|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Porncity Sewers
Posts: 418
|
If you hate lawyers, Read This!!!!!!
This was in the newspaper recently and I had to share it.
![]() Agent named Bon Dacko provides a tale that has to be a legal classic. It's a true story(Bob assures us) and was the first-prize winner in a recent American Criminal Lawyers Award Contest. A Charlotte, N.C. Lawyer purchased a box of rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against fire (among other things) Within a month, having smoked his entire two dozen of these great cigars, and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed a claim against the insurance company. In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost "in a series of small fires." The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason: That he had consumed the cigars in a normal fashion. The lawyer sued--and won. In delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The judge stated, nevertheless, the lawyer held a policy from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure against fire, without defining what is considered to be "unacceptable fires." and was obligated to pay the claim. Rather than clog up the courts for a lengthy time, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of rare cigars destroyed in the "rare fires." However, hang on. That was not the end of the unbelievable story. What came next was, well, justice. Read on! After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of arson! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine. Yes, a true story and, for once, I was cheering for the insurance company. I wonder if the lawyer has been barred from practicing in North Carolina! ------------------ Eraser Ca$h Surfer Cover there tracks and you get $35 per sale!! Tons of free content, get paid every week, url tracking |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,561
|
LMAO I think this can only be possible in the courts of the USA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Between your mamma's legs
Posts: 4,753
|
A classic US court case indeed !!
![]() In Boca Raton, it is still to this day illegal for alligators to cross the road on Sundays ... ------------------ We're Comin' To Get Ya !!! The Black Sheep of the Boneprone Family I like to rub lemon jelly on my nipples :D |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,335
|
Sad thing is if you lived in any ther country you'd be fucked even if innocent.
Its a catch 22 The one court case i remember in my business law class was a burgler breaks into a house via the bathroom window and manages to get hurt in the process only to be caught in the act. Only to come back and have him sue the homeowner for not have regulation sized windows and some other bullshit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: o-HI-o
Posts: 7,183
|
We had a good one 10-15 yrs back. A car dealership offered ANY car on the lot in some sort of prize deal. And they would pay the first payment for the winner. The winner chose a brand new 'vette. WHat the dealership wasn't thinking about is they also allowed the winner to chose how MANY payments were to be made on said car. (Obviously thinking at the time that since cars were just getting really expensive, the winner would pick 60 months etc)
He chose ONE payment and the dealer went to court. They ended up paying for the 'vette and the guy even had his legal bills covered. ![]() |
|
|
|