Wtf? Is this Gallery Pedo-porn? You Tell Me........ - GoFuckYourself.com

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:21 PM

http://www.vikinggalleries.com/patty...Pichunter.html

I had to rub my eyes a few times.............looks like CP to me or am I out to lunch?

European Lee · 08-27-2004, 01:22 PM

Im not even clicking that fucking link

Regards,

Lee

AaronM · 08-27-2004, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
I had to rub my eyes a few times.............looks like CP to me or am I out to lunch?

First off......You clearly don't know WTF is CP and what is not.

Secondly....If it was potential CP...WTF are you doing posting a link to it here?

bringer · 08-27-2004, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
I had to rub my eyes a few times.............looks like CP to me or am I out to lunch?

click thru to the site before posting

tootie · 08-27-2004, 01:24 PM

Looks legal to me. Based on the size of her breasts, the wrinkles under her eyes and the texture of her skin, I'd say she's at least 20-22. I've also seen this content posted here before.

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
First off......You clearly don't know WTF is CP and what is not.

Secondly....If it was potential CP...WTF are you doing posting a link to it here?

Because its on a major TGP, thats why.........I am amazed it got listed........those girls don't like of age.

modF · 08-27-2004, 01:25 PM

I'm not sure if it was the 2257 info or the billing though a major US processor that gave away the truth to me.

bringer · 08-27-2004, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
Because its on a major TGP, thats why.........I am amazed it got listed........those girls don't like of age.

you must be new
this is what they do, pigtails on younglooking girls which sells
welcome to the internet

AaronM · 08-27-2004, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
Because its on a major TGP, thats why.........I am amazed it got listed........those girls don't like of age.

Are you new to the Internet or something?

Thank you for your professional opinion.

BTW.....There is no nothing pornographic of that girl in that gallery in the first place.

Aly-Python · 08-27-2004, 01:26 PM

If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!

tootie · 08-27-2004, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
Because its on a major TGP, thats why.........I am amazed it got listed........those girls don't like of age.

She looks very much of age to me. She does have a baby face but if you look closely she doesn't look young at all. Christine Young looks younger than this girl. So does Little April.

nastyking · 08-27-2004, 01:28 PM

hi biskoppen

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
you must be new
this is what they do, pigtails on younglooking girls which sells
welcome to the internet

get fucking real, bringer.........who are you trying to kid.........those girls on that gallery look younger than your "average" teen gallery, by far..........don't play fast and loose........they may in fact be of age but my fucking point, if you can read, is that they don't appear of age.........the one girl looks younger than my niece you asshole

johndoebob · 08-27-2004, 01:29 PM

Totally legit, the site just looks a bit crappy tho.

bringer · 08-27-2004, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
get fucking real, bringer.........who are you trying to kid.........those girls on that gallery look younger than your "average" teen gallery, by far..........don't play fast and loose........they may in fact be of age but my fucking point, if you can read, is that they don't appear of age.........the one girl looks younger than my niece you asshole

http://www.littleapril.com/tour.html

btw, its all the same girl in that gallery

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aly-Python
If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!

I wanted some more opinions..............its obvious that their bodies are developed but those very young looking faces threw me..........far moreso than a typical teen gallery

AaronM · 08-27-2004, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
the one girl looks younger than my niece you asshole

Well now....That holds merit.

If your niece is 32.....She is almost certainly younger than your niece.

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
http://www.littleapril.com/tour.html

btw, its all the same girl in that gallery

are you trying to say those girls look as old as april? gimme a fucking break dude

Libertine · 08-27-2004, 01:31 PM

I'd hit it

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
I'd hit it

nastyking · 08-27-2004, 01:32 PM

http://web.archive.org/web/200108050...akeonline.com/

i doubt she was 18 in 2001

jimmyf · 08-27-2004, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
First off......You clearly don't know WTF is CP and what is not.

Secondly....If it was potential CP...WTF are you doing posting a link to it here?

well i hate 2 admit it but.....

I agree
And
I AGREE.

johndoebob · 08-27-2004, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
get fucking real, bringer.........who are you trying to kid.........those girls on that gallery look younger than your "average" teen gallery, by far..........don't play fast and loose........they may in fact be of age but my fucking point, if you can read, is that they don't appear of age.........the one girl looks younger than my niece you asshole

Bringer knows the teen TGP area, who cares about young looking / appearing young ?

Dirty F · 08-27-2004, 01:33 PM

Pedo porn wtf???

That girl passed 18 long time ago and 2nd wheres the fucking porn?? Shes non nude!

People should think before posting.

CybermedAndy · 08-27-2004, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
I'd hit it

Ya me too...after checking 2 peices of ID

exposed · 08-27-2004, 01:34 PM

pfftttt

bringer · 08-27-2004, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
are you trying to say those girls look as old as april? gimme a fucking break dude

what im saying is they do everything in their power to make them look as young as possible
havent you seen young looking girls with braces and pigtails in kid beds surrounded by teddybears?

jimmyf · 08-27-2004, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Battuss
Pedo porn wtf???

That girl passed 18 long time ago and 2nd wheres the fucking porn?? Shes non nude!

People should think before posting.

I must agree again

Jace · 08-27-2004, 01:35 PM

Quote:

In compliance with United States Code, Title 18, Section 2257, all models, actors, actresses and other persons who appear in any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at PattycakeOnline.com were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions.

Records required to be maintained pursuant to U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 are kept by the custodian of records at:

PCM
PO Box 726
Forence, KY 41022
[email protected]

email and ask, claim you want to promote her site but are worried

Dirty F · 08-27-2004, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
http://www.vikinggalleries.com/patty...Pichunter.html

I had to rub my eyes a few times.............looks like CP to me or am I out to lunch?

Ugh i have to quote this one more time...CP, do you have a clue what CP is?

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Battuss
Pedo porn wtf???

That girl passed 18 long time ago and 2nd wheres the fucking porn?? Shes non nude!

People should think before posting.

Battus, as much as I've agreed with other posts of yours, I think legally this is porn.........these girls are touching themselves thru their panties in for eg, pic 11 and 12.

My point is these girls may be of age, yes, but man, this is pushing the envelope too far and I can see this stuff agitating the DOJ into the 2257 bullshit we are now all subjected to. I don't agree with the DOJ, I hate the DOJ, but they use content like this as an excuse to slam us all........

Khun · 08-27-2004, 01:36 PM

Bah, shes 20 if shes a day

tootie · 08-27-2004, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
I wanted some more opinions..............its obvious that their bodies are developed but those very young looking faces threw me..........far moreso than a typical teen gallery

How old does this model look to you?

She's 20.

My point is, just because a model has a young looking face doesn't mean she is young.

Dirty F · 08-27-2004, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
Battus, as much as I've agreed with other posts of yours, I think legally this is porn.........these girls are touching themselves thru their panties in for eg, pic 11 and 12.

My point is these girls may be of age, yes, but man, this is pushing the envelope too far and I can see this stuff agitating the DOJ into the 2257 bullshit we are now all subjected to. I don't agree with the DOJ, I hate the DOJ, but they use content like this as an excuse to slam us all........

I honestly dont see anything wrong with this site. Nothing. The girl doesnt even look underaged to me.

You work in a business where you have no problems with a girl who turned 18 yesterday and now participates in a 10 guy anal gangbang but a 18+ year old girl in clothes you call offensive?

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Battuss
I honestly dont see anything wrong with this site. Nothing. The girl doesnt even look underaged to me.

You work in a business where you have no problems with a girl who turned 18 yesteday and now participates in a 10 guy anal gangbang but a 18+ year old girl in clothes you call offensive?

Not saying its offensive..........that gallery just caught me off guard because they are so young looking........moreso than per usual.......on that point most can agree...........my point is the draconian repubs at the DOJ use this stuff as an excuse to come after us all

Dirty F · 08-27-2004, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks

My point is these girls may be of age, yes, but man, this is pushing the envelope too far

But a double anal and triple facial is perfectly fine right.

nastyking · 08-27-2004, 01:40 PM

2001

http://web.archive.org/web/200108050...akeonline.com/

(non nude)

johndoebob · 08-27-2004, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Battuss
Ugh i have to quote this one more time...CP, do you have a clue what CP is?

Seems they all didn't see much teen stuff before.Just look at their tits, they tell you that they're 18+ , a babyface can't fool me.

Child = 12 or less
Real teen = 13-17
Teens sites = 18-20 something where the models appear to be max 15 or 16 so far away from CP.

Bansheelinks · 08-27-2004, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nastyking
2001

http://web.archive.org/web/200108050...akeonline.com/

(non nude)

to me, those girls on the above link look older than the gallery link originally posted..........

tootie · 08-27-2004, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
to me, those girls on the above link look older than the gallery link originally posted..........

What girlS are you talking about? It's the same girl. It's a single model site. The pictures on that link are her in 2001. The blonde and the brunette are the same girl, just with different hair colors.

bringer · 08-27-2004, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
to me, those girls on the above link look older than the gallery link originally posted..........

you keep saying those "girls" but the fact is, every picture on that site and in that gallery you posted is infact the SAME person.

Doctor Dre · 08-27-2004, 04:03 PM

She's just chubby . I wouldn't be surprised if she would be 25

Manowar · 08-27-2004, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aly-Python
If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!

Ex fucking actly

TheWolf · 08-27-2004, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by andykidd
Ya me too...after checking 2 peices of ID

Don't forget to photocopy the IDs.

Doctor Dre · 08-27-2004, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aly-Python
If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!

what he said

Rebel D · 08-28-2004, 06:14 AM

I know those guys well and they are stand up guys. vikingsgalleries guys are top notch

biskoppen · 08-28-2004, 06:36 AM

hehe, just saw this thread now... the gallery is mine, and NO, we would never touch CP - ever!

Dudes, the game with these sites are getting them look as young as possible. But it's all girls above 18..

Call it sick .. but it's still just the teen niche..

I agree that this Patty Cake is trying to look younger than 18 - but it isn't illegal - and if it was - we would NEVER touch it

But thanks for posting! - people posting CP should be nailed - all of them!

junction · 08-28-2004, 06:36 AM

You sir are a dumbass.

freeadultcontent · 08-28-2004, 06:39 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In compliance with United States Code, Title 18, Section 2257, all models, actors, actresses and other persons who appear in any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at PattycakeOnline.com were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions.

Records required to be maintained pursuant to U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 are kept by the custodian of records at:

PCM
PO Box 726
Forence, KY 41022
[email protected]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That not the appearance would make me suspicious and not promote them.

mardigras · 08-28-2004, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aly-Python If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
I wanted some more opinions..............

Had it actually been child porn you would have been banned from here. Never ever post suspected CP anywhere publicly, not even to "get opinions". It is a crime and anyone can report you for spreading child porn. Even though your intentions may be to help law enforcement doesn't look at it that way.

08-27-2004, 01:21 PM	#1
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	Wtf? Is this Gallery Pedo-porn? You Tell Me........ http://www.vikinggalleries.com/patty...Pichunter.html I had to rub my eyes a few times.............looks like CP to me or am I out to lunch?

08-27-2004, 01:22 PM	#2
European Lee Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Daytona Beach Posts: 7,133	Im not even clicking that fucking link Regards, Lee __________________ YOUR TRAFFIC IS SAFE WITH US - CONDOM CASH PUTTING THE GAY ADULT INDUSTRY ON YOUR PC!! AFFORDABLE 2257 COMPLIANT GAY + BI CONTENT

08-27-2004, 01:24 PM	#5
tootie Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Planet Earp Posts: 6,041	Looks legal to me. Based on the size of her breasts, the wrinkles under her eyes and the texture of her skin, I'd say she's at least 20-22. I've also seen this content posted here before. __________________

08-27-2004, 01:25 PM	#7
modF Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 1,888	I'm not sure if it was the 2257 info or the billing though a major US processor that gave away the truth to me. __________________ I do things skype:themodF

08-27-2004, 01:26 PM	#10
Aly-Python Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: West Hollywood Posts: 1,439	If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY! __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

08-27-2004, 01:28 PM	#12
nastyking Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,174	hi biskoppen __________________

08-27-2004, 01:29 PM	#14
johndoebob Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,405	Totally legit, the site just looks a bit crappy tho. __________________

08-27-2004, 01:31 PM	#19
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	I'd hit it __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/

08-27-2004, 01:32 PM	#21
nastyking Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,174	http://web.archive.org/web/200108050...akeonline.com/ i doubt she was 18 in 2001 __________________

08-27-2004, 01:33 PM	#24
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Pedo porn wtf??? That girl passed 18 long time ago and 2nd wheres the fucking porn?? Shes non nude! People should think before posting.

08-27-2004, 01:34 PM	#26
exposed Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: unknown Posts: 1,449	pfftttt __________________ "I felt victimized by the Ian Eisenbergs of the world" - Mary Burger

08-27-2004, 01:36 PM	#32
Khun Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: TN Posts: 1,239	Bah, shes 20 if shes a day __________________ Sig is on vacation... (I wish I could vacation as long as my sig has...)

08-27-2004, 01:40 PM	#37
nastyking Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,174	2001 http://web.archive.org/web/200108050...akeonline.com/ (non nude) __________________

08-28-2004, 06:14 AM	#46
Rebel D Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Ontario Posts: 3,916	I know those guys well and they are stand up guys. vikingsgalleries guys are top notch

08-28-2004, 06:36 AM	#47
biskoppen Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Very small penis Posts: 5,809	hehe, just saw this thread now... the gallery is mine, and NO, we would never touch CP - ever! Dudes, the game with these sites are getting them look as young as possible. But it's all girls above 18.. Call it sick .. but it's still just the teen niche.. I agree that this Patty Cake is trying to look younger than 18 - but it isn't illegal - and if it was - we would NEVER touch it But thanks for posting! - people posting CP should be nailed - all of them! __________________ Submit my videos to make bank, tons of 5 minute videos offered right here

08-28-2004, 06:36 AM	#48
junction Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Midwest Posts: 2,411	You sir are a dumbass.

08-28-2004, 06:39 AM	#49
freeadultcontent Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc" Posts: 9,976	-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In compliance with United States Code, Title 18, Section 2257, all models, actors, actresses and other persons who appear in any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at PattycakeOnline.com were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions. Records required to be maintained pursuant to U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 are kept by the custodian of records at: PCM PO Box 726 Forence, KY 41022 [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That not the appearance would make me suspicious and not promote them. __________________ Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites