Secondary Producers 2257 alternative - GoFuckYourself.com

besterman · 06-25-2005, 07:50 AM

I think the best scheme is to have primary producers and sponsors to hold records and then if the sponsors agree to "vouch" for an image should that image be investigated on an affiliates/webmasters site. It would seem good faith to extent protection to your affiliates. You don't have to release the release to them, simply say yes or no and to forward a request for proof to the sponsor and the sponsor then just shows the record. No disclosure, a little more work for the sponsor, but the sponsor already knows their content is compliant.

Mutt · 06-25-2005, 08:45 AM

ok, super idea, the DOJ i am sure will go along with it and kick themselves why they didn't think of it first. you've just saved everybody alot of time and worry.

who said GFY was filled with imbeciles and fry machine operators?

broke · 06-25-2005, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

who said GFY was filled with imbeciles and fry machine operators?

ROFL.

besterman · 06-25-2005, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

ok, super idea, the DOJ i am sure will go along with it and kick themselves why they didn't think of it first. you've just saved everybody alot of time and worry.

who said GFY was filled with imbeciles and fry machine operators?

If the intent of the DOJ is to use this new updated regulation to prevent CP (as they have repeatedly stated), then while the loose technical definitions would encompass a large amount of secondary producers in the States such as affiliates, in practical terms they would have to actually go after primary producers from which there may be questionable records. For example, take as an example, a sponsor program that is highly reputable, maybe Score Group, and who has records for all their models. If an affiliate uses a hardcore image on their site, do you think the DOJ will waste their time in their CP crusade knowing full well the images come from a company that is beyond reproach and that can even legally display the same images on their own domains?

06-25-2005, 07:50 AM	#1
besterman Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 623	Secondary Producers 2257 alternative I think the best scheme is to have primary producers and sponsors to hold records and then if the sponsors agree to "vouch" for an image should that image be investigated on an affiliates/webmasters site. It would seem good faith to extent protection to your affiliates. You don't have to release the release to them, simply say yes or no and to forward a request for proof to the sponsor and the sponsor then just shows the record. No disclosure, a little more work for the sponsor, but the sponsor already knows their content is compliant.

06-25-2005, 08:45 AM	#2
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	ok, super idea, the DOJ i am sure will go along with it and kick themselves why they didn't think of it first. you've just saved everybody alot of time and worry. who said GFY was filled with imbeciles and fry machine operators? __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!