GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=378038)

BRISK 10-27-2004 04:02 AM

Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals?
 
Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals to develop products and medicines that benefit human beings?

Jakke PNG 10-27-2004 04:06 AM

No. They should use homeless people.

notjoe 10-27-2004 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No. They should use homeless people.

Agreed.


I actually go out of my way to buy products not tested on animals even though they cost a bit more

TheSquealer 10-27-2004 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No. They should use homeless people.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

LaoTzu 10-27-2004 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No. They should use homeless people.
Yep. :thumbsup http://www.stopanimaltests.com/

bringer 10-27-2004 04:48 AM

i dont really care who its tested on
id rather have lab rats die then grow a 4th nipple

project_naughty 10-27-2004 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
i dont really care who its tested on
id rather have lab rats die then grow a 4th nipple

You already have three? Cool.

bringer 10-27-2004 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by project_naughty
You already have three? Cool.
http://www.thejamesbondfanclub.com/F...hirdNipple.jpg

Nicky 10-27-2004 05:37 AM

nope, I dont think its is :(

KRL 10-27-2004 05:55 AM

Unfortunately, the majority of people feel it is better to sacrifice animals for the sake of humans.

I don't think this opinion will be changing anytime soon.

Most animal experimentation is dramatically better regulated now and things have gotten better. The US government, primarily our military, still conducts gruesome and horrific biowarfare WMD experiments at Ft. Meade on animals including intelligent primates, dogs, and cats.

More and more companies are using computer models thankfully, however many chemicals are still tested on animals prior to their commercial introduction. Rats and Rabbits get the worst tests, often having chemicals inserted into their eyes, on their skin, and into their stomachs to test toxicity levels.

Is it morally acceptable? No.

DM4U 10-27-2004 07:34 AM

i am a animal lover, but i agree that sometimes is necessary, i am totally agains testing skin products and shampoo and stuff like that on animals, but in cases like cancer research and aids research i agree with that, i rather have a rat dead than my mother.

zzgundamnzz 10-27-2004 07:41 AM

Better them than us... they gotta experiment on somebody atleast its not a human.

The Heron 10-27-2004 08:48 AM

Who gives a shit about morals?
Actually I'd prefer they not bother developing anything unless it directly can help me. Forget the rest of you losers, I could care less if you die.

TheMob 10-27-2004 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
Unfortunately, the majority of people feel it is better to sacrifice animals for the sake of humans.

I don't think this opinion will be changing anytime soon.

Most animal experimentation is dramatically better regulated now and things have gotten better. The US government, primarily our military, still conducts gruesome and horrific biowarfare WMD experiments at Ft. Meade on animals including intelligent primates, dogs, and cats.

More and more companies are using computer models thankfully, however many chemicals are still tested on animals prior to their commercial introduction. Rats and Rabbits get the worst tests, often having chemicals inserted into their eyes, on their skin, and into their stomachs to test toxicity levels.

Is it morally acceptable? No.

Agreed. It just shows how far along we really are.

CET 10-27-2004 08:57 AM

No, it's not morally acceptable, but it's better then the alternative, which is not doing these tests. Not doing these tests would result in medical progress almost completely halting. Millions of lives have been saved just from insulin treatments that were developed through animal testing. It's a rotten deal, but it's better to do animal testing then not to.

Marcus Aurelius 10-27-2004 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by project_naughty
You already have three? Cool.
One of them is really just chewing gum.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123