GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   What Kerry is doing lately is dangerous for America (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=361435)

SomeCreep 09-25-2004 01:45 AM

50 votes for Kerry

robfantasy 09-25-2004 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ItBurnsWhenIpee
Oh yes, poor America...the most prosperous country on earth where you can accomplish anything if you put your mind to it.

It's just a disaster here for me, working on porn for a living and living on the beach. Why should we care if people are getting tortured and murdered if they aren't Americans?

Get a heart

for you and me no, for the people living below poverty level who cant get a job and are stuck in the court system (no liscense/no education/no future) those people live in America and should be taken care of first

ItBurnsWhenIpee 09-25-2004 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by robfantasy
for you and me no, for the people living below poverty level who cant get a job and are stuck in the court system (no liscense/no education/no future) those people live in America and should be taken care of first
Those people weren't given access to our public education? What were they denied that you and I were given? I've made my opportunities for myself. What about you? Have you been looking for handouts or did you make it on your own?

CET 09-25-2004 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
You're supposed to be 18+ to post on this board. Free us? LMFAO. Who the fuck is free now? The Iraqis are free, well unless they want to watch Al Jazeera.

Lensman really needs to do some house cleaning.

Oh shit! Someone disagreed with you?! That fucker needs to be banned now! http://www.freakmanor.com/smilies/jerkit.gif

CET 09-25-2004 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by malakajoe
Yes, please keep bombing our cities and killing children. We understand why missiles hit homes and cities where people live. We understand the children dying.

http://babykiller.com/warchildcollateral.jpg

http://babykiller.com/woundedchild2003.jpg

http://babykiller.com/nada_adman_skull_fracture.jpg

http://www.kirkbytimes.co.uk/images/...d_dead_bas.jpg

http://www.may41970.com/Update-Nov-2...IraqiChild.jpg

Fine, now show pictures of the stuff Saddam was doing to his own people by the thousands.

kenny 09-25-2004 01:53 AM

The US wouldn't worry about things like Iraq..

It's Bush's fault I don't have anymore fucking beer in my house!

Carry on.

malakajoe 09-25-2004 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
Fine, now show pictures of the stuff Saddam was doing to his own people by the thousands.
Please help me find those pictures. Actual pictures with people being killed or tortured.

And again..please help my confusion.

Are we at war because of terrorism? Or to free the people of Iraq? I can't get it straight anymore.

CET 09-25-2004 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by malakajoe
Do you have pictures of that? If so, please show them doing this stuff.

You know nothing of how many people Saddam has killed. If the number was so high, the United Nations would have been all over him. I don't doubt it was bad, but not what the liars in charge are telling us.

You're forgetting about how France, Germany and Russia (key security council countries) were being bribed by the Food for Oil program. Of course these countries are going to try to stop every effort to depose Saddam. Why do you think the UN passed 17 impotent resolutions over 12 years? As long as you have at least 1 security council veto, you're safe and that's what Saddam had. As a matter of fact, he had 3.

malakajoe 09-25-2004 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
You're forgetting about how France, Germany and Russia (key security council countries) were being bribed by the Food for Oil program. Of course these countries are going to try to stop every effort to depose Saddam. Why do you think the UN passed 17 impotent resolutions over 12 years? As long as you have at least 1 security council veto, you're safe and that's what Saddam had. As a matter of fact, he had 3.
Ok..if you are going to talk bribes...lol!!

Unocal. Haliburton. Any lobbiest in America.

Come on man. America has more bribes going on than most other countries. Wake up.


But wait...our government doesn't call those bribes. My mistake.

kenny 09-25-2004 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
You're forgetting about how France, Germany and Russia (key security council countries) were being bribed by the Food for Oil program. Of course these countries are going to try to stop every effort to depose Saddam. Why do you think the UN passed 17 impotent resolutions over 12 years? As long as you have at least 1 security council veto, you're safe and that's what Saddam had. As a matter of fact, he had 3.
UN resolutions AREN'T important!

kenny 09-25-2004 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by malakajoe
Ok..if you are going to talk bribes...lol!!

Unocal. Haliburton. Any lobbiest in America.

Come on man. America has more bribes going on than most other countries. Wake up.

Word.

The US pays everybody off.

robfantasy 09-25-2004 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ItBurnsWhenIpee
Those people weren't given access to our public education? What were they denied that you and I were given? I've made my opportunities for myself. What about you? Have you been looking for handouts or did you make it on your own?
i made it on my own but.. u must have never been to a school in the projects.. public education is not the same everywhere dood..
visit some of the less fortunate areas of your town..

all im saying is clean up america before u clean up iraq..

we have the same shit here.

Centurion 09-25-2004 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ItBurnsWhenIpee

You have the Prime Minister of Iraq saying things are going well, and you have John Kerry saying that he is full of shit, basically. What good can come from this except for pushing his own presidential agenda? Does he even want America to look good in the world, or does he just want to win the election?

Despite what the Republicans would have you believe, THE TRUTH *IS* the most important issue here.

The war is going WORSE than ever, and only people who still believe in Santa Claus are going to buy the line that things are going GREAT in Iraq.

Centurion 09-25-2004 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ItBurnsWhenIpee
Interesting how you don't post pictures of the mass graves, torture chambers, rape rooms, etc. that Saddam had. How about how his sons would bring schoolgirls to their palaces on field trips just to rape them? And no one could protest or they'd be killed.


Tell me just ONE place, ONE SPECIFIC item you have posted ANYWHERE in this thread that shows the IMPORTANCE of Iraq in the war on terrorism and Al Qaeda!

I frankly don't GIVE A FUCK what was happening earlier in Iraq before we invade because we had a much more IMPORTANT THING to do! CATCH THE MOTHERFUCKERS THAT ATTACKED US ON 9/11/01!!

Bush STARTED to do that, and then stopped and went off on his own merry little war in Iraq, thus allowing Al Qaeda and gang to re-group and get even stronger TODAY than they were THREE years ago!

Centurion 09-25-2004 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by monro
Don't talk about the UN! 80% of the members are ruled by dictators and do all they can to stop any country to become a democracy!

For the very first time there will be a free election in Iraq, thanks to Bush!

You can't blame USA for what the muslim murders are doing in Iraq, they do it all over the world to stop the way of living we are used to and like.

You do live in an alternate universe don't you?

1) WRONG on 80% of UN nations rules by dictators.
2)WRONG on free elections in Iraq. They will never happen because frankly IRAQ does not want free elections! They are not material for a western type of democracy.
3) We CAN blame the USA for the murders because if we hadn't invaded in the first place, there wouldn't be almost 1100 soldiers dead and numerous civilians on BOTH sides murdered!

Centurion 09-25-2004 02:50 AM

To all those who do the hokie pokie dance of "Saddam was a bad man who murdered his own people"..tell me just ONE THING:

HOW DID THE INVASION OF IRAQ HELP US IN THE WAR ON TERROR THAT WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE FIGHTING?

It hasn't helped..it has actually made it worse because Iraq is now a breeding/training ground for terrorists now where it WASN'T before.

And if you need to sniffle about how BAD Saddam was for your justification for killing 10's of thousands of innocents NOW in Iraq, then why aren't we doing it in ALL the countries were leaders are repressing their own people?

You are HYPOCRITES when you give the argument: "But he was a bad man we needed to take out!"

sacX 09-25-2004 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
You're forgetting about how France, Germany and Russia (key security council countries) were being bribed by the Food for Oil program. Of course these countries are going to try to stop every effort to depose Saddam. Why do you think the UN passed 17 impotent resolutions over 12 years? As long as you have at least 1 security council veto, you're safe and that's what Saddam had. As a matter of fact, he had 3.
Well 3 vetoes (actually only 2 because Germany doesn't have veto power)
is better than just 1 which Israel always gets.

Plus the UN for oil scandal is being investiaged and if found to be true then those countries deserve to be humiliated for their actions. However at the moment it is pure speculation without actual prooof.

sacX 09-25-2004 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by monro
Don't talk about the UN! 80% of the members are ruled by dictators and do all they can to stop any country to become a democracy!

For the very first time there will be a free election in Iraq, thanks to Bush!

You can't blame USA for what the muslim murders are doing in Iraq, they do it all over the world to stop the way of living we are used to and like.

80%?? fuck go read a book sometime.. hell even search google and you might not sound quite so retarded.

Rich 09-25-2004 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
We should of let Saddam be.

The world needs to know that things like resolutions and what not are not important.

The US needs to be a country of isolation like before WW2. For some reason we changed I forget why

What about the resolutions against the USA and Israel, and against the war itself? Ignore those ones right? Bush knows best. :1orglaugh

Agent White 09-25-2004 03:25 AM

ItburnswhenIpee, you are completely wrong.


http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...l=968350060724



Feel free to retract your statement.

monro 09-25-2004 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
What about the resolutions against the USA and Israel, and against the war itself? Ignore those ones right? Bush knows best. :1orglaugh
China, as a Security Council member blocked UN from stopping the killings in Sudan. Only one example.
Who shall save the lives of the people still being killed daily? Bush? You? Or just let them be killed?
And Israel, stupid Jews, they still don't know that they should not argue about being killed.

-------------------------------------
24 September 2004 ? The "unspeakable violence" being waged against the people of Sudan's troubled Darfur region means the crisis there is a global issue, and "not simply an African problem," Secretary-General Kofi Annan told the Security Council today.

In remarks at the outset of a Council meeting to hear a briefing by Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo on the situation in Africa, in particular Darfur, where more than 1.65 million people have had to flee their homes in the past year and a half because of the violence, Mr. Annan said civilians are still facing attacks every day.

China said: we will not support any actions from UN in Sudan. ( Veto )

Agent White 09-25-2004 03:44 AM

Saddam Hussein is an honorary citizen of detroit. Perhaps he should move there.


http://www.wndu.com/news/032003/news_19147.php


I wonder sometimes if Americans all suffer from long term memory loss. Saddam's your boy. You backed him in the Iran-Iraq war. In fact you backed him so much that at one point he had the 4th largest army in the world.

Some of you claim he killed "thousands of his people". When those people are Kurdish rebels who stage an armed revolt with promised military support of the US (which they didn't get), then they are no longer your people, they are insurgents.

And how does America treat insurgents in Iraq? No better than Saddam did.

The Iraqi Secret Police (The Fedayeen)? Abu Ghraib prison? Do you know why those exist?

They were there to suppress something prevalent in the middle east that Saddam did not want in his secular Baathist Party controlled country.

You guessed it. Militant, fundamentalist Islam. This is why Osama hated Saddam so much. Saddam was oppressing the very people that US forces are shooting it out with.


I can't believe that some of you make the most grandiose and assinine claims without doing even the slightest amount of research.


This is why (as I linked above) the rest of the world wants Bush out. We've done our homework.

We're still asking the same questions over and over and we're not getting answers.

Where's the WMDs?
Why aren't you trying to find Osama Bin Laden?
What does Iraq have to do with Terrorism?



Nobody has good answers for these questions. All the freedom fries and flag waving won't make the world stop asking.

Agent White 09-25-2004 04:01 AM

It's funny that the US talks about saving the Iraqis from the oppression of Saddam Hussein, yet the people Saddam was oppressing in his own country ARE THE VERY SAME PEOPLE SHOOTING AT US TROOPS

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...&notFound=true

I don't know whether to laugh or cry. By the way, check the date on that article.

This isn't new information.

mardigras 09-25-2004 04:31 AM

Bush got to revenge his daddy. That will be his legacy.

Head 09-25-2004 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MandyBlake
I know.
When did it become wrong to question our leaders in America? This country that is supposed to be so free.

Ya

Dead13 09-25-2004 07:04 AM

What you and Bush are doing is a hell of a lot more dangerous than what Kerry is doing.

Kerry is not doing anything more than giving us another direction to choose from, that is the American way.

You are not a patriot, you are not a good American, you are trying to feed into the bullshit that is destroying America from its very core.

Webmaster_Logic 09-25-2004 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xenophobic
Yes, Kerry's big plan to get out of this War is that he's not "Bush" therefore the U.N will flock to help non- George W. Bush guy finish the war in Iraq, like someone else pointed out in another thread they can't even agree on the term "genocide" while thousands of people are dying.

Rumsfield declares today Iraq doesn't need to be peaceful for U.S to withdraw, and then says the day before that there might be "limited" elections, a great day for democracy.

niether of these muppet's need to be in office, I vote "None of the Above [ ]"

Yeap i heard Rumsfield say that yesterday. pretty shitty thing to do to those people....

mardigras 09-25-2004 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
Yeap i heard Rumsfield say that yesterday. pretty shitty thing to do to those people....
Yet according to polls slightly more than half of Americans like the current course and want 4 more years of it. Go figure.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123