Get Ready For The "Iran War Jam" - GoFuckYourself.com

Greg B · 08-17-2004, 12:33 PM

All of a sudden Rush Limbaugh is ragging on about how evil Iran is.

Russia says they're 90% done with Iran's new nuclear reactor.

Who wants to bet that if Bush is re-elected we'll be bombing Iran by the end of next year? I smell a draft coming.

You knew it was gonna happen. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 but the evidence sure is now pointing to Iran or it's being made to point there.

EviLGuY · 08-17-2004, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greg B
All of a sudden Rush Limbaugh is ragging on about how evil Iran is.

Russia says they're 90% done with Iran's new nuclear reactor.

Who wants to bet that if Bush is re-elected we'll be bombing Iran by the end of next year? I smell a draft coming.

You knew it was gonna happen. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 but the evidence sure is now pointing to Iran or it's being made to point there.

Sounds like it might be possible to me.. once that republican media echo chamber starts up, you'll have all the talking heads blabbering about Iran in the next couple weeks.

NichePay_Manny · 08-17-2004, 01:27 PM

God help us all

NoCarrier · 08-17-2004, 01:43 PM

No. Expect Israel to launch an attack as soon as the reactors are ready.

Roger · 08-17-2004, 01:45 PM

Iran is developing nukes and they got lots of help from North Korea who btw is currently working on extending the reach of it's atomic weapons to the US.

I'm not sure what's going on but Iran surely looked at NK and noticed that the US won't attack a country that actually have WMD's and so it became convinced that it needs nukes to keep the US away.

You have a mad man in NK who seems almost as insane as Hitler but Bush is busy going after some weak third-world country crippled by decades of sanctions.

Greg B · 08-17-2004, 04:01 PM

I agree Roger, but North Korea's a pushover. We've got weapons that'd take em' out before they knew what hit em', problem is they've got reactors and nuclear fuels. If you hit the target and that plutonium goes up into the atmosphere or the ocean we're allllllllll ---FFFFFFUCKED!

That's the reason NK is still there. When we find a way to take em' out and not trigger a planetary catastrophe they'll wake up one day not on Earth any longer.

DarkBob · 08-17-2004, 04:32 PM

"Bring 'em on"

Greg B · 08-17-2004, 05:39 PM

Say, what's up with the post counts!?? I'm posting here and the counter like stopped? WTF? I should be almost at 3,000 by now.

Feed the fucking squirrel and get the wheels rollin' around here for cryin' out loud.

Rich · 08-17-2004, 05:42 PM

I'd be more worried about the war Bush is going to start with China.

Libertine · 08-17-2004, 05:43 PM

No other countries will be attacked until Iraq is a completely stable and safe democracy unless something *really* bad happens.

Neoconservatives may be dumb assholes, but they're not crazy.

Rich · 08-17-2004, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greg B
Say, what's up with the post counts!?? I'm posting here and the counter like stopped? WTF? I should be almost at 3,000 by now.

Feed the fucking squirrel and get the wheels rollin' around here for cryin' out loud.

mine are going up, but I'm special.

BRISK · 08-17-2004, 05:51 PM

Iran is much stronger than Iraq was

boobmaster · 08-17-2004, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
No. Expect Israel to launch an attack as soon as the reactors are ready.

They have a history of doing stuff like that, don't they?

boobmaster · 08-17-2004, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
I'd be more worried about the war Bush is going to start with China.

alexg · 08-17-2004, 05:56 PM

I think Israel can safely bomb Iran.
They will not respond, because they don't acknowledge Israel as a legitimate country.

cherrylula · 08-17-2004, 05:58 PM

Damn I thought this was an MP3 thread.

slavdogg · 08-17-2004, 06:02 PM

what for Israeli to take out Iran's nukes
they have a sub in the indian ocean
and now have long range f151 planes to reach iran

sumphatpimp · 08-17-2004, 06:06 PM

they start drafting what you guys gonna do?
they don't have a job called "pornographer" in the Army?
you better see about getting a good job now before it is too late.

Webby · 08-17-2004, 07:40 PM

Assuming for one weirdo moment that the "management" of Iran are not as dumb as Bush - I doubt Iran gives one shit about the US.

Middle East countries have there own problems to solve and "protection" to implement against existing nuclear powers in that region. What has that got to do with the US? Nothing as usual :-)

While we're at it... can we address the issue - a far more relevant one - of the US deviating/side-stepping/back-sliding ... whatever ya want to call it - of continually developing nuclear weaponary, despite they agreed to quit and limit this. Currently the budget for this is 6.4billion of US taxpayers funds while at the same time whining about everyone else - from North Korea to Iran and kissing the ass of an undemocratic military dictatorship in possession of nuclear capability in Pakistan.

Someone needs to see a shrink and look inwards and check out their own back yard.

NichePay_Manny · 08-17-2004, 09:15 PM

Rochard · 08-17-2004, 09:17 PM

The problem with these countries are not that they have nukes, but the fact that they refuse to allow anyone to inspect them.

North Korea can have all the nuclear weapons they want. The moment they launch, all of North Korea will be taken out. So they can have them.

Same with Iran.

The problem with nuclear power plants and weapons is that the rest of the world needs to know they are "safe". An problem at a nuclear power plant is not a local problem in North Korea; It can have effects thousands of miles away - and thus other countries feel the need to inspect them to make sure they are operted in a safe manner.

Both the US and Russia have had to major problems - Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.

You trust Iran to have nuclear power plants?

Pleasurepays · 08-17-2004, 09:41 PM

hmmm i love GFY conversations about a failed stalinist state starving its people to death whos only card to play is nuclear blackmail (which they have played many times) and a fanatical theocracy racing for nuclear weapons and refusing to cooperate with the IAOC/UN breaking all international treaties and agreements and how they are harmless.

funny.

you might hate the US... but are you so fucking stupid to think that a defiant and crumbling, fanatical islamic goverment posessing nuclear weapons is a good idea for anyone?

VeriSexy · 08-17-2004, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
No other countries will be attacked until Iraq is a completely stable and safe democracy unless something *really* bad happens.

Neoconservatives may be dumb assholes, but they're not crazy.

Right, at least finish the other two wars.

CET · 08-17-2004, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
No. Expect Israel to launch an attack as soon as the reactors are ready.

That is exactly what I would expect. WMDs or no, the US had a long standing beef with Iraq. I can't think of much of any beef the US has with Iran.

CET · 08-17-2004, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
I'd be more worried about the war Bush is going to start with China.

That's been a threat off and on since the Korean war. Maybe I'm desensitized, but I'll believe it when I see it.

piker · 08-17-2004, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by slavdogg
what for Israeli to take out Iran's nukes
they have a sub in the indian ocean
and now have long range f151 planes to reach iran

Israel destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor.... So they can and most likely will Iran's...

slavdogg · 08-17-2004, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker
Israel destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor.... So they can and most likely will Iran's...

slavdogg · 08-17-2004, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker
Israel destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor.... So they can and most likely will Iran's...

thats what i said

Webby · 08-17-2004, 11:49 PM

RocHard:

Quote:

The problem with these countries are not that they have nukes, but the fact that they refuse to allow anyone to inspect them.

That hoss is not a runner :-)

Why should some nations assume all others need inspections, yet they cannot agree on inspections of their own nuclear capability?

Add to that all the "deviant" continued nuclear development, tho agreements have been signed, yet they manage to spend 6.4billion this year alone on further development.

Honestly is not a one way street

fr8 · 08-17-2004, 11:49 PM

fuck this war shit is going to suck.

slavdogg · 08-17-2004, 11:50 PM

and lets not forget Arabs are as afraid of Persbian nukes as much as the rest of the world. I'm speaking about Saudis, Egyptians, and Gulf States.

As far as Russia's interests in Ian,
they have a very long history of friendship and Iran is the only friend they have in the middle east. Iran will never pose a thread to Moscow, but russians cant be that stupid to ignore future threats from their own Muslim population with the help from Iran.

Taking our Iranian nukes will be a challenge, but i dont forse US doing it at any cost. Israel will !

slavdogg · 08-17-2004, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webby

Why should some nations assume all others need inspections, yet they cannot agree on inspections of their own nuclear capability?
:

Russians inspect our nukes on an anual basis, and we do theirs.
and who the hell is asking to inspect our nukes? YOU ?

Webby · 08-18-2004, 12:00 AM

slavdogg:

Quote:

Russians inspect our nukes on an anual basis, and we do theirs.
and who the hell is asking to inspect our nukes? YOU ?

WTF are you talking about???

First, learn to spell - typos are OK tho. Second, learn at least "something" before you utter more dribble.

The US is the main obstacle in all Western Countries about "nuclear inspections". It is a country which has blocked every attempt at inhibiting everything from depleted uranium use to even clearing up your crap land mines. As for "inspections" - you don't know how to spell the word, nevermind it's meaning.

Credibility is a word to learn as well... there is none...

Goatse · 08-18-2004, 02:59 PM

This is all part of America's plan of insuring Israel's supremacy in the middle east, which is an extremely unhealthy situation that puts the lives of 300 million Americans in danger. If Israel wants to wage war with its neighbors, let them do it. But let's not drag the US into this as well. If Uncle Sam invades Iran, Russia could get involved for the other side and it would get really, really ugly...

rambler · 08-18-2004, 04:08 PM

" Iran threatens to destroy Israeli N-plant
TEHRAN -- Accompanied by a warning that its missiles have the range, Iran said yesterday it would destroy Israel's Dimona nuclear reactor if the Jewish state were to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. "

This was in todays paper.(Vancouver Province Aug. 18, 2004)

hmmm.... I wonder if things are starting to get heated up even more.

Roger · 08-18-2004, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by slavdogg
Russians inspect our nukes on an anual basis, and we do theirs.
and who the hell is asking to inspect our nukes? YOU ?

Actually the Bush admin is opposed to such inspections.

Rich · 08-18-2004, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker
Israel destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor.... So they can and most likely will Iran's...

Anyone hear Iran's response today?

"If Israel fires a missile into the Bushehr nuclear power plant, it has to say goodbye forever to its Dimona nuclear facility, where it produces and stockpiles nuclear weapons".

Accompanied by a warning that its missiles have the range.

kamasutrababe · 08-18-2004, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
That is exactly what I would expect. WMDs or no, the US had a long standing beef with Iraq. I can't think of much of any beef the US has with Iran.

There was this thing called the Iran Hostage Crisis. That was preceded by the overthrow of our puppet the Shah by Islamist fundamentalists under Ayatollah Khomeini. Which was preceded by our "regime change" overthrowing Mossadeq when his government voted to nationalize oil. And the whole reason we supported Saddam in the first place was to use him against the Iranians. So we've had a beef with Iran long before we had a beef with Iraq. Amazing how history repeats itself. If we found a reason to invade Iraq, you can bet the neocons can find a reason to invade Iran.

Webby · 08-18-2004, 05:40 PM

kamasutrababe:

Quote:

There was this thing called the Iran Hostage Crisis. That was preceded by the overthrow of our puppet the Shah by Islamist fundamentalists under Ayatollah Khomeini. Which was preceded by our "regime change" overthrowing Mossadeq when his government voted to nationalize oil. And the whole reason we supported Saddam in the first place was to use him against the Iranians. So we've had a beef with Iran long before we had a beef with Iraq. Amazing how history repeats itself. If we found a reason to invade Iraq, you can bet the neocons can find a reason to invade Iran.

Kinda sums up the history!

You would actually wonder why the US has *any* beef at all with Iran since they did more damage to that country than anyone on the planet - you get back the product of the seed that is sown.

And some wonder "why they hate us" - sheesh!! Tho "hate" may be the wrong word - maybe self-preservation is more applicable...the US can't be trusted as evidenced by history.

08-17-2004, 12:33 PM	#1
Greg B So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: EARTH (for the time being) Posts: 7,014	Get Ready For The "Iran War Jam" All of a sudden Rush Limbaugh is ragging on about how evil Iran is. Russia says they're 90% done with Iran's new nuclear reactor. Who wants to bet that if Bush is re-elected we'll be bombing Iran by the end of next year? I smell a draft coming. You knew it was gonna happen. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 but the evidence sure is now pointing to Iran or it's being made to point there.

08-17-2004, 01:43 PM	#4
NoCarrier We need more free porn Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 16,356	No. Expect Israel to launch an attack as soon as the reactors are ready. __________________

08-17-2004, 05:43 PM	#10
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	No other countries will be attacked until Iraq is a completely stable and safe democracy unless something really bad happens. Neoconservatives may be dumb assholes, but they're not crazy. __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/

08-17-2004, 05:51 PM	#12
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	Iran is much stronger than Iraq was __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

08-17-2004, 05:56 PM	#15
alexg IL4L.com Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Israel - ICQ: 162136565 Posts: 11,287	I think Israel can safely bomb Iran. They will not respond, because they don't acknowledge Israel as a legitimate country. __________________ Find fuck buddies in your area!

08-17-2004, 01:27 PM	#3
NichePay_Manny Registered User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Posts: 1,833	God help us all

08-17-2004, 01:45 PM	#5
Roger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: MetroCity Posts: 3,181	Iran is developing nukes and they got lots of help from North Korea who btw is currently working on extending the reach of it's atomic weapons to the US. I'm not sure what's going on but Iran surely looked at NK and noticed that the US won't attack a country that actually have WMD's and so it became convinced that it needs nukes to keep the US away. You have a mad man in NK who seems almost as insane as Hitler but Bush is busy going after some weak third-world country crippled by decades of sanctions.

08-17-2004, 04:01 PM	#6
Greg B So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: EARTH (for the time being) Posts: 7,014	I agree Roger, but North Korea's a pushover. We've got weapons that'd take em' out before they knew what hit em', problem is they've got reactors and nuclear fuels. If you hit the target and that plutonium goes up into the atmosphere or the ocean we're allllllllll ---FFFFFFUCKED! That's the reason NK is still there. When we find a way to take em' out and not trigger a planetary catastrophe they'll wake up one day not on Earth any longer.

08-17-2004, 04:32 PM	#7
DarkBob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 2,300	"Bring 'em on"

08-17-2004, 05:39 PM	#8
Greg B So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: EARTH (for the time being) Posts: 7,014	Say, what's up with the post counts!?? I'm posting here and the counter like stopped? WTF? I should be almost at 3,000 by now. Feed the fucking squirrel and get the wheels rollin' around here for cryin' out loud.

08-17-2004, 05:42 PM	#9
Rich So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 11,486	I'd be more worried about the war Bush is going to start with China.

08-17-2004, 05:58 PM	#16
cherrylula lol Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 15,969	Damn I thought this was an MP3 thread.

08-17-2004, 06:02 PM	#17
slavdogg Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 3,570	what for Israeli to take out Iran's nukes they have a sub in the indian ocean and now have long range f151 planes to reach iran

08-17-2004, 06:06 PM	#18
sumphatpimp Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 5,235	they start drafting what you guys gonna do? they don't have a job called "pornographer" in the Army? you better see about getting a good job now before it is too late.

08-17-2004, 07:40 PM	#19
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	Assuming for one weirdo moment that the "management" of Iran are not as dumb as Bush - I doubt Iran gives one shit about the US. Middle East countries have there own problems to solve and "protection" to implement against existing nuclear powers in that region. What has that got to do with the US? Nothing as usual :-) While we're at it... can we address the issue - a far more relevant one - of the US deviating/side-stepping/back-sliding ... whatever ya want to call it - of continually developing nuclear weaponary, despite they agreed to quit and limit this. Currently the budget for this is 6.4billion of US taxpayers funds while at the same time whining about everyone else - from North Korea to Iran and kissing the ass of an undemocratic military dictatorship in possession of nuclear capability in Pakistan. Someone needs to see a shrink and look inwards and check out their own back yard. Last edited by Webby; 08-17-2004 at 07:42 PM..

08-17-2004, 09:15 PM	#20
NichePay_Manny Registered User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Posts: 1,833

08-17-2004, 09:17 PM	#21
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 74,006	The problem with these countries are not that they have nukes, but the fact that they refuse to allow anyone to inspect them. North Korea can have all the nuclear weapons they want. The moment they launch, all of North Korea will be taken out. So they can have them. Same with Iran. The problem with nuclear power plants and weapons is that the rest of the world needs to know they are "safe". An problem at a nuclear power plant is not a local problem in North Korea; It can have effects thousands of miles away - and thus other countries feel the need to inspect them to make sure they are operted in a safe manner. Both the US and Russia have had to major problems - Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. You trust Iran to have nuclear power plants? __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

08-17-2004, 09:41 PM	#22
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	hmmm i love GFY conversations about a failed stalinist state starving its people to death whos only card to play is nuclear blackmail (which they have played many times) and a fanatical theocracy racing for nuclear weapons and refusing to cooperate with the IAOC/UN breaking all international treaties and agreements and how they are harmless. funny. you might hate the US... but are you so fucking stupid to think that a defiant and crumbling, fanatical islamic goverment posessing nuclear weapons is a good idea for anyone?

08-17-2004, 11:49 PM	#30
fr8 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,074	fuck this war shit is going to suck. __________________ █ joesmut (a) gmail Dot com █ Full Stack Developer

08-17-2004, 11:50 PM	#31
slavdogg Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 3,570	and lets not forget Arabs are as afraid of Persbian nukes as much as the rest of the world. I'm speaking about Saudis, Egyptians, and Gulf States. As far as Russia's interests in Ian, they have a very long history of friendship and Iran is the only friend they have in the middle east. Iran will never pose a thread to Moscow, but russians cant be that stupid to ignore future threats from their own Muslim population with the help from Iran. Taking our Iranian nukes will be a challenge, but i dont forse US doing it at any cost. Israel will !

08-18-2004, 02:59 PM	#34
Goatse Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,086	This is all part of America's plan of insuring Israel's supremacy in the middle east, which is an extremely unhealthy situation that puts the lives of 300 million Americans in danger. If Israel wants to wage war with its neighbors, let them do it. But let's not drag the US into this as well. If Uncle Sam invades Iran, Russia could get involved for the other side and it would get really, really ugly...

08-18-2004, 04:08 PM	#35
rambler Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: vancouver Posts: 745	" Iran threatens to destroy Israeli N-plant TEHRAN -- Accompanied by a warning that its missiles have the range, Iran said yesterday it would destroy Israel's Dimona nuclear reactor if the Jewish state were to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. " This was in todays paper.(Vancouver Province Aug. 18, 2004) hmmm.... I wonder if things are starting to get heated up even more.