Nah bro.

I'm anti war. We're fucked for being there. Voted for kerry.

You're still a fucking moron. :2 cents:

awesome
can we do that again in few more Iraqi cities ?

I do not agree with your "assumptions"...and they are assumptions. The duly elected representatives of the US made the decision to take down Saddam and the Baathist party...and in my opinon this decision should have been made within the first year of the '91 truce and the terms that Saddam and his Generals agreed to...and almost immediately violated.

The military of Iraq was defeated in three weeks and Iraq now has a new interim governmnet and constitution. I do not give a damn about the suffering we are inflicting as the solution to their suffering is simple...lay down their arms and turn in those that are killing coalition forces as well as killing their fellow Iraqi's...but I do give a damn about the suffering that is being inflicted upon our forces...UN personell...and all of the other orgs that are there to relieve the suffering of the Iraqi's.

That's a good idea - except it has a couple flaws. First, the money in storing the old blunt weapons would stop being wasted, causing government types to lose jobs. Second, the money being wasted on newer smart weapons would shrink, causing government people as well as civilian contractors to lose jobs. Third, if you level a whole city over there, you're now obligated to rebuild it after you're done. Use Japan as an example. So it ends up being about the same price, and the smart weapons way gives our people more money and leaves the enemy living in the same shit they've been in since they discovered dirt there.

:glugglug

http://www.whisky.fr/img2/produit/v1702.gif

I don't drink the stuff...a double Bloody Mary for breakfast...and beer in the afternoon is about it for me...but maybe you had another meaning?

cry me a fucking river... if i was there i'd be killing them just for looking at me, at least these guys had a valid reason to kill them... who wants a bunch of chicken heads squawking around you when you're busy killing the other chickens?

The banner was acknowledgement to the ships crew that had been at sea for...I believe its longest cruise ever...and for its performance in the Gulf. President Bush...and to the best of my knowledge no one in the Administration...ever said "Mission Accomplished". If I am wrong...then educate me.

John Wayne...is that you?

soon it will just be america and britain left there

50 killed "irakis"

Keep in mind that not all of us voted for that pathetic dipshit of a "President", so don't look to us for an answer to something we ourselves don't even understand.

Bush is a stupid asshole, who never should have been President in the first place, and the only reason why he is still there is because he is such a fucking little mindless pussy that he does whatever the money makers tell him to do, he's their little puppet boy. He couldnt' think for himself if it were to save his life.

but that's just my opinion... I fucking hate Bush with a passion, so I may be a little biased.

FOX News can kiss my ass too...

Liberate them even if we have to kill them all, eh? :1orglaugh

They are right in hating us. With every innocent person they behead, they avenge the deaths of a hundred of their own innocents. We look at them not as men, but as beasts, and treat them accordingly. Why then should they not accept our judgement, and show us the grave consequences it has?

The can choose to suffer as long as they want to...or choose not to suffer...the solution is in their hands. They avenge nothing...only cause more suffering...they are a backward people in general...and better suited for centuries past not the present.

It's funny how, over here in the west, we speak of individuals, yet when we speak about brown people in far away countries, they're nothing more than a uniform mass, a scary, abstract blob without actual human faces. The mujahideen and the shoemaker are one and the same, it is ok to kill one for the crimes of the other, because he could have committed them just as well... in fact, if he hasn't done so yet, he will soon, because he just watched his wife and children die. Collateral damage, nothing more.

Through out the history of war/conflicts...the enemy is almost always...if not always...considered to be a uniform mass...be it German Caucasions...or Oriental Japanese.

So they're right after all? They're not "the people we're trying to liberate", but "the enemy"?

That is pretty much the bottom line in the real world. As long as civilians continue to kill coalition forces they all have to be viewed with a weapon at the ready.

In addition the US is not trying to "liberate" anyone...but is acting in its perceived best interest. Having said that the Iraqi's would have a much better quality of life if they would submit to westernization...for at least as long as the western world...for whatever reasons...has an interest in that AO.