Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals? - GoFuckYourself.com

BRISK · 10-27-2004, 04:02 AM

Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals to develop products and medicines that benefit human beings?

Jakke PNG · 10-27-2004, 04:06 AM

No. They should use homeless people.

notjoe · 10-27-2004, 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No. They should use homeless people.

Agreed.

I actually go out of my way to buy products not tested on animals even though they cost a bit more

TheSquealer · 10-27-2004, 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No. They should use homeless people.

LaoTzu · 10-27-2004, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No. They should use homeless people.

Yep.

http://www.stopanimaltests.com/

bringer · 10-27-2004, 04:48 AM

i dont really care who its tested on
id rather have lab rats die then grow a 4th nipple

project_naughty · 10-27-2004, 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
i dont really care who its tested on
id rather have lab rats die then grow a 4th nipple

You already have three? Cool.

bringer · 10-27-2004, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by project_naughty
You already have three? Cool.

Nicky · 10-27-2004, 05:37 AM

nope, I dont think its is

KRL · 10-27-2004, 05:55 AM

Unfortunately, the majority of people feel it is better to sacrifice animals for the sake of humans.

I don't think this opinion will be changing anytime soon.

Most animal experimentation is dramatically better regulated now and things have gotten better. The US government, primarily our military, still conducts gruesome and horrific biowarfare WMD experiments at Ft. Meade on animals including intelligent primates, dogs, and cats.

More and more companies are using computer models thankfully, however many chemicals are still tested on animals prior to their commercial introduction. Rats and Rabbits get the worst tests, often having chemicals inserted into their eyes, on their skin, and into their stomachs to test toxicity levels.

Is it morally acceptable? No.

DM4U · 10-27-2004, 07:34 AM

i am a animal lover, but i agree that sometimes is necessary, i am totally agains testing skin products and shampoo and stuff like that on animals, but in cases like cancer research and aids research i agree with that, i rather have a rat dead than my mother.

zzgundamnzz · 10-27-2004, 07:41 AM

Better them than us... they gotta experiment on somebody atleast its not a human.

The Heron · 10-27-2004, 08:48 AM

Who gives a shit about morals?
Actually I'd prefer they not bother developing anything unless it directly can help me. Forget the rest of you losers, I could care less if you die.

TheMob · 10-27-2004, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
Unfortunately, the majority of people feel it is better to sacrifice animals for the sake of humans.

I don't think this opinion will be changing anytime soon.

Most animal experimentation is dramatically better regulated now and things have gotten better. The US government, primarily our military, still conducts gruesome and horrific biowarfare WMD experiments at Ft. Meade on animals including intelligent primates, dogs, and cats.

More and more companies are using computer models thankfully, however many chemicals are still tested on animals prior to their commercial introduction. Rats and Rabbits get the worst tests, often having chemicals inserted into their eyes, on their skin, and into their stomachs to test toxicity levels.

Is it morally acceptable? No.

Agreed. It just shows how far along we really are.

CET · 10-27-2004, 08:57 AM

No, it's not morally acceptable, but it's better then the alternative, which is not doing these tests. Not doing these tests would result in medical progress almost completely halting. Millions of lives have been saved just from insulin treatments that were developed through animal testing. It's a rotten deal, but it's better to do animal testing then not to.

Marcus Aurelius · 10-27-2004, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by project_naughty
You already have three? Cool.

One of them is really just chewing gum.

10-27-2004, 04:02 AM	#1
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals? Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals to develop products and medicines that benefit human beings? __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

10-27-2004, 04:06 AM	#2
Jakke PNG ex-TeenGodFather Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Suomi Finland Perkele Posts: 20,306	No. They should use homeless people. __________________ ..and I'm off.

10-27-2004, 04:48 AM	#6
bringer i have man boobies Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: van down by the river Posts: 13,082	i dont really care who its tested on id rather have lab rats die then grow a 4th nipple __________________ 333-765-551

10-27-2004, 05:37 AM	#9
Nicky Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sweden Posts: 30,070	nope, I dont think its is __________________ gfynicky @ gmail.com

10-27-2004, 05:55 AM	#10
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	Unfortunately, the majority of people feel it is better to sacrifice animals for the sake of humans. I don't think this opinion will be changing anytime soon. Most animal experimentation is dramatically better regulated now and things have gotten better. The US government, primarily our military, still conducts gruesome and horrific biowarfare WMD experiments at Ft. Meade on animals including intelligent primates, dogs, and cats. More and more companies are using computer models thankfully, however many chemicals are still tested on animals prior to their commercial introduction. Rats and Rabbits get the worst tests, often having chemicals inserted into their eyes, on their skin, and into their stomachs to test toxicity levels. Is it morally acceptable? No. __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

10-27-2004, 07:34 AM	#11
DM4U Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 18	i am a animal lover, but i agree that sometimes is necessary, i am totally agains testing skin products and shampoo and stuff like that on animals, but in cases like cancer research and aids research i agree with that, i rather have a rat dead than my mother. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

10-27-2004, 07:41 AM	#12
zzgundamnzz Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 6,102	Better them than us... they gotta experiment on somebody atleast its not a human. __________________

10-27-2004, 08:48 AM	#13
The Heron Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Michigan Posts: 4,488	Who gives a shit about morals? Actually I'd prefer they not bother developing anything unless it directly can help me. Forget the rest of you losers, I could care less if you die.

10-27-2004, 08:57 AM	#15
CET Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 2,754	No, it's not morally acceptable, but it's better then the alternative, which is not doing these tests. Not doing these tests would result in medical progress almost completely halting. Millions of lives have been saved just from insulin treatments that were developed through animal testing. It's a rotten deal, but it's better to do animal testing then not to. __________________ Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts! Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training "Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."