You are an idiot!

If I say yes, then you will say I am crazy, and if I say no, then you will say I am a hypocrit. Does it really matter to you what I believe?

If all you can do is make idiotic statements on this issue, it is pointless for me to continue discussing it with you.

Santa Claus exists and no one can prove otherwise.

How old are you, btw? First off, the question of whether or not God exists is very different from the question of whether or not God is Jesus.

Second, are you so certain that all that 'crap' was made up by humans? The bible has been attacked for centuries and to date there is not a single valid criticism that can be convincingly maintained. It's historical accuracy is unquestioned.

Equating Christianity with Elvis worship is just plain stupid.

Keep mocking it, moron!

Yeah Ok so why aren't dinosaurs mentioned in the Bible? Earth is only 7000 yers old? How did Noah get to Austrailia to save the kanagoos, platapuses and koala bears before the flood killed then all since his boat was built on DRY LAND?

You have not been very nice to me in other threads so I don't expect much from you here. Your statement might be true, if, as you say, God exists the way he is portrayed to exist by some on the far right. Is there a reason we need to assume he is as intollerent as some of the people who worship him are? I have not conceded that such is the case.

If you are correct, let me be the first to say:

Welcome to HELL. :glugglug

Do you realize how stupid you sound? You are basing your argument on your personal feelings, not on any substantive evidence. How can you slam me for having a belief based on faith when your belief is based on the same thing. If you want to discuss this issue intelligently, I am open to listening to your opinions. If you are going to rant on like an uneducated child, please don't waste my time.

Maybe there are many gods like the old religions? Sun god, harvest god, etc.

so how much time are you gonna get for pushing porn, corrupting kids, and wrecking marriages?


:1orglaugh

No shit. What's with these useless surfer threads?

He belongs on *********.

And how would any of this prove its claims to be false? The bible wasn't concerned with amnimals, as I recall.

You automatically assume that if God exists, he has to be as intollerent as the Jerry Falwells of the world say he is?

then why did Noah built such a big boat to house them?

you realize the planation of the animals on this planet to christians is because some drunk put them on a boat and sailed for 40 days?

:1orglaugh

Knowledge, like religion, must be "experienced" in order to be known.
Edwin P. Whipple

Perhaps you are right. I have already conceded that I am a pathetic hypocrit. That does not change the fact that God exists.

Um because some idiot claimed that it was HISTORICALLLY ACCURATE. You can't say something is HISTORICALLLY ACCURATE when it's not and then excuse it with "God doesn't care about animals anyways"

No one is forcing you to read them, are they?

my dog believes in god

So what's your point?

You're a moron!

The bible is ment to be a covenant between god and man. It deals with the relationship between god and man over time. The existence of a certain type of animal species is peripheral to that context. There are millions of life forms on the planet. Are you saying the bible is not historically accurate because it does not mention each and every one of these life forms? It's already a pretty big book, wouldn't you say? Your reasoning is idiotic.

You should investigate some religions before you judge..

as idiotic as this comment:

"It's already a pretty big book, wouldn't you say?"

what immaculate reasoning you have there



:1orglaugh

PLEASE READ - if you want to post a well thought objection to my posts, please do so. But don't keep on with the 'anyone who believes in God is a stupid moron' crap. Intelligence and faith are totally unrelated. In fact, many of the world's most intelligent people have been persons of devout faith. I have a PhD and teach at a university and I believe in God. If you are going to slam me for doing so based on my 'intelligence', please state your credentials before you do.

How would the mention of T Rex further the bible's objectives? This argument is completely ridiculous.

the bible as you call it is not even the full version so how do you know its intent?

what do you have to say about the excess gospels and lit they are finding and crediting to as one day belonging to the bible then?

if you think the bible is a finished end all piece of work, why is it not complete?

I have 20+ books you are missing, and so are the Gospels according to Mary Magdalene, how do you feel about all those stories?

And if you do not know them how can you even claim to know the bibles *intentions?*

and please, the bible is NOT a covenant between man and god.

it is SUPPOSED to be the word of god, not a fucking covenant.,

youve watched too many religious movies, and are simply repeating things...

the Rainbow is a covenant between man and god regarding the flooding of the earth, nothing more.

youre confusing facts, go back to sunday school and learn your beaitutudes.

credentials?

10+ years of Catholic School, attending mass 3 times a week for 15 years and being schooled by nuns on religious studioes my entire life.

my first few years of school, before age 5 even in Kindergarten were at the discipline of old nuns.

I don't quite know how to respond to this. You are claiming to have in your possession over 20 books that should be part of the bible but which are, for some strange reason, not included, and that if I don't have these 20 books, I can't completely understand the bible.

I know you like smoking the occasional dubie, Fletch, but I am thinking that you may have exceeded your limit for the day. :)

Catholic school. Ah, that explains a lot. You are rebelling against authority. Your problem isn't with God. Your problem is with the vatican.

typical avoid.

side step it and dance.

you could never hold a discussion about Theology.

I have stood with nuns and Theologians in heavy debates in college and in 3 day bible studioes. My first choice in college courses was Theology.

whereas you want to argue on a board.

go read and come back when you have.

you claim to know the bibles objectives, but yet you are not schooled enough to even have read past the first 20-odd chapters.

yes the Apocrypha are more books you are obviously missing.

what is more embarrasing to your argument is, you have neither heard of them, nor have you read them.

also, you probably have never even read the other Gospels, one day maybe youll pick a topic you can talk about...

rebelling? i was open for discussion, but its easy to see your intentions.

i dont engage in further talks with you over this, its beyond obvious you just want to talk shit and say things like the above.

you ask for credentials then bash them.

too funny.

anyway, ill go make money, keep telling yourself you are an adult webmaster and post here

hahaha

god.....its a new word...i dont know it

touche'


PS: admitedly I agree a God exists...however I don't believe in a traditional definition...

I like the Jehovah's witness, and buddist definition of hell...much nicer (actually non-existant) really from what I gather...

Boobmaster,

If you believe in God, why do you not live by the principles of the Bible? I recall you posting one time that you go to strip clubs to recruit models and you were saying how some strippers in Tx are more wild and do extra stuff for extra money ...

If you believe in God, would God not condemn such activities such as going to these "places of sin" and ogling naked women while they grind you is not a very "holy" activity?

Also, what subject do you teach at University? Just curious.

Where is this proof, last i knew there WAS no actual proof that a man named 'jesus' cruised around back in the day, and it was just more bullshit propoganda, being pushed by the relegious nuts.

I misunderstood you. I though you were talking about some additional books that noone but you had seen. I apologize for not recognizing that you were refering to the books of the Apocrypha.

My answer to you is that I do not subscribe to the belief that these books are authentic. They have been accepted by the Catholic church, but not by any of the denominations within the protestant movement. I don't accept their authenticity so it is pointless for me to comment further on them.