Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2004, 05:10 AM   #301
titmowse
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 5,320
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
We didn't evolve from the chimp.
Evolution doesn't say we evolved from chimps or apes. Didn't you read the whole thread?
__________________
I still love everybody
titmowse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:10 AM   #302
Johny Traffic
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,461
Quote:
Why wasn't there always a human there to put boxes in a room near a banana?
The wood hadnt evolved into a box yet, maybe as time goes on and we evolve, instead of trees growing, boxes will grow, then the monkeys can climb on the boxes to get the bannanas without humans help.
__________________


hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blog
Johny Traffic is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:10 AM   #303
Joe Citizen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally posted by stocktrader23
You don't prove scientific theories, you attempt to falsify them.

You don't prove stocktrader23 theories either.
I'm not asking you to prove it, I'm asking for some evidence.
Joe Citizen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:11 AM   #304
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by stocktrader23
I have a theory that in the center of the earth resides an alien race. Prove me wrong or believe it.
That's the logical fallacy of "proving a negative" and that's not how evolutions works. What you just did is exactly what christians do with god. Try again bucksnort.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:11 AM   #305
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
Even teachers teaching for 60 years can get it wrong.

Haven't you ever met somebody at a job who said something like, "What are you talking about? I've been working here for 30 years, I know what I'm talking about and you don't" when you actually know the idiot is dead wrong?

Happens all the time.
My mother in law is a nurse. She bases her entire life and thinking around what she read in medical books while she was in school over 30 years ago even though much of it is completely wrong.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:11 AM   #306
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
Then how can natural selection occur? As you said, they were always resistant.
What? Your question doesn't make sense
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:11 AM   #307
titmowse
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 5,320
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
Even teachers teaching for 60 years can get it wrong.

Haven't you ever met somebody at a job who said something like, "What are you talking about? I've been working here for 30 years, I know what I'm talking about and you don't" when you actually know the idiot is dead wrong?

Happens all the time.
Then you define intelligence. And keep in mind humans would not be as advanced as they are were it not for opposable thumbs and protein from meat.
__________________
I still love everybody
titmowse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:12 AM   #308
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
That's the logical fallacy of "proving a negative" and that's not how evolutions works. What you just did is exactly what christians do with god. Try again bucksnort.
I wasn't trying to prove anything, it was a joke.

Try again Tony Robbins.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:14 AM   #309
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
That's the logical fallacy of "proving a negative" and that's not how evolutions works. What you just did is exactly what christians do with god.
It's also what evolutionists do. They have a theory based on a premise and now they try to find things to support it. There has been quite a lack of evidence thus far.
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:15 AM   #310
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally posted by Colin
I don't believe that. I believe that evidence and methodology make some things much more likely than others.
As do I...and probably as...any other reasonable/logical thinking person does...but when the book is still open on any subject...I tend not to become "religious" in my belief and insistent that my "belief" is the only acceptable alternative...as people like Joe Sixpack seem to do.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:15 AM   #311
sacX
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,998
Mike33,

So you don't believe in mutation? I ask because you seem to think that a populations DNA is static (e.g. there was always resistance).
sacX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:16 AM   #312
ADL Colin
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
ADL Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tube Titans, USA
Posts: 11,929
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33

But anyway, we're getting off topic. We're 99% similar in DNA yet the chimp is clearly far inferior. We didn't evolve from the chimp. This was the chimp from the beginning of chimps. We were always man. That's just my belief. There is litle or no evidence to the contrary.
Why do you call a chimp inferior? Is a rat inferior? Is a cockroach? How about a virus? Humanity does not stand at the apex of evolution.

You're correct. Humans did NOT evolve from chimps. Chimps and humans have a common ancestor. DNA similarity IS evidence of exactly that. DNA changes with time through mutation. If you extrapolate the amount of expected variation with time you would estimate that humans and chimps have an ancestor between 5 and 7 million years ago. That 5-7 million years ago your DNA and bobo's DNA were the same.
__________________


Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

skype = "adultdatelink"
ADL Colin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:16 AM   #313
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
Even teachers teaching for 60 years can get it wrong.

Haven't you ever met somebody at a job who said something like, "What are you talking about? I've been working here for 30 years, I know what I'm talking about and you don't" when you actually know the idiot is dead wrong?

Happens all the time.
That guy at the job is usually wrong because he hasn't bothered to learn anything about his job since he got it. In most jobs, there are changes that you are expected to stay abreast of. The teacher might be one of those, but that doesn't prove anything either way.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:17 AM   #314
sacX
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
It's also what evolutionists do. They have a theory based on a premise and now they try to find things to support it. There has been quite a lack of evidence thus far.
Good scientists try to find evidence to disprove it. Since you don't believe it, it would seem reasonable to present some arguments that appear to you to disprove it.
sacX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:17 AM   #315
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by stocktrader23
You don't prove scientific theories, you attempt to falsify them.

You don't prove stocktrader23 theories either.
Stocktrader23 needs to prove his theory, then we will attempt to falsify his proof.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:17 AM   #316
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by titmowse
Then you define intelligence. And keep in mind humans would not be as advanced as they are were it not for opposable thumbs and protein from meat.
I was just giving an example of how your teacher was a nutjob.

Intelligence certainly encompasses more than an animal that appears to live in complete harmony with it's environment, not from it's own volition, but by necessity. The dolphin does not choose to be harmonious with the world. He is that way and was that way from birth by being a dolphin and he can do nothing else.
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:18 AM   #317
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by stocktrader23
My mother in law is a nurse. She bases her entire life and thinking around what she read in medical books while she was in school over 30 years ago even though much of it is completely wrong.
And what hospital does she work at?
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:18 AM   #318
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
Stocktrader23 needs to prove his theory, then we will attempt to falsify his proof.
I am from the future and I've seen it myself.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:19 AM   #319
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
And what hospital does she work at?
It doesn't matter, they are nearly all the same.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:19 AM   #320
titmowse
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 5,320
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
I was just giving an example of how your teacher was a nutjob.

Intelligence certainly encompasses more than an animal that appears to live in complete harmony with it's environment, not from it's own volition, but by necessity. The dolphin does not choose to be harmonious with the world. He is that way and was that way from birth by being a dolphin and he can do nothing else.
I read somewhere that the dolphin was once a land creature that chose to return to the sea. But of course, some wacky evolutionist probably made it up.
__________________
I still love everybody
titmowse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:19 AM   #321
jayeff
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,944
If you lived in SE Kansas, you wouldn't have much faith in evolution either
jayeff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:20 AM   #322
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
What? Your question doesn't make sense
My question makes perfect sense, you just don't know how to answer it. How can natural selection occur of black people were always resistant to malaria? If all species of organisms have always had all the resistances they have, then there can be no natural selection.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:20 AM   #323
Joe Citizen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally posted by theking
As do I...and probably as...any other reasonable/logical thinking person does...but when the book is still open on any subject...I tend not to become "religious" in my belief and insistent that my "belief" is the only acceptable alternative...as people like Joe Sixpack seem to do.
The book is not 'open' on creationism.

It is pseudo-science.
Joe Citizen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:21 AM   #324
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by sacX
Good scientists try to find evidence to disprove it. Since you don't believe it, it would seem reasonable to present some arguments that appear to you to disprove it.
I've tried time and time again the tenuous links you guys are using to support the theory of evolution.

I've shown you that natural selection does not mean evolution. I've shown you that our differences and/or similarities to apes does not mean we are at all linked. I've shown you that genes are not gauranteed to be passed down even when they're beneficial. I've shown that we have been unable to demonstrate it in the lab. And even if we assume it has on a cell by cell basis, does that still hold up that we were monkeys? No


Yet these are some of the things that are used to suppor the theory.
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:22 AM   #325
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
It's also what evolutionists do. They have a theory based on a premise and now they try to find things to support it. There has been quite a lack of evidence thus far.
Bullshit! AGAIN, you show that you know squat about squat. No reputable scientist would do this and get away with it for longer then about a minute.

If you think biologists ask everyone else to prove negatives, then show me one example of just that. Since you think they do and do not believe in evolution, then it should not take you long. Good luck!
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:23 AM   #326
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by Johny Traffic
The wood hadnt evolved into a box yet, maybe as time goes on and we evolve, instead of trees growing, boxes will grow, then the monkeys can climb on the boxes to get the bannanas without humans help.
Guess what evolutionists say about giraffes.... their necks are long so that they can eat the berries at the tops of the trees. See how absurd this is? Why not make longer legs then? Why not let it be able to climb?

There are other alternatives but this is most convenient so it becomes the "official" explanation.
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:23 AM   #327
ADL Colin
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
ADL Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tube Titans, USA
Posts: 11,929
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
There has been quite a lack of evidence thus far.
There are many thousands of papers and books on the subject detailing the fossil and molecular evidence.

Read some!

Biology didn't stop in 1859!
__________________


Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

skype = "adultdatelink"
ADL Colin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:24 AM   #328
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Citizen
The book is not 'open' on creationism.

It is pseudo-science.
I say the book is open on "creationism" as at this point in time I am only aware of two possible origins of life and that is either by abiogenesis (which there is not any proof of abiogenesis having taken place) or by a "creator". If you can provide other alternitives please do so?
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:24 AM   #329
Joe Citizen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
I've tried time and time again the tenuous links you guys are using to support the theory of evolution.

I've shown you that natural selection does not mean evolution. I've shown you that our differences and/or similarities to apes does not mean we are at all linked. I've shown you that genes are not gauranteed to be passed down even when they're beneficial. I've shown that we have been unable to demonstrate it in the lab. And even if we assume it has on a cell by cell basis, does that still hold up that we were monkeys? No


Yet these are some of the things that are used to suppor the theory.
Mike, honestly, you haven't shown us anything other than that your understanding of the theory of evolution is flawed, and very limited.
Joe Citizen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:25 AM   #330
titmowse
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 5,320
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
Guess what evolutionists say about giraffes.... their necks are long so that they can eat the berries at the tops of the trees. See how absurd this is? Why not make longer legs then? Why not let it be able to climb?

There are other alternatives but this is most convenient so it becomes the "official" explanation.
Not so absurd. The giraffe is able to eat a food other animals cannot. A food they evidently need to survive.
__________________
I still love everybody
titmowse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:25 AM   #331
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by Colin
Why do you call a chimp inferior? Is a rat inferior? Is a cockroach? How about a virus? Humanity does not stand at the apex of evolution.

You're correct. Humans did NOT evolve from chimps. Chimps and humans have a common ancestor. DNA similarity IS evidence of exactly that. DNA changes with time through mutation. If you extrapolate the amount of expected variation with time you would estimate that humans and chimps have an ancestor between 5 and 7 million years ago. That 5-7 million years ago your DNA and bobo's DNA were the same.
The fact that we have something in common called DNA to mean that we are related is an assumption.
I'm sure all living things have something in common.
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:26 AM   #332
Joe Citizen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally posted by titmowse
Not so absurd. The giraffe is able to eat a food other animals cannot. A food they evidently need to survive.
Same with koalas.
Joe Citizen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:26 AM   #333
sacX
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
I've tried time and time again the tenuous links you guys are using to support the theory of evolution.

I've shown you that natural selection does not mean evolution. I've shown you that our differences and/or similarities to apes does not mean we are at all linked. I've shown you that genes are not gauranteed to be passed down even when they're beneficial. I've shown that we have been unable to demonstrate it in the lab. And even if we assume it has on a cell by cell basis, does that still hold up that we were monkeys? No


Yet these are some of the things that are used to suppor the theory.
1. Genes don't have to pass down EVERY time they're beneficial. You're thinking one example again. Evolution suggests that in general over a population, beneficial genes are MORE likely to be passed down.

2. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is shown to occur in the lab.

3. I don't understand how you've shown that our similarity to apes doesn't mean we're linked. It suggests we have a common ancestor sometime in history.


Also you said a population always had resistance to say sickle trait, or a bacteria to antibiotics. Are you saying that mutation does not occur? or simply that mutation is not powerful enough to effect a change in an individual?
sacX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:27 AM   #334
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally posted by titmowse
Not so absurd. The giraffe is able to eat a food other animals cannot. A food they evidently need to survive.
So before they "evolved" longer necks they couldn't reach this food and died? Nothing left to evolve from eh?
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:27 AM   #335
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by titmowse
I read somewhere that the dolphin was once a land creature that chose to return to the sea. But of course, some wacky evolutionist probably made it up.
Sounds like a wacky idea to me. It doesn't to you?
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:27 AM   #336
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
The fact that we have something in common called DNA to mean that we are related is an assumption.
I'm sure all living things have something in common.
It goes FAR deeper then that. It goes so deep that I can't even begin to explain it. Go talk to a biologist, take a couple of classes, READ the scientific literature.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:28 AM   #337
titmowse
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 5,320
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
Sounds like a wacky idea to me. It doesn't to you?
no wackier than any other
__________________
I still love everybody
titmowse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:28 AM   #338
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
Bullshit! AGAIN, you show that you know squat about squat. No reputable scientist would do this and get away with it for longer then about a minute.

If you think biologists ask everyone else to prove negatives, then show me one example of just that. Since you think they do and do not believe in evolution, then it should not take you long. Good luck!
CET, this whole evolution thing started with Darwin. He had a premise that things evolved over time. That's the premise that runs through to today. It's the premise upon which all evolutionary inquiry rests.
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:28 AM   #339
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally posted by titmowse
no wackier than any other
Like religion?
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:29 AM   #340
Johny Traffic
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,461
Quote:
Mike, honestly, you haven't shown us anything other than that your understanding of the theory of evolution is flawed, and very limited.
Actually he has shown me something. I thought that the reason that 50% of americans dont believe in evolution was becuase they were all church going nutters, but hes shown me that others dont believe becuase the science behind it they believe is flawed. Thats a refreshing attitude and whether I agree with him or not, Im glad that there are free thinking people like him over there still
__________________


hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blog

Last edited by Johny Traffic; 11-05-2004 at 05:30 AM..
Johny Traffic is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:29 AM   #341
Joe Citizen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally posted by theking
I say the book is open on "creationism" as at this point in time I am only aware of two possible origins of life and that is either by abiogenesis (which there is not any proof of abiogenesis having taken place) or by a "creator". If you can provide other alternitives please do so?
When I say 'creationism' I refer to what is known as 'scientific' creationism, not the idea that there is a creator.
Joe Citizen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:29 AM   #342
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by sacX
1. Genes don't have to pass down EVERY time they're beneficial. You're thinking one example again. Evolution suggests that in general over a population, beneficial genes are MORE likely to be passed down.

2. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is shown to occur in the lab.

3. I don't understand how you've shown that our similarity to apes doesn't mean we're linked. It suggests we have a common ancestor sometime in history.


Also you said a population always had resistance to say sickle trait, or a bacteria to antibiotics. Are you saying that mutation does not occur? or simply that mutation is not powerful enough to effect a change in an individual?
I've noticed that Mike has completely avoided my question about natural selection and mutation. He can't tell me how natural selection occurs without mutations. Maybe if I keep bringing it up he'll be forced to answer it one way or another.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:29 AM   #343
sacX
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
Guess what evolutionists say about giraffes.... their necks are long so that they can eat the berries at the tops of the trees. See how absurd this is? Why not make longer legs then? Why not let it be able to climb?

There are other alternatives but this is most convenient so it becomes the "official" explanation.
Uh that's a long discredited theory of evolution. No modern day evolutionist believes that.
sacX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:30 AM   #344
jayeff
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,944
Quote:
Originally posted by Johny Traffic
Man is taller now than he was 500 years ago. Have a look at european Knights armor, you can see how small we was.
Not exactly... very few examples of battle armor survived, for obvious reasons. But from the few that do, it is clear that these were big guys. Pretty much what you would expect when you figure out the strength it takes to wield a sword that is 4-6 feet long.

The armor you see on tombs, in castles, etc., was for display only and because it was expensive, made smaller than life.

The growth thing is not anyway part of evolution as such, because evolution implies change. But FYI I recall reading in Israel a few years ago their stats showed that simply because of improvements in nutrition, successive generations there since WW2 were averaging 1-2 inches taller than their parents.
jayeff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:30 AM   #345
Joe Citizen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
CET, this whole evolution thing started with Darwin. He had a premise that things evolved over time. That's the premise that runs through to today. It's the premise upon which all evolutionary inquiry rests.
It actually started with Lamarck... but he had things a little confused.
Joe Citizen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:30 AM   #346
sacX
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
I've noticed that Mike has completely avoided my question about natural selection and mutation. He can't tell me how natural selection occurs without mutations. Maybe if I keep bringing it up he'll be forced to answer it one way or another.
yes I think this is the third time I've mentioned mutation also :/
sacX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:31 AM   #347
titmowse
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 5,320
I love the interweb

http://www.cetacea.org/evolve.htm

The Cetacean's Adaptations for Sea Life
Over a period of millions of years, the cetacean returned to the sea - there was more food there, and more space than on land. Because of this increase in space, there was no natural limit to the cetacean's size (i.e. the amount of weight its legs could hold) since the water provided buoyancy. It had no longer any need for legs.

During this time, the cetacean lost the qualities that fitted it for land existence and gained new qualities for life at sea. Its hind limbs disappeared, its body became more tapered and streamlined - a form that enabled it to move swiftly through the water. For the same reason, most of its fur disappeared, reducing the resistance of the giant body to the water. The cetacean's original tail was replaced by a pair of flukes that acted like a propeller.
__________________
I still love everybody
titmowse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:31 AM   #348
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by stocktrader23
So before they "evolved" longer necks they couldn't reach this food and died? Nothing left to evolve from eh?
Those that just happened to have longer necks were able to eat more then those with shorter necks. Thus those with shorter necks died and those with longer necks had more children. The children with the longest necks could reach the most food, thus giving thier children the trait of having longer necks. Etc.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:31 AM   #349
Joe Citizen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally posted by sacX
Uh that's a long discredited theory of evolution. No modern day evolutionist believes that.
Yes, Lamarckism.
Joe Citizen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 05:32 AM   #350
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
It goes FAR deeper then that. It goes so deep that I can't even begin to explain it. Go talk to a biologist, take a couple of classes, READ the scientific literature.
CET, this isn't rocket science. Whenever you don't have the answer referring somebody to go to see a biologist just doesn't cut it.

If you understood what you're talking about you'd be able to paraphrase. The general idea is what we're looking for. We've challenged it and showed where there are assumptions. All you need to do is show why they're aren't assumptions but that they're true. You can't.
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.