GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   President Bush has 213 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=353455)

Centurion 09-09-2004 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Well...I am satisfied that my brothers do not consider themselves to be fake...but...no they are not my brothers by blood...but we are "brothers" none the less...faggot.
Hey "Probably a faggot in the closet since he doesn't date women even by his own admission!" (:1orglaugh ), then my "DAD" Lens says you are full of shit Pathfinder!

Donnie Gangsta 09-09-2004 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BustIt
that's right. The dud lost his home state. LOL
Gore lost his home state because he had a Jewish running mate.... the rednecks in Tennessee all listed to their pastors saying not to vote for a jesus killer, etc..

baddog 09-09-2004 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
So it's not really a democracy?

To me it's the guy with the most votes wins.

But this way it seems someone can carry most of the populated States, yet with all the lesser populated going against him he loses.

Or do I have it wrong?

no, we are a Republic, and the EC is the only thing that keeps the smaller, less populated states even in the game

Centurion 09-09-2004 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
I made perfectly good points...and others agree that the Electorial College is the way to go...you and some others just do not agree...comprende?
You didn't make ONE plausable argument!
Tell me the states that have the different "VALUES" PATHFINDER! Still waiting for an answer to that brilliant gem!

Centurion 09-09-2004 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
The list of differences is to long to list and you would not comprehend the differences. Yes we are a country of United States Each with individual State rights...each with laws that are in variance with other States...each with "slightly" different cultures/values. Each that would like to have a modicum of parity when it comes to electing a President.
oh.now it is SLIGHTLY different "cultures/values".
GET SPECIFIC DIP! Lets have some of these "slightly different values" that you hallucinate about!

baddog 09-09-2004 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
Stupid must be your middle name.

What worked in 1804, 1904, 1954, 1984 does not necessarily work tomorrow.

You go and buy a clue, idiot.

Run down to the mall and cash your food stamps while you still have them.

Stupid must be your first name then . . again, why don't you worry about the politics in your country, if you can decide which one you want to consider yours

baddog 09-09-2004 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pornweaver
The reason the Electoral college does NOT work is because there are always biased people casting votes for the "masses", trying to narrow down the results to only a few in most cases, as well as each state has a different # of votes based on it's population. Where to have a truely FAIR election process, each state should only have 12 votes.

There is absolutely NO reason why California should have 54 votes while Montana gets 3.

Each state should have 12 representatives from their state, with at least one of each of the following types of people on the panel:

African, Caucasion, Hispanic, Middle-Eastern, Asian, Female, Male, Wealthy, Poor, Blue Collar, White Collar, Youth, Elderly and so on... Covering as many broad backgrounds as possible within the 12 slots. Every 4 years new Electors should be voted in by popular vote.

Each of the states gets: 12 Votes (TOTAL: 612)
Each of the 6 US Territories should get: 9 Votes (TOTAL: 54)

The playing field needs to be leveled.

why should a state that has less people than Los Angeles get the same weight?

theking 09-10-2004 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
And as usual, you prove you don't know what the heck you are talking about by posting!

READ & LEARN:

"The first time the House of Representatives chose the President was in 1800. At that time, the President was the candidate who received the most electoral votes, and the Vice-President was the candidate who received the second most electoral votes. Thomas Jefferson was the Democratic-Republican candidate for President and Aaron Burr was his Vice-Presidential candidate. The Federalists nominated John Adams for a second term with his Vice-Presidential candidate Charles Cotesworth Pinckney as the Vice-Presidential candidate.

The Democratic-Republican electors forgot to withhold one electoral vote from Burr, so when the final results were announced, the results were Jefferson and Burr, 73 electoral votes each; Adams, 65; Pinckney, 64; and John Jay 1. It then fell to the lame duck Congress, with its partisan Federalist majority, to decide the result. When no candidate gets a majority of the electoral votes, the House of Representatives chooses the President. Each state has one vote, decided by a majority of its delegation, with a majority of the states needed for election.

To make a long story short, the Federalist House toyed with electing Aaron Burr, because they hated Jefferson so much. But in the end, after 36 ballots in all, Jefferson was elected President. It is well to remember that a lame duck House nearly elected Aaron Burr President rather than the author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson.

The second time the House of Representatives picked the President was in 1824. In a four way race for President between Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay and William H. Crawford. Crawford, secretary of the Treasury under James Monroe. When the electoral votes were counted, Jackson had 94, Adams 84, Crawford 41 and Clay 37. In the popular vote, Jackson led with 41.34%; Adams had 30.92%; Clay had 12.99% and Crawford 11.17%.

Under the 12th amendment to the Constitution, when no candidate gets a majority of the electoral votes, the names of the three top contenders - Jackson, Adams and an ailing Crawford, were placed before the House. Clay's support was vital to the frontrunners.

Again, to make a long story short, Clay agreed to support Adams in exchange for being made Secretary of State. In those days, Secretary of State was considered the best stepping stone to the White House.

When the House met to vote, Adams was supported by the six New England states and New York, and in large part through Clay's backing, by Maryland, Ohio, Kentucky, Illinois, Missouri and Louisiana. So, Adams was elected on the first ballot with 13 of the 24 states in the union at that time. The "deal" with Clay cast a cloud on Adams administration from which it never emerged.

Four years later, Andrew Jackson ran for President again making much of his contention that the House of Representatives had thwarted the will of the people by denying him the presidency in 1825, even though he had been the leader in electoral and popular votes. In 1828, Jackson was elected with 178 electoral votes to Adams 83, and 55.97% of the popular vote. Jackson's popular vote total was the highest percentage until Theodore Roosevelt was elected President in 1904 on the heels of William McKinley's assassination. Jackson went on to win re-election in 1832.

The third time the House chose the President was in the Hayes-Tilden election of 1876. Democrat Samuel J. Tilden, Governor of New York, won the election with 50.97% of the vote. However, Florida, South Carolina and Louisiana; southern states then under Republican carpetbag rule, submitted two sets of returns. The House was called upon to decide who won the electoral votes from these three states.

For Hayes to become President by a 185-184 margin, he needed to win all 19 of the contested electoral votes. If Tilden won even one of the electoral votes from Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina, he would have been elected president.

The Congress passed a law appointing a commission consisting of five House members, five Senate members and five Supreme Court Justices to decide the disputed electoral votes. The majority party (Democrats controlled the House and the Republicans controlled the Senate) was to have three members and the minority party two members of each delegation with two supreme court members each. The fifth supreme court member would be chosen by the other four.

To make another long story short, the commission awarded every disputed electoral vote to Hayes by a vote of 8-7, along strictly party lines. Civil War threatened. But Hayes agreed to withdraw federal troops from the south in exchange for the South agreeing to respect Negro rights. Hayes was elected President and kept his part of the bargain, but the South didn't keep theirs. For the next 20 years every presidential election margin was a plurality, razor thin margin."

http://www.leinsdorf.com/House.htm

Yea...of little comprehension...have just proven again your lack of comprehension...and I quote.

"and to the best of my knowledge it has never gone to the House of Representatives. "

Which statement was off the top of head without researching it. I hate to disappoint you but...though I have a good memory...I do not have a photographic memory...that is why I used the qualifier "to the best of my knowledge"...comprende?

theking 09-10-2004 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Hey "Probably a faggot in the closet since he doesn't date women even by his own admission!" (:1orglaugh ), then my "DAD" Lens says you are full of shit Pathfinder!
Maybe that makes since to you...faggots seldom make since to me.

theking 09-10-2004 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
oh.now it is SLIGHTLY different "cultures/values".
GET SPECIFIC DIP! Lets have some of these "slightly different values" that you hallucinate about!

It was always "SLIGHTLY different" as I think the falling shows...taken from the first page of this thread.

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
The Electorial College still seves us well. We are a country of United States (50 countries if you will). California has a little different culture/values than New York. New York has a little different culture/values than Texas. Texas has a little different culture/values than Hawaii...etc. etc. Because of the Electorial College each State (Country) has some say as to who is elected President...and not just California and New York. Now go fuck your content wife in her ear...your foreign piece of trash.
I think that "slightly different" and a "little different" are synonymous in meaning.

As for getting specific...I refuse to do so...because I do not like your attitude...and definitely do not take orders from a flaming faggot. Why don't you ask your lover to pay for a course in reading comprehension...or has he already wasted his money on the effort?

GatorB 09-10-2004 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Yes it does matter...as each states electorial votes go to whoever wins that states popular vote.
No it doesn't. Do republican votes in California, NY, Hawaii, Massachusettes count for anything? Do Dem votes in Texas, Alaska, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Alabama, count? Do third party votes ANYWHERE count for anything? Of course not. It's all a scam. Please explain why in the primaries the delegates are given out PROPORTIONALLY while in the general election it's winner take all? In 2000 Florida was basically TIE. Since Bush barely won he should have gotten 13 elecotral votes Gore 12. Not ALL. Bush didn't get 100% of the vote in Florida. Didn't even get 50% when you look at it.

theking 09-10-2004 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by GatorB
No it doesn't. Do republican votes in California, NY, Hawaii, Massachusettes count for anything? Do Dem votes in Texas, Alaska, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Alabama, count? Do third party votes ANYWHERE count for anything? Of course not. It's all a scam. Please explain why in the primaries the delegates are given out PROPORTIONALLY while in the general election it's winner take all? In 2000 Florida was basically TIE. Since Bush barely won he should have gotten 13 elecotral votes Gore 12. Not ALL. Bush didn't get 100% of the vote in Florida. Didn't even get 50% when you look at it.
Yes they count...if they are the majority in the state...if not then no...they do not count in regards to electing the President. President Bush won the popular majority vote in Florida...by a few hundred votes...thus the Electoral votes went to him.

DarkJedi 09-10-2004 12:32 AM

reminder: theking = pedo

theking 09-10-2004 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
reminder: theking = pedo
You cannot prove your statement...I on the other hand can prove that you are a small time...tgp submitting...gallery thief. :321GFY thief.

GatorB 09-10-2004 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Yes they count...if they are the majority in the state...if not then no...they do not count in regards to electing the President. President Bush won the popular majority vote in Florida...by a few hundred votes...thus the Electoral votes went to him.
I know how it works dumbass. I'm making a point that it shouldn't be that way. 50% of the people don't vote because they know their vote doesn't really count. MY point is if NOBODY voted for Bush in NY and California nad NO ONE voted for Gore in Texas and Florida the electoral count would have ended up being the same which is fucked up.

Since elecotral votes are made of the # of Representatives and Senate members each state has then it makes sense then to award electoral votes by CONGRESSINAL district with the statewide winner getting the 2 Senate electoral votes.

theking 09-10-2004 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by GatorB
I know how it works dumbass. I'm making a point that it shouldn't be that way. 50% of the people don't vote because they know their vote doesn't really count. MY point is if NOBODY voted for Bush in NY and California nad NO ONE voted for Gore in Texas and Florida the electoral count would have ended up being the same which is fucked up.

Since elecotral votes are made of the # of Representatives and Senate members each state has then it makes sense then to award electoral votes by CONGRESSINAL district with the statewide winner getting the 2 Senate electoral votes.

Well "dumbass" it is apparent that you think the Electoral College System needs to be revised. Have you made this known to your Congressmen? Complaining to me about how you think the system should be revised will not accomplish anything. I am simply a retired citizen that likes to go fishing.

GatorB 09-10-2004 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Well "dumbass" it is apparent that you think the Electoral College System needs to be revised. Have you made this known to your Congressmen? Complaining to me about how you think the system should be revised will not accomplish anything. I am simply a retired citizen that likes to go fishing.
I'm not trying to accomplish anything. Nor would complaining to my congressman. I don't think the electoral college should be revised, it should be dumped, but just like Socialism InSecurity and MediScam it won't be.

SykkBoy 09-10-2004 01:00 AM

213? like the SLAYER song about Jeffery Dahmer

Driving compulsion morbid thoughts come to mind
Sexual release buried deep inside
Complete control of a prized possession
To touch and fondle with no objection
Lonely souls an emptiness fullfilled
Physical pleasure and addictive thrill
An object of perverted reality
An obsession beyond your wildest dreams

Death loves final embrace
Your cool tenderness
Memories keep love alive
Memories will never die

The excitement of dissection is sweet
My skin crawls with orgasmic speed
A lifeless object for my subjection
An obsession beyond your imagination
Primitive instinct a passion for flesh
Primal feeding on the multitudes of death
Sadistic acts a love so true
Absorbingly masticating a part of you

Death loves final embrace
Your cool tenderness
Memories keep love alive
Memories will never die

I need a freind
Please be my companion
I don't want to be
Left alone with my sanity

Erotic sensations tingle my spine
A dead body lying next to mine
Smooth blue black lips
I start salivating as we kiss
Mine forever this sweet death
I cannot forget your soft breaths
Panting excitedly with my hands around your neck

Shades are drawn
No one can see
What I've done
What's become of me
Here I stand
Above all that's been true
How I love
How I love to kill you

Centurion 09-10-2004 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

As for getting specific...I refuse to do so...because I do not like your attitude...and definitely do not take orders from a flaming faggot. Why don't you ask your lover to pay for a course in reading comprehension...or has he already wasted his money on the effort?

As usual Pathfinder, when faced with FACTS & not YOUR FICTION, all you can do is fall back on your booze & pills and call people a flaming faggot. Yep, that really supports you well doesn't it?

You were a loser, you ARE a loser, you will ALWAYS be a loser!
You were a liar, you are a liar, and most likely will ALWAYS be a liar.

You couldn't handle it as Pathfinder so you faked your own "death". Now in your own delusional state, you come back as "Theking" and pretends he has other mothers & brothers and wants us to believe he has this grand military background.

You're not a webmaster, not even of a non-adult variety, even though you lie constantly saying that you are.

All lies..all part of one man's dellusional life who obviously has no friends so he hangs out here on a porn message board 24/7 trying to prop up his own self importance by posting messages he believes to be TRUTH, and then simply ignores the facts that proves him wrong on almost every issue.

Call me a flaming faggot, or as many names as your shriveled up old brain can manage. At least I don't LIE about 99% of my life and have NOTHING to be ashamed of as you do.

You are a poor pathetic fool who continues to prove that point.

CDSmith 09-10-2004 01:22 AM

Despite all the bullshit bickering and empty insults, this thread is somewhat of a good read for anyone wanting to learn more about the US electoral system and how it works.

And holy shit, if a bunch of average American citizens on this board argue like this over it, just imagine how much arguing was done nearly 230 years ago by those in your government who came up with it.

theking 09-10-2004 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
As usual Pathfinder, when faced with FACTS & not YOUR FICTION, all you can do is fall back on your booze & pills and call people a flaming faggot. Yep, that really supports you well doesn't it?

You were a loser, you ARE a loser, you will ALWAYS be a loser!
You were a liar, you are a liar, and most likely will ALWAYS be a liar.

You couldn't handle it as Pathfinder so you faked your own "death". Now in your own delusional state, you come back as "Theking" and pretends he has other mothers & brothers and wants us to believe he has this grand military background.

You're not a webmaster, not even of a non-adult variety, even though you lie constantly saying that you are.

All lies..all part of one man's dellusional life who obviously has no friends so he hangs out here on a porn message board 24/7 trying to prop up his own self importance by posting messages he believes to be TRUTH, and then simply ignores the facts that proves him wrong on almost every issue.

Call me a flaming faggot, or as many names as your shriveled up old brain can manage. At least I don't LIE about 99% of my life and have NOTHING to be ashamed of as you do.

You are a poor pathetic fool who continues to prove that point.

Pigshit.

Centurion 09-10-2004 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Despite all the bullshit bickering and empty insults, this thread is somewhat of a good read for anyone wanting to learn more about the US electoral system and how it works.

And holy shit, if a bunch of average American citizens on this board argue like this over it, just imagine how much arguing was done nearly 230 years ago by those in your government who came up with it.

Do you think the authors then, if they were around now, would keep the system now?

theking 09-10-2004 01:38 AM

BTW faggot...there have been links posted to some of my sites...multiple times...on this board...and info from whois posted on this board multiple times. I have had in total more than 150 sites. I have put them up and I have taken them down based upon performance. I currently only work on two sites...at my leisure...which I haven't been doing much of for the last couple of months as I am experimenting with something else but my experiment is almost completed. None of this is any of your business. As for me calling you a faggot...you are the one that said you are a faggot...so I call you what you are. An uncomprehending faggot.

theking 09-10-2004 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Do you think the authors then, if they were around now, would keep the system now?
I do not know of any reason why they would want to fix something that isn't broke...faggot.

theking 09-10-2004 01:50 AM

I am not going to compose a list of differences in values...but I will provide a single example. In one state the people do not approve of euthanasia...in another they do. I am not going to oppose a list of differences in culture but I will provide a single example. In one state the instrument of choice is the Ukelele and the dance of choice is the Hula...in another state the instrument of choice is a Mandolin and the dance of choice is the Square Dance. Get the idea...faggot.

Centurion 09-10-2004 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
BTW faggot...there have been links posted to some of my sites...multiple times...on this board...and info from whois posted on this board multiple times. I have had in total more than 150 sites. I have put them up and I have taken them down based upon performance. I currently only work on two sites...at my leisure...which I haven't been doing much of for the last couple of months as I am experimenting with something else but my experiment is almost completed. None of this is any of your business. As for me calling you a faggot...you are the one that said you are a faggot...so I call you what you are. An uncomprehending faggot.
You continue to lie. I NEVER said I was a faggot.
QUOTE me the thread where I said I was a faggot.

Can't can you? Because it's not true.
You talk a big story, but can never back up ANYTHING you say because most of the things you say are simply untrue.

Name your top 3 sites that you had!

Centurion 09-10-2004 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
I do not know of any reason why they would want to fix something that isn't broke...faggot.
Sad old man.

Centurion 09-10-2004 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
I am not going to compose a list of differences in values...but I will provide a single example. In one state the people do not approve of euthanasia...in another they do. I am not going to oppose a list of differences in culture but I will provide a single example. In one state the instrument of choice is the Ukelele and the dance of choice is the Hula...in another state the instrument of choice is a Mandolin and the dance of choice is the Square Dance. Get the idea...faggot.
NAME the state where the VAST majority support euthanasia and prove it! You can't can you?

and to prove your point on culture/values, you bring up the "ukelele" * the "hula" , the "Mandolin" & "the square dance" as IMPORTANT to the election of the President?!? (I have to ask you, WHICH state has the Mandolin?) omg!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


sad SAD old man! :1orglaugh

theking 09-10-2004 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
NAME the state where the VAST majority support euthanasia and prove it! You can't can you?

and to prove your point on culture/values, you bring up the "ukelele" * the "hula" , the "Mandolin" & "the square dance" as IMPORTANT to the election of the President?!? (I have to ask you, WHICH state has the Mandolin?) omg!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


sad SAD old man! :1orglaugh

Easy to do...Oregon.

http://www.nrlc.org/press_releases_n...ase030603.html

Easy to do.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by theking
I do not knowingly know any gays at this point in time..."queens" or otherwise and if I did I would not associate with them...I never have. Before someone asks why I have not...and would not associate with them...much for the same reason that I do not assoicate with...say members of the American Nazi Party or the L.A. Crypts...I don't like them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
THIS IS THE BEST NEWS I'VE EVER RECEIVED ON GFY!
YOU HAVE SOOOOOOOOO MADE MY DAY CLUELESS!

Here's where you're "you cannot comprehend" lines comes back and bites you big time clueless!

Now remember..you MUST keep your promise. Do NOT associate with people you know are GAY!! (Because you are an admitted BIGOT!)

So here it is Mr. "I'm not in touch with reality as the majority of people know it."..............


I'M GAY! :1orglaugh
I'M GAY:BangBang:
I'M GAY GAY GAY GAY!:thumbsup

So go to your room and drink yourself into another stupor cuz I never want to see you replying to any of my messages again. If you do, you're breaking your self appointed bigot pledge of not associating with GAYS! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh



quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by WarChild
I don't personally have anything against gay marriage. Why? Because the entire institution of marriage is a sham in my mind. Other people, mostly religious people, see it differently. Let them have the name. Why do you care so much?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Truthfully, "gay marriage" is not that big of an issue for me personally. But I do get a kick out of reading all the reasons given by people against gay marriage.

And there only truly seems to be one issue the "antis" can come up with: The "sanctity of marriage" which of course comes from "The Bible".

See you're in Vancouver..next time when in Seattle, you should drop by for a drink and meet me & the hubby! :)

Gay and faggot have synonymous meanings.

theking 09-10-2004 04:21 AM

Just to educate you further.

On October 27, 1997 physician-assisted suicide became a legal medical option for terminally ill Oregonians. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act requires that the Oregon Health Services (OHS) monitor compliance with the law, collect information about the patients and physicians who participate in legal physician-assisted suicide, and publish an annual statistical report.

The Oregon Death with Dignity Act, a citizens' initiative, was first passed by Oregon voters in November 1994 by a margin of 51% in favor and 49% opposed. Immediate implementation of the Act was delayed by a legal injunction. After multiple legal proceedings, including a petition that was denied by the United States Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the injunction on October 27, 1997 and physician-assisted suicide then became a legal option for terminally ill patients in Oregon. In November 1997, Measure 51 (authorized by Oregon House Bill 2954) was placed on the general election ballot and asked Oregon voters to repeal the Death with Dignity Act. Voters chose to retain the Act by a margin of 60% to 40%.

Webmaster_Logic 09-10-2004 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
But from what I understand it can happen that they suddenly vote for the second candidate.
you are correct on this......:glugglug

theking 09-10-2004 08:39 AM

Bump for the Centurion faggot.

BustIt 09-10-2004 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Do you think the authors then, if they were around now, would keep the system now?

Why not?

CDSmith 09-10-2004 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Do you think the authors then, if they were around now, would keep the system now?
Maybe not. Is there a better one on the table? I'm a huge fan of telling the critics of something to shut the hell up unless they have a better solution ready to be considered.

dig420 09-10-2004 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
It was always "SLIGHTLY different" as I think the falling shows...taken from the first page of this thread.



I think that "slightly different" and a "little different" are synonymous in meaning.

As for getting specific...I refuse to do so...because I do not like your attitude...and definitely do not take orders from a flaming faggot. Why don't you ask your lover to pay for a course in reading comprehension...or has he already wasted his money on the effort?

why don't you go into another business fucking wrinkled up junkie homophobe surfer fuck?

dig420 09-10-2004 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
BTW faggot...there have been links posted to some of my sites...multiple times...on this board...and info from whois posted on this board multiple times. I have had in total more than 150 sites. I have put them up and I have taken them down based upon performance. I currently only work on two sites...at my leisure...which I haven't been doing much of for the last couple of months as I am experimenting with something else but my experiment is almost completed. None of this is any of your business. As for me calling you a faggot...you are the one that said you are a faggot...so I call you what you are. An uncomprehending faggot.
fat crippled up alcoholic liar.

As a straight man, I'd rather hang out with faggots all day long than some toothless, womanless, piece of shit doped up moron like you.

kenny 09-10-2004 09:53 AM

They can't do it by majority vote because the less populated states will never have their issues addressed

dig420 09-10-2004 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Yea...of little comprehension...have just proven again your lack of comprehension...and I quote.

"and to the best of my knowledge it has never gone to the House of Representatives. "

Which statement was off the top of head without researching it. I hate to disappoint you but...though I have a good memory...I do not have a photographic memory...that is why I used the qualifier "to the best of my knowledge"...comprende?

in other words, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about but you'll talk about it all day long anyway

theking 09-10-2004 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
why don't you go into another business fucking wrinkled up junkie homophobe surfer fuck?
Because I am retired...Danny boy.

BustIt 09-10-2004 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Maybe not. Is there a better one on the table? I'm a huge fan of telling the critics of something to shut the hell up unless they have a better solution ready to be considered.

Their (the Dems) guy lost the lost election. Therefore, there must be something wrong with the system. :1orglaugh

theking 09-10-2004 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
fat crippled up alcoholic liar.

As a straight man, I'd rather hang out with faggots all day long than some toothless, womanless, piece of shit doped up moron like you.

As for your personal descriptions...in your pot clouded imagination only...Danny boy.

"Womanless"...and this coming from someone that goes to the board asking for help on how to meet chicks. Unlike you I am womanless by choice. Fucking pathetic...aren't you Danny boy.

Giorgio_Xo 09-10-2004 10:35 AM

Kerry will win the popular vote and Bush will win the Electoral College for the second time. At that point, large states like California and New York will reexamine their involvement in the United States and will move towards secession. The Southern and Midwest states will form the precorsor to the Republic of Gilead, a wholesome Christian fundamentalist state. Over time democratic elements within these Christian states will rebel which will lead to a crackdown and the creation of a Christian military government also known as the Army of God which will crush the liberal forces and force them to flee to safe havens of the West Coast and Northeast.

theking 09-10-2004 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
in other words, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about but you'll talk about it all day long anyway
I am just a novice at it Danny boy...where as you are a master of it.

dig420 09-10-2004 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
As for your personal descriptions...in your pot clouded imagination only...Danny boy.

"Womanless"...and this coming from someone that goes to the board asking for help on how to meet chicks. Unlike you I am womanless by choice. Fucking pathetic...aren't you Danny boy.

you're womanless because you're fit for female company. You're unwanted by women, just like you're unwanted on this board surfer faggot.

take out those false teeth and maybe I'll let you suck my cock to keep you busy

rett11 09-10-2004 11:25 AM

I'm pretty sure that anyone who is a bigot or a homophobe doesn't deserve any of our time. Go back into your hole idiot.

theking 09-10-2004 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420

take out those false teeth and maybe I'll let you suck my cock to keep you busy

Hmm...false teeth...only in your pot clouded imagination...Danny boy. Do not mistake me for Centurion...that is his thing...not mine.

theking 09-10-2004 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rett11
I'm pretty sure that anyone who is a bigot or a homophobe doesn't deserve any of our time. Go back into your hole idiot.
"Our time"? You suffer with the Sybil Syndrome?

rett11 09-10-2004 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
"Our time"? You suffer with the Sybil Syndrome?
'from the' not 'with the'...and no, I meant everyone else here except for 2 or 3 other fools.

theking 09-10-2004 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rett11
I'm pretty sure that anyone who is a bigot or a homophobe doesn't deserve any of our time. Go back into your hole idiot.
big·ot ( P ) Pronunciation Key (bgt)
n.
One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

I am very tolerant...thus do not qualify.

homophobe

n : a person who hates or fears homosexual people

I neither fear or hate faggots...thus I do not qualify.

rett11 09-10-2004 11:49 AM

mmmkay...well, just delusional then.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123