Man Jailed for Filming Girls at Pool - GoFuckYourself.com

TheGarbageMan · 12-12-2004, 11:19 AM

"A Melbourne man who filmed young girls naked at a suburban swimming pool was today sentenced to five months imprisonment... Gilbert edited his 10 minutes of footage into a five-minute tape he played for his own sexual gratification, the court was told... However Gilbert's voyeurism was unlikely to develop into criminal paedophilia, Dr Orchard said." ? The Age (Australia)

The peculiar thing about this case is that the tape the voyeur made and edited from his peeping footage was utilized solely for his own enjoyment. While no doubt this is probably a common practice ? video voyeurs making their own personal porno movies ? it is peculiar in the following sense.

Men ogle women. They stare and peep and peer and store up the luscious sights in memory, where they play them back as the urge arises. This is not illegal. It may be invasive, imprudent, or even in a case such as this, where the victims were minors, immoral. But it's not illegal. So why, if you do it with a video camera, does it become illegal? The only difference is that the things seen are preserved on tape rather than in the faculty of memory. And yet, if the tape is genuinely reserved for personal use, then how significant a difference is this? Set aside the fact that the victims were minors and that some peeping situations are just plain illegal regardless of whether or not you have a camera. If a person undresses at a pool, what is the difference between storing the sight in your brain and storing the sight on a videotape? After all, a tape seen by no one but yourself doesn't have much more reality than your own personal recollections anyway. It's like Bishop Berkeley said: to be is to be perceived. If the tape is not seen by anyone but yourself, it has little more existence than a memory. So how can something with such a negligible quotient of reality entail such real punishment?
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...220757446.html

Rictor · 12-12-2004, 11:35 AM

There goes my favorite hobby.

bret · 12-12-2004, 11:40 AM

the tape was real, the crime was real, the punishment was real. all that other jibberish is a pathetic way to justify pedopheilia.

the legislation draws lines and the line was crossed. without lines there are no boundries, without boundries we have chaos.

alias · 12-12-2004, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret
the tape was real, the crime was real, the punishment was real. all that other jibberish is a pathetic way to justify pedopheilia.

the legislation draws lines and the line was crossed. without lines there are no boundries, without boundries we have chaos.

yeah the jibberish sounds like a rationalization

Manowar · 12-12-2004, 11:45 AM

deserved it

modF · 12-12-2004, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret
the tape was real, the crime was real, the punishment was real. all that other jibberish is a pathetic way to justify pedopheilia.

Exactly, the fucker can burn there for all I care.

TheFrog · 12-12-2004, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Manowar
deserved it

colpanic · 12-12-2004, 12:34 PM

Yeah, let him rot...

Bigger question in my mind is, wtf are you doing letting your underage kid hang out at a pool naked.

I understand nudity is more accepted outside the States, but cmon...

Fletch XXX · 12-12-2004, 12:34 PM

every parent with a video camera is at risk of being jailed for child porn.

foolio · 12-12-2004, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by colpanic
Bigger question in my mind is, wtf are you doing letting your underage kid hang out at a pool naked.

"Gilbert filmed the girls, aged between two and 10, naked at the Harold Holt swimming pool as they were changing, according to a summary handed to the court. "

maxdaname · 12-12-2004, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by foolio
"Gilbert filmed the girls, aged between two and 10, naked at the Harold Holt swimming pool as they were changing, according to a summary handed to the court. "

Ouch!
Only 5 months?

NBDesign · 12-12-2004, 12:47 PM

This is siick... some people should be shot.

I mean it's bad enough taking an 18 year old and making her look young... (even though she is of legal age, the same perverse thoughts are there as if they were younger) is bad enough... but to film children to jerk off too? What is theis world comming to?

Fletch XXX · 12-12-2004, 12:56 PM

oh no child porn!

that plane resembles a dildo!

lock em up and burn the witches!!!!

burn the witches!!!!

burn the witches!!!!

Raf1 · 12-12-2004, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Manowar
deserved it

exactly

rowan · 12-12-2004, 01:18 PM

Uh... this article is 18 months old, you just noticed it?

colpanic · 12-12-2004, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by foolio
"Gilbert filmed the girls, aged between two and 10, naked at the Harold Holt swimming pool as they were changing, according to a summary handed to the court. "

Aah... didn't catch that. Yup, shoot the fucker.

12-12-2004, 11:19 AM	#1
TheGarbageMan So Fucking Banned Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: New York City Posts: 643	Man Jailed for Filming Girls at Pool "A Melbourne man who filmed young girls naked at a suburban swimming pool was today sentenced to five months imprisonment... Gilbert edited his 10 minutes of footage into a five-minute tape he played for his own sexual gratification, the court was told... However Gilbert's voyeurism was unlikely to develop into criminal paedophilia, Dr Orchard said." ? The Age (Australia) The peculiar thing about this case is that the tape the voyeur made and edited from his peeping footage was utilized solely for his own enjoyment. While no doubt this is probably a common practice ? video voyeurs making their own personal porno movies ? it is peculiar in the following sense. Men ogle women. They stare and peep and peer and store up the luscious sights in memory, where they play them back as the urge arises. This is not illegal. It may be invasive, imprudent, or even in a case such as this, where the victims were minors, immoral. But it's not illegal. So why, if you do it with a video camera, does it become illegal? The only difference is that the things seen are preserved on tape rather than in the faculty of memory. And yet, if the tape is genuinely reserved for personal use, then how significant a difference is this? Set aside the fact that the victims were minors and that some peeping situations are just plain illegal regardless of whether or not you have a camera. If a person undresses at a pool, what is the difference between storing the sight in your brain and storing the sight on a videotape? After all, a tape seen by no one but yourself doesn't have much more reality than your own personal recollections anyway. It's like Bishop Berkeley said: to be is to be perceived. If the tape is not seen by anyone but yourself, it has little more existence than a memory. So how can something with such a negligible quotient of reality entail such real punishment? http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...220757446.html

12-12-2004, 12:34 PM	#8
colpanic Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 1,007	Yeah, let him rot... Bigger question in my mind is, wtf are you doing letting your underage kid hang out at a pool naked. I understand nudity is more accepted outside the States, but cmon... __________________ I like ducks.

12-12-2004, 12:34 PM	#9
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	every parent with a video camera is at risk of being jailed for child porn. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

12-12-2004, 12:47 PM	#12
NBDesign Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: The other side of Hell Posts: 5,814	This is siick... some people should be shot. I mean it's bad enough taking an 18 year old and making her look young... (even though she is of legal age, the same perverse thoughts are there as if they were younger) is bad enough... but to film children to jerk off too? What is theis world comming to? __________________ Use Lensman's program and get the most for your hard earned traffic. Get Heidi for your site Here. Lots of sets to choose from. She makes a great Addition to any site. Grab one Grab All.

12-12-2004, 12:56 PM	#13
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	oh no child porn! that plane resembles a dildo! lock em up and burn the witches!!!! burn the witches!!!! burn the witches!!!! __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

12-12-2004, 11:35 AM	#2
Rictor Old Timer Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 12,208	There goes my favorite hobby.

12-12-2004, 11:40 AM	#3
bret Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: detroit Posts: 766	the tape was real, the crime was real, the punishment was real. all that other jibberish is a pathetic way to justify pedopheilia. the legislation draws lines and the line was crossed. without lines there are no boundries, without boundries we have chaos.

12-12-2004, 11:45 AM	#5
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	deserved it

12-12-2004, 01:18 PM	#15
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	Uh... this article is 18 months old, you just noticed it?