OJ. Was he guilty or innocent? - GoFuckYourself.com

ADL Colin · 03-01-2005, 02:21 AM

OJ. Was he guilty or innocent?

spentrent · 03-01-2005, 02:22 AM

Ask Nicole. WE SHALL NEVER KNOW?

Johny Traffic · 03-01-2005, 02:23 AM

Is there any doubt it was him?

slipkid · 03-01-2005, 02:30 AM

GUILTY as fuck

reynold · 03-01-2005, 02:34 AM

I say he's guilty.

ADL Colin · 03-01-2005, 02:36 AM

Q: Why do they call O.J. "Juice"?
A: Because he beat his wife to a pulp.

baddog · 03-01-2005, 02:39 AM

Wrong question, everyone knows he is innocent, the question should be, did he do it or not?

Big difference.

Danny Dukes · 03-01-2005, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Wrong question, everyone knows he is innocent, the question should be, did he do it or not?

Big difference.

This is true, did he do it? I say Hells Yes!

swedguy · 03-01-2005, 02:44 AM

Is the pope catholic?

jamesonxx · 03-01-2005, 02:49 AM

I think he's guilty.

Hey You . . . I Know You! · 03-01-2005, 06:52 AM

Guilty or innocent of what?

Why wasn't anything in the news or on tv regarding this?

StuartD · 03-01-2005, 06:57 AM

When OJ started dating again, he was quoted as saying
"I'd like to take another stab at it"

Babagirls · 03-01-2005, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slipkid

GUILTY as fuck

agreed!

gh0st · 03-01-2005, 07:02 AM

naw he's innocent, i killed her.. and they still haven't caught me...

bwahahahahahaha

for the feds that lurk around here, yes, i'm just kidding around <^>

ADL Colin · 03-01-2005, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Wrong question, everyone knows he is innocent, the question should be, did he do it or not?

Big difference.

Innocent, not "legally innocent".

David! · 03-01-2005, 07:05 AM

He is as innocent as Michael Jackson in a middle school

tungsten · 03-01-2005, 07:09 AM

he did it

ADL Colin · 03-01-2005, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan

He is as innocent as Michael Jackson in a middle school

He likes kids that old?

Steve · 03-01-2005, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

OJ. Was he guilty or innocent?

Are you Colin D. from "Building An Empire"?

Dirty Dane · 03-01-2005, 07:25 AM

All I know is that he was rich

Spunky · 03-01-2005, 07:26 AM

Guilty as sin...he should have fried but what do we know

Cassie · 03-01-2005, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

Q: Why do they call O.J. "Juice"?
A: Because he beat his wife to a pulp.

hahahahahhaha

that wasn't funny but then again it was

maxdaname · 03-01-2005, 07:44 AM

I think he's guilty! They pulled the race card and it worked. Many, many, MANY black people defended him because he was known as a positive black icon. He was a great football player turned part time actor. Cultural Icons represent their people that's why they can't fail.

I think if O.J. would've been a regular or a thug black dude killing his white woman, he would've been locked up for at least 25 years...

Bansheelinks · 03-01-2005, 07:45 AM

Anyone who knows anything about science knows he is guilty of murdering both his ex wife and Ron Goldman. That question has already been answered beyond a shadow of a doubt. We leave it to the uneducated to even dispute this, for whatever reasons they may be harboring.

IwantU Bryan · 03-01-2005, 08:23 AM

Yeah, it´s tough to say, but i think he is guilty

XxXotic · 03-01-2005, 08:27 AM

innocent, mark fuhrman tried to frame him

fl_prn_str · 03-01-2005, 08:28 AM

oh.....he was like sooooooooooooooo innocent.......4 shizzle....

PrivateIvy · 03-01-2005, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

OJ. Was he guilty or innocent?

He was quilty...no doubt !

Ivy

ADL Colin · 03-01-2005, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve

Are you Colin D. from "Building An Empire"?

What the hell ya been up to, Steve?

Bansheelinks · 03-01-2005, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XxXotic

innocent, mark fuhrman tried to frame him

Yep its always good to try and frame someone BEFORE you even know what all the other officers on the scene, and there were 50 there before him, were finding and collecting.

What a ridiculous statement. Mark Fuhrman was played as a race card pure and simple to appeal to the jury and the bad feeling for the LAPD. Examine the entire chronology of events closely; Fuhrman planted nothing, he collected no blood (how do you account for the blood trail leading to OJ's place with HIS blood?).......did Fuhrman slice up OJ's finger too? did Fuhrman doctor the photos of OJ wearing the Bruno Magli shoes that matched the shoeprints found at the murder scene, a fact that OJ lied about that he never owned such shoes.............he lied because he knew it was likely they had his shoeprints there at the scene.................the fact is, it was an incredibly sloppy murder done out of rage and passion.

Save the conspiracy bullshit for something worthy.

sickkittens · 03-01-2005, 08:43 AM

10+ years later and this is still being asked?

mardigras · 03-01-2005, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Wrong question, everyone knows he is innocent, the question should be, did he do it or not?

Big difference.

Actually, he was "not guilty", not "innocent". Big difference

Sosa · 03-01-2005, 08:46 AM

i'm sure he did it

MandyBlake · 03-01-2005, 08:47 AM

yup i totally think he did it.

mardigras · 03-01-2005, 08:51 AM

Mark Fuhrman didn't have to try to frame him. The LAPD and investigators bungled the case from minute one. Then the prosecution got the Hollywood bug and put on a farce. People often say there was jury nullification involved in the OJ case, but an all white jury would have found him not guilty based on that prosecution's case if they followed the letter of the law during deliberations. The civil trial on the otherhand was another story. With "making a name/new career" for the pundits out of the equation they were able to do what was needed to do to get a judgment.

NoCarrier · 03-01-2005, 08:51 AM

No he was innocent.

That's because he was hilarious in the Naked Gun movies. You can't be funny and guilty at the same time.

Manowar · 03-01-2005, 08:52 AM

Definetly guilty.

ADL Colin · 03-01-2005, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sickkittens

10+ years later and this is still being asked?

Moses. Accused of killing an Egyptian. Was he guilty or innocent?

escorpio · 03-01-2005, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bansheelinks

Yep its always good to try and frame someone BEFORE you even know what all the other officers on the scene, and there were 50 there before him, were finding and collecting.

What a ridiculous statement. Mark Fuhrman was played as a race card pure and simple to appeal to the jury and the bad feeling for the LAPD. Examine the entire chronology of events closely; Fuhrman planted nothing, he collected no blood (how do you account for the blood trail leading to OJ's place with HIS blood?).......did Fuhrman slice up OJ's finger too? did Fuhrman doctor the photos of OJ wearing the Bruno Magli shoes that matched the shoeprints found at the murder scene, a fact that OJ lied about that he never owned such shoes.............he lied because he knew it was likely they had his shoeprints there at the scene.................the fact is, it was an incredibly sloppy murder done out of rage and passion.

Save the conspiracy bullshit for something worthy.

But he said "niggger"!

Greg B · 03-01-2005, 09:08 AM

Based on the evidence he's innocent. Toooo many fuckups.

The one thing that did it for me were those footprints at the crime scene. Any old time fan of OJ knows he's the most bowlegged, pigeon toed dude on the gridiron. Even when they took those pics of him wearing those Bruno Magli shoes his foot is bent so far in you can see his ankles. Not only that, but the picture of him wearing those shoes was taken at a stadium with tens of thousands of people but only ONE pic of him showed up??? Like thousands of other people attending an historic event didn't bring their cameras?

So those footprints were side by side even-steven. Like OJ suddenly could perform a mircale and straighten out a lifetime bone disorder?

Oh yeah, kinda odd how them footprints are barely noticeable once they trail off toward the back gate but for some strange reason Furman could see damn near a full print inside a car at night to the detail of size and brand of shoe.

Also, Dr. Lee the forensics expert said after the trial that one piece of evidence not allowed to be admitted was that bloody glove. The prosecution said OJ climbed over a fence and dropped a bloody glove but there was no blood anywhere to be found on the thick foliage on top of the fence! Yes, OJ has non blood staining plants he got when he traded in his cow for magic non blood staining seeds.

Oh yeah, the glove, hat, didn't fit eithers.

No it wasn't OJ it was Detective Frank Drebben who was moonlighting selling ginsu knife sets and his clumsiness got out of hand.

nojob · 03-01-2005, 09:09 AM

I think that he was guilty. It shouldnt take that much to prove that you are innocent.

XxXotic · 03-01-2005, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bansheelinks

Yep its always good to try and frame someone BEFORE you even know what all the other officers on the scene, and there were 50 there before him, were finding and collecting.

What a ridiculous statement. Mark Fuhrman was played as a race card pure and simple to appeal to the jury and the bad feeling for the LAPD. Examine the entire chronology of events closely; Fuhrman planted nothing, he collected no blood (how do you account for the blood trail leading to OJ's place with HIS blood?).......did Fuhrman slice up OJ's finger too? did Fuhrman doctor the photos of OJ wearing the Bruno Magli shoes that matched the shoeprints found at the murder scene, a fact that OJ lied about that he never owned such shoes.............he lied because he knew it was likely they had his shoeprints there at the scene.................the fact is, it was an incredibly sloppy murder done out of rage and passion.

Save the conspiracy bullshit for something worthy.

wtf does collecting evidence have to do with mark trying to frame OJ? picture this then tell me how the fuck cops being there have ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT

mark sees nicole, gets his mack on she turns him down. he gets mad and kills her and her fruity ass crackhead boyfriend and plants the evidence at OJ's house. reports go into the police, cops arrive at OJ's and find planted evidence.

this is like 3rd grade shit here man, you don't have to be the 1st cop on scene in order to frame someone, hell furman didn't even need to show up to OJ's house at all and he STILL could have framed him. It's not hard to do, especially when you have access like furman would have had at the time.

I don't actually believe this theory but it *IS* possible

Bansheelinks · 03-01-2005, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XxXotic

wtf does collecting evidence have to do with mark trying to frame OJ? picture this then tell me how the fuck cops being there have ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT

mark sees nicole, gets his mack on she turns him down. he gets mad and kills her and her fruity ass crackhead boyfriend and plants the evidence at OJ's house. reports go into the police, cops arrive at OJ's and find planted evidence.

this is like 3rd grade shit here man, you don't have to be the 1st cop on scene in order to frame someone, hell furman didn't even need to show up to OJ's house at all and he STILL could have framed him. It's not hard to do, especially when you have access like furman would have had at the time.

I don't actually believe this theory but it *IS* possible

boy oh boy
@-)

8-x

Pornwolf · 03-01-2005, 10:47 AM

Heh heh, this question is much like a religion or politics question.

Bansheelinks · 03-01-2005, 10:57 AM

there's a lot of stupid people out there perfectly willing to dismiss DNA evidence for whatever reasons, be they political, racial, or out of ignorance due to a lack of education.............its the dumbed-down tabloid mentality.

when it comes to homicide, i'll put my faith in forensics over the inflammatory demagogue, Johnnie Cochran. if you still think he's innocent, do some reading and investigation...............and if thats too hard, go back to your taped episodes of "Hard Copy" and "A Current Affair"

wjxxx · 03-01-2005, 11:37 AM

He killed her.

03-01-2005, 02:21 AM	#1
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	OJ. Was he guilty or innocent? OJ. Was he guilty or innocent? __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"

03-01-2005, 02:23 AM	#3
Johny Traffic Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 5,461	Is there any doubt it was him? __________________ hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blog

03-01-2005, 02:30 AM	#4
slipkid Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: USA Posts: 791	GUILTY as fuck __________________ Tons of porn sites Sell Adult products on your sites

03-01-2005, 02:36 AM	#6
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	Q: Why do they call O.J. "Juice"? A: Because he beat his wife to a pulp. __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"

03-01-2005, 06:57 AM	#12
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	When OJ started dating again, he was quoted as saying "I'd like to take another stab at it" __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

03-01-2005, 02:22 AM	#2
spentrent Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: LA Posts: 876	Ask Nicole. WE SHALL NEVER KNOW?

03-01-2005, 02:34 AM	#5
reynold Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Global Traveler Posts: 51,271	I say he's guilty.

03-01-2005, 02:39 AM	#7
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	Wrong question, everyone knows he is innocent, the question should be, did he do it or not? Big difference.

03-01-2005, 02:44 AM	#9
swedguy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 7,981	Is the pope catholic?

03-01-2005, 02:49 AM	#10
jamesonxx Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 758	I think he's guilty.

03-01-2005, 06:52 AM	#11
Hey You . . . I Know You! Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,908	Guilty or innocent of what? Why wasn't anything in the news or on tv regarding this?

03-01-2005, 07:02 AM	#14
gh0st So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 928	naw he's innocent, i killed her.. and they still haven't caught me... bwahahahahahaha for the feds that lurk around here, yes, i'm just kidding around <^>

03-01-2005, 07:05 AM	#16
David! By the wrath of Agamemnon Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Miami Posts: 6,501	He is as innocent as Michael Jackson in a middle school __________________ .

03-01-2005, 07:09 AM	#17
tungsten Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 10,579	he did it __________________ VOYEUR /HOMEMADE, HENTAI / CARTOON, Reality, Amateur, Shemale, Hardcore, Cuckold, Celebrity, Retro/Vintage, ect...ALL OUR SITES >> Unbelievable Ratio \| High % of Rebills \| Bi-Monthly Payments (also to E-Passporte) Ton's of EXCLUSIVE Free content & FHG's \|=> GREAT REVENUE $$$ GUARANTEED!

03-01-2005, 07:25 AM	#20
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	All I know is that he was rich

03-01-2005, 07:26 AM	#21
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,943	Guilty as sin...he should have fried but what do we know __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

03-01-2005, 07:44 AM	#23
maxdaname Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,193	I think he's guilty! They pulled the race card and it worked. Many, many, MANY black people defended him because he was known as a positive black icon. He was a great football player turned part time actor. Cultural Icons represent their people that's why they can't fail. I think if O.J. would've been a regular or a thug black dude killing his white woman, he would've been locked up for at least 25 years...

03-01-2005, 07:45 AM	#24
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	Anyone who knows anything about science knows he is guilty of murdering both his ex wife and Ron Goldman. That question has already been answered beyond a shadow of a doubt. We leave it to the uneducated to even dispute this, for whatever reasons they may be harboring.

03-01-2005, 08:23 AM	#25
IwantU Bryan Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Costa Rica Posts: 1,764	Yeah, it´s tough to say, but i think he is guilty __________________ Bryan D ICQ: 293214625 !!!Coming Soon!!!

03-01-2005, 08:27 AM	#26
XxXotic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Da Swamps Posts: 8,500	innocent, mark fuhrman tried to frame him __________________ Sponsors.. Tired of people not using your shitty RSS Feeds? Let Us Help You! Oxeo - Serious Hosting For Serious Webmasters. iCQ:135.887013

03-01-2005, 08:28 AM	#27
fl_prn_str Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Tampa, FL Posts: 5,736	oh.....he was like sooooooooooooooo innocent.......4 shizzle....

03-01-2005, 08:43 AM	#31
sickkittens I am a meat popsicle. Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,100	10+ years later and this is still being asked? __________________ HIGHEST PAYOUTS FOR NO-CONSOLE TOURS IN THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY! THIS SIG CAN BE YOURS FOR $200 - ICQ: 78881543

03-01-2005, 08:46 AM	#33
Sosa In Tushy Land Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Nebraska Posts: 40,149	i'm sure he did it

03-01-2005, 08:47 AM	#34
MandyBlake The one and only! Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 17,761	yup i totally think he did it. __________________ Mandy's Playhouse Her First Fat Girl If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921

03-01-2005, 08:51 AM	#35
mardigras Bon temps! Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: down yonder Posts: 14,194	Mark Fuhrman didn't have to try to frame him. The LAPD and investigators bungled the case from minute one. Then the prosecution got the Hollywood bug and put on a farce. People often say there was jury nullification involved in the OJ case, but an all white jury would have found him not guilty based on that prosecution's case if they followed the letter of the law during deliberations. The civil trial on the otherhand was another story. With "making a name/new career" for the pundits out of the equation they were able to do what was needed to do to get a judgment.

03-01-2005, 08:51 AM	#36
NoCarrier We need more free porn Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 16,356	No he was innocent. That's because he was hilarious in the Naked Gun movies. You can't be funny and guilty at the same time. __________________

03-01-2005, 08:52 AM	#37
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	Definetly guilty.

03-01-2005, 09:08 AM	#40
Greg B So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: EARTH (for the time being) Posts: 7,014	Based on the evidence he's innocent. Toooo many fuckups. The one thing that did it for me were those footprints at the crime scene. Any old time fan of OJ knows he's the most bowlegged, pigeon toed dude on the gridiron. Even when they took those pics of him wearing those Bruno Magli shoes his foot is bent so far in you can see his ankles. Not only that, but the picture of him wearing those shoes was taken at a stadium with tens of thousands of people but only ONE pic of him showed up??? Like thousands of other people attending an historic event didn't bring their cameras? So those footprints were side by side even-steven. Like OJ suddenly could perform a mircale and straighten out a lifetime bone disorder? Oh yeah, kinda odd how them footprints are barely noticeable once they trail off toward the back gate but for some strange reason Furman could see damn near a full print inside a car at night to the detail of size and brand of shoe. Also, Dr. Lee the forensics expert said after the trial that one piece of evidence not allowed to be admitted was that bloody glove. The prosecution said OJ climbed over a fence and dropped a bloody glove but there was no blood anywhere to be found on the thick foliage on top of the fence! Yes, OJ has non blood staining plants he got when he traded in his cow for magic non blood staining seeds. Oh yeah, the glove, hat, didn't fit eithers. No it wasn't OJ it was Detective Frank Drebben who was moonlighting selling ginsu knife sets and his clumsiness got out of hand.

03-01-2005, 09:09 AM	#41
nojob The Original NoJob Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Jerzzey Posts: 3,682	I think that he was guilty. It shouldnt take that much to prove that you are innocent.

03-01-2005, 10:47 AM	#44
Pornwolf Drunk and Unruly Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hollywood Posts: 22,712	Heh heh, this question is much like a religion or politics question. __________________ I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade... Webair, bitches.

03-01-2005, 10:57 AM	#45
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	there's a lot of stupid people out there perfectly willing to dismiss DNA evidence for whatever reasons, be they political, racial, or out of ignorance due to a lack of education.............its the dumbed-down tabloid mentality. when it comes to homicide, i'll put my faith in forensics over the inflammatory demagogue, Johnnie Cochran. if you still think he's innocent, do some reading and investigation...............and if thats too hard, go back to your taped episodes of "Hard Copy" and "A Current Affair"

03-01-2005, 11:37 AM	#46
wjxxx So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 4,448	He killed her.