Double standards concerning underage porn on this board? - GoFuckYourself.com

psyko514 · 10-03-2004, 05:12 PM

Seems everyone gets their panties in a bunch when they get a CP spam or sexeducation posts CP links, yet they have no problem requesting and watching a video of a 13-14 year old girl masturbating. And no one calls for a ban when people post the videos.

Pretty disturbing if you ask me.

Reference this thread.

As a side note, this thread is in no way endorsing sexeducation. He's a fucked up sicko, just like the others enjoying videos of minors masturbating.

MrJackMeHoff · 10-03-2004, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
Seems everyone gets their panties in a bunch when they get a CP spam or sexeducation posts CP links, yet they have no problem requesting and watching a video of a 13-14 year old girl masturbating. And no one calls for a ban when people post the videos.

Pretty disturbing if you ask me.

Reference this thread.

As a side note, this thread is in no way endorsing sexeducation. He's a fucked up sicko, just like the others enjoying videos of minors masturbating.

Dude that girl is in her 20's stfu

psyko514 · 10-03-2004, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrJackMeHoff
Dude that girl is in her 20's stfu

Prove it.

Many have said otherwise. As well, a news article was posted stating she was in grade 8, placing her age at 13-14, unless she failed 8 or 9 times.

Personally, I wouldn't take the risk of downloading potential child porn. Obviously, you didn't care.

I'm sure "But judge... MrJackMeHoff on GoFuckYourself.com said she was in her 20s" would get you acquitted.

detoxed · 10-03-2004, 05:31 PM

nice thread

korzon · 10-03-2004, 05:32 PM

im not downloading it

psyko514 · 10-03-2004, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by detoxed
nice thread

yet everyone is quiet...

MrJackMeHoff · 10-03-2004, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
Prove it.

Many have said otherwise. As well, a news article was posted stating she was in grade 8, placing her age at 13-14, unless she failed 8 or 9 times.

Personally, I wouldn't take the risk of downloading potential child porn. Obviously, you didn't care.

I'm sure "But judge... MrJackMeHoff on GoFuckYourself.com said she was in her 20s" would get you acquitted.

The artical didnt feature the video. Someone just tried to pass the video off as the artical video. Why would an artical post a video of underage porn!?

IPK · 10-03-2004, 06:11 PM

Where does it say in that the article that it is in reference to that particular video? Please cite it.

I guess there is only one webcam video on the internet where someone masturbates.

sexeducation · 10-03-2004, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
Seems everyone gets their panties in a bunch when they get a CP spam or sexeducation posts CP links, yet they have no problem requesting and watching a video of a 13-14 year old girl masturbating. And no one calls for a ban when people post the videos.

Pretty disturbing if you ask me.

Reference this thread.

As a side note, this thread is in no way endorsing sexeducation. He's a fucked up sicko, just like the others enjoying videos of minors masturbating.

yes ...
very weird ...

And I am not a fucked up'd sicko ...
I just have the guts to talk about the most controversial sexual issues that exist.

The only sure certain fact that I can swear my life on ...
Is that this time in the history of our planet will be known as the sexual dark ages ...

IPK · 10-03-2004, 06:15 PM

untitled · 10-03-2004, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
Seems everyone gets their panties in a bunch when they get a CP spam or sexeducation posts CP links, yet they have no problem requesting and watching a video of a 13-14 year old girl masturbating. And no one calls for a ban when people post the videos.

Pretty disturbing if you ask me.

Reference this thread.

As a side note, this thread is in no way endorsing sexeducation. He's a fucked up sicko, just like the others enjoying videos of minors masturbating.

so your defending sexeducation?

IPK · 10-03-2004, 06:19 PM

who is quiet now....

psyko514 · 10-03-2004, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IPK
Where does it say in that the article that it is in reference to that particular video? Please cite it.

Where does it say it isn't?

I'm assuming you've seen the video. Based on many first hand accounts I've read, the girl certainly looks like she's 13-14. Do you agree?

Is it worth the risk? With so much legal porn available on the net, are you really so desperate to see more that you'll download what is very likely child porn. Even while knowing there's a very good chance the girl's a minor?

There's something wrong with that.

sexeducation · 10-03-2004, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IPK
who is quiet now....

Where is "Quiet" now ?
Is he okay?

We've had our words.
But truly, I do wish him the best as a CONTRIBUTOR to the discussions of this chat board and not just a sig flaming GFY sheep.

Get well my friend.

JSA Matt · 10-03-2004, 06:24 PM

Lensman allows a known pedophile to constantly spam here, there is no hope.... don't waste your time.

sexeducation · 10-03-2004, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JSA Matt
Lensman allows a known pedophile to constantly spam here, there is no hope.... don't waste your time.

You're going to be FUCKING BANNED ...
you can NOT say that about anyone on any board unless it is true.
As it is not - you will be fucking banned !!!

Is that fucking crystal clear?

uchase/webpry · 10-03-2004, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JSA Matt
Lensman allows a known pedophile to constantly spam here, there is no hope.... don't waste your time.

JSA Matt · 10-03-2004, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
You're going to be FUCKING BANNED ...
you can NOT say that about anyone on any board unless it is true.
As it is not - you will be fucking banned !!!

Is that fucking crystal clear?

You have just openly admitted to being a pedophile, who the fuck said your name?

IPK · 10-03-2004, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
Where does it say it isn't?

I'm assuming you've seen the video. Based on many first hand accounts I've read, the girl certainly looks like she's 13-14. Do you agree?

Is it worth the risk? With so much legal porn available on the net, are you really so desperate to see more that you'll download what is very likely child porn. Even while knowing there's a very good chance the girl's a minor?

There's something wrong with that.

I saw it on a video dump. It was on http://videodump.com/ but the link is gone. It just said Psycho_Girl.

Oh so you do research on each and every video link before you click on it.

I don't think she looks 13-14. You didn't see the video so your opinion doesn't matter.

What makes you think that news article is about that particular video? Well? There are no links between that video and that news article.

I think if anyone were to read your posts they would be lead to believe that you actually watched the video and are consumed by much guilt and denial that you feel the need to spearhead the crusade.

sexeducation · 10-03-2004, 06:30 PM

Lensman
in the thread
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...pagen umber=1

I don't understand where this Pedo crap comes from. I've never seen it here. That's why he is not banned.

Mike Okitch · 10-03-2004, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by untitled
so your defending sexeducation?

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
As a side note, this thread is in no way endorsing sexeducation

Does't look like it.

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23

For instance, last spring, when an eighth-grade girl at Horace Mann School in the Riverdale section of the Bronx, sent a digital video of herself masturbating to a male classmate on whom she had a crush, it quickly appeared on a file-sharing network that teenagers use to trade music. Hundreds of New York private school students saw the video, in which the girl's face was clearly visible, and it was available to a worldwide audience of millions.

That stocktrader23 quote was in
this thread . It does mention 8th grade. EIGHT FUCKING GRADE FOLKS!!! Bullshit or not, this makes it at best a dangerous file to download.

The mere doubt that someone underage can be on that file should be more than enough to avoid this thing like the plague. When in doubt, stay out.

The haters who say she's of age can fuck off untill they come back with proof.

sexeducation · 10-03-2004, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JSA Matt
Lensman allows a known pedophile to constantly spam here, there is no hope.... don't waste your time.

Better yet ...
POST YOUR FUCKING PROOF ...

Or are you a GFY sheep - post your proof !!!

psyko514 · 10-03-2004, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IPK
I saw it on a video dump. It was on http://videodump.com/ but the link is gone. It just said Psycho_Girl.

Oh so you do research on each and every video link before you click on it.

I don't think she looks 13-14. You didn't see the video so your opinion doesn't matter.

What makes you think that news article is about that particular video? Well? There are no links between that video and that news article.

I think if anyone were to read your posts they would be lead to believe that you actually watched the video and are consumed in so much guilt and denial that you feel the need to spearhead the crusade.

There's more evidence to show the article is about her than there is evidence to show it's not about her.

How confident are you that she's over 18? Honestly.

As for your lame attempts at reversing this on me, you're wrong. I can equally say that you're getting so defensive because you feel guilty and you're trying to justify your actions.

Until someone proves that the girl is over 18, wouldn't "Better safe than sorry" be a good motto to abide by?

JSA Matt · 10-03-2004, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Better yet ...
POST YOUR FUCKING PROOF ...

Or are you a GFY sheep - post your proof !!!

Quote:

Originally posted by JSA Matt
You have just openly admitted to being a pedophile, who the fuck said your name?

IPK · 10-03-2004, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
There's more evidence to show the article is about her than there is evidence to show it's not about her.

How confident are you that she's over 18? Honestly.

As for your lame attempts at reversing this on me, you're wrong. I can equally say that you're getting so defensive because you feel guilty and you're trying to justify your actions.

Until someone proves that the girl is over 18, wouldn't "Better safe than sorry" be a good motto to abide by?

What "evidence?" Please post all the evidence that shows the article is about her.

Yeah it's better to be safe than sorry. I agree with you there. I clicked a link on a video dump, are you saying I should research each link before I click on it?

sexeducation · 10-03-2004, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike Okitch
Does't look like it.

That stocktrader23 quote was in
this thread . It does mention 8th grade. EIGHT FUCKING GRADE FOLKS!!! Bullshit or not, this makes it at best a dangerous file to download.

The mere doubt that someone underage can be on that file should be more than enough to avoid this thing like the plague. When in doubt, stay out.

The haters who say she's of age can fuck off untill they come back with proof.

2257 the original was a good step.
The newest 2257 crap - I don't know yet.

However, I can go anywhere I feel like it on the internet as I am truly a sexual researcher with published results.

"No aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain name."

"Vaginal orgasm is a lie".

Did I follow the link to conclusion .. no .. don't need to for this discussion.

IPK · 10-03-2004, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
There's more evidence to show the article is about her than there is evidence to show it's not about her.

I am still waiting for "evidence" that shows the article is about her. I'm not accepting hearsay from other message boards either.

MrJackMeHoff · 10-03-2004, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
There's more evidence to show the article is about her than there is evidence to show it's not about her.

How confident are you that she's over 18? Honestly.

As for your lame attempts at reversing this on me, you're wrong. I can equally say that you're getting so defensive because you feel guilty and you're trying to justify your actions.

Until someone proves that the girl is over 18, wouldn't "Better safe than sorry" be a good motto to abide by?

Im just saying you posted this thread with no proof at all so shut it.

psyko514 · 10-03-2004, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IPK
What "evidence?" Please post all the evidence that shows the article is about her.

Yeah it's better to be safe than sorry. I agree with you there. I clicked a link on a video dump, are you saying I should research each link before I click on it?

Dude, you're explicitly looking for that exact type of video. I'm willing to bet a considerable amount of those videos star minors.

As for the evidence, here's the paragraph from the article:

Quote:

For instance, last spring, when an eighth-grade girl at Horace Mann School in the Riverdale section of the Bronx, sent a digital video of herself masturbating to a male classmate on whom she had a crush, it quickly appeared on a file-sharing network that teenagers use to trade music. Hundreds of New York private school students saw the video, in which the girl's face was clearly visible, and it was available to a worldwide audience of millions.

Based on what I've gleaned from posts on GFY and a local forum I go on, as well as the transcript posted on a site linked in your thread, the "Psycho girl" video features a young girl in a digital video of herself masturbating while professing her love for what is apparently a male classmate who she has a crush on. Links started showing up on GFY in August leading me to believe it's a pretty recent video. Could be as recent as last spring. And, through the internet, it's available to a worldwide audience of millions.

Now what's your argument to show that the video in question isn't the one mentioned in the article?

MrJackMeHoff · 10-03-2004, 06:50 PM

Quote:

[i]
Now what's your argument to show that the video in question isn't the one mentioned in the article? [/B]

The video is old I saw it like a year ago. Nuff said already.

IPK · 10-03-2004, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
Based on what I've gleaned from posts on GFY and a local forum I go on, as well as the transcript posted on a site linked in your thread, the "Psycho girl" video features a young girl in a digital video of herself masturbating while professing her love for what is apparently a male classmate who she has a crush on. Links started showing up on GFY in August leading me to believe it's a pretty recent video. Could be as recent as last spring. And, through the internet, it's available to a worldwide audience of millions.

That does not qualify as "evidence." Please try again.

psyko514 · 10-03-2004, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IPK
That does not qualify as "evidence." Please try again.

Yeah, it does. Now where's your evidence to that gurantees the video in the article is not the same as the video you've downloaded?

And you neglected to answer another question I asked. How confident are you that she's over 18?

IPK · 10-03-2004, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
Yeah, it does. Now where's your evidence to that gurantees the video in the article is not the same as the video you've downloaded?

And you neglected to answer another question I asked. How confident are you that she's over 18?

I'm not going to argue with someone with a flawed sense of logic. Ask one of the webmasters in these threads for answers to your questions concerning the video, I'm through:

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...hreadid=348343

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...hreadid=349307

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...hreadid=348031

Let me know how it goes.

psyko514 · 10-03-2004, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IPK
I'm not going to argue with someone with a flawed sense of logic.

Flawed sense of logic? Look up "cirumstantial evidence". That's what I posted.

You've dodged the question quite a few times. How confident are you that she's over 18?

Your refusal to answer leads me to believe that you're not very confident at all.

And now you're leaving the thread, under pretense that my logic is flawed.

And you had the balls to accuse me of feeling guilty and in denial? Ha!

SureFire · 10-03-2004, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
.... And I am not a fucked up'd sicko ...
...

Could have fooled me. SexEd you are one f-up poster and IMHO, a pedo.

10-03-2004, 05:12 PM	#1
psyko514 See sig. Join Epic Cash. Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec. ICQ: 214702014 Posts: 22,366	Double standards concerning underage porn on this board? Seems everyone gets their panties in a bunch when they get a CP spam or sexeducation posts CP links, yet they have no problem requesting and watching a video of a 13-14 year old girl masturbating. And no one calls for a ban when people post the videos. Pretty disturbing if you ask me. Reference this thread. As a side note, this thread is in no way endorsing sexeducation. He's a fucked up sicko, just like the others enjoying videos of minors masturbating.

10-03-2004, 05:32 PM	#5
korzon Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 1,524	im not downloading it __________________

10-03-2004, 06:11 PM	#8
IPK Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 4,209	Where does it say in that the article that it is in reference to that particular video? Please cite it. I guess there is only one webcam video on the internet where someone masturbates. __________________ DomainerResource.com strategies for monetizing and investing in domain names... Last edited by IPK; 10-03-2004 at 06:13 PM..

10-03-2004, 06:15 PM	#10
IPK Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 4,209	__________________ DomainerResource.com strategies for monetizing and investing in domain names...

10-03-2004, 06:19 PM	#12
IPK Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 4,209	who is quiet now.... __________________ DomainerResource.com strategies for monetizing and investing in domain names...

10-03-2004, 05:31 PM	#4
detoxed vip member Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 17,798	nice thread

10-03-2004, 06:24 PM	#15
JSA Matt So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 5,464	Lensman allows a known pedophile to constantly spam here, there is no hope.... don't waste your time.

10-03-2004, 06:30 PM	#20
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	Lensman in the thread http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...pagen umber=1 I don't understand where this Pedo crap comes from. I've never seen it here. That's why he is not banned.