Should the pedo be banned? - GoFuckYourself.com

dropped9 · 09-16-2004, 02:20 PM

The masterblogger asked me for my help in setting up a poll for him, so I kindly said yes...

Should the pedo be banned?

dropped9 · 09-16-2004, 02:21 PM

Now remember pedo, if the gfy community votes you off the island you must leave gfy forever!

Juicy D. Links · 09-16-2004, 02:21 PM

kush · 09-16-2004, 02:23 PM

You know it was so long ago that I forget why everyone calls him that.

What did he do again?

Ice · 09-16-2004, 02:24 PM

Fuck yes...... he at one time posted his site that had cp on it... we all know the history... I don't give a fuck if it's not there anymore. He is not right in the fucking head.......

CDSmith · 09-16-2004, 02:24 PM

CD Smith's prediction:

Yes (ban the pedo):
397 (99.24%)

No (Let the pedo stay):
3 (0.66%)

PA-LACE YOUR BETSSS!!

Tipsy · 09-16-2004, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iceicebaby
Fuck yes...... he at one time posted his site that had cp on it... we all know the history... I don't give a fuck if it's not there anymore. He is not right in the fucking head.......

You needed to be around at the time to undertsand how difficult it was to make him see why posting CP and marketing a site to pedos AND kids was wrong. It was very, very disturbing.

Is there any reason this will be any more effective than any of the other 100 polls asking if he should be banned?

iFliPcEss · 09-16-2004, 02:30 PM

he should be banned!!!!

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tipsy
You needed to be around at the time to undertsand how difficult it was to make him see why posting CP and marketing a site to pedos AND kids was wrong. It was very, very disturbing.

Is there any reason this will be any more effective than any of the other 100 polls asking if he should be banned?

I don't know who you are talking about ...]
I'm not a pedo ..

but I can relate to this post in the learning process of "risk management" as I have often said learned right here on GFY ..

I voted YES - we should ban all "pedo's".

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 02:31 PM

ooops ... I just voted for myself.

Ice · 09-16-2004, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tipsy
You needed to be around at the time to undertsand how difficult it was to make him see why posting CP and marketing a site to pedos AND kids was wrong. It was very, very disturbing.

Is there any reason this will be any more effective than any of the other 100 polls asking if he should be banned?

I was around at the time and thats why I say he isn't right in the head.... he doesn't understand right from wrong.

MattO · 09-16-2004, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

I voted YES - we should ban all "pedo's".

I just voted for myself.

If that's not a confession, I don't know what is.

polish_aristocrat · 09-16-2004, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MattO
If that's not a confession, I don't know what is.

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iceicebaby
I was around at the time and thats why I say he isn't right in the head.... he doesn't understand right from wrong.

but there's no proof right icy?

just like I have asked soooo sooo often to post a SINGLE LINK to the proof that vaginal orgasm exists ...

what you get is - insults ...
what ...
but NEVER credible proof ...

I believe that GFY is one of this worlds MOST UNIQUE communities where webmasters like myself DO NOT LINK general audience websites to an ADULT ONLY FORUM ... and if they do THAT IS WRONG ...
so post your ADULT ONLY PROOF ...

Jace · 09-16-2004, 02:36 PM

haha, i think we all know the answer to your question

Jace · 09-16-2004, 02:37 PM

hahaha, we all the know who the 1 vote came from

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JaceXXX
hahaha, we all the know who the 1 vote came from

I voted ban all pedo's as I didn't immediately see the (sexeducation) text.

I did NOT vote no - I voted yes.

boobmaster · 09-16-2004, 02:40 PM

I am so fucking SICK of these 'ban the PEDO polls.' Not because I sympathize with the PEDO, but because they are a fucking daily occurance on GFY. Shit, people. If you don't want to read the guy's threads or posts, PUT THE FUCKER ON IGNORE.

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
I am so fucking SICK of these 'ban the PEDO polls.' Not because I sympathize with the PEDO, but because they are a fucking daily occurance on GFY. Shit, people. If you don't want to read the guy's threads or posts, PUT THE FUCKER ON IGNORE.

yep ...
now to bump the real reason I post on GFY ...
I want to know if Adult.com and Playboy.com are going to allow me the opportunity to "push buttons" - yes controversial shit - while I rebuild my website into a profitable adventure.

polish_aristocrat · 09-16-2004, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JaceXXX
hahaha, we all the know who the 1 vote came from

Actually it's already 4 votes.

Tipsy · 09-16-2004, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iceicebaby
I was around at the time and thats why I say he isn't right in the head.... he doesn't understand right from wrong.

*nod* - it was more for the many that weren't. Disturbing thing is I think it's not just as simple as knowing right from wrong. The guy has shown countless times that although he often can't differentiate right from wrong, he also has a genuine fascination with children and sex and more importantly sex involving children. However he does genuinely fail to see it and as you say, fails to see how it's wrong.

That disturbs me hugely. Left to his own devices the guy really does seem damaged enough to cause a lot of harm to kids and not just mentally. Through his 'articles' and 'advice' on his site using the pedo 'dad' alias he can do, and probably has done, a lot of damage.

The one good thing about all the crap on GFY I suppose is that at least he hasn't been able to go about this undetected and for the abuse, be it written or otherwise, to get any worse. I'd imagine the guy is being watched carefully (and least I would hope this is true). This being the biggest porn board around it's almost certainly monitored and combined with non-internet complaints about him the guy must be under scrutiny. Were it not for GFY the scrutiny may not have been so intense.

That said this really is no place for someone like that. The industry has enough troubles caused for the most part by itself without individuals like him adding to them. It remains a huge shame that the line between profit and social conscience really has vanished here for the most part.

Sadly this poll is unlikely to change anything either. Even a banning is pretty useless unless it's also applied to other names as and when he registers them, which no longer seems to happen here.

Ice · 09-16-2004, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
but there's no proof right icy?

just like I have asked soooo sooo often to post a SINGLE LINK to the proof that vaginal orgasm exists ...

what you get is - insults ...
what ...
but NEVER credible proof ...

I believe that GFY is one of this worlds MOST UNIQUE communities where webmasters like myself DO NOT LINK general audience websites to an ADULT ONLY FORUM ... and if they do THAT IS WRONG ...
so post your ADULT ONLY PROOF ...

When the shit started going down months ago... I wen't to your site and saw the fucking CP on there. You were trying to defend it saying it was only one picture, blah, blah, blah. We all told you it didn't matter if it was one pic or not... it still wasn't right....

Seek help.... your idea of reality is fucked up man.

polish_aristocrat · 09-16-2004, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
yep ...
now to bump the real reason I post on GFY ...
I want to know if Adult.com and Playboy.com are going to allow me the opportunity to "push buttons" - yes controversial shit - while I rebuild my website into a profitable adventure.

And you needed 4500 posts for it?

boobmaster · 09-16-2004, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
yep ...
now to bump the real reason I post on GFY ...
I want to know if Adult.com and Playboy.com are going to allow me the opportunity to "push buttons" - yes controversial shit - while I rebuild my website into a profitable adventure.

YOUR WEBSITE WILL NEVER BE A PROFITABLE VENTURE. GIVE UP AND GO KILL YOURSELF.

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
And you needed 4500 posts for it?

Yes of course ...
answer yes or no ...
Do you agree ...that there ...should be ...
"No aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain name" Dad@.

yes or no ??

CET · 09-16-2004, 02:50 PM

Whether someone should be banned and whether someone will be banned are 2 entirely different matters. I don't think petitions will do anything to change one to the other.

Manowar · 09-16-2004, 02:50 PM

polish_aristocrat · 09-16-2004, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
Whether someone should be banned and whether someone will be banned are 2 entirely different matters. I don't think petitions will do anything to change one to the other.

I think my kak_azn ban petition was succesfull. :D:D:D

TurboAngel · 09-16-2004, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
I am so fucking SICK of these 'ban the PEDO polls.' Not because I sympathize with the PEDO, but because they are a fucking daily occurance on GFY. Shit, people. If you don't want to read the guy's threads or posts, PUT THE FUCKER ON IGNORE.

He's on ignore here. if people wouldn't reply he would go away.

brand0n · 09-16-2004, 02:53 PM

see you around

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
I think my kak_azn ban petition was succesfull. :D:D:D

Your countries TLD may no longer be allowed in Canada and the United States if you continue to avoid the question...

Yes or NO ...
Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?

Answer the question coward ...

BradM · 09-16-2004, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Your countries TLD may no longer be allowed in Canada and the United States if you continue to avoid the question...

Yes or NO ...
Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?

Answer the question coward ...

Another post from you that made so LITTLE sense it gives me a headache.

Moron!

NoCarrier · 09-16-2004, 02:57 PM

NoCarrier · 09-16-2004, 02:58 PM

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradM
Another post from you that made so LITTLE sense it gives me a headache.

Moron!

You requested anonymity ... I gave it to you and your firm.
However, you chose to enter this thread...

Answer the question ...
"Should aroused genital or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name" - yes or no?

GiantGnome · 09-16-2004, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
I think my kak_azn ban petition was succesfull. :D:D:D

too bad he wont stay away

even if sexed gets banned he will still come back too

NoCarrier · 09-16-2004, 02:59 PM

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier

As usual just insults from MasterBlogger wannabe's ...
answer the question ...

"Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?"

Answer the question ...

I say the Unites States Webmaster have begun VOLUNTARILY to comply according to western COMMUNITY STANDARDS and we should BANN ALL THOSE EU countries that do not comply to the reasonable access to the information age that minors deserve.

CYA - rogue nations.
I've won a ten year battle.

CDSmith · 09-16-2004, 03:08 PM

NoCarrier · 09-16-2004, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith

Print it and market it, I swear to God, I'll wear it.

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith

Gets some guts little boy ...
it's only GFY ..

"Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be show on any directly accessed domain name" - yes or no?

So let's wake up the answer is no - that current legislation and cc changes (regardless of my rants) have made this a reality.

Why the FUCK are we allowing Russian and EU communities to do what we don't accept - ban all their TLD's.

MT_Butterfly · 09-16-2004, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tipsy
*nod* - it was more for the many that weren't. Disturbing thing is I think it's not just as simple as knowing right from wrong. The guy has shown countless times that although he often can't differentiate right from wrong, he also has a genuine fascination with children and sex and more importantly sex involving children. However he does genuinely fail to see it and as you say, fails to see how it's wrong.

That disturbs me hugely. Left to his own devices the guy really does seem damaged enough to cause a lot of harm to kids and not just mentally. Through his 'articles' and 'advice' on his site using the pedo 'dad' alias he can do, and probably has done, a lot of damage.

The one good thing about all the crap on GFY I suppose is that at least he hasn't been able to go about this undetected and for the abuse, be it written or otherwise, to get any worse. I'd imagine the guy is being watched carefully (and least I would hope this is true). This being the biggest porn board around it's almost certainly monitored and combined with non-internet complaints about him the guy must be under scrutiny. Were it not for GFY the scrutiny may not have been so intense.

That said this really is no place for someone like that. The industry has enough troubles caused for the most part by itself without individuals like him adding to them. It remains a huge shame that the line between profit and social conscience really has vanished here for the most part.

Sadly this poll is unlikely to change anything either. Even a banning is pretty useless unless it's also applied to other names as and when he registers them, which no longer seems to happen here.

Now this is a VERY good post and everything you've said is true. I truly believe that one class of individual's who can't be rehab'ed or helped is "pedophile's". There is a very good reason that the reoffense rate is so high for them....and that is their psychological make up. They see nothing wrong with harming children and in their own sick, twisted minds, it is "OK" to act on their urges and harm kid's. They are able to justify their actions in their minds and that is all that matter's to them.

Luckily, this board is monitored and reports are being made. All a person can hope for is that justice will prevail and those offenders will face the legal consequences of their actions.

Juicy D. Links · 09-16-2004, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier

erehwon · 09-16-2004, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tipsy
*nod* - it was more for the many that weren't. Disturbing thing is I think it's not just as simple as knowing right from wrong. The guy has shown countless times that although he often can't differentiate right from wrong, he also has a genuine fascination with children and sex and more importantly sex involving children. However he does genuinely fail to see it and as you say, fails to see how it's wrong.

That disturbs me hugely. Left to his own devices the guy really does seem damaged enough to cause a lot of harm to kids and not just mentally. Through his 'articles' and 'advice' on his site using the pedo 'dad' alias he can do, and probably has done, a lot of damage.

The one good thing about all the crap on GFY I suppose is that at least he hasn't been able to go about this undetected and for the abuse, be it written or otherwise, to get any worse. I'd imagine the guy is being watched carefully (and least I would hope this is true). This being the biggest porn board around it's almost certainly monitored and combined with non-internet complaints about him the guy must be under scrutiny. Were it not for GFY the scrutiny may not have been so intense.

That said this really is no place for someone like that. The industry has enough troubles caused for the most part by itself without individuals like him adding to them. It remains a huge shame that the line between profit and social conscience really has vanished here for the most part.

Sadly this poll is unlikely to change anything either. Even a banning is pretty useless unless it's also applied to other names as and when he registers them, which no longer seems to happen here.

Outright ban his IP, and all his nicks, this industry doesn't need this kind of webmaster making all of our lives worse than it already is.

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by juicylinks

I change my defence of you Juicy ...
they are right on anything important you only post "smilies" ...

Get off the fucking fence and join an actual discussion for once.

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erehwon

Outright ban his IP, and all his nicks, this industry doesn't need this kind of webmaster making all of our lives worse than it already is.

Say why ... you coward ...
OMG am I tired of the sig whores on this board that only insult ...
state you reasons ...
make a logical arguement ..

MattO · 09-16-2004, 03:20 PM

Hmm, it looks like the pedo has 6 nicks

NoCarrier · 09-16-2004, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MattO
Hmm, it looks like the pedo has 6 nicks

Or 5 other pedos who voted for him that do not want to lose access to the private CP area on sexeducation.com.

sexeducation · 09-16-2004, 03:23 PM

No MattO ...
just six people with the guts ...
maybe which do not agree with me - but can at least see my point of reference and are not GFY sheep ...
whoever you are ... thank you

MT_Butterfly · 09-16-2004, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
As usual just insults from MasterBlogger wannabe's ...
answer the question ...

"Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?"

Answer the question ...

Gee, I thought this campaign was "officially over"? Well, according to this, you said it was...........

(stand by)

"Our old campaign ("No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name") is now officially over........."

And here is the url, just in case you've forgotten about it...
http://livehomepage.blogspot.com/

So, have you officially reactivated this campaign, or is this just another way to take the spotlight off the real issues? Or is this just another lie? Or is this how MasterBlogger's do shit?

View Poll Results: Should the pedo(sexeducation) be banned?
Yes	112	90.32%
No	12	9.68%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

09-16-2004, 02:20 PM	#1
dropped9 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Your moms box Posts: 26,727	Should the pedo be banned? The masterblogger asked me for my help in setting up a poll for him, so I kindly said yes... Should the pedo be banned?

09-16-2004, 02:24 PM	#5
Ice Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Sunny California Posts: 26,053	Fuck yes...... he at one time posted his site that had cp on it... we all know the history... I don't give a fuck if it's not there anymore. He is not right in the fucking head....... __________________ icq 1904905

09-16-2004, 02:24 PM	#6
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	CD Smith's prediction: Yes (ban the pedo): 397 (99.24%) No (Let the pedo stay): 3 (0.66%) PA-LACE YOUR BETSSS!! __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

09-16-2004, 02:50 PM	#26
CET Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 2,754	Whether someone should be banned and whether someone will be banned are 2 entirely different matters. I don't think petitions will do anything to change one to the other. __________________ Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts! Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training "Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."

09-16-2004, 02:21 PM	#2
dropped9 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Your moms box Posts: 26,727	Now remember pedo, if the gfy community votes you off the island you must leave gfy forever!

09-16-2004, 02:21 PM	#3
Juicy D. Links So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: N.Y. -Long Island -- Posts: 122,992

09-16-2004, 02:23 PM	#4
kush Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,382	You know it was so long ago that I forget why everyone calls him that. What did he do again?

09-16-2004, 02:30 PM	#8
iFliPcEss Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 3,087	he should be banned!!!!

09-16-2004, 02:31 PM	#10
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	ooops ... I just voted for myself.

09-16-2004, 02:36 PM	#15
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	haha, i think we all know the answer to your question

09-16-2004, 02:37 PM	#16
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	hahaha, we all the know who the 1 vote came from

09-16-2004, 02:40 PM	#18
boobmaster So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 6,185	I am so fucking SICK of these 'ban the PEDO polls.' Not because I sympathize with the PEDO, but because they are a fucking daily occurance on GFY. Shit, people. If you don't want to read the guy's threads or posts, PUT THE FUCKER ON IGNORE.

09-16-2004, 02:50 PM	#27
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	Yes.

09-16-2004, 02:53 PM	#30
brand0n been very busy Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: the queen city Posts: 26,983	see you around __________________ want to buy this spot for cheap? it is of course for sale. long term deals are always the best bet. brand0n/ at/ a o l dot commies.

09-16-2004, 02:57 PM	#33
NoCarrier We need more free porn Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 16,356	__________________

09-16-2004, 02:58 PM	#34
NoCarrier We need more free porn Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 16,356	__________________

09-16-2004, 02:59 PM	#37
NoCarrier We need more free porn Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 16,356	__________________

09-16-2004, 03:08 PM	#39
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	__________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

09-16-2004, 03:20 PM	#47
MattO The O is for Oohhh Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AUSTIN TEJAS Posts: 10,861	Hmm, it looks like the pedo has 6 nicks

09-16-2004, 03:23 PM	#49
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	No MattO ... just six people with the guts ... maybe which do not agree with me - but can at least see my point of reference and are not GFY sheep ... whoever you are ... thank you