Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2001, 07:13 AM   #1
Bake
Confirmed User
 
Bake's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Outback of bumfuck Aussie
Posts: 5,484
How many people review sites for TGP's

Whats is the ratio for rules breakers or people who just didnt read them.
I say Im running about 75% of submits I dont post if I take out the regulars who have a pass, The joys of tgping.
Bake

------------------

Post your movie galleries or quaility pages here

The harder I work the luckyer I get.
You must have a firm grip on Irony before life becomes fun
Bake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2001, 08:02 AM   #2
Susan
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Amost UK central
Posts: 772
Ah, glad you brought up this subject ? this made me smile.

My Sis Sally makes TGP galleries for us and submits almost full time. She never cheats and makes clean custom galleries for each TGP using automated perl process.
Sally has never submitted to Richards Realm before and decided to give him a try with a gallery on our paid host.

This arrived in her mail today..

*******************************

Sally

Many thanks for submitting your page, but I've
decided not to list it for the reason given below:

"Thumbnails do not match full size images."


*******************************

Now what you have to bear in mind is an identical gallery got accepted by 15 top TGP?s including PK Elephant etc in the same day.

Here is an example of this gallery on a free host
http://freepages.teenspys.com/big_as.html

Thanks to Richards Realm for actually replying to our submission it?s very rare, but really I do think he should get his viewers eyes tested LOL
On another note, if this really has been rejected because the thumbs don?t show the full area of the linked pic then TGP rules are going beyond a joke.


P.S.

We are having problems with smutserver 5 ? it?s failing to load thumbs and graphics which really don?t look good in the face of a gallery viewer.
Susan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2001, 08:06 AM   #3
Bake
Confirmed User
 
Bake's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Outback of bumfuck Aussie
Posts: 5,484
Ill see whats up.
Thanks Bake
Bake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2001, 10:47 AM   #4
Steve
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,894
I have had galleries kicked back for cropping the image to use as thumbs, too. Kind of a bummer, but it is worth rolling the dice.

As far as reviews go - I look at 150-200/day, and approve about 40. Most of the kickbacks are stupid stuff, mainly people messing up the TGSW script, either the wrong recips(to totally different sites) or the page fails to load (404 error). A lot are just scammers, and once I see their IP address, or past work/sponsor codes, they are easy to catch. I am so happy I can count on 40-65 quality submissions each and every day. Nothing better than having professional gallery builders who submit on a regular basis.
Steve is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2001, 11:40 AM   #5
Badgurl
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 161
Maybe richards just doesn't want any more of that dogfart content posted or something

It is getting old fast..

Just an idea of what the problem might be.

They have some stock replies for the violations etc...and maybe there isn't one in there that's polite enough about that particular sponsor...you know, if they wrote back and the reason was "Don't post any more of the fucking bullshit, I've seen enough of that same gallery to last me a lifetime"
Or along those lines...then Richard might be stepping on the toys of the dogfart boys...and who needs conflict????

"dogfart"..yeah, that turns me on...first thing I think of is sex.....

right outta the box...

camelpuke productions

elephantshitbomb babes

Badgurl is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2001, 12:40 PM   #6
Susan
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Amost UK central
Posts: 772
Well dogfart as much as its been pushed around is still making the $$$ - I wish some other content had so many miles in it.

It does nothing for me either, but thats not my aim.

And as for Sir Richards .. no big deal

Susan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2001, 08:02 PM   #7
Dirtypainter
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boondocks, Iowa
Posts: 425
Bake,
well I love reviewing as much as the next person *LOL* got to have that alt F4 cocked and ready. And I love being able to trash a cheaters email with a click of a button.

If it wasn't for some of the decent webmaster's out there I wouldn't want this job for any amout of money.

And I am running about a 50% ratio right now.

------------------
Dirtypainter is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2001, 09:09 PM   #8
Susan
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Amost UK central
Posts: 772
I would love to view galleries for a day just to see what stuff people send in to cheat.
Susan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2001, 05:39 AM   #9
wiZd0m
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,526
Yeah,
I know my script sucks cocks. But things are changing now, I will write or buy state of the art software for the site. That will get the workload cut by 95%

------------------
wiZd0m
Fortune Pussy Adult Links
wiZd0m is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2001, 09:38 AM   #10
Steve
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,894
Susan, the smart cheaters keep them pretty clean, and then just re-direct the traffic once it gets liked (harder to catch) or after a few days (easier to catch). Then you have the real stupid cheaters who just bomb you with consoles and shit as you do the review. (very easy to catch).
Steve is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2003, 02:22 AM   #11
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Lensman is a hypocrite


The Revive Juicybone Now Coalition
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.