'tis true. I'm too lazy to search GFY for the thread.

But it's out there.

I dont have site or a program so nothing to be jealous about. The sites I once had were also not in the CP niche. Teen yes, CP, no.

Please go see the rest of your peers that agree with my stance on this subject.

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/435438-hot-teen-girl.html

acceptible by who's standards??

we produce content to meet fantasies - whether they be milf's or gay - thats what porn is all about. As I said before, that its a matter of an individuals interpretation - what you see as being underage may not be to someone else.

The adult industry for all the good it may have is still here to make money.. simple as that. We owe no explanation to anyone what does or does not appeal to members. To simply stop producing teen content for fear that they look under 18 opens up any website to witch hunts - which is what you are attempting now !!

Using your logic we should stop producing gay content simply because it may cause divorces and alter teen men to grow up gay. The adult industry is not .. NOT .. responsible for how the content is perceived or what happens as a result. If so, then lawsuits would raining down.

Sorry but this is your interpretation, it may be right - but this falls under the category of.. "if you dont like it then dont use it or sign up for it" rather than create a thread attempting to push your views onto others

PerfectionGirls Jeff used to sell pedo sites himself:

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/87169-ccbill-pulling-plug.html

Yup. it is.

this thread had to be some sort of publicity stunt.

http://www.sexy-celebs.net/hotlink/owneddoggy.jpg

I see absolutely nothing wrong with the sites dude.

i have nothing to add.

wait - i have: Topanga is cute and i'd definitely hit her. :thumbsup

hahaha, good one Johnny :)

fiddy type shit

50 comments to sickest shit ever

which are you Jeff the Pot or the Kettle?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh


late like me :winkwink:

I don't really see what the uproar is about. Those sites are clearly marketed as 18 year olds. What freaks me out even more is - anyone get OMP new model notifications? About once a month I am getting 15-17 year old girls with their butt cheeks hanging out of thongs looking for (non-node, rightttttt) shoots.

Really the teen thing is just a fantasy and I don't see the issue as long as the site is clearly marketed as having 18 year old girls. I don't see where those sites step over the line.

Weren't you caught shaving?? perfection jeff??
am I missing something....

Teen Revenue - Great looking sites

In case anyone hasn't signed up yet. Looks like it will be a real money maker.

Dressed down? Where? I see a chick with braces. People of all ages can get braces. At 18 years old, my ex-girlfriend still had hers. Hell, her dad got braces in his 40s.

I agree to an extent, but all of what you used as examples are well within the limits of the law. While i do not care for gay content or the lifestyle I dont try to moralize, condem or push my personal views on others. I dont like it, I dont look. I see this as a different issue all together. Its not a moral issue for me at all. Ive pushed teen solo site girls since the day I started, all within the limits of the law and never dressing down a girl to look younger then she is. Making them look cute with a pony tail or something is one thing... making them look 12 or 13 is quite another. What I see here is a program using an illegal media in a legal fashion.

I know without question the content of these sites are legal. Im not suggesting that they arnt. What I am questioning is the motive behind the way the models are portrayed. A new standard has been set for sure and nothing, not even the boundries of CP are sacred anymore.

Sorry, its how I feel.

What are you smokin? Just because a model (who's 22 by the way) has her hair tied up in pony tails and has braces, that offends you?

I'd just echo The Legacy's post.

Oh my God I didn't look at the sites before. Trixie Teen can get this Negro Cock for sure!

I mailed you 2 days ago, can you please check, since ICQ is down :-(

No different than your girls Jeff.

Then what are you doing with this thread?

Grade "A" moron.

Dude, put that little sound bite back into its context. Read below.


"I agree to an extent, but all of what you used as examples are well within the limits of the law. While i do not care for gay content or the lifestyle I dont try to moralize, condem or push my personal views on others. I dont like it, I dont look. I see this as a different issue all together. Its not a moral issue for me at all. Ive pushed teen solo site girls since the day I started, all within the limits of the law and never dressing down a girl to look younger then she is. Making them look cute with a pony tail or something is one thing... making them look 12 or 13 is quite another. What I see here is a program using an illegal media in a legal fashion."

Tell me she does not look 12.
http://teentopanga.com/updates/14.jpg

I dont like those sites either..... It leaves me with a creepy feeling

However, I market some sites that a lot here wouldnt like as well..... I have to respect that

If you are REALLY upset then do something about it..... I suspect you wont

Great, Jeff had underaged sites, caught shaving and now is attacking a perfectly fine, non shaving, 18+ site/webmaster.

Hmm something is wrong in this story.

Jeff, shut your hole....you make yourself look like a retard more and more with every reply you make.

What could one do? Its legal. However, once upon a time, not that long ago, this industry would have drawn and quartered the producers of sites that shown a teen girl in this fashion. Times have changed I guess.

You said you don't push your personal views unto others, yet that's what you are doing. Context is irrelavant in this statement of yours.

Actually, she looks 16 to me. Ugly 16, but still 18 none the less. Some people just look young to begin with. I had a girlfriend who was 19 and looked 14. It just happens. There ARE sites that go too far with it, as MET did in the past, they went out of their way to make the girls look 12 and pre-pubescent. That's why nobody touched them until as of late when they got their act together.

I understand your points about the whole matter and agree with you on many levels of it, but attacking teenrevenue is like attacking yourself man. The girls look just as young as some of the girls you've shot in the past. Why is it different for you and not OK for them?

Sure use what you think I did to justify the wrong doings of others.

I dont care if you think I look like a retard with every post or not. Im not here to make a buck or win yours or anyone else affection.

:321GFY

nice stuff michael :)

fuck the haters

This is the model in the topanaga site. Clearly she is 18 or over.

http://www.perfectpeople.net/media/celebs/212/0132.jpg

Here she is here dressed down to look like a 12 year old for this site.

http://galleries.teentopanga.com/008...2/DSC08456.jpg


Please. In the top pick she looks her age. Please, please tell me that this was not staged to make the girl look 12.

How is it supporting the child porn industry? By your own opinion, it's taking the aim off of illegal children, and putting the main subject on legal adult females. You may not like it, but it's helping to put a halt to child porn.

You are a moron. That isn't the same girl. The top girl is the girl who played Topanga in Boy Meets World.

Yes, Im sure the Attorney General will see it that way also.

This from a guy who used to run underage non nude sites too. Did you photograph the underage girls yourself?

Thanks for the link though, little april does great and I can only imagine those other legal over 18 girl sites must convert awesome.

:winkwink: