Why have the 2257 talks stopped - GoFuckYourself.com

riosluts · 09-18-2004, 11:36 PM

Anyone notice that there wasnt much threads made about the 2257 in the last 2 weeks. I wonder why that is

Steen2 · 09-18-2004, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by riosluts
Anyone notice that there wasnt much threads made about the 2257 in the last 2 weeks. I wonder why that is

*Scared*

xclusive · 09-18-2004, 11:48 PM

I think people just got sick of it...

Goatse · 09-19-2004, 12:03 AM

Because we've all moved our shit to Mongolia.

xxxoutsourcing · 09-19-2004, 12:04 AM

Many people seem to be moving servers to other countries from what we have seen too.

abyss_al · 09-19-2004, 12:17 AM

moving servers to other countries wont get rid of the issue.... move it all you want, the domain still belongs to the states, and is being viewed here... i think have read it and realized how stupid their questions were, when all they had to do is do a little bit of research

freeadultcontent · 09-19-2004, 12:26 AM

Like always a good chunk of the people will use the recent time tested plan of ignore and bury head in sand.
These will be the same people with no knowledge or history of what happened in the 80's. They just see those that talk about such government intrusions as chicken little's.

graphicsbytia · 09-19-2004, 12:31 AM

The smart ones consulted lawyers, and/or did a lot of reading on the subject

The not so smart ones just asked for advice without doing their own research

Paul Markham · 09-19-2004, 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by graphicsbytia
The smart ones consulted lawyers, and/or did a lot of reading on the subject

The not so smart ones just asked for advice without doing their own research

WORD.

If you have not fixed it yet you need to start thinking about getting your site off line or praying no one knocks on your door.

graphicsbytia · 09-19-2004, 12:49 AM

earlier today, I saw a newbie on another board asking about 2257

I could hardly believe my eyes when I read the reply of one of the most respected people in the business, one who all the new people look up to, saying that the government never did anything about it before, so what makes us think they'd do something about it now..

the sheer ignorance of people never ceases to amaze me

freeadultcontent · 09-19-2004, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by graphicsbytia
earlier today, I saw a newbie on another board asking about 2257

I could hardly believe my eyes when I read the reply of one of the most respected people in the business, one who all the new people look up to, saying that the government never did anything about it before, so what makes us think they'd do something about it now..

the sheer ignorance of people never ceases to amaze me

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed."

graphicsbytia · 09-19-2004, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeadultcontent
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed."

success by default?

Matt 26z · 09-19-2004, 04:14 AM

Who the regs apply to or their roles in record keeping is not changing from the old regs to the new regs. Even if you didn't bother to read the old regs and the new ones, this was explicitly stated so by the DOJ in their original announcement.

Secondary producers have always been required to keep copies, but the Sundance case made this a possible grey area for certain secondary producers. This was something the updated regs do not address.

The part that got Sundance off the hook is still there and they could have easily re-worded it, but didn't.

Reak · 09-19-2004, 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by riosluts
Anyone notice that there wasnt much threads made about the 2257 in the last 2 weeks. I wonder why that is

I'm not from USA

gothoes · 09-19-2004, 04:33 AM

only in america, GUNS OVER NUDITY

Manowar · 09-19-2004, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Goatse
Because we've all moved our shit to Mongolia.

09-18-2004, 11:36 PM	#1
riosluts Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 5,250	Why have the 2257 talks stopped Anyone notice that there wasnt much threads made about the 2257 in the last 2 weeks. I wonder why that is __________________

09-18-2004, 11:48 PM	#3
xclusive Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Buffalo, NY Posts: 35,218	I think people just got sick of it... __________________ I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /

09-19-2004, 12:04 AM	#5
xxxoutsourcing Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 3,888	Many people seem to be moving servers to other countries from what we have seen too. __________________ xxxoutsourcing.com ICQ:119936 \| Aim:xxxoutsourcing \| MSN:msn@ xxxoutsourcing.com \| Yahoo:xxxoutsourcing Submitters, Designers, Programmers, Cartoonist, Creative Writers, Video & Photo Editors Convert your Paysite into a cartoon site convert2toons.com

09-19-2004, 12:17 AM	#6
abyss_al LOOKING FOR TRADES Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Southern California Posts: 15,605	moving servers to other countries wont get rid of the issue.... move it all you want, the domain still belongs to the states, and is being viewed here... i think have read it and realized how stupid their questions were, when all they had to do is do a little bit of research __________________ EMAIL: allen @ vasmediagroup.com \| ICQ: 311329761 \| SKYPE: abyss.al \| AIM: xABYSSxALx

09-19-2004, 12:26 AM	#7
freeadultcontent Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc" Posts: 9,976	Like always a good chunk of the people will use the recent time tested plan of ignore and bury head in sand. These will be the same people with no knowledge or history of what happened in the 80's. They just see those that talk about such government intrusions as chicken little's. __________________ Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

09-19-2004, 12:03 AM	#4
Goatse Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,086	Because we've all moved our shit to Mongolia.

09-19-2004, 12:31 AM	#8
graphicsbytia Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Tennessee Posts: 2,618	The smart ones consulted lawyers, and/or did a lot of reading on the subject The not so smart ones just asked for advice without doing their own research

09-19-2004, 12:49 AM	#10
graphicsbytia Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Tennessee Posts: 2,618	earlier today, I saw a newbie on another board asking about 2257 I could hardly believe my eyes when I read the reply of one of the most respected people in the business, one who all the new people look up to, saying that the government never did anything about it before, so what makes us think they'd do something about it now.. the sheer ignorance of people never ceases to amaze me

09-19-2004, 04:14 AM	#13
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	Who the regs apply to or their roles in record keeping is not changing from the old regs to the new regs. Even if you didn't bother to read the old regs and the new ones, this was explicitly stated so by the DOJ in their original announcement. Secondary producers have always been required to keep copies, but the Sundance case made this a possible grey area for certain secondary producers. This was something the updated regs do not address. The part that got Sundance off the hook is still there and they could have easily re-worded it, but didn't.

09-19-2004, 04:33 AM	#15
gothoes Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Durty Durty Posts: 131	only in america, GUNS OVER NUDITY __________________ ICQ 434221575