Does Google now penalize adult sites with PICs meta tags? - GoFuckYourself.com

pussyluver · 08-30-2004, 08:31 PM

Has this been this way for a while and I just finally caught on. I did a quick sampling of top sites listed on my adult related keywords and the top positions are going to sites with out the PICS tags identifying the sites as adult. If this is true, this is so wrong!

Noticed that google hit me hard this week.

Need to do a bigger sampling I guess. Haven't been to the SEO boards in awhile. Guess its time.

Comments?

pussyluver · 08-30-2004, 08:33 PM

My preferences on google are set to "Do Not filter...."

Kard63 · 08-30-2004, 08:35 PM

GL getting a defenitive answer on such an important topic. I bookmarked it because I am curious, but I dont expect a straight answer.

pussyluver · 08-30-2004, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kard63
GL getting a defenitive answer on such an important topic. I bookmarked it because I am curious, but I dont expect a straight answer.

The Q will lead to some emails to google and icra of course. You're right on getting an answer even then. Checking the major player sites now.

pussyluver · 08-30-2004, 08:42 PM

hrmmm, think this is suppose to be secret info, not for all to know.

Jace · 08-30-2004, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
hrmmm, think this is suppose to be secret info, not for all to know.

i won't tell if you don't

pussyluver · 08-30-2004, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JaceXXX
i won't tell if you don't

The thread has attracted all kinds of attention

Google seems all screwed up. Like that would be a new topic.

exposed · 08-30-2004, 09:31 PM

of course

rowan · 08-30-2004, 09:35 PM

I have a webcam archive site that has all the PICS/ICRA flags set (since the source of the images is uncontrolled), google still displays it on the first page for several terms.

Setting the family filter to "strict" removes it from the results, but "moderate" and "none" still show it.

Muff · 08-30-2004, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rowan
I have a webcam archive site that has all the PICS/ICRA flags set (since the source of the images is uncontrolled), google still displays it on the first page for several terms.

Setting the family filter to "strict" removes it from the results, but "moderate" and "none" still show it.

Ditto

Dagwolf · 08-30-2004, 09:50 PM

Maybe try not using hardcore metas?

pussyluver · 08-30-2004, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dagwolf
Maybe try not using hardcore metas?

Rumor is google doesn't look at them for the most part. Was trying to follow W3C and also do the right thing with the pics.

Have to change something to get the SERPs back.

Maybe WG will call google and put the fix in for me

Hear he has connections.

iwantchixx · 08-30-2004, 10:22 PM

concentrate on your content, metas mean fuck all compared to giving good content for google bot to chew on

pornguy · 08-30-2004, 10:51 PM

google is a pain in the ass lately.

pussyluver · 08-30-2004, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pornguy
google is a pain in the ass lately.

More than understatement. Makes a big difference to the bottom line. Many say get traffic from other sources, buy traffic etc. - NOT the same.

Terenzo · 09-01-2004, 12:33 AM

have a look at this thread, notice why people call me idiot?

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=346661

08-30-2004, 08:31 PM	#1
pussyluver Clueless OleMan Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ICQ - 169903487 Posts: 11,009	Does Google now penalize adult sites with PICs meta tags? Has this been this way for a while and I just finally caught on. I did a quick sampling of top sites listed on my adult related keywords and the top positions are going to sites with out the PICS tags identifying the sites as adult. If this is true, this is so wrong! Noticed that google hit me hard this week. Need to do a bigger sampling I guess. Haven't been to the SEO boards in awhile. Guess its time. Comments?

08-30-2004, 08:35 PM	#3
Kard63 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: 237 619 975 Posts: 8,944	GL getting a defenitive answer on such an important topic. I bookmarked it because I am curious, but I dont expect a straight answer. __________________

08-30-2004, 09:31 PM	#8
exposed Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: unknown Posts: 1,449	of course __________________ "I felt victimized by the Ian Eisenbergs of the world" - Mary Burger

08-30-2004, 09:50 PM	#11
Dagwolf President of Canada Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Leaving Hell, Entering Limbo Posts: 23,141	Maybe try not using hardcore metas? __________________ Sleep well, and dream of large women.

08-30-2004, 10:51 PM	#14
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	google is a pain in the ass lately. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

08-30-2004, 08:33 PM	#2
pussyluver Clueless OleMan Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ICQ - 169903487 Posts: 11,009	My preferences on google are set to "Do Not filter...."

08-30-2004, 08:42 PM	#5
pussyluver Clueless OleMan Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ICQ - 169903487 Posts: 11,009	hrmmm, think this is suppose to be secret info, not for all to know.

08-30-2004, 09:35 PM	#9
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	I have a webcam archive site that has all the PICS/ICRA flags set (since the source of the images is uncontrolled), google still displays it on the first page for several terms. Setting the family filter to "strict" removes it from the results, but "moderate" and "none" still show it.

08-30-2004, 10:22 PM	#13
iwantchixx Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: The Boonies Posts: 12,860	concentrate on your content, metas mean fuck all compared to giving good content for google bot to chew on

09-01-2004, 12:33 AM	#16
Terenzo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 971	have a look at this thread, notice why people call me idiot? http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=346661