Scott Peterson Verdict In -- Guilty or not Guilty? - GoFuckYourself.com

MikeHawk · 11-12-2004, 12:45 PM

1 hour away from a Verdict...is he guilty or not? I think he did it and needs to burn in hell!

Veterans Day · 11-12-2004, 12:45 PM

guilty

Donny · 11-12-2004, 12:51 PM

I don't think there is enough concrete evidence to convict him. For the integrity of our legal system I think he must be found not guilty.

Innocent until proven guilty.

I don't think guilt has been proven.

vas · 11-12-2004, 12:53 PM

too much circumstantial evidence agianst him...

a little bit of circumstancial evidence is not enough to convict but there is too much on him...

but they did let OJ off the hook and there was far more evidence on him then on this peterson guy....

DarkBob · 11-12-2004, 12:54 PM

Not Guilty

I'm going with the satantic cult theory

Veterans Day · 11-12-2004, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by vas
too much circumstantial evidence agianst him...

a little bit of circumstancial evidence is not enough to convict but there is too much on him...

but they did let OJ off the hook and there was far more evidence on him then on this peterson guy....

OJ and Scott are 2 far different people

Matt 26z · 11-12-2004, 12:58 PM

Guilty, but then there will be a new trial.

Nader · 11-12-2004, 12:59 PM

Guilty - for sure

kenny · 11-12-2004, 01:00 PM

Guilty as a mofo

Although they had one of the old jurors said he was leaning towards acquittal

Regardless, I am glad it's over with

vas · 11-12-2004, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
OJ and Scott are 2 far different people

yeah no shit... and i know the circumstances surrounding the 2 are different, im just saying you never know, OJ was guilty as shit and he walked.

TheSaint · 11-12-2004, 01:02 PM

The speed with which the jury convicted him means that the verdict must be guilty. This isn't a jury angry about racial issues, and he obviously did it.

Most people would be surprised to learn that people who commit murder are usually convicted on circumstantial evidence, usually much thinner than in this case.

Looks like things won't be working out for Scott afterall, but he may go free while on apeal and skip the country yet.

MikeHawk · 11-12-2004, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
I don't think there is enough concrete evidence to convict him. For the integrity of our legal system I think he must be found not guilty.

Innocent until proven guilty.

I don't think guilt has been proven.

41 reasons for the police to think he did it....

80 miles away from there house, he goes fishing, and the same bay they find his wife and there un born baby right by where he was fishing? hmmm

If he gets off, he will be killed very quickly, and that is what he really deserves, our legal system sucks dick....

Bring a high profile lawyer on, and get off like OJ....

Justice...what is that?

MikeHawk · 11-12-2004, 01:06 PM

That court room is going to be nuts, in 55 min......

So sad..

KC · 11-12-2004, 01:13 PM

Guilty...

a) Who goes fishing in the Bay. (It's fucking dirty water)
b) Who goes fishing on Christmas in the bay?
c) Who's dead wife turns up in the same body of water in which the innocent husband went fishing?

I think it was probably an accident... He was beating the shit out of her and "accidentally" threw her ass down the stairs and killed her.. then he decided to cover it up.

Guilty - Life in Prison.

cypocrypt · 11-12-2004, 01:15 PM

i personally think the guy is guilty as hell but i but i have a nasty feeling it will end up with a hung jury proving one more time that our judicial system needs an enema

Lonny · 11-12-2004, 01:16 PM

im saying not guilty just for the fact that the calif system sucks.

Donny · 11-12-2004, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MikeHawk
80 miles away from there house, he goes fishing, and the same bay they find his wife and there un born baby right by where he was fishing? hmmm

That is the easiest argument to refute. The bodies weren't found for months after the entire world knew where he went fishing. It would be easy to plant a body in that area if a person was trying to frame him.

And why in the world would he tell police where he went fishing if he took his wife there to dump her body? I know I'd personally want them as far away from the site as possible.

Do I think he's guilty? He probably is... but I don't think "beyond a reasonable doubt" has been accomplished. I have some pretty reasonable doubts.

kmanrox · 11-12-2004, 01:20 PM

without knowing much about the case, I'd say GUILTY just because I'd hope Americans would not stand to let the OJ Simpson fiasco happen again.

Fake Nick · 11-12-2004, 01:25 PM

guilty , no doubt,

MikeHawk · 11-12-2004, 02:16 PM

JURY SAYS HE IS GUILTY AS A MOTHER FUCKER...BURN IN HELL SCOTT PETERSON...YOU FUCK

Poppy · 11-12-2004, 02:19 PM

Pretty funny he was arrested at Torrey Pines Golf course in San Diego, where I play occassionally.

Dyes his hair and has $10k worth of cash in the trunk...hmm???

11-12-2004, 12:45 PM	#1
MikeHawk Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In bed with Harley Girl....Not sleepin Posts: 6,683	Scott Peterson Verdict In -- Guilty or not Guilty? 1 hour away from a Verdict...is he guilty or not? I think he did it and needs to burn in hell! __________________ THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW

11-12-2004, 12:45 PM	#2
Veterans Day Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: The Windy City Posts: 8,403	guilty __________________ Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated

11-12-2004, 01:00 PM	#9
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	Guilty as a mofo Although they had one of the old jurors said he was leaning towards acquittal Regardless, I am glad it's over with __________________ 7

11-12-2004, 01:02 PM	#11
TheSaint Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Everywhere at once Posts: 991	The speed with which the jury convicted him means that the verdict must be guilty. This isn't a jury angry about racial issues, and he obviously did it. Most people would be surprised to learn that people who commit murder are usually convicted on circumstantial evidence, usually much thinner than in this case. Looks like things won't be working out for Scott afterall, but he may go free while on apeal and skip the country yet. __________________ I have no signature

11-12-2004, 01:06 PM	#13
MikeHawk Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In bed with Harley Girl....Not sleepin Posts: 6,683	That court room is going to be nuts, in 55 min...... So sad.. __________________ THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW

11-12-2004, 12:51 PM	#3
Donny As you wish... Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 13,754	I don't think there is enough concrete evidence to convict him. For the integrity of our legal system I think he must be found not guilty. Innocent until proven guilty. I don't think guilt has been proven.

11-12-2004, 12:53 PM	#4
vas Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Toronto Posts: 562	too much circumstantial evidence agianst him... a little bit of circumstancial evidence is not enough to convict but there is too much on him... but they did let OJ off the hook and there was far more evidence on him then on this peterson guy....

11-12-2004, 12:54 PM	#5
DarkBob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 2,300	Not Guilty I'm going with the satantic cult theory

11-12-2004, 12:58 PM	#7
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	Guilty, but then there will be a new trial.

11-12-2004, 12:59 PM	#8
Nader Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Posts: 5,086	Guilty - for sure

11-12-2004, 01:13 PM	#14
KC Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 1995 Posts: 2,417	Guilty... a) Who goes fishing in the Bay. (It's fucking dirty water) b) Who goes fishing on Christmas in the bay? c) Who's dead wife turns up in the same body of water in which the innocent husband went fishing? I think it was probably an accident... He was beating the shit out of her and "accidentally" threw her ass down the stairs and killed her.. then he decided to cover it up. Guilty - Life in Prison. __________________ Jupiter Hosting, Inc. Vice President, Business Development kc (AT) jupiterhosting.com

11-12-2004, 01:15 PM	#15
cypocrypt Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: New York and on icq 108422465 Posts: 1,851	i personally think the guy is guilty as hell but i but i have a nasty feeling it will end up with a hung jury proving one more time that our judicial system needs an enema

11-12-2004, 01:16 PM	#16
Lonny Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Riverside Ca. Posts: 3,539	im saying not guilty just for the fact that the calif system sucks. __________________ crakrevenue

11-12-2004, 01:20 PM	#18
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	without knowing much about the case, I'd say GUILTY just because I'd hope Americans would not stand to let the OJ Simpson fiasco happen again. __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

11-12-2004, 01:25 PM	#19
Fake Nick So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: go troll goo! Posts: 7,708	guilty , no doubt,

11-12-2004, 02:16 PM	#20
MikeHawk Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In bed with Harley Girl....Not sleepin Posts: 6,683	JURY SAYS HE IS GUILTY AS A MOTHER FUCKER...BURN IN HELL SCOTT PETERSON...YOU FUCK __________________ THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW

11-12-2004, 02:19 PM	#21
Poppy Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: O H I O Posts: 6,254	Pretty funny he was arrested at Torrey Pines Golf course in San Diego, where I play occassionally. Dyes his hair and has $10k worth of cash in the trunk...hmm??? __________________ VP Sales, Peak5Payments [email protected] Skype: consultpoppy In adult since 98'