Choker banned! - GoFuckYourself.com

BloodFart · 12-20-2004, 08:50 PM

Who SHOULD be banned

Sleazydream for posting "in 6 years she could be a pornstar" refering to chokers 12 year old daughter

or choker who IS BANNED for calling him a pedo

Doctor Dre · 12-20-2004, 08:52 PM

It's Lensman's call, not ours

European Lee · 12-20-2004, 08:52 PM

Who cares

Regards,

Lee

Sly · 12-20-2004, 08:53 PM

Neither.

polish_aristocrat · 12-20-2004, 08:53 PM

hehe, you stole my idea to make a poll

but I don't think this poll will have much influence on Lensman's decision

pussyluver · 12-20-2004, 08:53 PM

It would take choker a hell of a long time to catch up to all the nasty stuff Sleazy has said on the board.

Dre is right, not our call in the end.

digifan · 12-20-2004, 08:57 PM

I think none of them should be banned.. they are able to sort this out themselves, they are adults and not the typical schoolboys looking for drama.

pussyluver · 12-20-2004, 09:00 PM

Tribal council meeting tonight ? not looking good for Sleazy.

polish_aristocrat · 12-20-2004, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
Tribal council meeting tonight ? not looking good for Sleazy.

5% : 95% so far

JayJay · 12-20-2004, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly
Neither.

Funky Bastard · 12-20-2004, 09:36 PM

If chokers gone the Sleazy needs to go with him!

Basic_man · 12-20-2004, 09:37 PM

I prefer Choker to Sleazy !

KMR Stitch · 12-20-2004, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Doctor Dre
It's Lensman's call, not ours

JayJay · 12-20-2004, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HKS
If chokers gone the Sleazy needs to go with him!

Thats true

polish_aristocrat · 12-20-2004, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Basic_man
I prefer Choker to Sleazy !

Judging by the poll you are not the only one.

emthree · 12-20-2004, 09:44 PM

You like feeding on other peoples probs, dont you?
You're a fucking bottom feeding bitch

emthree · 12-20-2004, 09:46 PM

shit - I voted wrong.
That makes it -1 for choker and +1 for sleazydream should be banned.

18clips · 12-20-2004, 09:48 PM

Nobody Vote Its Mean Spirited & Not in The Theme of Christmas

Get these 2 hevy weight prize fighting cocks in the ring!

If its true the vote should be on wether Lensman has the right to judge, if he's so willing to do so maybe he could referee the boxing

Choker V Mr Sleze

At the next big gathering we should have a boxing ring with choker in one corner and mr sleez in the other wearing those huge over-sized boxing gloves. Loser gives $1000 to the winners charity.

sean416 · 12-20-2004, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emthree
shit - I voted wrong.
That makes it -1 for choker and +1 for sleazydream should be banned.

lol. you just shitted on the guy for makign the poll, then you voted on the poll, and fucked up your answer.

I dont mean to laugh at you, but even you gotta admit thats kinda funny.

Meloncash · 12-20-2004, 09:51 PM

Ban them both, then unban the Boobmaster

maxdaname · 12-20-2004, 09:54 PM

Sleazy is a god

GiantGnome · 12-20-2004, 09:56 PM

calling someone a pedo gets you banned? since when?

BloodFart · 12-20-2004, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emthree
shit - I voted wrong.
That makes it -1 for choker and +1 for sleazydream should be banned.

So you're being a parasite on my bottom feeding poll? fucking asshat.

pussyluver · 12-20-2004, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HKS
If chokers gone the Sleazy needs to go with him!

Agree.

If you have much of a post count, you've prolly said somethings you wish you could take back. I have. Does the thread in question really rise to a ban? Pimpdogg used to make very offensive slurs and not get banned. He did go far enough to get banned though.

Why not let the dust settle. Ban Choker and I'm not sure he'd come back? Other than that, the board seems to be speaking through the poll.

Someone could be fucking with the board too??? There are those around with the technical ability to stir some shit.

Gotta believe, given who is involved that there would be some one on one discussion with the parties involved before a ban.

My

1215 · 12-20-2004, 10:12 PM

i dont think people should really post pics of any kids on here, especially their own. first, its just not right, simple conflict of interest. second, youre setting yourself up for asshole remarks. wether its a joke or not, you walked yourself into it by placing your own kids on the net, especially an adult related one. what, did you expect sleazy to say that in 4 years, shell be driving? hell, his nick says it all. now if chokers says it all as well, sleazy is in some trouble!

from another point of view, sleazy's joke completely fit the scenario of this forum - adult related and not giving a fuck. however, if someone posts their kids, you might have a little respect and not joke about them.

so...
1 - you shouldnt post kids pics here anyway, especially your own. i can see if its some random funny pic from the net, or a video of some kid falling off his skateboard. stuff like that would be ok.

2 - when people arent thinking in the right mind and post their kids here, dont insult them, even if its a joke. most people take pride in their kids, so a joke on their kids is a real slap in the face.

think about it, if you ban one of them, theres gonna be 9003345 posts about how it was unfair and why the unbanned should be banned.

id drop it and ban no one. but both of them should be warned to stop being a retard.

Babaganoosh · 12-20-2004, 10:31 PM

Since when did GFY become a democracy? I wish we could vote on banning people but so far that isn't a possibility.

Double L · 12-20-2004, 10:35 PM

Neither or Both...

SleazyDream · 12-20-2004, 11:00 PM

I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients.

here's the reason that I see.

My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable.

Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity.

I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation.

Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light.

broke · 12-20-2004, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1215
i dont think people should really post pics of any kids on here, especially their own. first, its just not right, simple conflict of interest. second, youre setting yourself up for asshole remarks. wether its a joke or not, you walked yourself into it by placing your own kids on the net, especially an adult related one. what, did you expect sleazy to say that in 4 years, shell be driving? hell, his nick says it all. now if chokers says it all as well, sleazy is in some trouble!

from another point of view, sleazy's joke completely fit the scenario of this forum - adult related and not giving a fuck. however, if someone posts their kids, you might have a little respect and not joke about them.

so...
1 - you shouldnt post kids pics here anyway, especially your own. i can see if its some random funny pic from the net, or a video of some kid falling off his skateboard. stuff like that would be ok.

2 - when people arent thinking in the right mind and post their kids here, dont insult them, even if its a joke. most people take pride in their kids, so a joke on their kids is a real slap in the face.

think about it, if you ban one of them, theres gonna be 9003345 posts about how it was unfair and why the unbanned should be banned.

id drop it and ban no one. but both of them should be warned to stop being a retard.

Remember when your opinion mattered... me neither.

SleazyDream · 12-20-2004, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
It would take choker a hell of a long time to catch up to all the nasty stuff Sleazy has said on the board.

Dre is right, not our call in the end.

i stand behind EVERY single statement I've ever made on this board. I'm made some wrong ones and apologied for them and owned up to them in the past, and I don't deny I've done so.

MonsterCock · 12-20-2004, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients.

here's the reason that I see.

My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable.

Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity.

I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation.

Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light.

Did you post this just to check if you were banned?

WarChild · 12-20-2004, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients.

here's the reason that I see.

My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable.

Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity.

I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation.

Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light.

Libel not liable. At least you knew it wasn't slander. Half marks there.

Mr Pheer · 12-20-2004, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients.

here's the reason that I see.

My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable.

Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity.

I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation.

Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light.

Did you mean LIBEL or LIABLE?

Rebecca Love · 12-20-2004, 11:07 PM

I plead the 5th on my vote!

But I do agree, if one goes, both should go.

Chris · 12-20-2004, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WarChild
Libel not liable. At least you knew it wasn't slander. Half marks there.

Oh no he didnt * snaps fingers *

this is one for the ages

theking · 12-20-2004, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
i stand behind EVERY single statement I've ever made on this board.

Well...there it is people...straight from the horse's...err hog's...mouth. Confirmation that he is an "idiot".

WarChild · 12-20-2004, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JupZChris

Oh no he didnt * snaps fingers *

this is one for the ages

I don't normally spend much time pointing out spelling mistakes when people can't even master the very basics of their native language.

However, if somebody is going to make a post making a big deal out of a word, using it over and over and even all in capital letters, they should at least be using the right word.

SleazyDream · 12-20-2004, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rebecca Love
I plead the 5th on my vote! But I do agree, if one goes, both should go.

I think i just LOST a lot of respect for you. I can't fucking stand people who don't have a god damn clue about what they are talkign about. do you mind QUANTIFYING THAT? - GFY is full of rude comments all the time. Accusing someone of being a PEDO is another matter.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 12-20-2004, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
I think i just LOST a lot of respect for you. I can't fucking stand people who don't have a god damn clue about what they are talkign about. do you mind QUANTIFYING THAT? - GFY is full of rude comments all the time. Accusing someone of being a PEDO is another matter.

And asking someone there kid gonna be a pornstar is OK?

SleazyDream · 12-20-2004, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
And asking someone there kid gonna be a pornstar is OK?

read url

fris · 12-20-2004, 11:30 PM

i vote lee to be banned for putting regards in every post

DaLord · 12-20-2004, 11:31 PM

LOL 90% pointing fingers at Sleazydream at the moment. That's a bit mean... but then again!

escorpio · 12-21-2004, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by WarChild
However, if somebody is going to make a post making a big deal out of a word, using it over and over and even all in capital letters, they should at least be using the right word.

And not calling someone an "idiot".

Cavello · 12-21-2004, 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
i stand behind EVERY single statement I've ever made on this board. I'm made some wrong ones and apologied for them and owned up to them in the past, and I don't deny I've done so.

you didn't own up to this one. You only said it was rude of you after Choker wasn't able to post. Way to be a pussy.

I know Lensman's the one that pays the bills but the vote at least shows how some people feel.

SleazyDream · 12-21-2004, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DaLord
LOL 90% pointing fingers at Sleazydream at the moment. That's a bit mean... but then again!

90% no names

SleazyDream · 12-21-2004, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
And asking someone there kid gonna be a pornstar is OK?

is your child a pornstar?

Cavello · 12-21-2004, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
is your child a pornstar?

You live in a small box, don't you ? You just can not stop shitting on your self.

Doctor Dre · 12-23-2004, 07:18 AM

Damn we cannot see who voted

chemicaleyes · 12-23-2004, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Neither.

TheSwed · 12-23-2004, 07:23 AM

View Poll Results: Who SHOULD be banned? Sleazy or choker?
Choker	11	7.86%
Sleazydream	129	92.14%
Voters: 140. You may not vote on this poll

12-20-2004, 08:50 PM	#1
BloodFart Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 728	Choker banned! Who SHOULD be banned Sleazydream for posting "in 6 years she could be a pornstar" refering to chokers 12 year old daughter or choker who IS BANNED for calling him a pedo

12-20-2004, 08:52 PM	#3
European Lee Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Daytona Beach Posts: 7,133	Who cares Regards, Lee __________________ YOUR TRAFFIC IS SAFE WITH US - CONDOM CASH PUTTING THE GAY ADULT INDUSTRY ON YOUR PC!! AFFORDABLE 2257 COMPLIANT GAY + BI CONTENT

12-20-2004, 08:53 PM	#4
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,337	Neither. __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc. Click here for more details.

12-20-2004, 08:53 PM	#5
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	hehe, you stole my idea to make a poll but I don't think this poll will have much influence on Lensman's decision __________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

12-20-2004, 08:53 PM	#6
pussyluver Clueless OleMan Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ICQ - 169903487 Posts: 11,009	It would take choker a hell of a long time to catch up to all the nasty stuff Sleazy has said on the board. Dre is right, not our call in the end.

12-20-2004, 08:57 PM	#7
digifan The Profiler Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: ICQ 76281726 and I'm female Posts: 14,618	I think none of them should be banned.. they are able to sort this out themselves, they are adults and not the typical schoolboys looking for drama. __________________ [email protected] Webair Rocks

12-20-2004, 09:00 PM	#8
pussyluver Clueless OleMan Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ICQ - 169903487 Posts: 11,009	Tribal council meeting tonight ? not looking good for Sleazy.

12-20-2004, 09:36 PM	#11
Funky Bastard So Fucking Banned Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: San Antonio, Texas Posts: 2,544	If chokers gone the Sleazy needs to go with him!

12-20-2004, 09:37 PM	#12
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	I prefer Choker to Sleazy ! __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

12-20-2004, 09:44 PM	#16
emthree Dialer Kingpin Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: New York Posts: 10,816	You like feeding on other peoples probs, dont you? You're a fucking bottom feeding bitch __________________ • Sell Patches & Pills •

12-20-2004, 09:46 PM	#17
emthree Dialer Kingpin Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: New York Posts: 10,816	shit - I voted wrong. That makes it -1 for choker and +1 for sleazydream should be banned. __________________ • Sell Patches & Pills •

12-20-2004, 09:48 PM	#18
18clips Registered User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: uk Posts: 27	Nobody Vote Its Mean Spirited & Not in The Theme of Christmas Get these 2 hevy weight prize fighting cocks in the ring! If its true the vote should be on wether Lensman has the right to judge, if he's so willing to do so maybe he could referee the boxing Choker V Mr Sleze At the next big gathering we should have a boxing ring with choker in one corner and mr sleez in the other wearing those huge over-sized boxing gloves. Loser gives $1000 to the winners charity. __________________

12-20-2004, 09:51 PM	#20
Meloncash So Fucking Banned Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 196	Ban them both, then unban the Boobmaster

12-20-2004, 09:54 PM	#21
maxdaname Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,193	Sleazy is a god

12-20-2004, 09:56 PM	#22
GiantGnome Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Nebraska Posts: 4,344	calling someone a pedo gets you banned? since when? __________________ NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-Darth Vader

12-20-2004, 10:12 PM	#25
1215 Boner Party Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 2,376	i dont think people should really post pics of any kids on here, especially their own. first, its just not right, simple conflict of interest. second, youre setting yourself up for asshole remarks. wether its a joke or not, you walked yourself into it by placing your own kids on the net, especially an adult related one. what, did you expect sleazy to say that in 4 years, shell be driving? hell, his nick says it all. now if chokers says it all as well, sleazy is in some trouble! from another point of view, sleazy's joke completely fit the scenario of this forum - adult related and not giving a fuck. however, if someone posts their kids, you might have a little respect and not joke about them. so... 1 - you shouldnt post kids pics here anyway, especially your own. i can see if its some random funny pic from the net, or a video of some kid falling off his skateboard. stuff like that would be ok. 2 - when people arent thinking in the right mind and post their kids here, dont insult them, even if its a joke. most people take pride in their kids, so a joke on their kids is a real slap in the face. think about it, if you ban one of them, theres gonna be 9003345 posts about how it was unfair and why the unbanned should be banned. id drop it and ban no one. but both of them should be warned to stop being a retard. __________________ Best Hosting

12-20-2004, 10:31 PM	#26
Babaganoosh ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥ Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: /home Posts: 15,841	Since when did GFY become a democracy? I wish we could vote on banning people but so far that isn't a possibility.

12-20-2004, 10:35 PM	#27
Double L Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: US Posts: 349	Neither or Both...

12-20-2004, 11:00 PM	#28
SleazyDream I'm here for SPORT Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Phone # (401) 285-0696 Posts: 41,470	I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients. here's the reason that I see. My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable. Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity. I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation. Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light. __________________ This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog! Now read without the word dog.

12-20-2004, 11:07 PM	#34
Rebecca Love Skinemax BQueen Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Las Vegas NV Posts: 2,145	I plead the 5th on my vote! But I do agree, if one goes, both should go. __________________ Kisses, Rebecca Love "Skinemax BQueen of Late-Nite" www.RebeccaLove.com

12-20-2004, 11:30 PM	#41
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,372	i vote lee to be banned for putting regards in every post __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Stuff

12-20-2004, 11:31 PM	#42
DaLord Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Denmark Posts: 3,318	LOL 90% pointing fingers at Sleazydream at the moment. That's a bit mean... but then again!

12-23-2004, 07:23 AM	#50
TheSwed Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Sweden. Posts: 3,483	__________________ Cheap Viagra and Cialis Erectionpills