Great Quote on Circumcision Science by George Bernard Shaw - GoFuckYourself.com

DarkJedi · 08-16-2004, 02:02 AM

"Tradition will accustom people to any atrocity."
George Bernard Shaw

The USA is the last remaining civilized country to still butcher 63% of its sons.

It's time we left this tradition to the muzzies and jews and joined the civilized world.

Jdoughs · 08-16-2004, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
"Tradition will accustom people to any atrocity."
George Bernard Shaw

The USA is the last remaining civilized country to still butcher 63% of its sons.

It's time we left this tradition to the muzzies and jews and joined the civilized world.

None of my boys are circumsized...I wouldnt have been able to handle it. Theres no way in hell that it doesnt hurt them.

boobmaster · 08-16-2004, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
"Tradition will accustom people to any atrocity."
George Bernard Shaw

The USA is the last remaining civilized country to still butcher 63% of its sons.

It's time we left this tradition to the muzzies and jews and joined the civilized world.

Are you STILL bitching about this?

boobmaster · 08-16-2004, 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jdoughs
None of my boys are circumsized...I wouldnt have been able to handle it. Theres no way in hell that it doesnt hurt them.

For a couple of seconds, and then it's over. Newborns don't have the ability to remember it so it's basically over before it starts. And it's healthier for them.

If I ever have a son, he's getting cut.

MrJackMeHoff · 08-16-2004, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
For a couple of seconds, and then it's over. Newborns don't have the ability to remember it so it's basically over before it starts. And it's healthier for them.

If I ever have a son, he's getting cut.

Chop Chop little bitch!

Jakke PNG · 08-16-2004, 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
For a couple of seconds, and then it's over. Newborns don't have the ability to remember it so it's basically over before it starts. And it's healthier for them.

If I ever have a son, he's getting cut.

How in the fuck is it healthier?
Bare cockhead against feces inside diapers, or protected by foreskin?
I can see how that's healthier....

CamChicks · 08-16-2004, 02:21 AM

Anyone who mutilates a childs genitals needs to be locked up for life.

Veterans Day · 08-16-2004, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
How in the fuck is it healthier?
Bare cockhead against feces inside diapers, or protected by foreskin?
I can see how that's healthier....

or feces inside foreskin in diaper

Jakke PNG · 08-16-2004, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
or feces inside foreskin in diaper

How'd they get in there?

Veterans Day · 08-16-2004, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
How in the fuck is it healthier?
Bare cockhead against feces inside diapers, or protected by foreskin?
I can see how that's healthier....

mule · 08-16-2004, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
For a couple of seconds, and then it's over.

LOL, you can't seriously believe that. I guess it's OK to burn infants with cigarettes as well then.

Veterans Day · 08-16-2004, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mule
LOL, you can't seriously believe that. I guess it's OK to burn infants with cigarettes as well then.

your an idiot with a ridiculous analogy

The Truth Hurts · 08-16-2004, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
How in the fuck is it healthier?
Bare cockhead against feces inside diapers, or protected by foreskin?
I can see how that's healthier....

having never seen one up close and personal, but having plenty of experience with baby shit, wouldn't the same feces get into the foreskin opening so that you'd have to retract it to clean out all the time?

i'm asking, because for my next child, I plan on having a boy.
of course my wife and daughter have differen ideas about that.

The Truth Hurts · 08-16-2004, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamChicks
Anyone who mutilates a childs genitals needs to be locked up for life.

I said the same thing about my wife getting my 4 year old daughters ears pierced.

Jakke PNG · 08-16-2004, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
having never seen one up close and personal, but having plenty of experience with baby shit, wouldn't the same feces get into the foreskin opening so that you'd have to retract it to clean out all the time?

i'm asking, because for my next child, I plan on having a boy.
of course my wife and daughter have differen ideas about that.

Well, I don't have a kid. I also don't wear diapers and don't have any memories of wearing any. But I think it's quite fucking hard for the shit to get inside the foreskin. I believe it's quite tight on infants.. I can't be wrong with this one though.. I haven't handled babies, ever.

Gunni · 08-16-2004, 02:29 AM

hehe, that always makes an interesting debate

But it is as amazing that people still do this to babies, as it is that people are still voting for Bush...

mule · 08-16-2004, 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
your an idiot with a ridiculous analogy

Nop, I'm just following through on boobmaster's line of reasoning: if amputating the most sensitive part of an infant's body hurts only for a few seconds, it would hardly notice a cigarette burn.

Jdoughs · 08-16-2004, 02:37 AM

Its a hygiene issue.

If your babies dick gets infected cause you couldnt keep it clean then you shouldnt be allowed to have kids anyways.

Clean cock = no infection

See what im getting at?

Cut the kids fuckin ears off to, then we dont have to wash behind them.

If you doubt this, ask your doctor.

stocktrader23 · 08-16-2004, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
How in the fuck is it healthier?
Bare cockhead against feces inside diapers, or protected by foreskin?
I can see how that's healthier....

Just grabbed this from a website on the issue real quick.

Circumcision prevents infection and inflammation of the foreskin. And it may decrease the risk of penile cancer.

Circumcision might play a role in reducing the risk of sexually transmitted diseases. Practicing safe sex, however, is a far more important factor in preventing these diseases than whether a man is circumcised.

Infants who are not circumcised may be more likely to develop urinary tract infections. These infections early in life may lead to kidney problems later in life. Infants who have kidney or bladder abnormalities are at higher risk of urinary tract infections, so circumcision may be advised for these babies.

In rare circumstances problems can occur with the uncircumcised penis that may require circumcision at an older age. These problems include inflammation of the foreskin or adherence of the foreskin to the tip of the penis. Circumcision during infancy eliminates the possible need for the procedure at an older age.

Circumcision makes it easy to keep the end of the penis clean. However, the shedding skin cells that naturally accumulate on the glans of an uncircumcised boy are not harmful. Don't try to force the foreskin back to clean the penis of an infant or young boy. Washing externally with mild soap and water is all that's necessary.

CamChicks · 08-16-2004, 03:03 AM

The best compromise should be to acknowledge that every individual has the right to decide what to do with their own body. If you want to cut off your foreskin later, fine.

But you will notice that uncircumcised males aren't lining up to do this. That is because the part that gets cut off is a part that adds pleasure to sex. (sorry cut guys, but at least you don't know what you're missing) Circumcision was designed to try to discourage masturbation, a "sin" that you now make your living on. The "health" justifications were invented later and have been debunked by recent medical studies.

One of my closest friends in high school had his whole life ruined by a botched circumcision, that he was too young to object to. His case was on the more extreme end of the spectrum, but problems are not uncommon. If you've ever seen a penis that bent in a wierd direction, that is due to scarring (or atypical healing) from circumcision.

Jakke PNG · 08-16-2004, 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23

Circumcision prevents infection and inflammation of the foreskin. And it may decrease the risk of penile cancer.

No shit?

Amputating your babys other lung reduces the risk of lungcancer by 50%
Maybe you want to pull of all his teeth, that prevents toothdecay.

Praguer · 08-16-2004, 04:06 AM

The nerves in the foreskin provide an impulse to aid erection. Circumcision has long been associated with an increased incidence of impotence in males over 40 years old.

20/20 News (ABC TV) featured a special segment in their March 20th, 1998 telecast.

They reported the current statistics that over 18 million men in the United States suffer from impotence because of circumcisions.

Such overwhelming numbers of sexual dysfunction are unique to North America.

Impotence and other sexual disfunctions in European countries where circumcision is virtually non-existent are minuscule in comparison.

Well you all know know why Viagra is sooooo Popular in the USA

Praguer · 08-16-2004, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No shit?

Amputating your babys other lung reduces the risk of lungcancer by 50%
Maybe you want to pull of all his teeth, that prevents toothdecay.

Jdoughs · 08-16-2004, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No shit?

Amputating your babys other lung reduces the risk of lungcancer by 50%
Maybe you want to pull of all his teeth, that prevents toothdecay.

AHAHA fuck there goes my coffee!

neewwman · 08-16-2004, 04:32 AM

My two-year-old son is not circumcised. There is no compelling reason to circumcise, as any responsible pediatrician will tell you.

As for poop, I don't think it would be a problem either way. When my kid poops in a diaper the shit collects behind his balls and never makes it to the penis head.

I have twins, a boy and a girl. It's always easier to clean the boy's poopy diaper because his balls act as a poop-dam. The girl's poop gets everywhere.

By the way, I am circumcised but I don't buy the "circumcise him so he looks like Daddy" argument.

Preacher · 08-16-2004, 05:12 AM

i am uncut and are very happy about it.
circumcision sucks.

KraZ · 08-16-2004, 05:53 AM

i am uncut and are very happy about it.

Same here dude ... I can't imagine I'd go through that pain just to be the next Peter North

unconnected · 08-16-2004, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by neewwman
My two-year-old son is not circumcised. There is no compelling reason to circumcise, as any responsible pediatrician will tell you.

As for poop, I don't think it would be a problem either way. When my kid poops in a diaper the shit collects behind his balls and never makes it to the penis head.

I have twins, a boy and a girl. It's always easier to clean the boy's poopy diaper because his balls act as a poop-dam. The girl's poop gets everywhere.

By the way, I am circumcised but I don't buy the "circumcise him so he looks like Daddy" argument.

AHAHA,, and there goes my coffee.. Poopdamn, man that is priceless.

Besides religious reasons there is absolutely no reason to circumsize.. It is not cleaner, it is not healthier, and it is not safer, and even though those wonderful facts posted earlier from www.godschildrenarecircumsized.com state otherwise, it just ain't so..

dapproid · 08-16-2004, 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
"Tradition will accustom people to any atrocity."
George Bernard Shaw

The USA is the last remaining civilized country to still butcher 63% of its sons.

It's time we left this tradition to the muzzies and jews and joined the civilized world.

Damn, I had no idea there were so many. It's maybe the reason so many babies gets circumcised still today.

Doctor Dre · 08-16-2004, 07:19 AM

I'm not . but sometimes I wish I was . My GF freaks out when I hold the skin :P

chodadog · 08-16-2004, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
For a couple of seconds, and then it's over. Newborns don't have the ability to remember it so it's basically over before it starts. And it's healthier for them.

If I ever have a son, he's getting cut.

While you're at it, give your kid a good kick in the face. It'll only hurt for a little while, and it'll make him tougher!

12clicks · 08-16-2004, 07:39 AM

lots of girls don't like sucking dog dick.
case closed. chop chop.

Jakke PNG · 08-16-2004, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
lots of girls don't like sucking dog dick.
case closed. chop chop.

I personally only need one. But I'm modest.

08-16-2004, 02:02 AM	#1
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	Great Quote on Circumcision Science by George Bernard Shaw "Tradition will accustom people to any atrocity." George Bernard Shaw The USA is the last remaining civilized country to still butcher 63% of its sons. It's time we left this tradition to the muzzies and jews and joined the civilized world.

08-16-2004, 02:21 AM	#7
CamChicks Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: godless northwest Posts: 1,552	Anyone who mutilates a childs genitals needs to be locked up for life. __________________ camchicks.com

08-16-2004, 02:37 AM	#18
Jdoughs Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Great White North Posts: 5,794	Its a hygiene issue. If your babies dick gets infected cause you couldnt keep it clean then you shouldnt be allowed to have kids anyways. Clean cock = no infection See what im getting at? Cut the kids fuckin ears off to, then we dont have to wash behind them. If you doubt this, ask your doctor. __________________ LinkSpun - Premier Adult Link Trading Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250 Be Seen By New Webmasters/Affiliates * Target out webmasters/affiliates based on niches your sites are for less than $20 a month. AmeriNOC - Proudly hosted @ AmeriNOC!

08-16-2004, 03:03 AM	#20
CamChicks Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: godless northwest Posts: 1,552	The best compromise should be to acknowledge that every individual has the right to decide what to do with their own body. If you want to cut off your foreskin later, fine. But you will notice that uncircumcised males aren't lining up to do this. That is because the part that gets cut off is a part that adds pleasure to sex. (sorry cut guys, but at least you don't know what you're missing) Circumcision was designed to try to discourage masturbation, a "sin" that you now make your living on. The "health" justifications were invented later and have been debunked by recent medical studies. One of my closest friends in high school had his whole life ruined by a botched circumcision, that he was too young to object to. His case was on the more extreme end of the spectrum, but problems are not uncommon. If you've ever seen a penis that bent in a wierd direction, that is due to scarring (or atypical healing) from circumcision. __________________ camchicks.com Last edited by CamChicks; 08-16-2004 at 03:04 AM..

08-16-2004, 04:06 AM	#22
Praguer Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Prague, CZ Posts: 991	The nerves in the foreskin provide an impulse to aid erection. Circumcision has long been associated with an increased incidence of impotence in males over 40 years old. 20/20 News (ABC TV) featured a special segment in their March 20th, 1998 telecast. They reported the current statistics that over 18 million men in the United States suffer from impotence because of circumcisions. Such overwhelming numbers of sexual dysfunction are unique to North America. Impotence and other sexual disfunctions in European countries where circumcision is virtually non-existent are minuscule in comparison. Well you all know know why Viagra is sooooo Popular in the USA __________________ High Quality-High Definition Adult Content ICQ: 348740763

08-16-2004, 02:29 AM	#16
Gunni Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Barcelona Posts: 2,385	hehe, that always makes an interesting debate But it is as amazing that people still do this to babies, as it is that people are still voting for Bush...

08-16-2004, 04:32 AM	#25
neewwman Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA Posts: 1,737	My two-year-old son is not circumcised. There is no compelling reason to circumcise, as any responsible pediatrician will tell you. As for poop, I don't think it would be a problem either way. When my kid poops in a diaper the shit collects behind his balls and never makes it to the penis head. I have twins, a boy and a girl. It's always easier to clean the boy's poopy diaper because his balls act as a poop-dam. The girl's poop gets everywhere. By the way, I am circumcised but I don't buy the "circumcise him so he looks like Daddy" argument. __________________ Porn Wealth Everything the newbie adult webmaster needs to know. Buy it, or sell it through our 50% affiliate program! Last edited by neewwman; 08-16-2004 at 04:34 AM..

08-16-2004, 05:12 AM	#26
Preacher Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 2,970	i am uncut and are very happy about it. circumcision sucks.

08-16-2004, 05:53 AM	#27
KraZ Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: ICQ:: 18822023 Posts: 2,636	i am uncut and are very happy about it. Same here dude ... I can't imagine I'd go through that pain just to be the next Peter North __________________ Selling MedicalPorn,com and a dozen other gyno & doctor domains here: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=871984

08-16-2004, 07:39 AM	#32
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,788	lots of girls don't like sucking dog dick. case closed. chop chop. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.