Paid Hosting Galleries vs Free Hosted Galleries - GoFuckYourself.com

Unriz3n · 06-04-2001, 05:20 PM

Need everyone's feedback on which they like better and why. I tend to like paid hosting galleries for posting on smaller tgps/moviepost that send around 5k-8k a day. In my experiences paid hosting galleries seem to be alot more effective then freehosted ones

deniska · 06-04-2001, 05:26 PM

Obviously paid hosting is much better then any free host. When you post a gallery on paid hosting its obvious that there is some sort of investment made on your part to host the site. Plus many webmasters who use free hosts constantly cheat and don't follow rules. And then there are those that use terra.es but I am not going to get into that

its a sensitive topic

RedShoe · 06-04-2001, 06:09 PM

Take a listing on the hun as an example.
He posted the gallery yesterday, and he sent me 53K.
The gallery was on my paid host, and is one that I built a month ago. It didn't perform as well as I had hoped.

I would rather take fewer signups using a free host than the signups I got using a paid host. After the bandwidth bill, I'll come out only a little ahead. With paid hosting it's pure profit on my end. Less profit, but more than on my paid host.

------------------
...:::End Of Line:::...
------------------
* uSexFan.com
* ICQ : 114683191

AA3X · 06-04-2001, 06:23 PM

*snicker* The Hun... I posted about 3 galleries there and they killed my server. lol. He can send the traffic, I would never post a site I had hosted on my pay server there again. Well, especially now that I am paying for the bandwidth.
But it was a rush to see 25k hits in about 7 hours hit my site.

------------------
Get you site listed at
Amateur Adult XXX
[email protected]
ICQ# 23922007

Unriz3n · 06-04-2001, 07:13 PM

Well i'm not really looking to direct my paid host galleries to places like the Hun. thats just insane...getting that much traffic you'd be stupid not to have it on a free host. I'm more interested in smaller tgp/movieposts.

kush · 06-04-2001, 07:20 PM

If you have some experience go with paid hosting... you'll make more $ with it

------------------
My Webmaster's Page feel free to take a peek here ;)
***Also if you're interested in a high converting and retaining partership sponsor with TONS of original free content (hardcore + soft) contact me for info (and I would appreciate you signing up with my referral code if you're interested).

Paul Markham · 12-21-2003, 02:48 AM

Lensman is a hypocrite

The Revive Juicybone Now Coalition

06-04-2001, 05:20 PM	#1
Unriz3n Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 378	Paid Hosting Galleries vs Free Hosted Galleries Need everyone's feedback on which they like better and why. I tend to like paid hosting galleries for posting on smaller tgps/moviepost that send around 5k-8k a day. In my experiences paid hosting galleries seem to be alot more effective then freehosted ones

12-21-2003, 02:48 AM	#7
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Lensman is a hypocrite The Revive Juicybone Now Coalition __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

06-04-2001, 05:26 PM	#2
deniska Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Miami Beach, FL Posts: 1,053	Obviously paid hosting is much better then any free host. When you post a gallery on paid hosting its obvious that there is some sort of investment made on your part to host the site. Plus many webmasters who use free hosts constantly cheat and don't follow rules. And then there are those that use terra.es but I am not going to get into that its a sensitive topic

06-04-2001, 06:09 PM	#3
RedShoe 赤い靴 call me 202-456-1111 Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: The Valley Posts: 14,831	Take a listing on the hun as an example. He posted the gallery yesterday, and he sent me 53K. The gallery was on my paid host, and is one that I built a month ago. It didn't perform as well as I had hoped. I would rather take fewer signups using a free host than the signups I got using a paid host. After the bandwidth bill, I'll come out only a little ahead. With paid hosting it's pure profit on my end. Less profit, but more than on my paid host. ------------------ ...:::End Of Line:::... ------------------ * uSexFan.com * ICQ : 114683191

06-04-2001, 06:23 PM	#4
AA3X Registered User Join Date: Jun 2001 Posts: 40	snicker The Hun... I posted about 3 galleries there and they killed my server. lol. He can send the traffic, I would never post a site I had hosted on my pay server there again. Well, especially now that I am paying for the bandwidth. But it was a rush to see 25k hits in about 7 hours hit my site. ------------------ Get you site listed at Amateur Adult XXX [email protected] ICQ# 23922007

06-04-2001, 07:13 PM	#5
Unriz3n Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 378	Well i'm not really looking to direct my paid host galleries to places like the Hun. thats just insane...getting that much traffic you'd be stupid not to have it on a free host. I'm more interested in smaller tgp/movieposts.

06-04-2001, 07:20 PM	#6
kush Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,382	If you have some experience go with paid hosting... you'll make more $ with it ------------------ My Webmaster's Page feel free to take a peek here ;) **Also if you're interested in a high converting and* retaining partership sponsor with TONS of original free content (hardcore + soft) contact me for info (and I would appreciate you signing up with my referral code if you're interested).