"Technology could be used to keep children from adult sites" - GoFuckYourself.com

Pipeline Q · 02-11-2005, 02:00 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/02/10/b....ap/index.html

What the fuck is that? As if that will fly with Americans.

Harmon · 02-11-2005, 02:01 PM

The only "BONE" they need to analyze is this 2 inch cocktail weenie I have in my polyester gym teacher shorts

gh0st · 02-11-2005, 02:01 PM

That's some communist shit right there

polish_aristocrat · 02-11-2005, 02:03 PM

Quote:

NEW YORK (AP) -- A leading security company is exploring technology for verifying whether a user is a child or an adult by analyzing a bone in a person's finger.

Users simply place a middle finger against a device that attaches to a computer. The device uses ultrasound waves to check more than a dozen biometric attributes, including how much calcium is present (children have less than adults).

The device can then determine the probability the user is a child or an adult.

As if this would be always accurate and could distinguish if someone is 17 or 19

but then again, if you are 19 and the device wilkl tell you you are a child, you can sue the producer and get $50 Million

welcome to America

Pipeline Q · 02-11-2005, 05:49 PM

I wouldn't be suprised if we see more of this sort of thing.

Once a feesable method of accurately verifying age over the internet becomes available the government will seriously consider requiring all adult themed sites to deploy the technology, much like the V-Chip.

For the patent holder of such technology, that will be good news. You want an adult site, you'll have to pay a royalty.

I still think the best way is to label sites with ICRA.org codes. MSIE comes standard with parental controls that make use of those codes, and kids simply can't get around it. The key is getting all adult sites to include it, which won't happen unless it's made into a law....

Rochard · 02-11-2005, 06:15 PM

That will never fly.
a) the cost of buying such a device would sky high. Generally people with kids don't have that kind of money.
b) How will this device tell you if it's adult content they are looking at?
c) Small boned people - like Jordan Capri - although of legal age wouldn't be able to log on as an adult.

Mike Okitch · 02-11-2005, 06:47 PM

Complete fucking bullshit.

tungsten · 02-11-2005, 06:48 PM

this shit wont fly

BlackCrayon · 02-11-2005, 07:12 PM

what about the dwarves? they need porn too.

Mr.Fiction · 02-11-2005, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gh0st

That's some communist shit right there

The right wing wants to turn America into China.

GatorB · 02-11-2005, 07:33 PM

WTF ever happened to personal responsibility. I am a aprent of a9 year old. I am responsible for his internet useage. I can tell you my kid has been on the net since he was 4 and he has NEVER seen porn. He doesn't have an e-mail address( WTF do kids need e-mail for? ) and he's is not allowed to chat. That's called PARENTING.

02-11-2005, 02:00 PM	#1
Pipeline Q Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 3,891	"Technology could be used to keep children from adult sites" http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/02/10/b....ap/index.html What the fuck is that? As if that will fly with Americans.

02-11-2005, 02:01 PM	#2
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,010	The only "BONE" they need to analyze is this 2 inch cocktail weenie I have in my polyester gym teacher shorts __________________ [email protected]

02-11-2005, 06:15 PM	#6
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 74,001	That will never fly. a) the cost of buying such a device would sky high. Generally people with kids don't have that kind of money. b) How will this device tell you if it's adult content they are looking at? c) Small boned people - like Jordan Capri - although of legal age wouldn't be able to log on as an adult. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

02-11-2005, 06:47 PM	#7
Mike Okitch Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Posts: 4,126	Complete fucking bullshit. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

02-11-2005, 06:48 PM	#8
tungsten Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 10,579	this shit wont fly __________________ VOYEUR /HOMEMADE, HENTAI / CARTOON, Reality, Amateur, Shemale, Hardcore, Cuckold, Celebrity, Retro/Vintage, ect...ALL OUR SITES >> Unbelievable Ratio \| High % of Rebills \| Bi-Monthly Payments (also to E-Passporte) Ton's of EXCLUSIVE Free content & FHG's \|=> GREAT REVENUE $$$ GUARANTEED!

02-11-2005, 02:01 PM	#3
gh0st So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 928	That's some communist shit right there

02-11-2005, 05:49 PM	#5
Pipeline Q Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 3,891	I wouldn't be suprised if we see more of this sort of thing. Once a feesable method of accurately verifying age over the internet becomes available the government will seriously consider requiring all adult themed sites to deploy the technology, much like the V-Chip. For the patent holder of such technology, that will be good news. You want an adult site, you'll have to pay a royalty. I still think the best way is to label sites with ICRA.org codes. MSIE comes standard with parental controls that make use of those codes, and kids simply can't get around it. The key is getting all adult sites to include it, which won't happen unless it's made into a law....

02-11-2005, 07:12 PM	#9
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	what about the dwarves? they need porn too. __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

02-11-2005, 07:33 PM	#11
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	WTF ever happened to personal responsibility. I am a aprent of a9 year old. I am responsible for his internet useage. I can tell you my kid has been on the net since he was 4 and he has NEVER seen porn. He doesn't have an e-mail address( WTF do kids need e-mail for? ) and he's is not allowed to chat. That's called PARENTING.