webalizer or awstats... - GoFuckYourself.com

zentz · 09-12-2004, 10:33 AM

which one you think si better ? and why ?

BradM · 09-12-2004, 10:34 AM

webalizer. Because I said so

Gheenz · 09-12-2004, 10:35 AM

Webalizer seriously sucks...go with awstats

Tipsy · 09-12-2004, 10:35 AM

Webalizer tells you what SE terms come from each individual SE which is nice. AWS stats is better in every other area though.

Thrawn$ · 09-12-2004, 10:37 AM

awstats

Ice · 09-12-2004, 10:38 AM

awstats

PbG · 09-12-2004, 10:38 AM

We offer both on our Cpanel servers. However I find Webalizer has been more accurate than Awstats since August 2003.

zentz · 09-12-2004, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PbG
We offer both on our Cpanel servers. However I find Webalizer has been more accurate than Awstats since August 2003.

yeah i use both on my box as well though i am not sure if that will slowdown the server so i wanted to turn off one of them ?

TheWildcard · 09-12-2004, 10:47 AM

awstats no doubt

Argoz · 09-12-2004, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheWildcard
awstats no doubt

VeriSexy · 09-12-2004, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NickHimself
Webalizer seriously sucks...go with awstats

extreme · 09-12-2004, 11:04 AM

aws may be more detailed but eats more CPU as well.

senseidru · 09-12-2004, 11:10 AM

I've run both and definately prefer awstats

Kel · 09-12-2004, 11:17 AM

Awstats... been a long time since i ran webalizer but I think Awstats gives you more specific info and is less of a drain on sys resources.

btw - extreme: love your sig. I had that game for the C64.... ah the good 'ol days.

Manowar · 09-12-2004, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by iceicebaby
awstats

Fabuleux · 09-12-2004, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheWildcard
awstats no doubt

The best of those two. But Urchin is way better... AWStats doesn't count about 25% of your traffic.

cosis · 09-12-2004, 11:42 AM

webalizer has froze up my server and a few other people i know in the past, i recommend analog

fr8 · 09-12-2004, 12:47 PM

webalizer is ok. ive never been impressed with it though.

EscortDate_Enoj · 09-12-2004, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by zentz
yeah i use both on my box as well though i am not sure if that will slowdown the server so i wanted to turn off one of them ?

Even though you use both stats applications, they probably parse the same log file. The only possible slowdown will be when the stats get generated (once a day?), as both your stats applications must parse the log file once each. That's generally a fast process and shouldn't cause any issues as long as you set them to run at night time.

BigPinPin · 09-12-2004, 02:00 PM

awstats

dailyduke · 09-12-2004, 02:05 PM

I like awstats, but I use both for a more robust picture - more info more chance of getting the numbers correct

Easton · 09-12-2004, 02:07 PM

AWStats for sure

dunefield · 09-12-2004, 02:08 PM

awstats most definately... lil disappointed my host doesn't have it

beemk · 09-12-2004, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cosis
webalizer has froze up my server and a few other people i know in the past, i recommend analog

stop buying cheap servers

warlock5 · 09-12-2004, 03:08 PM

awstats and urchin

sirrobin · 09-12-2004, 03:39 PM

Awstats

V a i o · 09-12-2004, 03:52 PM

go with awstats.

webalizer sucks.

ShaneRyale · 09-12-2004, 04:01 PM

Awstats is best. I used to use it, but now I have to use Urchin because of a much more robust and complicated network.

Horny Dude · 09-12-2004, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by warlock5
awstats and urchin

Urchin kicks ass, have it on one box and then I have both AWStats and Webalizer on another box and I always go with AWStats!

austinth · 09-12-2004, 04:35 PM

awstats

Basic_man · 09-12-2004, 04:39 PM

AWSTATS

zentz · 09-13-2004, 06:45 AM

webalizer turned off, lets move on with the awstats

FrankWhite · 09-13-2004, 06:46 AM

why dont you install both of em ?

09-12-2004, 10:33 AM	#1
zentz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 8,053	webalizer or awstats... which one you think si better ? and why ? __________________ Programs that owe me money ---- Epassporte.com ~ $2700 \| Protraffic.com ~ $2600 \| XonDemand.com ~ $3000 Email: [email protected]

09-12-2004, 10:35 AM	#3
Gheenz Here's Your Sign Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: MT, USA Posts: 2,410	Webalizer seriously sucks...go with awstats __________________ Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

09-12-2004, 10:35 AM	#4
Tipsy Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: See sig Posts: 6,989	Webalizer tells you what SE terms come from each individual SE which is nice. AWS stats is better in every other area though. __________________ Ignorance is never bliss.

09-12-2004, 10:37 AM	#5
Thrawn$ Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Mtl Posts: 4,596	awstats __________________ Tracking 202 \| Start Tracking PPC Campaigns Like A Pro

09-12-2004, 10:38 AM	#6
Ice Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Sunny California Posts: 26,053	awstats __________________ icq 1904905

09-12-2004, 10:34 AM	#2
BradM Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 1123,6536,5231 Posts: 3,397	webalizer. Because I said so

09-12-2004, 10:38 AM	#7
PbG Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 1,025	We offer both on our Cpanel servers. However I find Webalizer has been more accurate than Awstats since August 2003. __________________ Uncensored-Hosting \| Photography by Gus

09-12-2004, 10:47 AM	#9
TheWildcard So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 4,759	awstats no doubt

09-12-2004, 11:04 AM	#12
extreme Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: lalaland Posts: 2,120	aws may be more detailed but eats more CPU as well. __________________ Browse and find new paysites with screenshot-preview Export FHGs/FLVs/Paysites by JSON, XML, CSV and Text Find FHGs/FLVs/Paysites from any given Category or Search-query

09-12-2004, 11:10 AM	#13
senseidru Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: UKStyle.UKFlow Posts: 1,767	I've run both and definately prefer awstats __________________

09-12-2004, 11:17 AM	#14
Kel Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Ashland, OR Posts: 591	Awstats... been a long time since i ran webalizer but I think Awstats gives you more specific info and is less of a drain on sys resources. btw - extreme: love your sig. I had that game for the C64.... ah the good 'ol days. __________________ Trust Me... [IMG]http://signups.triplexcash.com/promo/***/banners/triplexcash_120x60_05.gif[/IMG] They wouldn't be in my sig if they didn't convert well!

09-12-2004, 11:42 AM	#17
cosis Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Beach Posts: 5,281	webalizer has froze up my server and a few other people i know in the past, i recommend analog

09-12-2004, 12:47 PM	#18
fr8 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,074	webalizer is ok. ive never been impressed with it though. __________________ █ joesmut (a) gmail Dot com █ Full Stack Developer

09-12-2004, 02:00 PM	#20
BigPinPin Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Spain Posts: 894	awstats

09-12-2004, 02:05 PM	#21
dailyduke Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: City of Angels & Sin... Posts: 286	I like awstats, but I use both for a more robust picture - more info more chance of getting the numbers correct __________________ WE BUILD WEBSITES

09-12-2004, 02:07 PM	#22
Easton Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 9,825	AWStats for sure __________________ New models booked and shot every week... MILFs, pornstars and teens. Girls for every niche and project. Looking for high-quality affordable exclusive content? Check me out at Easton Content for all the details.

09-12-2004, 02:08 PM	#23
dunefield www.barely18movies.com Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 10,920	awstats most definately... lil disappointed my host doesn't have it __________________

09-12-2004, 03:08 PM	#25
warlock5 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Uranus Posts: 2,808	awstats and urchin

09-12-2004, 03:39 PM	#26
sirrobin Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 453	Awstats

09-12-2004, 03:52 PM	#27
V a i o Registered User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SF Posts: 73	go with awstats. webalizer sucks. __________________ Work hard, party harder!

09-12-2004, 04:01 PM	#28
ShaneRyale Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 961	Awstats is best. I used to use it, but now I have to use Urchin because of a much more robust and complicated network. __________________ Shane - Affiliate Manager [email protected] ICQ: 170164556 See Who I Am At AdultWhosWho.com!

09-12-2004, 04:35 PM	#30
austinth Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Fantasy Island Posts: 1,770	awstats __________________ Get A $25 Circuit City GIFT Card - *FREE*!

09-12-2004, 04:39 PM	#31
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	AWSTATS __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

09-13-2004, 06:45 AM	#32
zentz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 8,053	webalizer turned off, lets move on with the awstats __________________ Programs that owe me money ---- Epassporte.com ~ $2700 \| Protraffic.com ~ $2600 \| XonDemand.com ~ $3000 Email: [email protected]

09-13-2004, 06:46 AM	#33
FrankWhite Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: nyc Posts: 3,540	why dont you install both of em ?