autopsy showed that a person died from a morphine overdose, then the doctors would be prosecuted.

CoreAdult-Dee · 03-27-2005, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Good post. But do you agree that letting her "naturally" die by starving her is right. Why not just get it over with.

Alex, starvation is not actually so bad. She does not feel hunger or thirst..she doesn't feel anything. As the body slips away it actually does not want food or water...it is natures way.

If they overdosed her, it would technicaly be euthenasia...which some do not believe in...not feeding her is letting her die "naturally". I personally would want it over in one quick shot..but medically and morally speaking...that is killing her...a very fine line indeed...but that is the way law and medicine is.

aico · 03-27-2005, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

Killing a criminal = capital punishment.
It's a special prerogative of a state.

Terri has commited no crimes and hasnt been convicted.

Now STFU you stupid piece of shit.

Or what? You gonna stab me with your lightsaber? oh, oh, i know, I know, do the pinchy thingy with your fingers and choke me...

BTW... way to completely miss the point...

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 02:30 PM

Anyway, now that we have found out that Terri is indeed on life support, how fucking hypocritical is her father disconnecting his own mother from life support and crying that only God can take life ?

baddog · 03-27-2005, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Thats why you are not "leagally" concerned in this.

You should really stick with words you know how to spell.

benc · 03-27-2005, 02:33 PM

Pretty much anyone who thinks of life support, thinks of someone in a coma and using a breathing machine etc.

When you think of 'life support' the first thing that comes to a persons mind isn't a person that just has a feeding tube.

What about a person that has a colostomy bag. Is that life support.

Fake Nick · 03-27-2005, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johny Traffic

Do you think adding lots of syupid laughing faces after your post makes you look clever or funny?

you want to look smart by questioning his motives, he does it by smilies , no difference here

and yeah WHY were you questioning his motives again ?? oops , already answered that one myself

Damian_Maxcash · 03-27-2005, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

If an autopsy showed that a person died from a morphine overdose, then the doctors would be prosecuted.

No they wouldnt.... It has been challenged in court many times in the US and the UK

The Drs responibility is to keep the patient comfortable. If the dose required to do that is high enough to stop the patient breathing then the Dr is still entitled to prescribe that dose. The Dr just has to be convinced that it is required to keep the patient comfortable.

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Or what? You gonna stab me with your lightsaber? oh, oh, i know, I know, do the pinchy thingy with your fingers and choke me...

BTW... way to completely miss the point...

You can call me names all night long, dork. means about as much as playground insults. Doesnt change the fact that you're a fucking troll.

I'm not going to waste my time on you anymore.

baddog · 03-27-2005, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan

In a criminal case, family witness usually never have much weight since they are most of time testifying for one of their family member.
No one knows what Terri Schiavo wanted, there are 5 people who claim that she said she would not have wanted to be kept alive, one of them is the husband, the other 4 are the husband's family members.
No one from her side or no one who was friend with her ever heard her say that.
Also, why did the husband wait 7 years to let the court that she wanted not to live like that?
If there was something in writting or if there was at least one witness from the Schindler side, then we would not be here discussing this.

Would you want to be fed by a tube for 15 years? Unable to move, unable to speak, unable to communicate in any way? Do you know anyone that would?

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001

No they wouldnt.... It has been challenged in court many times in the US and the UK

The Drs responibility is to keep the patient comfortable. If the dose required to do that is high enough to stop the patient breathing then the Dr is still entitled to prescribe that dose. The Dr just has to be convinced that it is required to keep the patient comfortable.

Link ?

Doctor can not prescribe a potentialy fatal dose no matter how uncomfortable the patient is.

Clicky_Bucks · 03-27-2005, 02:38 PM

Her brain is mush. What are we arguing about here?

baddog · 03-27-2005, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

That is correct. But an infant is just as much as a "vegetable" as Schiavo is.

Thank you. We're all refreshed and challenged by your unique point of view.

aico · 03-27-2005, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

You can call me names all night long, dork. means about as much as playground insults. Doesnt change the fact that you're a fucking troll.

I'm not going to waste my time on you anymore.

Not too sure what's funnier, that you say I am calling you names in a post that has no name calling, or that you explain how calling names means nothing and then call me names...

Keep using those big words, I am sure someone will think you're smart...

Damian_Maxcash · 03-27-2005, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

Link ?

Doctor can not prescribe a potentialy fatal dose no matter how uncomfortable the patient is.

They can and they do... I have seen it many times.... and I dont need Google to tell me that.

Before porn I was a nurse, I worked on ITU for about 2 years and also on general wards. I pushed the morphine in myself on more than one occasion.

Entropy · 03-27-2005, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan

Every case is different.
In this case:
-dude marries woman
-they live together for 7 years
-she gets fucked up
-she is in irreversible coma/vegetative state/whatever you want to call it
-dude gets new woman
-dude gets 2 new kids with his new woman
-court decide that dude is and will remain the legal guardian

Now if you think that he should be the one to decide on her behalf, then I will have to be the one to go shoot myself.

You're ignoring the fact that the man and her parents worked together for years and years in search of treatment before he finally accepted what doctors told him almost all along...that there is no hope of recovery.

baddog · 03-27-2005, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan

Now if you think that he should be the one to decide on her behalf, then I will have to be the one to go shoot myself.

It was nice knowing you. Be sure to use a high caliber weapon and place the weapon against the temple, or if using a rifle, place the barrel pointing towards the roof of your mouth so we are not forced into putting you on life support.

David! · 03-27-2005, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Would you want to be fed by a tube for 15 years? Unable to move, unable to speak, unable to communicate in any way? Do you know anyone that would?

I don't know, it would depend on a lot of factors.
I know most people would not want to be kept alive.
That is why if you do not want to be kept alive, then you should have a living will and/or a DNR.
And if a living will/DNR is not available, then your next of kin should make the decision.
In the Schiavo case I do not agree with the court that says that the husband is the one to make the decision. In 95% of the case I would agree that it is for the spouse to make the decision, but in a case like that where the normal spouse has redone his life and is living with another woman, then he has lost his marital rights.

baddog · 03-27-2005, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

the fact that you use "dude" more than twice in one paragraph makes me agree with baddog on this one.

I know it must be tough, I can't believe I am agreeing with both you and Dark Jedi on the same day, much less the same thread

MetaMan · 03-27-2005, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan

I don't know, it would depend on a lot of factors.
I know most people would not want to be kept alive.
That is why if you do not want to be kept alive, then you should have a living will and/or a DNR.
And if a living will/DNR is not available, then your next of kin should make the decision.
In the Schiavo case I do not agree with the court that says that the husband is the one to make the decision. In 95% of the case I would agree that it is for the spouse to make the decision, but in a case like that where the normal spouse has redone his life and is living with another woman, then he has lost his marital rights.

SHE IS ALREADY DEAD! you people are fucking stupid, it is truly terrible whatever god there is gave you people air to breathe.

her brain is liquid!!!!!!!! HER BRAIN IS LIQUID!

read above HER FUCKING BRAIN IS LIQUID!

David! · 03-27-2005, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Entropy

You're ignoring the fact that the man and her parents worked together for years and years in search of treatment before he finally accepted what doctors told him almost all along...that there is no hope of recovery.

Look, she was DOA, almost 15 minutes with no oxygen, there was no hope from the beginning.
The point is: Why did he wait 7 years and a new "wife" and 2 new children to come out with the information that she did not want to be kept alive?
Had he done that from the beginning, then no one would have had any problem with it.
Each day hundreds and hundreds of people have to make that decision and it does not make the news.
Why wait so long to let the court know?

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001

They can and they do... I have seen it many times.... and I dont need Google to tell me that.

Then they are criminals.

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001

Before porn I was a nurse, I worked on ITU for about 2 years and also on general wards. I pushed the morphine in myself on more than one occasion.

Oh, we are going to take for granted legal medical advice from a former junkie and now a porn webmaster ?

Just think of what you're saying: "If a patient feels uncomfortable, the doctor can give him a fatal dose of drugs"

Don't make me laugh.

David! · 03-27-2005, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

SHE IS ALREADY DEAD! you people are fucking stupid, it is truly terrible whatever god there is gave you people air to breathe.

her brain is liquid!!!!!!!! HER BRAIN IS LIQUID!

read above HER FUCKING BRAIN IS LIQUID!

Why are you getting so excited?

MetaMan · 03-27-2005, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan

Why are you getting so excited?

because there is no way any half intelligent person would ever say "keep her alive"

ANYONE with half a brain would understand why she should be let go and its stupid people who "think" they understand issues that make this world a worse place.

baddog · 03-27-2005, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benc

I support right to die, and think this girl should be kept alive.

why ?

David! · 03-27-2005, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

because there is no way any half intelligent person would ever say "keep her alive"

ANYONE with half a brain would understand why she should be let go and its stupid people who "think" they understand issues that make this world a worse place.

I am not arguing to keep her alive.
I am arguing that it is not your decision nor my decision to keep her alive.
It is the parents decision, and that is because of the facts of that SPECIFIC CASE.
In most case, it would be the spouse decision but in this SPECIFIC CASE, it is the parents decision.

Damian_Maxcash · 03-27-2005, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

Then they are criminals.

Oh, we are going to take for granted legal medical advice from a former junkie and now a porn webmaster ?

Just think of what you're saying: "If a patient feels uncomfortable, the doctor can give him a fatal dose of drugs"

Don't make me laugh.

OK.... Believe what you like..... I have no reason to lie to you

Im 34 years old.... Like most people on here that are not teenagers, I had a 'real' job and a life before the internet.

Edit: BTW... where did yiu get junkie from?

baddog · 03-27-2005, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

True.
So but why cant you agree that since we are in a sense killing her by not feeding her, why not just end it with one heavy dose of morphine

because euthanasia is illegal

David! · 03-27-2005, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

why ?

Because there is no absolute proof that this is what she wants.
Just like I oppose abortion but I support the right of a woman to choose.

Alex · 03-27-2005, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan

It is the parents decision, and that is because of the facts of that SPECIFIC CASE.

Didnt a handful of judges and courts say otherwise. If it was the parents decision she wouldnt be kept alive now would she?>

aico · 03-27-2005, 02:58 PM

Why don't they just freeze the bitch and sort it all out later... problem solved.

Alex · 03-27-2005, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

because euthanasia is illegal

Why dont you post that a few more times.

David! · 03-27-2005, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

because euthanasia is illegal

Then we should make euthanasia legal when it is requested by a sane and conscious individual. I would have no problem with that

David! · 03-27-2005, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Didnt a handful of judges and courts say otherwise. If it was the parents decision she wouldnt be kept alive now would she?>

I am stating my opinion, not the judge's opinion

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001

OK.... Believe what you like..... I have no reason to lie to you

Im 34 years old.... Like most people on here that are not teenagers, I had a 'real' job and a life before the internet.

Real job ? A nurse picking shit from under the patients ?

I have a Masters Degree in Laws and i have 5 family members who are real doctors (not nurses). I'm telling you that giving a potentially fatal dose of drugs to someone in a felony.

Euthanasia is illegal, okay ?

MetaMan · 03-27-2005, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan

Because there is no absolute proof that this is what she wants.
Just like I oppose abortion but I support the right of a woman to choose.

no "proof"

if you find 1 single human that would like to sit in a chair with no communication or learning ability for 15 years come and post it here.

what PROOF is needed!? 15 years!? its common sense! 99.9% of EVERYONE on this plant would have wanted to plug pulled on themselves after the first couple years (most even less).

aico · 03-27-2005, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

Real job ? A nurse picking shit from under the patients ?

I have a Masters Degree in Laws and i have 5 family members who are real doctors (not nurses). I'm telling you that giving a potentially fatal dose of drugs to someone in a felony.

Euthanasia is illegal, okay ?

Ha ha ha, ha.. haaaaaaa, haaa.. Masters Degree in Laws... haaaa ha.... scan it and post it.. I'd LOVE to see that one...

DarkJedi · 03-27-2005, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Ha ha ha, ha.. haaaaaaa, haaa.. Masters Degree in Laws... haaaa ha.... scan it and post it.. I'd LOVE to see that one...

Wanna make a bet ? $5000

We'll use an escrow - someone respected from this board.

Then i'll post a scan.

Damian_Maxcash · 03-27-2005, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

Real job ? A nurse picking shit from under the patients ?

I have a Masters Degree in Laws and i have 5 family members who are real doctors (not nurses). I'm telling you that giving a potentially fatal dose of drugs to someone in a felony.

Euthanasia is illegal, okay ?

Read this.... Its a letter from a staff nurse in a hospital in Scotland

It explains what happens better than I can

http://www.euthanasia.cc/mail22.html

And trust me nursing is a very real job.....

Ask the 5 Drs in your family if this dosnt happen, almost every day..... u may be surprised at the answer

David! · 03-27-2005, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

no "proof"

if you find 1 single human that would like to sit in a chair with no communication or learning ability for 15 years come and post it here.

what PROOF is needed!? 15 years!? its common sense! 99.9% of EVERYONE on this plant would have wanted to plug pulled on themselves after the first couple years (most even less).

This is not about what people want or would like, this is about the law.
The law says that the hospice must carry out T.S. wish.
Some people are arguing that it was not her wishes to be unplugged.
Other people are arguing that it was her wish to be unplugged.
I am arguing that it has not been shown beyond reasonable doubt that she wanted to be unplugged.
How do we even know that she is not part of the 0.01%?

aico · 03-27-2005, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

Wanna make a bet ? $5000

We'll use an escrow - someone respected from this board.

Then i'll post a scan.

Ya, let's bet... you are such an idiot... why the fuck would I bet you, if you got it, post it, you ashamed of it or something?

I just think you're far too stupid to have a Masters in anything, but hey, I could be wrong, would love to see it... unlike you (obviously) I have no problems with being wrong from time to time...

03-27-2005, 02:22 PM	#102
TheSaint Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Everywhere at once Posts: 991	Since her brain is liquid it doesn't matter much what happens to Terri; sorry to say. But I don't know anyone that would want their demented self displayed on TV 24 hours a day and turned into the poster child for the far right. I used to think that Romans feeding Christians to the lions was barbaric, but I can see now they might have had a point... I had a child near death once, and I can tell you there is no way I'd let my baby end up like that; would fight like hell to let her die a dignified death as the husband is doing; he is the real hero in this. The lies by the far right are just amazing, for instance all the money was spent years ago and the husband gets not one penny when she does. A selflish bastard would have sold her living corpse to that guy that offered him 1 million 2 weeks ago; anybody notice he turned it down???? __________________ I have no signature

03-27-2005, 02:33 PM	#115
benc Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Florida Posts: 788	Pretty much anyone who thinks of life support, thinks of someone in a coma and using a breathing machine etc. When you think of 'life support' the first thing that comes to a persons mind isn't a person that just has a feeding tube. What about a person that has a colostomy bag. Is that life support. __________________ Numerous Adult and Non Adult Domains For Sale Such as SlutVideos.com, FitWomen.com Listed on Sedo or can do direct sale

03-27-2005, 02:38 PM	#121
Clicky_Bucks Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Hawaii Posts: 746	Her brain is mush. What are we arguing about here? __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

03-27-2005, 02:30 PM	#113
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	Anyway, now that we have found out that Terri is indeed on life support, how fucking hypocritical is her father disconnecting his own mother from life support and crying that only God can take life ?

03-27-2005, 02:58 PM	#140
aico Moo Moo Cow Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington State Posts: 14,748	Why don't they just freeze the bitch and sort it all out later... problem solved.