For All You John Kerry Lovers..... - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

woj · 10-03-2004, 07:54 AM

50 John Kerry supporters...

trouserrat · 10-03-2004, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
This is great, camchicks is giving this guy a recent history lesson and he's responding with half a Rush Limbaugh rant and nothing to back up his assumptions and bs. Don't waste your time with that kid.

CamChicks couldn't give me a history lesson if his life depended on it. As I said, I don't engage in "google-offs" with people. Given enough time, I could find internet articles to prove everything from the existence of Bigfoot to the location of the lost city of Atlantis. Does that mean those things exist? No. Does it mean some idiots believe they do? Yes. Personally, I don't have the time. I read the thread, I respond out of my own knowledge of the subject based on the facts and history that I know to be true and based on opinions that I have formed by drawing conclusions from multiple sources. Not just what I happened to find when googling through the news that day on a quest to find yet another thing that proves how stupid Bush is.

You extremist idiots are ridiculous. You can tell the education level of most of you by the amount of times someone has compared Bush to Hitler in this thread. See, here on GFY it's easy to act cool because the uninformed and grammatically challenged peanut gallery will chime in in your defense. In the real world of intellectual discussion though, you are mental midgets. As is anyone who consistently takes the same extremist view every time. Things aren't that black and white. What you basically do is render your opinion irrelevant. It becomes sort of like white noise that no one pays attention to. Who cares what you, directfiesta, Cam Chicks or your ilk really have to say on a subject? We already know it will be all one-sided, biased, and based on a hatred for Bush. It just makes you look totally silly and like a nut (anywhere but on GFY). The things I've posted in this thread are true whether you want to believe them or not. I might actually listen to your side of the story if it wasn't so biased and unjust all the time. No one with any sense goes to Michael Moore and expects a fair view of things. The same can be said of Rush Limbaugh. As I said: white noise. I have things I agree and disagree with from Bush and Kerry. I just happen to disagree with Kerry more. But I listen to and understand both sides.

I'd put you on ignore, but it's too damn funny reading your BS that you think makes you looks so politically informed. I would like to see Cam Chicks in a debate though: "your response to the question?" "uh...hey guys, wait a sec, I gotta go google some articles for you! I didn't know we wouldn't have internet access at the podium. duuuuuuh".

Btw, thanks for the "kid" reference, I'm always telling my wife I feel old ever since I turned 30.

At least I'm not a "looser" anymore.

CamChicks · 10-03-2004, 12:08 PM

I'm going to ignore trouserrat's silly implication that posting facts somehow diminished the arguement. or the person making the arguement.

Hey, look what else I just google'd....

Quote:

?1994: North Korea and U.S. sign nuclear agreement in Geneva. North Korea pledges to freeze and eventually dismantle its nuclear weapons program in exchange for international aid to build two power-producing nuclear reactors.

?August 1998: North Korea fires a multistage rocket that flies over Japan and lands in the Pacific Ocean, proving the Koreans can strike any part of Japan's territory.

?May 1999: Former Defense Secretary William Perry visits North Korea and delivers a U.S. disarmament proposal during four days of talks.

?September 1999: North Korea pledges to freeze testing of long-range missiles for the duration of negotiations to improve relations.

?Sept. 17, 1999: President Clinton agrees to the first significant easing of economic sanctions against North Korea since the Korean War ended in 1953.

?December 1999: A U.S.-led international consortium signs a $4.6 billion contract to build two safer, Western-developed light-water nuclear reactors in North Korea.

?July 2000: North Korea renews its threat to restart its nuclear program if Washington does not compensate for the loss of electricity caused by delays in building nuclear power plants.

?June 2001: North Korea warns it will reconsider its moratorium on missile tests if the Bush administration doesn't resume contacts aimed at normalizing relations.

?July 2001: State Department reports North Korea is going ahead with development of its long-range missile. A senior Bush administration official says North Korea has conducted an engine test of the Taepodong-1 missile.

?December 2001: President Bush warns Iraq and North Korea that they would be "held accountable" if they developed weapons of mass destruction "that will be used to terrorize nations."

?Jan. 29, 2002: Bush labels North Korea, Iran and Iraq an "axis of evil" in his State of the Union address. "By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger," he says.

Bush's diplomatic skills amount to doing nothing but name-calling. That may be applauded by his xenophobic redneck base, but it puts the world in unneccessary danger. This isn't how you make friends.

trouserrat · 10-03-2004, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamChicks
I'm going to ignore trouserrat's silly implication that posting facts somehow diminished the arguement. or the person making the arguement.

Of course you'll ignore it, it makes it much easier to continue with your BS. Of course I always find it funny that things are "facts" when they agree with your argument but falsehoods when they don't. Keep googling, moron. If left to your own devices and knowledge, you'd appear the fool. You're going to be so sad come November, aren't you?

(PS. argument is spelled argument not "arguement". You spelled it that way twice so I assume it's not a typo. And before you say that's a lame observation, consider this: Spelling=how well read you are. Reading=information. Information=Knowledge. Maybe you should read more and cut and paste less.)

CC · 10-03-2004, 01:35 PM

CamChicks, for once, could you please try to use your brain to compose an intelligent rebuttal, rather than simply copying and pasting facts that are easily found through any simple web search.

Rich · 10-03-2004, 01:50 PM

lol

"Make up shit based on half truths you heard on talk radio, don't post facts from news articles."

Good point guys.

We present valid points regarding this situation and the truth about the bilateral talks, and this jackass comes back with insults about us and reasons why we're not credible, the main reason being that we're posting facts. Does it get any better than this?

Oh, and don't forget the spelling corrections.

EviLSuperstaR · 10-03-2004, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
lol

"Make up shit based on half truths you heard on talk radio, don't post facts from news articles."

Good point guys.

We present valid points regarding this situation and the truth about the bilateral talks, and this jackass comes back with insults about us and reasons why we're not credible, the main reason being that we're posting facts. Does it get any better than this?

Oh, and don't forget the spelling corrections.

I think the Bush monkeys are upset because their upper-chimp got owned big time by Kerry.
Muhahahahahahahaha!

trouserrat · 10-03-2004, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by EviLSuperstaR
I think the Bush monkeys are upset because their upper-chimp got owned big time by Kerry.
Muhahahahahahahaha!

So owned, he's going to win the election. Good one.

Rich, I don't think I've seen you post a valid point on this board ever. As with most people like you, valid points are only "valid" if they agree with your rhetoric. Take for instance this new thread:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...adid=366194&s=
They literally have video of Kerry taking a cheat sheet from his pocket, yet there's some reason for it or no that's not what you're seeing...it's a pen! C'mon. But Bush is Hitler. Yea that's reasonable. It's just so absurd.

Anyway, the bottom line is I enjoy debating politics with plenty of people on message boards with discussions ranging from music to video games to Walt Disney World. I talk with friends and family ranging from my homosexual raving liberal brother to my mom who literally has a talking George Bush doll. The reason I can discuss things with any of them is because they are 1) intelligent and 2) able to see multiple sides of an argument. As I have said before, this is something you and many others here are unable to do. Thus, you are pretty pathetic and your opinions only have even the tiniest shred of relevancy when you are espousing them to others as deluded as you. Walk outside and speak to actual knowledgable intellectuals and you'll be laughed at. I think you know this is the case and that's why you spend so much time BSing on here.

Btw, notice that Cam Chicks has not responded again to this thread because he was told to actually use his brain, not Google. Anyhow, better things to do tonight than debate with people who don't actually debate, only blather and bluster. Ta Ta.

10-03-2004, 07:54 AM	#51
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	50 John Kerry supporters... __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

10-03-2004, 01:35 PM	#55
CC Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,690	CamChicks, for once, could you please try to use your brain to compose an intelligent rebuttal, rather than simply copying and pasting facts that are easily found through any simple web search.

10-03-2004, 01:50 PM	#56
Rich So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 11,486	lol "Make up shit based on half truths you heard on talk radio, don't post facts from news articles." Good point guys. We present valid points regarding this situation and the truth about the bilateral talks, and this jackass comes back with insults about us and reasons why we're not credible, the main reason being that we're posting facts. Does it get any better than this? Oh, and don't forget the spelling corrections.