yes it dit , you claimed many times in this thread jesus was conceived through the hand of god !! many fuckin times! how am I supposed to know what you want clairyfied if you are not specific


do some reading on who Jesus was and not the Christian mumbo jumbo


why was he killed ?

why did the romans want him dead ?

:2 cents:

Lazycash , you are on dumb fuck


you are in the porn biz yet you believe people CAN be made throught the hand of god , that is Ignorance at his finest

I think we should have started back at square one when this thread started and asked you what you think the "Christian belief" means. I can assure you that you and I must have completely different views on what it means to believe in when one says they are a Christian. So if you base your beliefs on some controversial Harvard professors and you say they are Christians, am I then to deduce that that you consider yourself to be a Christian?

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Fake Nick
[B]yes it dit , you claimed many times in this thread jesus was conceived through the hand of god !!

through the hand? I reiterate; There is a footnote in the Greek bible from which the St. Jame's version was taken that claims Jesus to have been concieved from the anus of Mary. It has been argued that by scholars that God did not wish to damage Mary's hymen.

thats right... jesus was an ass cookie!

hell no I am not


pls wath the documentary , then we can argue

it is a very interesting documentary , it let all sorts of people speak even ignorant fucks like yourself


watch it then come back .............

Oh geez, this is amazing, my latest question to you had nothing to do with Christ's birth, I specifically asked what writings you based your current views of Jesus on, thats it. You give general non related answers, go off on tangents, namecall and generally avoid constructive debate. I can assure you have done far more reading on who Jesus was and his life than you have. All you've done is demean and discount what Christians believe, but the more you write the more its clear you really don't know what they believe. Since you want me to read who Jesus was, maybe you can direct me to some sources that will help me understand, go ahead and list them.

I can see this is going nowhere and I should have seen that long ago. I thought you might be capable of intelligent debate, but obviously not. So now you call me a dumb fuck because I don't believe as you do, hit me up on icq if you have any questions 15819167, this is pointless.

not on the bible

Ok, thats a start, I presumed that, come on I know you can spit it out, what then if not the Bible?

all your claims are based on a book , the bible , that was rewritten many times by the people in power of that time to get a tighter grip on the power


there is no thrutvalue whatsoever to the bible


I have told you many times what my views are based on but you chose to reade past that and keep on aksing the same question :2 cents:

I already posted this on page one !! ! !! ! ! yet you claim I never told you what I base my vies on? ? ??


watch documentary lazycash then come back !!!

it is a VERY interesting piece of work !

I have it in my library and have watched it many times, what specific part did you want to discuss? So now I'm an ignorant fuck, does it bother you that bad that people don't believe as you do that you have to resort to childish namecalling?

dont start making thing up , you never watched it

quite funny that we have been discussing this many pages posts hours , and only now you come forward and claim you have already seen it


if this wa true you would have said so many posts ago ................

Nowhere in this entire thread have you specifically stated what writings you derived your beliefs on regarding who you think Jesus was. I've asked the same question nine times and it now appears that you must not have any answers or are incapable of comprehending the question at hand. For the tenth time, i'm not referring to your views on the birth, i'm not referring to what you think of the documentary, i'm not referring to darwin, but what source did you use to come upon your conclusion that Jesus wasn't who he said he was?

huh ? I never claimed Jesus isn't who he said he is


you claimed he is something he never claimed he was , all you have for prove is an untruthfull book

you keep on changing your goddamn question

Go back and read. I also have documentaries from noted scholars backing up the belief that Jesus was immaculately conceived, would you like me to mail you those? The more I listen to you it appears you watched a 50 min documentary and now base your entire belief system on it.

like I said on PAGE FUCKIN ONE

these manuscripts also speak about the life of Jesus I base my views partially on those


I have been saying this since page one !! !!!!! ! yet you have the ignorance to claim I dont reveal my source while I have been revealing them since page one !! !



my views on who Jesus is are backed up by these manuscripts !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !




I have said this since PAGE ONE !!! !! you are THICK

it was not a 50 min docu , more like a 4 hour one

Lol, so what writings do you have to back up your claims that Jesus claimed he was something otherwise? You claim my source is untruthful and erroneous, yet you can't even provide a source for your beliefs of what you claim Jesus was. If you're so concerned with the Bible being changed, learn how to translate from the Greek and Hebrew and go back and read the earliest manuscripts before they were translated.

PAGE FUCKIN ONE BITCH !!!!!! and alread THREE TIMES ON THIS FUCKIN page !! ! !


jeez pls read then fuckin reply

I can conclude that you are a christian with no scholing who wants to defend his child of god by any means

Afraid not, nowhere in any of this thread have you eluded to specific writings that you used to formulate your beliefs on who you think Jesus was. I feel like I'm talking to a five year old who can't understand the most basic of questions.