GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   "Successful" paysites with no affiliates? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=378606)

psyko514 10-27-2004 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
uhhh
it's true.

Drake 10-27-2004 11:00 PM

It's also an interesting question because Qmov seems to break the mold. They don't use exclusive content, but seem to do well. Of coarse looks can be decieving. I have no idea how well they do.

The others seem to have a unique niche. CaliforniaPimp definitely came out with an excellent product. They're huge.

BRISK 10-27-2004 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
it's true.
As far as I know, Southern Charms isn't a paysite. It's a collection of paysites, and they don't seem to have a public affiliate program

It's like saying Tawnee Stone is a Lightspeed affiliate

Drake 10-27-2004 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
uhhh
What does that mean? It's a pretty simple model actually. Works well. It's a lot like AVS but only focuses on amateurs.

lagwagon 10-27-2004 11:02 PM

www.wifeysworld.com

Veterans Day 10-27-2004 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lagwagon
www.wifeysworld.com
http://www.wifeycash.com

Drake 10-27-2004 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
As far as I know, Southern Charms isn't a paysite. It's a collection of paysites, and they don't seem to have a public affiliate program

It's like saying Tawnee Stone is a Lightspeed affiliate

Tawnee doesn't promote her own site. Affiliates do. The amateurs with sites on SC promote their sites. They're essentially affiliates of Southern Charms.

BRISK 10-27-2004 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
What does that mean? It's a pretty simple model actually. Works well. It's a lot like AVS but only focuses on amateurs.
I just don't think calling those girls affiliates is very accurate, they're closer to being paysite operators than affiliates.

BRISK 10-27-2004 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Tawnee doesn't promote her own site. Affiliates do. The amateurs with sites on SC promote their sites. They're essentially affiliates of Southern Charms.
But they don't promote Southern Charms, they promote their own sites.

Jace 10-27-2004 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by datatank
matsmodels.com comes to mind also .
http://www.airwoodmedia.com/

PerfectionGirls 10-27-2004 11:08 PM

www.wifeysworld.com

Yep... and several others.

Veterans Day 10-27-2004 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PerfectionGirls
www.wifeysworld.com

Yep... and several others.

http://www.wifeycash.com

Drake 10-27-2004 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
But they don't promote Southern Charms, they promote their own sites.
Is an AVS webmaster an affiliate or paysite owner? Whatever you call it, they're under the umbrella of a program that takes a cut of their revenue.

Steen2 10-27-2004 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Is an AVS webmaster an affiliate or paysite owner? Whatever you call it, they're under the umbrella of a program that takes a cut of their revenue.
Congrats on 2k.

Drake 10-27-2004 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Steen2
Congrats on 2k.
Thanks man!:glugglug :thumbsup

BRISK 10-27-2004 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Is an AVS webmaster an affiliate or paysite owner? Whatever you call it, they're under the umbrella of a program that takes a cut of their revenue.
and CCBill and Epoch take a cut of revenue out of paysites, does that mean we should just call paysite operators "affiliates"?

Drake 10-27-2004 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
and CCBill and Epoch take a cut of revenue out of paysites, does that mean we should just call paysite operators "affiliates"?
No because they're only processing the subscription. They're not doing the hosting, updating the main home site, getting more amateur sites up etc.

But I get your point. Can we end this?:1orglaugh

Steen2 10-27-2004 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
and CCBill and Epoch take a cut of revenue out of paysites, does that mean we should just call paysite operators "affiliates"?
No...

pornguy 10-27-2004 11:17 PM

that is right. A few very successful sites out there just do not want to be copied, so they keep to themselves and make a nice chunk of money.

BRISK 10-27-2004 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
No because they're only processing the subscription. They're not doing the hosting, updating the main home site, getting more amateur sites up etc.

But I get your point. Can we end this?:1orglaugh

I know what you mean. My point is that it's a little hard to refer to the SC girls as "affiliates" when they clearly have a direct connection to the running of their own websites and the content that appears on their site, as apposed to say an affiliate of TCG, ARS, NastyDollars who have no input into the sites they send traffic to.

I suppose the term "affiliate" is a bit vague.

psyko514 10-27-2004 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
I know what you mean. My point is that it's a little hard to refer to the SC girls as "affiliates" when they clearly have a direct connection to the running of their own websites and the content that appears on their site, as apposed to say an affiliate of TCG, ARS, NastyDollars who have no input into the sites they send traffic to.

I suppose the term "affiliate" is a bit vague.

I think what Sly went is paysites where all the promotion/traffic generation is done internally.

That's not quite the case for SC.

JulianSosa 10-27-2004 11:35 PM

This thread started off well..

foolio 10-27-2004 11:36 PM

hell ya - they are cool peep also. They 2 of my single girl sites as 'friends' and dammm the traffic was awesome.

Sly 10-27-2004 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JulianSosa
This thread started off well..
Judging from your past posts I got the assumption that you have an in-house setup. No clue what you have though!

Drake 10-27-2004 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by foolio
hell ya - they are cool peep also. They 2 of my single girl sites as 'friends' and dammm the traffic was awesome.
Any idea how they got so big?

BRISK 10-27-2004 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JulianSosa
This thread started off well..
...until I made it better :winkwink:

codymc12 10-28-2004 12:31 AM

50-75 joins a day? Not many.

But 10-20k a month? More than you might think.

There are lots of reasons not to go with an affliate program - ask anyone who runs one.

There are also lots of reasons TO go with an affiliate program - ask anyone who runs one.

It becomes a matter of choice and what level of success is acceptable to you.

Historically, you saw this a lot in the amateur arena. Sites started off with no affliate program, and grew to a comfortable level, successful by any standard. THEN they started affliate programs. Homegrown and Carol Cox are two I could name without feeling I was saying anything anyone didn't want revealed. Both those sites were doing very well prior to starting their affliate programs.

codymc12 10-28-2004 12:32 AM

an addendum:

I was once told by the owner of a very large, well known affiliate program:

Unless you are bringing deep pockets to the table, a good rule of thumb on starting a paysite - if you can't make it profitable with your own traffic and no affiliates, you probably won't make it as a sponsor.

Opinion only, but I can see the sense of it.

EscortBiz 10-28-2004 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by codymc12
50-75 joins a day? Not many.

But 10-20k a month? More than you might think.

There are lots of reasons not to go with an affliate program - ask anyone who runs one.

There are also lots of reasons TO go with an affiliate program - ask anyone who runs one.

It becomes a matter of choice and what level of success is acceptable to you.

Historically, you saw this a lot in the amateur arena. Sites started off with no affliate program, and grew to a comfortable level, successful by any standard. THEN they started affliate programs. Homegrown and Carol Cox are two I could name without feeling I was saying anything anyone didn't want revealed. Both those sites were doing very well prior to starting their affliate programs.

oh

frankfortuna 10-28-2004 12:35 AM

We operate around 60 mainstream sites focused on the same group of products. Average of 150-225 sales daily with no affiliates.

baddog 10-28-2004 12:39 AM

www.pamporn.com been around and making money since 1998 . . . no affiliates . . . . it is for sale BTW

codymc12 10-28-2004 12:49 AM

Wow - pamporn... been around forever.

baddog 10-28-2004 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by codymc12
Wow - pamporn... been around forever.
want to buy it?

polish_aristocrat 10-28-2004 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by WiredGuy
Thing is, I think Quiet is the only one who's rather public about it. I'm sure there's a few paysite operators out there who are successful but we simply don't know of them because they don't want to be that well known.

WG

Same goes for SE experts. ;)

polish_aristocrat 10-28-2004 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by datatank
Im out of the loop but im sure if you check the hun, world sex , sleazy and other big ones you will see all the sites that are doing that.

Do all those bachelor party and euro sex party sites have affiliate programs?
They look like they are making a killing .

Euro Sex Parti is Nasty Dollars

maxjohan 10-28-2004 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
Euro Sex Parti is Nasty Dollars
I belive he talked about cfnm.com

On another note I read that redclouds.com had 600,000 paid members in an article that was made in 2001.

The funny thing was that they was complaing about
bandiwidth costs in that article.

The most successful guys
without affiliates, dont you think?

:eek7

psyko514 10-28-2004 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by maxjohan
I belive he talked about cfnm.com

On another note I read that redclouds.com had 600,000 paid members in an article that was made in 2001.

The funny thing was that they was complaing about
bandiwidth costs in that article.

The most successful guys
without affiliates, dont you think?

:eek7

Don't they have a similar setup to Southern Charms?

PornBroker 10-28-2004 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by codymc12
if you can't make it profitable with your own traffic and no affiliates, you probably won't make it as a sponsor.
I would tend to agree.

cafeaulait 10-28-2004 04:04 AM

www.bubblegirls.com

maxjohan 10-28-2004 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
Don't they have a similar setup to Southern Charms?
they have proadult.com for affiliates.

You can get free hosting aka redclouds server as an affiliate.

:glugglug


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123