you get owned every time you post, you senile old drunk. You're just too Republican to know it.

Take another Vicodin and STFU :1orglaugh

hey Dipshit, he didn't command that boat until two months AFTER Kerry left Vietnam. As in 60 days.

Keep trying to defend the indefensible. The idiot style is working for you.

Why don't all you morons admire McCain instead? You deliberately have to pick the dumbest person from the 'stupid party' to throw your allegiance to? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

When Bush is Re-elected, I hope GFY gets split in half... cause you left wing wackos are barely tolerable as it is... I can't imagine what it'll be like here come November 3rd.

you support a proven liar who's wasted american lives and billions of our dollars AND made the rest of the world hate us AND wants to throw us all in jail to boot; and we're the wackos.

Nice world you live in. I don't think I'd want to visit though.

here's a clue.... the rest of the world always hated us, and always will...
Bush just made them all stand up and be counted.

the rest of the world always hated us?

like I said, you conservatives live in a very scary world. Too bad for you.

I think you have mistaken your childhood for how the world has always viewed the United States.

:1orglaugh

You know when you've come across a thread with more insult than argument, that liberals have dominated the posting.

1) McCain's comment was dishonorable itself, because he had no way of knowing that the men were being *dishonest.* They knew Kerry better than he did.

2) The fact or allegation that someone paid for that ad proves nothing, Moore's *crockumentary* was funded (527), and was in effect a big anti-Bush ad--not to mention bullshit.

The book is coming out August 15th *Unfit for Command*

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/boo...-2004+18:19:26


*Michael Moore is A Big Fat Stupid White Man*
http://www.nrbookservice.com/bookpage.asp?prod_cd=c6494


*American Soldier* with Gen Tommy Franks

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...books&n=507846



Admit it, you guys are excited about Kerry simply because of the $7.00 minimum wage
:winkwink:

they both suck get over it :)

NOT: :disgust http://drudgereport.com/dnc89.htm

http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesui...unfit_aff.html

http://swift1.he.net/~swiftvet/index.php

well we know that none of those guys served with Kerry. We know that O'Neill has been a Kerry hit man ever since Nixon recruited him as a hatchet man. We know that everyone who served with Kerry save one said he was a great man and a great commander, and the one who doesn't like him said he was fit for command anyway.

What would it take to discredit this group in your little conservative mind? They have to get caught running a child porn ring or something?

This is the kind of thing that makes liberals think conservatives are just... well... stupid people. You're willing to believe anything if it suits the view you already had. Which was a stupid viewpoint to begin with.

Throw the Jew down the well!

but which one do you want appointing supreme court justices?

I wish someone would put a fucking muzzle on you. You talk STUPID FUCKING SHIT 99% of the time.

It's just impossible to believe that people think this is a real story and not political propoganda.

This is the same group that tried to discredit Mccains service in vietnam. One of them already has called it a horrible mistake already.

When a group used a hitler reference on behalf of the democrats, kerry renounced it and asked for it to stop being played.
All the republicans have done about this is say they dont question kerry's record...

Just use common sense on this one.

Funny I was gonna say the the same thing about you,Booby.

Can you tell me more stories from your sacred book; I need a laugh( I have had a long boring day)

They won't question his Vietnam record. They do and should question his ultra-liberal 20-year voting record, where he was often alone and voted against even by his fellow Democrats.

Clarence Thomas was the dissenting voice required to defeat the latest attempt at COPA.

And he is a Republican appointed by Reagan.

us atrocities in vietnam happened. you need some homework

Killing Civilians.

Powell still has no compunction about killing civilians during war. The lefty media watchdog Fairness & Accuracy In Media points out that in his 1995 autobiography, My American Journey: An Autobiography (New York: Random House, 1995), Powell wrote:

"If a helo [helicopter] spotted a peasant in black pajamas who looked remotely suspicious, a possible MAM [military-aged male], the pilot would circle and fire in front of him. If he moved, his movement was judged evidence of hostile intent, and the next burst was not in front, but at him. Brutal? Maybe so. But an able battalion commander with whom I had served at Gelnhausen, Lt. Col. Walter Pritchard, was killed by enemy sniper fire while observing MAMs from a helicopter. And Pritchard was only one of many. The kill-or-be-killed nature of combat tends to dull fine perceptions of right and wrong."

In his memoirs, Powell also defends the torching of civilians' huts, a tactic his unit constantly employed in Vietnam.

link

oh and:

My Lai

No 1 on Amazon! hee hee

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...192755-3901757

100 lying scumbag politicians... who will be no better than the last lying scumbag politicians.

So Reagan will appoint judges posthumously?

He normally can be counted on to follow Scalia, but in this case went his own way :thumbsup

The only part that was really relevant was that he was Republican.

I assumed you were expressing fear about Republican-appointed judges threatening the porn business.??

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I wasn't referring to just any republican, I was referring to George W. Bush

Stupid fucking pothead...aren't you Danny boy.

At least two of the ones appointed by Reagan voted contrary to his opinions many times, the same would probably happen with any appointed by Bush.

Reagan often expressed disappointment over the votes of his appointees, so they're not presidential puppets.

I won't argue with that, but my fear is that Bush will go out of his way to find judges that agree with him on certain issues, porn being one of them. It has been said that as many as 3 justices could retire in the next 4 years. He will have an opportunity to change this country drastically, and it won't be the same for years. I don't think he'll miss that opportunity, and I don't want to take that chance.

In reference to:

and

It's a minor point, since it was a Republican president all the same, but Thomas was actually appointed by George HW Bush (Bush 1), not Reagan.

Your point about Supreme Court justices is well-taken though; they often show more of an independent/objective streak than the pres. who appointed them would like. It's not quite as simple as "appointed by conservative - will vote conservative" or vice versa.

- Q.

yes that's me, and you're the old drunk with the big mouth and the wet brain.