GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   NHL cancels entire season (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=432559)

tungsten 02-16-2005 01:42 PM

the players that went to europe are probably making 1/10th of what they could be in the NHL

ronaldo 02-16-2005 01:44 PM

Once, just ONCE, I'd like to see an owner pay a player 50% of his salary because his performance sucked.

Player's have no problem holding out for more money when they have ONE good year, so why the hell not?

Lock out that ONE player until he agrees to a salary reduction.

How fast would a breach of contract lawsuit take in that case?

Why an owner didn't try suing a player for breach of contract when he held out, I'll never know.

V_RocKs 02-16-2005 01:45 PM

FUCK CANADA!

On a lighter note... damn....

andrej_NDC 02-16-2005 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane
there is no other hockey league in the world that will pay these players what they make in the NHL. A good example. Jagr made 13 million last year. He argues that when he plays hockey, that is what he is worth so that is what he should be paid. You could argue if he is worth that, but clearly one team was willing to pay it regardless. So then on the lockout comes and he ends up playing in russia for 1.5 million. So he says he's worth 13 mil but is obviously willing to play for much much less. Many NHL players ( some of the big stars in the game ) went off to play in europe for 1/10th of what they made in the NHL. I think in doing this they shot themselves in the foot becase it told the owners that the players are willing to play for less.

good point

NaughtyINC 02-16-2005 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo
Once, just ONCE, I'd like to see an owner pay a player 50% of his salary because his performance sucked.

Player's have no problem holding out for more money when they have ONE good year, so why the hell not?

Lock out that ONE player until he agrees to a salary reduction.

How fast would a breach of contract lawsuit take in that case?

Why an owner didn't try suing a player for breach of contract when he held out, I'll never know.

i would rather do a pps type system with hockey players :)

but ur right.. but its not just the players fault here.. owners are greedy and so forth.. either way its out of hand on both sides..

andrej_NDC 02-16-2005 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net
:1orglaugh nice try


put it this way... I do 1 million a year.. Because you are vital to my success.. I pay you 50% ... $500k .. Why? Because I think you are worth %50 of the business...(even though that % can be negotiated) Next year.. I make $300k .. you think you should get $500k .. base on fucking what? Your salary is based on profits... If I make $20 millions.. you get 10millions.. If i make $300k you get $150k ..... Its not a hard concept to grasp is it..?

but players are not partners, but emplyees, if you have an employee, you have to pay him the salary no matter if you make 1 million or $300k per year.

xxxdesign-net 02-16-2005 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC
but players are not partners, but emplyees, if you have an employee, you have to pay him the salary no matter if you make 1 million or $300k per year.

wrong...

there's 2 types of employes.. those who are paid for what the work they do is worth... based on scholarity, skills, experience, etc.. but not based on revenues..
Exemple.. construction workers, doctors, etc...

And employes with salaries based on the revenues they can generate... Employes that are not replacable and directly responsible for the revenue genrated...

Why do you think certain celebrities are paid $20M and sport athetes are paid millions...? Why do you think footaball players are paid 2x more than hockey players..? Because they work harder? No, because they simply generate more revenues...

andrej_NDC 02-16-2005 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net
Why do you think certain celebrities are paid $20M and sport athetes are paid millions...? Why do you think footaball players are paid 2x more than hockey players..? Because they work harder? No, because they simply generate more revenues...

of course, more publicity, more money...But the owner of the company, movie company, football club, hockey club has to know what he can afford to pay. Not to make a contract and then say: Oh, sorry, my calculations were wrong, I have to cut your salary.

kane 02-16-2005 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo
Once, just ONCE, I'd like to see an owner pay a player 50% of his salary because his performance sucked.

Player's have no problem holding out for more money when they have ONE good year, so why the hell not?

Lock out that ONE player until he agrees to a salary reduction.

How fast would a breach of contract lawsuit take in that case?

Why an owner didn't try suing a player for breach of contract when he held out, I'll never know.

I agree.

A great example. Adrian Beltre ( a baseball player ) has been an average to above average player his whole career and makes around 5 million a year last year he had a break out year and signed a 5 year 11.5 million a year contract. But I bet if he goes back to being average this year he won't be giving back a bunch of that money.

ronaldo 02-16-2005 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane
I agree.

A great example. Adrian Beltre ( a baseball player ) has been an average to above average player his whole career and makes around 5 million a year last year he had a break out year and signed a 5 year 11.5 million a year contract. But I bet if he goes back to being average this year he won't be giving back a bunch of that money.

Exactly.

The WORST incident, I've EVER heard of was Keith Tkachuk in Winnipeg about 10 years ago.

Jackass signed a front loaded contract for say 5 million year one, and one million for years two, three and four. He AGREED to these terms, and signed it.

He played the first year, NO problem, as he was one of the highest paid players in the league.

Year two rolled around and he held out, because he was now being underpaid. Nevermind that he was being OVERPAID the year previous.

That's pretty much when the NHL players lost my respect.

Edit-Those figures show him making an average of 2 million per year (which is probably about right for time actually), so why not just sign a four year deal for 8 million dollars? Presumably because he had full intention of not honoring the deal beyond year one.

xxxdesign-net 02-16-2005 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC
of course, more publicity, more money...But the owner of the company, movie company, football club, hockey club has to know what he can afford to pay. Not to make a contract and then say: Oh, sorry, my calculations were wrong, I have to cut your salary.

you dont seem to understand to high revenue teams set player value by paying them more than what they are worth (based on average team revenues)...

Small revenue teams need to pay players more than what they are worth just to lose LESS revenues that they would have lost without any star players...

High revenue teams pay players more than they are worth because they'll lose money if they dont get those star players while letting their COMPETITORS have them...

Thats the reason why a cap based on revenues is important.. to set rules for the owners to follow...

swedguy 02-16-2005 03:13 PM

Sweet! Then we get to keep all the NHL players for the rest of the season :thumbsup

Jman 02-16-2005 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Chris
I was actually optimistic that overnight talks would produce some kind of resolution to this. Apparently it hasn't.

The players are idiots. They have no idea how this will impact the game. :mad:

Those players are overgrown kids with a wayyy to large EGO...

Maurice Richard must be fucking turning in is grave...

No wonder i stopped watching this great game over 5 years ago.

andrej_NDC 02-16-2005 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net
you dont seem to understand to high revenue teams set player value by paying them more than what they are worth (based on average team revenues)...

Small revenue teams need to pay players more than what they are worth just to lose LESS revenues that they would have lost without any star players...

High revenue teams pay players more than they are worth because they'll lose money if they dont get those star players while letting their COMPETITORS have them...

Thats the reason why a cap based on revenues is important.. to set rules for the owners to follow...

Well, here in Europe it works different, in soccer, hockey and all other sports. There are bigger clubs with more money and smaller clubs with less money. A smaller club will not pay a player if they cant afford them, just to take him away from the competitor. They work like efficient company, no money, no expensive players. This is how economy should work.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123