Looks legal to me. Based on the size of her breasts, the wrinkles under her eyes and the texture of her skin, I'd say she's at least 20-22. I've also seen this content posted here before.
If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Originally posted by Bansheelinks Because its on a major TGP, thats why.........I am amazed it got listed........those girls don't like of age.
She looks very much of age to me. She does have a baby face but if you look closely she doesn't look young at all. Christine Young looks younger than this girl. So does Little April.
Originally posted by bringer you must be new
this is what they do, pigtails on younglooking girls which sells
welcome to the internet
get fucking real, bringer.........who are you trying to kid.........those girls on that gallery look younger than your "average" teen gallery, by far..........don't play fast and loose........they may in fact be of age but my fucking point, if you can read, is that they don't appear of age.........the one girl looks younger than my niece you asshole
Originally posted by Bansheelinks get fucking real, bringer.........who are you trying to kid.........those girls on that gallery look younger than your "average" teen gallery, by far..........don't play fast and loose........they may in fact be of age but my fucking point, if you can read, is that they don't appear of age.........the one girl looks younger than my niece you asshole
Originally posted by Aly-Python If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!
I wanted some more opinions..............its obvious that their bodies are developed but those very young looking faces threw me..........far moreso than a typical teen gallery
Originally posted by Bansheelinks get fucking real, bringer.........who are you trying to kid.........those girls on that gallery look younger than your "average" teen gallery, by far..........don't play fast and loose........they may in fact be of age but my fucking point, if you can read, is that they don't appear of age.........the one girl looks younger than my niece you asshole
Bringer knows the teen TGP area, who cares about young looking / appearing young ?
Originally posted by Bansheelinks are you trying to say those girls look as old as april? gimme a fucking break dude
what im saying is they do everything in their power to make them look as young as possible
havent you seen young looking girls with braces and pigtails in kid beds surrounded by teddybears?
In compliance with United States Code, Title 18, Section 2257, all models, actors, actresses and other persons who appear in any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at PattycakeOnline.com were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions.
Records required to be maintained pursuant to U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 are kept by the custodian of records at:
That girl passed 18 long time ago and 2nd wheres the fucking porn?? Shes non nude!
People should think before posting.
Battus, as much as I've agreed with other posts of yours, I think legally this is porn.........these girls are touching themselves thru their panties in for eg, pic 11 and 12.
My point is these girls may be of age, yes, but man, this is pushing the envelope too far and I can see this stuff agitating the DOJ into the 2257 bullshit we are now all subjected to. I don't agree with the DOJ, I hate the DOJ, but they use content like this as an excuse to slam us all........
Originally posted by Bansheelinks I wanted some more opinions..............its obvious that their bodies are developed but those very young looking faces threw me..........far moreso than a typical teen gallery
How old does this model look to you?
She's 20.
My point is, just because a model has a young looking face doesn't mean she is young.
Originally posted by Bansheelinks Battus, as much as I've agreed with other posts of yours, I think legally this is porn.........these girls are touching themselves thru their panties in for eg, pic 11 and 12.
My point is these girls may be of age, yes, but man, this is pushing the envelope too far and I can see this stuff agitating the DOJ into the 2257 bullshit we are now all subjected to. I don't agree with the DOJ, I hate the DOJ, but they use content like this as an excuse to slam us all........
I honestly dont see anything wrong with this site. Nothing. The girl doesnt even look underaged to me.
You work in a business where you have no problems with a girl who turned 18 yesterday and now participates in a 10 guy anal gangbang but a 18+ year old girl in clothes you call offensive?
Originally posted by Battuss I honestly dont see anything wrong with this site. Nothing. The girl doesnt even look underaged to me.
You work in a business where you have no problems with a girl who turned 18 yesteday and now participates in a 10 guy anal gangbang but a 18+ year old girl in clothes you call offensive?
Not saying its offensive..........that gallery just caught me off guard because they are so young looking........moreso than per usual.......on that point most can agree...........my point is the draconian repubs at the DOJ use this stuff as an excuse to come after us all
Originally posted by Bansheelinks to me, those girls on the above link look older than the gallery link originally posted..........
What girlS are you talking about? It's the same girl. It's a single model site. The pictures on that link are her in 2001. The blonde and the brunette are the same girl, just with different hair colors.
She's just chubby . I wouldn't be surprised if she would be 25
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Originally posted by Aly-Python If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!
what he said
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
In compliance with United States Code, Title 18, Section 2257, all models, actors, actresses and other persons who appear in any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at PattycakeOnline.com were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions.
Records required to be maintained pursuant to U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 are kept by the custodian of records at:
Originally posted by Aly-Python If you THINK it MAY be CP, report it toASACP, not GFY!
Originally posted by Bansheelinks I wanted some more opinions..............
Had it actually been child porn you would have been banned from here. Never ever post suspected CP anywhere publicly, not even to "get opinions". It is a crime and anyone can report you for spreading child porn. Even though your intentions may be to help law enforcement doesn't look at it that way.
Comment