The newest FACE on SexEducation.com! This will push some buttons.[LARGE PIC] - GoFuckYourself.com

Manowar · 10-24-2004, 08:28 AM

i'd hit it.

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 08:31 AM

Uhhh, you retard, in case you haven't noticed, that picture belongs to ATKINGDOM, and last I heard, they don't allow their pictures to be used freely. I'll forward this thread to them and see what they think.

fr33s3x · 10-24-2004, 08:36 AM

she's nice

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Uhhh, you retard, in case you haven't noticed, that picture belongs to ATKINGDOM, and last I heard, they don't allow their pictures to be used freely. I'll forward this thread to them and see what they think.

Can't have it both ways baby doll ...
all my content is 2257 compliant and licensed.

It was never the graphics that were the problem on the old SexEducation.com website- it was the text!

Let's be honest for a change.

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Can't have it both ways baby doll ...
all my content is 2257 compliant and licensed.

It was never the graphics that were the problem on the old SexEducation.com website- it was the text!

Let's be honest for a change.

This has nothing to do with compliance and everything to do with permission. Are you promoting ATK? And if so, is your use of the content within their acceptable use policy? I dunno, last time I checked promoting atk was an INVITE ONLY program, and the content was PROVIDED to affiliates ONLY through ATK staff or direct permission from them. Somehow I don't think this has changed, and I get the distinct impression they won't like the way you're using their content.

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Can't have it both ways baby doll ...
all my content is 2257 compliant and licensed.

It was never the graphics that were the problem on the old SexEducation.com website- it was the text!

Let's be honest for a change.

Oh, and the graphics WERE a problem.. I seem to remember some ILLEGALLY POSTED images from Time magazine and many other news media sources, including many adult sites. DOn't get caught in your own lies, retard.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
This has nothing to do with compliance and everything to do with permission. Are you promoting ATK? And if so, is your use of the content within their acceptable use policy? I dunno, last time I checked promoting atk was an INVITE ONLY program, and the content was PROVIDED to affiliates ONLY through ATK staff or direct permission from them. Somehow I don't think this has changed, and I get the distinct impression they won't like the way you're using their content.

Well I think the graphic converts well ...
Is not against global community standards but yes - is controversial on my most generic domain name ...

however, I have a message of true sexual equality I want out and that will be done ...
because I am the MasterBlogger ...

hey kewl...
I own MasterBlogger.com
Just like I own you!!!

Theo · 10-24-2004, 08:51 AM

Didnt u say you'll stop posting for a week?

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Oh, and the graphics WERE a problem.. I seem to remember some ILLEGALLY POSTED images from Time magazine and many other news media sources, including many adult sites. DOn't get caught in your own lies, retard.

Because I am a sexual researcher - which has been proven - for over a decade - I can use "fair use" whenever I decide to - BUT DO NOT !!

"Risk management" honey bun - learned right here on GFY!

I don't have the power or money like Rick Latona to defend my rights to free speech and research - and it's not the primary issue.

Sexual equality is.

I have more then enough creativity to work within the risk parameters as set before me.

As I am a MasterBlogger.

; )

Kamilla36D · 10-24-2004, 08:53 AM

Why hasn't this moron's domain name been banned on gfy already??

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
Didnt u say you'll stop posting for a week?

Ya - I think I did...
oh well ...
shit happens

I forgot and can't anyways right now as SexTherapy.com and Harrow.com are for sale on Afternic.com.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kamilla36D
Why hasn't this moron's domain name been banned on gfy already??

See sig for GOOD REAL CONTENT !!!

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Because I am a sexual researcher - which has been proven - for over a decade - I can use "fair use" whenever I decide to - BUT DO NOT !!

"Risk management" honey bun - learned right here on GFY!

I don't have the power or money like Rick Latona to defend my rights to free speech and research - and it's not the primary issue.

Sexual equality is.

I have more then enough creativity to work within the risk parameters as set before me.

As I am a MasterBlogger.

; )

This is not covered by fair use laws. Hire a lawyer, burger flipper.

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 09:02 AM

Oh, and I did forward this thread to the folks at ATK. I won't bother to speak for them, I'm quite sure they will make their own judgement call about it.

Jakke PNG · 10-24-2004, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
This is not covered by fair use laws. Hire a lawyer, burger flipper.

Didn't you just fight with this buttmucher about copyrights when he first emerged here on gfy?

MattO · 10-24-2004, 09:03 AM

Don't worry, once ATK finds out about this idoit they'll dump his account. Just show them the archive'd pages with all the CP keywords.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
This is not covered by fair use laws. Hire a lawyer, burger flipper.

Don't need to ...
I only use licensed 2257 compliant graphics.

What's the issue?

You got your wish ...

IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE TEXT THOUGH - DOES IT???

roflmao

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
Didn't you just fight with this buttmucher about copyrights when he first emerged here on gfy?

I was one of the people who originally pointed out the fact that he was NOT covered under "fair use", and that he was in fact infringing on many copyrights, yes. Too bad he hasn't learned anything.

Actually, I'll be amused to see what comes of this.. I'd love to see him sued.

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Don't need to ...
I only use licensed 2257 compliant graphics.

What's the issue?

You got your wish ...

IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE TEXT THOUGH - DOES IT???

roflmao

You are using the image without the direct permission of the owner of the image, and even if you did have permission, unless you are using it to promote their program, you are in VIOLATION OF THEIR TERMS OF USE. Are you promoting ATK on your farse of a website, MasterMoron?

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
Didn't you just fight with this buttmucher about copyrights when he first emerged here on gfy?

Yes she did.
So I deleted the entire website and have begun again.

I am only using 2257 compliant graphics.
What's the issue?

In fact - you can search Google.com for my very first post here and it will say LadyMischief invited me to post here.

She is the one that told me about GFY ... she told me to post here on another board.

Blame it on her ...
lol

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Yes she did.
So I deleted the entire website and have begun again.

I am only using 2257 compliant graphics.
What's the issue?

In fact - you can search Google.com for my very first post here and it will say LadyMischief invited me to post here.

She is the one that told me about GFY otherwise ... she told me to post here on another board.

Blame it on her ...
lol

I told you to come here because I KNEW that people here would see you for what you are, and they do. It's good to have idiots like yourself exposed. And it doesn't matter if the graphics are compliant, IF YOU DON"T HAVE PERMISSION TO USE THEM, YOU ARE STILL FUCKED, do you understand me?

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 09:10 AM

Sexeducation, are you are not worth my time. I think this thread speaks VOLUMES about your stupidity and complete naivity when it comes to the law. Like I say, I'm sure ATK will have something to say about it, they have been forwarded the thread.

One word of advice though, you twit. Save up your pennies, I have a feeling you will need them.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
You are using the image without the direct permission of the owner of the image, and even if you did have permission, unless you are using it to promote their program, you are in VIOLATION OF THEIR TERMS OF USE. Are you promoting ATK on your farse of a website, MasterMoron?

Yep ...
I always link directly to my affiliated program when I use a licensed 2257 graphic.

What's this issue LM?

For once be honest ...

You and Jact do not like the fact I advocate that there should be no aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain name.

Stay below the radar - remember - Centurian?

Well guess what - porn is going mainstream - and I am the radar!!!

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:12 AM

You can only use ATK images if:

1. You are an affiliate of ATK. This is by invite only. I doubt you are an affiliate.

2. You are using the images provided by ATK in the affiliate area. These are the ONLY ATK images you can use.

3. You are using the images to promote ATK and ONLY ATK.

Using the images in any other way is a violation of ATK's copyright and is subject to a fine of $150,000 PER IMAGE. Seriously.

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
I advocate that there should be no aroused genitals

Welcome to the ATK Free Page:

http://www.atkingdom.com/kingdom1b.htm

Now shut up, idiot!

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
You can only use ATK images if:

1. You are an affiliate of ATK. This is by invite only. I doubt you are an affiliate.

I am an affiliate.

Quote:

2. You are using the images provided by ATK in the affiliate area. These are the ONLY ATK images you can use.

The graphic is from their "content" area.

Quote:

3. You are using the images to promote ATK and ONLY ATK.

I am only promoting ATK on my homepage.

Quote:

Using the images in any other way is a violation of ATK's copyright and is subject to a fine of $150,000 PER IMAGE. Seriously.

I don't believe I have broken any rules.
If I have - I value that affiliation like I value my Adult.com affiliation both by the letter of the TOS and in spirit and will make adjustments as I continue to push buttons for a global standard for sex education.

Crystal?

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
I am only promoting ATK on my homepage.

You must be promoting ATK on the page on which the image is used. You MUST ALWAYS promote ATK on pages where the image is used.

lazycash · 10-24-2004, 09:19 AM

Please no aroused genitals on the front page, her nipple looks kinda hard and aroused.

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
You can only use ATK images if:

1. You are an affiliate of ATK. This is by invite only. I doubt you are an affiliate.

2. You are using the images provided by ATK in the affiliate area. These are the ONLY ATK images you can use.

3. You are using the images to promote ATK and ONLY ATK.

Using the images in any other way is a violation of ATK's copyright and is subject to a fine of $150,000 PER IMAGE. Seriously.

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:21 AM

I don't think they'll approve of how you use the image. For one thing, you're promoting ATK Cash instead of an ATK pay site.

You really are a moron, aren't you?

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lazycash
Please no aroused genitals on the front page, her nipple looks kinda hard and aroused.

Yep ...
controversial for sure ...

never done the controversial route [smirk]

we'll see how it goes ...

want to see another pic?

ATKcash.com graphics convert and are 2257 compliant.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
I don't think they'll approve of how you use the image. For one thing, you're promoting ATK Cash instead of an ATK pay site.

You really are a moron, aren't you?

Huh?

perhaps?

How did I screw up ...

WTF - I thought I was promoting MY affiliate link?

Are you saying I got my linking wrong?

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

How did I screw up ...

You need to be promoting either the Galleria or the Hairy site, not ATK Cash.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
You need to be promoting either the Galleria or the Hairy site, not ATK Cash.

grrrr ...
gone to check my homepage ...

brb

thanx

MattO · 10-24-2004, 09:27 AM

By the time he "fixes" the links he'll be dropped.

mary34d · 10-24-2004, 09:27 AM

sexeducation got owned

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
You need to be promoting either the Galleria or the Hairy site, not ATK Cash.

My link is to Gallleria ...
so I am okay ...

it's only people with your status that can push MY buttons ...

good one ...

whew ...

had me worried there for a second.

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:31 AM

Even with the link fixed I doubt ATK will approve the way he uses their image. It takes up the entire page and there is one really small text link to give them credit for providing the image. The way he uses it seems to suggest that ATK is somehow supportive of his site. They ABSOLUTELY HATE controversy and like to remain low key. Being associate with sexeducation is likely not something they'll accept with arms wide open.

mary34d · 10-24-2004, 09:31 AM

you'd think a masterblogger would know how to resize pics

LadyMischief · 10-24-2004, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
Even with the link fixed I doubt ATK will approve the way he uses their image. It take up the entire page and there is one really small text link to give them credit for providing the image. The way he uses it seems to suggest that ATK is somehow supportive of his site. They ABSOLUTELY HATE controversy and like to remain low key. Being associate with sexeducation is likely not something they'll accept with arms wide open.

I would tend to agree.. HOw are you doing lately, Donny! Haven't talked much with you in ages..

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
Even with the link fixed I doubt ATK will approve the way he uses their image. It take up the entire page and there is one really small text link to give them credit for providing the image. The way he uses it seems to suggest that ATK is somehow supportive of his site. They ABSOLUTELY HATE controversy and like to remain low key. Being associate with sexeducation is likely not something they'll accept with arms wide open.

Perhaps ...
one thing is for sure

we will find out if they have the NUTS like Lensman does...

To stand up to a different kind of adult website.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:38 AM

No NATS - No NUTS !!!
Lensman has 'em both.

Why are you trusting who you are with now?
just curious...

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Perhaps ...
one thing is for sure

we will find out if they have the NUTS like Lensman does...

To stand up to a different kind of adult website.

You miss the point... it has nothing to do with "having the nuts".

They don't give a shit about you. Period. They are not on a crusade or a mission of any sort. They provide some of the very best sites on the internet and they are only interested in providing excellent customer service and great content so that members retain. And, guess what, THE SITES RETAIN (for years sometimes).

This is not about what THEY offer to YOU... it's about what YOU offer to THEM. That is why affiliates must be approved!! If you don't offer something to ATK, ATK will not continue to offer an affiliate position to you.

We'll see if they think you offer anything.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
You miss the point... it has nothing to do with "having the nuts".

They don't give a shit about you. Period. They are not on a crusade or a mission of any sort. They provide some of the very best sites on the internet and they are only interested in providing excellent customer service and great content so that members retain. And, guess what, THE SITES RETAIN (for years sometimes).

This is not about what THEY offer to YOU... it's about what YOU offer to THEM. That is why affiliates must be approved!! If you don't offer something to ATK, ATK will not continue to offer an affiliate position to you.

We'll see if they think you offer anything.

They offer the one of the finest adult erotica networks of websites on the internet.

I offer honesty - no matter how controversial.

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
They offer the one of the finest adult erotica networks of websites on the internet.

I offer honesty - no matter how controversial.

You missed the point again... see the last half of your sentence? The part that says "no matter how controversial"? That is the part ATK will not like.

XxXotic · 10-24-2004, 09:46 AM

how is the dingleberry fuckstick not either

a: dead
b: in jail
c: killed while in jail

?

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
You missed the point again... see the last half of your sentence? The part that says "no matter how controversial"? That is the part ATK will not like.

What part of the "truth" do you not understand?

It is very good for business to promote the truth.

They have REAL ORGASM video's - I want to show my members that content.

Donny · 10-24-2004, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
What part of the "truth" do you not understand?

It is very good for business to promote the truth.

They have REAL ORGASM video's - I want to show my members that content.

There is no need for further argument. Email has been sent to the program owner. It's in his hands now.

sexeducation · 10-24-2004, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
There is no need for further argument. Email has been sent to the program owner. It's in his hands now.

You should send one to ePassporte.com and AEBN.com because I am coming there way as well.

Actually - with AEBN.com - I am already an affiliate!

10-24-2004, 08:25 AM	#1
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	The newest FACE on SexEducation.com! This will push some buttons.[LARGE PIC]

10-24-2004, 08:31 AM	#3
LadyMischief Orgasms N Such! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Ontario Posts: 18,135	Uhhh, you retard, in case you haven't noticed, that picture belongs to ATKINGDOM, and last I heard, they don't allow their pictures to be used freely. I'll forward this thread to them and see what they think. __________________ ICQ 3522039 Content Manager - orgasm.com [email protected]

10-24-2004, 08:36 AM	#4
fr33s3x Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 5,064	she's nice __________________

10-24-2004, 08:53 AM	#11
Kamilla36D Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: YourSearchNow.com - Search Me! ;-) Posts: 605	Why hasn't this moron's domain name been banned on gfy already?? __________________ YourSearchNow.com Advertise 1c/click - 60% affiliate program - unique exit link program ClickForWebmasters.com Amateur niche toplists, PicPost and Resource

10-24-2004, 09:02 AM	#15
LadyMischief Orgasms N Such! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Ontario Posts: 18,135	Oh, and I did forward this thread to the folks at ATK. I won't bother to speak for them, I'm quite sure they will make their own judgement call about it. __________________ ICQ 3522039 Content Manager - orgasm.com [email protected]

10-24-2004, 08:28 AM	#2
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	i'd hit it.

10-24-2004, 08:51 AM	#9
Theo HAL 9000 Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 34,515	Didnt u say you'll stop posting for a week?

10-24-2004, 09:03 AM	#17
MattO The O is for Oohhh Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AUSTIN TEJAS Posts: 10,861	Don't worry, once ATK finds out about this idoit they'll dump his account. Just show them the archive'd pages with all the CP keywords.

10-24-2004, 09:10 AM	#23
LadyMischief Orgasms N Such! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Ontario Posts: 18,135	Sexeducation, are you are not worth my time. I think this thread speaks VOLUMES about your stupidity and complete naivity when it comes to the law. Like I say, I'm sure ATK will have something to say about it, they have been forwarded the thread. One word of advice though, you twit. Save up your pennies, I have a feeling you will need them. __________________ ICQ 3522039 Content Manager - orgasm.com [email protected]

10-24-2004, 09:12 AM	#25
Donny As you wish... Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 13,754	You can only use ATK images if: 1. You are an affiliate of ATK. This is by invite only. I doubt you are an affiliate. 2. You are using the images provided by ATK in the affiliate area. These are the ONLY ATK images you can use. 3. You are using the images to promote ATK and ONLY ATK. Using the images in any other way is a violation of ATK's copyright and is subject to a fine of $150,000 PER IMAGE. Seriously.

10-24-2004, 09:19 AM	#29
lazycash Troll Patrol Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Local Socal Posts: 15,214	Please no aroused genitals on the front page, her nipple looks kinda hard and aroused. __________________ "WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams.. Its crazy..." VenusBlogger

10-24-2004, 09:21 AM	#31
Donny As you wish... Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 13,754	I don't think they'll approve of how you use the image. For one thing, you're promoting ATK Cash instead of an ATK pay site. You really are a moron, aren't you?

10-24-2004, 09:27 AM	#36
MattO The O is for Oohhh Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AUSTIN TEJAS Posts: 10,861	By the time he "fixes" the links he'll be dropped.

10-24-2004, 09:27 AM	#37
mary34d Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Northern Cuba Posts: 3,358	sexeducation got owned __________________ The guys at CJ Bucks will do absolutely anything to get your business. You owe it to yourself to at least ask! Free Hosting, Content, etc. CJ Bucks has it all. Sign up! I'll show you my tits now you show me your traffic.

10-24-2004, 09:31 AM	#39
Donny As you wish... Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 13,754	Even with the link fixed I doubt ATK will approve the way he uses their image. It takes up the entire page and there is one really small text link to give them credit for providing the image. The way he uses it seems to suggest that ATK is somehow supportive of his site. They ABSOLUTELY HATE controversy and like to remain low key. Being associate with sexeducation is likely not something they'll accept with arms wide open. Last edited by DonovanPhillips; 10-24-2004 at 09:33 AM..

10-24-2004, 09:38 AM	#43
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	No NATS - No NUTS !!! Lensman has 'em both. Why are you trusting who you are with now? just curious...

10-24-2004, 09:46 AM	#47
XxXotic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Da Swamps Posts: 8,500	how is the dingleberry fuckstick not either a: dead b: in jail c: killed while in jail ? __________________ Sponsors.. Tired of people not using your shitty RSS Feeds? Let Us Help You! Oxeo - Serious Hosting For Serious Webmasters. iCQ:135.887013